Transportation Vs Livestock: Who's The Bigger Polluter?

The transportation and livestock industries are two of the world's biggest polluters. The transportation sector, which includes airplanes, trains, and ships, emits more than half of all carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides in the US and 28% of all US global warming pollution. On the other hand, livestock is responsible for 18% of total global greenhouse gas emissions, which is more than the emissions from the entire transportation sector. However, it is worth noting that these numbers are difficult to compare due to the different methodologies used to calculate them. For example, the EPA separates emissions from transportation, energy, and refrigeration, while the UN includes all these categories under animal agriculture. Additionally, the impact of each industry varies depending on the specific country and region.

Livestock emissions are a focus because beef requires more resources than other foods

Livestock emissions have come under scrutiny because of the resources required to produce beef. Beef requires far more resources than other food sources, such as chicken, pork, or eggs, and is more resource-intensive than most other kinds of meat.

Beef production requires 28 times more land, six times more fertilizer, and 11 times more water than other food sources, such as poultry, dairy, eggs, or pork. This means that beef production results in about five times more greenhouse gas emissions than these other food sources.

The Earth Policy Institute estimates that approximately 35% of the world's grain harvest is used to raise livestock for human consumption. Grain-fed beef is one of the most inefficient converters of grain, requiring approximately 7 pounds of grain to produce 1 pound of live-weight beef. This inefficiency is a significant issue when considering the global hunger crisis, as this grain could be used to directly feed starving populations.

Additionally, beef production has a substantial impact on the climate. Ruminant animals, such as cows, emit methane, a potent greenhouse gas, through a process called "enteric fermentation." Methane has a higher global warming potential than carbon dioxide, and while it only has a lifespan of about 12 years in the atmosphere, reducing methane emissions would have a positive impact on climate change within a much shorter time frame.

Overall, the high resource requirements and environmental impact of beef production have made livestock emissions a focus when considering ways to reduce global warming and promote sustainable food production.

The EPA estimates transport emits 28% of US global warming pollution

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimates that the transportation sector, which includes airplanes, trains, and ships, emits more than half of all carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides nationwide. As of 2016, it accounted for 28% of all US global warming pollution, more than any other sector. The EPA has been addressing climate change by taking actions to reduce GHG emissions from the transportation sector. These include the SmartWay program, which helps the freight transportation sector improve supply chain efficiency, reduce greenhouse gases, and save fuel costs for participating companies. The EPA also provides resources to help consumers identify more fuel-efficient vehicles, such as the Green Vehicle Guide.

The EPA's estimate of 28% for the transportation sector's contribution to US global warming pollution is significant, but it is important to note that this number may not include all emissions associated with transportation. For example, the life cycle assessment (LCA) approach considers the manufacturing, maintenance, and disposal of vehicles, which can add to the sector's carbon footprint. Additionally, the EPA's calculation method differs from that of other organizations, such as the UN, which includes transportation, energy, and refrigeration emissions related to animal agriculture in the agriculture category.

Comparatively, the agricultural sector, including animal agriculture, contributes about 9% of total US global warming emissions. While this is a smaller percentage than transportation, it is important to recognize that agriculture is the largest global source of fine particulate air pollution, which results from ammonia emissions combining with other chemicals, sunlight, and volatile organic compounds. Farms are responsible for over 90% of airborne ammonia pollution, which comes mainly from fertilizers and livestock manure.

The EPA's estimate of 28% for the transportation sector's contribution to US global warming pollution highlights the need to reduce emissions from this sector. Strategies to achieve this include low-carbon fuels, improved vehicle technologies, reducing vehicle miles traveled, and operating vehicles more efficiently. However, it is important to consider the nuances and complexities of emissions calculations and the different methodologies used by organizations when comparing sectors, such as transportation and agriculture.

While the EPA's estimate focuses on the direct emissions from the transportation sector, it is worth noting that indirect emissions and life cycle assessments can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the sector's environmental impact. Additionally, the comparison between transportation and agriculture emissions highlights the need to address both issues and work towards sustainable practices in these sectors.

Animal agriculture makes up 3.9% of US GHG emissions

Animal agriculture, including meat, milk, and eggs, is a significant contributor to climate change. According to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), animal agriculture accounts for 3.9% of total US greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This percentage is lower than the global average due to the United States' high level of industrialization and wealth, as well as its high consumption of energy, fossil fuels, and transportation.

