Consumer Actions: Unseen Pollution Sources

Consumers have a huge environmental impact, causing more than 60% of the world's greenhouse gas emissions and up to 80% of the world's water use. The production, use, and disposal of goods cause pollution at every stage of a product's lifecycle. Consumers can contribute to pollution through their consumption of goods and services, such as processed foods, which have a disproportionately high water consumption, and the burning of fossil fuels for energy. While individual consumer choices may seem insignificant, they can collectively have a substantial impact on the planet.

Consumers cause over 60% of global greenhouse gas emissions

Consumers have a huge impact on the environment. A study by researchers at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology's Industrial Ecology Programme found that consumers are responsible for more than 60% of global greenhouse gas emissions. The study, which analysed the environmental impact of consumer choices in 43 countries, also found that consumers were responsible for up to 80% of the world's water use.

The production, use, and disposal of consumer goods contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions. The average product, across its life cycle, results in carbon emissions of 6.3 times its own weight. This includes the energy, materials, and water required to produce, process, package, and transport the goods we consume. For example, in the fashion industry, a wide range of colours of clothing are offered, but often only a few colours sell well, resulting in excess production and associated carbon emissions. Similarly, chocolate is one of the most water-intensive products we buy, requiring 17,000 litres of water to produce one kilo of chocolate.

The transportation sector is a significant contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, with over 94% of the fuel used for transportation being petroleum-based, including gasoline and diesel. The burning of fossil fuels for road, rail, air, and marine transport results in direct emissions, contributing 15% of global greenhouse gas emissions in 2019. The commercial, residential, and industrial sectors also contribute substantially to emissions, with the use of electricity for heating, ventilation, air conditioning, lighting, appliances, and industrial machinery.

The impact of consumer choices on the environment is influenced by individual consumption levels and purchasing decisions. The richer a country or individual is, the more they tend to consume, and the greater their impact on the planet. However, it is important to note that consumption is not solely driven by individual consumers but also by the broader economic and industrial systems that promote cheap, disposable goods and artificial lowering of fossil fuel costs through subsidies.

To address the environmental impact of consumer choices, it is essential to reduce consumption and adopt more sustainable practices. This includes making informed purchasing decisions, such as buying more sustainably produced goods, reducing water and energy consumption, and considering the supply chains and embedded carbon emissions associated with the products we buy.

The richer a country, the more its inhabitants consume

Consumption rates are significantly higher in developed countries, with the average consumption per person of oils and other resources being up to 30 times higher than in less developed countries. This is due to the fact that the richer a country is, the more its inhabitants consume. The US, for example, with less than 5% of the world's population, consumes about 30% of the world's resources.

The consumption of natural resources has increased since the mid-1900s, with the richest 20% of the global population doubling their per capita consumption of energy, meat, timber, steel, and copper, and quadrupling the number of cars owned since 1950. In contrast, the poorest 20% have barely increased their per capita consumption. This disparity in consumption patterns between rich and poor countries has significant environmental implications.

The environmental impact of consumption is evident in the production, use, and disposal of goods. The production of processed foods, for instance, requires energy, materials, and water, contributing to water consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. The richer a country is, the higher the demand for such products, leading to increased environmental impacts. Additionally, the export of products from developing countries, such as China, shifts the responsibility for environmental impacts from the producer to the consumer.

While it is challenging to control immigration flows, the desire for more affluent lifestyles drives people from developing countries to immigrate to developed nations. This further increases consumption rates in already high-consuming countries, exacerbating the environmental impacts. To achieve a sustainable future, it is crucial to address the inequality in consumption rates and transition to more sustainable consumption patterns globally.

Consumers' demand for fossil fuels contributes to carbon emissions

Consumers' demand for fossil fuels significantly contributes to carbon emissions, which has adverse effects on the environment and human health. Fossil fuels, including coal, oil, and natural gas, are the primary sources of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, with the combustion of these fuels releasing vast amounts of carbon into the atmosphere. In 2018, 89% of global CO2 emissions stemmed from fossil fuels and industrial activities, with coal being the most significant contributor, responsible for over 0.3°C of the 1°C increase in global temperatures. Oil, another commonly used fossil fuel, releases approximately one-third of the world's total carbon emissions.

The consumption of fossil fuels is driven by their prevalence in meeting energy demands and their use in various sectors. Currently, fossil fuels supply around 80% of the world's energy. The energy sector, including electricity generation and heat production, relies heavily on burning fossil fuels, particularly coal, oil, and natural gas. Additionally, the transportation sector, with its increasing demand for fuel, significantly contributes to carbon emissions. The industrial sector, including manufacturing and construction, also plays a role in driving fossil fuel consumption, as do agricultural activities and waste management practices.

The impact of consumers' demand for fossil fuels extends beyond carbon emissions to other forms of pollution. Fossil fuel companies are major polluters, not only producing and selling these products but also engaging in advertising campaigns that promote their commitment to low-carbon energy and cleaner alternatives. Furthermore, the production and use of fossil fuels are closely linked to water consumption and pollution. The extraction and processing of fossil fuels require significant water resources, contributing to water scarcity and impacting aquatic ecosystems.

Moreover, the consumption of fossil fuels has indirect effects on pollution levels. The demand for fossil fuels influences the development and implementation of policies and economic models. For instance, fossil fuel subsidies artificially lower the cost of these fuels, promoting excessive consumption and hindering the transition to a circular economy, which aims for regenerative and restorative production systems. Additionally, the consumption patterns influenced by consumer demand for fossil fuels have broader environmental implications. The richer a country is, the higher its per capita consumption and environmental impact tend to be. This correlation underscores how consumer choices and lifestyles contribute to pollution and environmental degradation.

It is important to recognize that addressing the root causes of pollution, such as the dominant "take, make, waste" linear economy, is essential. This involves transitioning from disposable goods and cheap, accessible energy to a circular economy that prioritizes regenerative practices and sustainable markets. While emissions reduction efforts have been slow, there is some progress, with emissions from fossil fuels declining in 27 countries during the decade ending in 2022, even as their economies grew. Nevertheless, more urgent action is needed to meet the targets set by the Paris Agreement and to mitigate the severe impacts of climate change.

Buying items for social status generates climate-changing emissions

Consumerism is a significant driver of climate change, with the production and use of household goods and services generating a large amount of greenhouse gas emissions. A 2015 study found that these activities account for 60% of global emissions. As consumers, our habits are contributing to climate change, and this is particularly evident during festive periods, such as between Thanksgiving and New Year's Day, when Americans produce 25% more waste than usual.

The link between social status and consumption further exacerbates this issue. Once individuals' basic needs are met, their purchasing behaviour is often influenced by social status. As people strive for higher social status, their demand for expensive items symbolizing that status increases. This phenomenon is more prevalent in richer countries, where the consumption patterns of the wealthy have a more significant environmental impact. A UN report revealed that the richest 1% of the global population emits more than twice as much as the poorest 50%, and as people become wealthier, their energy consumption increases.

The production of status-symbol goods contributes to greenhouse gas emissions, leading to climate change. For instance, the energy-intensive process of manufacturing processed foods, such as chocolate, has a high environmental impact. Additionally, companies deliberately design their products to have a short lifespan, encouraging consumers to buy newer versions. This deliberate obsolescence, coupled with reduced prices that do not reflect the true environmental cost of production, promotes overconsumption and exacerbates the problem.

To address this challenge, it is essential to recognize that consumption is a significant contributor to climate change and that our purchasing decisions have consequences. While technology offers energy efficiency solutions, the growth in consumption has outpaced the benefits of these advancements. Therefore, we must go beyond simply 'greening' our purchases and fundamentally reevaluate our consumption habits. This may involve considering the life cycle carbon implications of goods and embracing circular economy principles, where production systems are intentionally restorative and regenerative.

Consumers' food choices, like processed foods, impact water consumption

Consumers' choices and actions have a significant impact on the environment, and this includes their food choices. Processed foods, in particular, have a disproportionately high impact on water consumption.

Water is a critical and indispensable resource in food production, used at various stages and for multiple purposes. It is used as an ingredient, for cleaning and sanitation, and in manufacturing processes. The quality of water is essential, as it can impact food quality and safety, equipment operation, and maintenance. Mismanagement of water can lead to issues in these areas, as well as loss of revenue. Agriculture is the largest consumer of water, requiring over 100 times more water than is used for personal needs.

Processed foods require water at every stage of production, from growing the raw materials to packaging the final product. This includes water used for irrigation, processing, and in the final product itself. The production of processed foods often involves shipping raw materials to the processor, which can contribute to water consumption in transportation and energy generation.

The water footprint of a product refers to the amount of water consumed in its production and supply chain. Consumers can reduce their water footprint by choosing foods with lower water footprints. For example, the water footprint of 200 grams of beef is equivalent to 47 eight-minute showers, and eating chicken instead can significantly reduce a couple's water footprint over a year. Similarly, choosing vegetables or tea over coffee can reduce water consumption. Chocolate is one of the most water-intensive products, requiring 17,000 liters of water to produce one kilo.

By understanding the water footprints of their food choices, consumers can make more informed decisions to reduce their environmental impact. This can include choosing foods with lower water footprints, reducing overall consumption, or supporting companies and governments in their efforts to improve water sustainability and efficiency.

Frequently asked questions