While animal agriculture's contribution to US GHG emissions is significant, the transportation sector remains the largest contributor to US GHG emissions. The EPA estimates that the transportation sector, including airplanes, trains, and ships, emits more than half of the nation's carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides. As of 2016, the sector accounted for 28% of all US global warming pollution, more than any other sector. This percentage has likely increased, as GHG emissions in the transportation sector have risen more than any other sector since 1990.

The impact of animal agriculture on climate change is complex and multifaceted. While it contributes to GHG emissions, it also plays a crucial role in addressing malnutrition and providing livelihoods for millions of people worldwide. Additionally, animal agriculture is a significant source of fine-particle air pollution and water pollution, with farms responsible for over 90% of airborne ammonia pollution, largely from fertilizers and livestock manure.

It is worth noting that the EPA and the UN calculate emissions differently. The EPA categorizes transportation, energy, and refrigeration emissions separately from animal agriculture, while the UN includes them under animal agriculture. This discrepancy can lead to variations in the assessed impact of animal agriculture on climate change.

To address the environmental impact of animal agriculture, several countries, particularly in Latin America, are developing low-carbon livestock production methods. These initiatives focus on emission intensity, soil carbon, pasture restoration, and improved waste recycling, offering environmental and socioeconomic benefits, including biodiversity, water conservation, and rural employment.

Transport emissions come from driving, manufacturing, maintaining, and disposing of vehicles

The transport sector, which includes airplanes, trains, and ships, emits a significant amount of pollutants that contribute to climate change and air pollution. These emissions arise not only from driving or operating vehicles but also from the broader lifecycle of vehicles, including their manufacturing, maintenance, and eventual disposal.

Driving or operating vehicles contributes significantly to transport emissions. In the United States, road travel accounts for the majority of transport emissions, with passenger vehicles like cars and buses contributing 45.1% and trucks carrying freight making up 29.4%. Aviation, despite often being a focus of discussions on climate change, accounts for a smaller portion, at 11.6% of transport emissions. Similarly, rail travel and freight contribute only 1% of transport emissions.

The manufacturing of vehicles also contributes to transport emissions. This includes the production and assembly of vehicles, as well as the emissions associated with transporting materials and parts to factories. The production and disposal of electric vehicles, for example, have environmental impacts that should be considered alongside their generally lower emissions during use.

Maintenance and disposal of vehicles are additional sources of transport emissions. The wear and tear on roads and runways, as well as the emissions associated with repairing and maintaining vehicles, contribute to the overall environmental footprint of the transport sector.

While transport emissions are significant, it is important to note that agricultural activities, including livestock, also contribute to pollution. Livestock emissions, in particular, have gained attention due to the resources required to produce meat and the methane emissions associated with rumen digestion and manure management. However, it is challenging to make a direct comparison between transport and livestock emissions due to the lack of comprehensive life cycle assessment data for the transport sector.

The EPA and UN calculate emissions from animal agriculture differently

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the UN calculate emissions from animal agriculture differently. The EPA categorises transportation, energy, and refrigeration emissions separately from animal agriculture, while the UN includes all these categories under animal agriculture. This discrepancy in calculation methods can lead to confusion and impact public policy decisions.

The EPA estimates that the transportation sector, including airplanes, trains, and ships, emits more than half of the nation's carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides. As of 2016, this sector contributed to 28% of all US global warming pollution, more than any other sector. In contrast, the EPA estimates that the agricultural sector, including animal agriculture, contributes about 9% of total US global warming emissions. However, it is important to note that the EPA's agricultural sector emissions estimate includes indirect emissions from electricity use, which account for about 5% of direct emissions.

The EPA's calculations highlight the significant impact of the transportation sector on global warming emissions. Still, by separating transportation and refrigeration emissions from animal agriculture, they provide a different perspective than the UN's calculations.

On the other hand, the UN's calculations, as referenced in the documentary "Cowspiracy," take a more comprehensive approach by including transportation, energy, and refrigeration emissions under animal agriculture. This approach recognises that the production and consumption of animal products involve significant transportation, energy use, and refrigeration. By consolidating these emissions under animal agriculture, the UN's calculations emphasise the overall environmental impact of the industry.

The difference in calculation methods between the EPA and the UN underscores the complexity of quantifying emissions from various sectors accurately. It also highlights the need for standardised measurement systems to ensure that policy decisions are based on consistent and comparable data.

Frequently asked questions