Bitcoin's Environmental Impact: Pollution Or Progress?

Bitcoin is a decentralized, digital currency that is managed and traded on a public, open ledger known as a blockchain. The process of creating new bitcoins and finalizing transactions is called bitcoin mining, which is energy-intensive and results in carbon emissions. The environmental impact of bitcoin mining has been a cause for concern, with studies showing that it has a significant carbon footprint and impact on water and land. The massive energy consumption of bitcoin mining has raised questions about its contribution to climate change and pollution, especially as it often relies on fossil fuels.

Bitcoin mining's carbon emissions

Bitcoin mining is a highly electricity-intensive process that consumes about 95.5 TWh of energy annually, representing 0.4% of the world's electricity consumption. This energy consumption leads to significant carbon emissions, with an estimated 65 Mt CO2 emitted annually, representing 0.2% of global emissions. The top ten Bitcoin mining nations, including China, the United States, Kazakhstan, and Russia, are responsible for 92-94% of the global carbon footprint of Bitcoin. China's coal-intensive Bitcoin mining operations alone produced more than 41 Mt CO2eq in 2020-2021.

The energy-intensive nature of Bitcoin mining is due to the proof-of-work mechanism, where miners compete to solve cryptographic puzzles to generate new bitcoins and verify transactions. This process requires specialized computer hardware, resulting in a significant amount of electronic waste. Additionally, the heat generated by mining machines has led to concerns about water consumption and contamination, as miners have turned to water cooling to manage equipment temperatures.

The environmental impact of Bitcoin mining has attracted attention from activists and scholars, who advocate for a transition to a proof-of-stake protocol, which is more energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable. They argue that popular financial services corporations involved in Bitcoin, such as Fidelity, have the influence to incentivize this change. However, some Bitcoin advocates oppose such a transition, claiming that proof-of-work is necessary to secure the network.

While Bitcoin mining has significant carbon emissions, it is important to note that the energy sources used for mining vary by country, resulting in different environmental impacts. For example, Canada, which relies more on nuclear and natural gas, has a smaller carbon footprint from Bitcoin mining compared to other nations. Additionally, scholars suggest that Bitcoin mining could support renewable energy development by utilizing surplus electricity from wind and solar sources.

The growing concern over Bitcoin's carbon emissions has led to discussions about the role of tax policies in curbing emissions. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates that a direct tax on the crypto mining industry could drive emissions reductions in line with global goals. Additionally, the implementation of a broad carbon price coordinated across countries would encourage reduced fossil fuel consumption and cleaner power sources.

Bitcoin's water footprint

To address this increasing water footprint, Bitcoin miners could apply immersion cooling and consider using power sources that do not require freshwater. A change in the Bitcoin software could also significantly reduce the network's water footprint. For example, a transition to the proof-of-stake protocol, which has better energy efficiency, has been described as a sustainable alternative to Bitcoin's current scheme. Bitcoin advocates oppose such a change, arguing that proof of work is needed to secure the network.

The environmental impact of Bitcoin mining is significant, as it is a highly electricity-intensive process that results in carbon emissions. Bitcoin mining uses specialized computer hardware with a short lifespan, resulting in electronic waste. The amount of e-waste generated by Bitcoin mining is comparable to that of the Netherlands. Additionally, the heat generated by mining machines has led to the use of water cooling, with large mining farms discharging hot or warm water into lakes or other water bodies. This practice raises concerns about contaminating these water bodies and increasing their average temperature.

Bitcoin mining's distribution makes it difficult to determine the location of miners and their electricity use, making it challenging to translate energy consumption into carbon emissions. However, a 2022 study estimated that Bitcoin mining resulted in annual carbon emissions of 65 Mt CO2, representing 0.2% of global emissions. The amount of carbon dioxide produced by Bitcoin mining each year may be comparable to the emissions of Greece in 2019.

Bitcoin's land footprint

Bitcoin mining has a significant environmental impact on land, water, and carbon emissions. The land footprint of the global Bitcoin mining network during the 2020-2021 period was 1,870 square kilometers, or 722 square miles, which is 1.4 times the area of Los Angeles. China's land footprint alone takes up 913 square kilometers, or 353 square miles.

The environmental impact of Bitcoin mining is not limited to carbon emissions, as previous studies have suggested. The dramatic increase in the price of Bitcoin over the last few years has led to a global race for Bitcoin mining, turning the cryptocurrency market into one of the world's leading polluting sectors. The environmental footprint of Bitcoin mining includes significant water and land footprints, with the top 10 Bitcoin mining nations contributing to 92-94% of its global impact.

The land footprint of server farms is negligible, according to Kaveh Madani, the Director of the United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment, and Health (UNU-INWEH). However, the overall environmental impact of Bitcoin mining is worrying, and urgent regulatory intervention and technological breakthroughs are needed to mitigate the impact of the rapidly growing digital currency sector.

Madani and his co-authors used energy, carbon, water, and land-use data from 2020 to 2021 to calculate country-specific environmental impacts for 76 countries known to mine Bitcoin. The results were concerning, as the demand for Bitcoin is rising quickly. Madani stated that even with more energy-efficient mining approaches, if the demand continues to grow, so too will the environmental footprint of mining.

Bitcoin's electronic waste

Bitcoin mining is an energy-intensive process that consumes vast amounts of electricity. It involves specialized computer hardware that competes to solve cryptographic puzzles to generate bitcoins, a process known as "proof of work". This competitive nature of bitcoin mining has led to a computational arms race, with miners constantly upgrading to more powerful and efficient hardware, rendering older equipment obsolete.

The short lifespan of bitcoin mining hardware, typically becoming obsolete every 1.5 years, results in a significant amount of electronic waste (e-waste). This waste is generated as miners discard outdated equipment in favour of newer, more powerful machines. The Bitcoin E-waste Monitor estimates that each bitcoin transaction produces e-waste equivalent to the weight of 1.77 iPhones 12 or 0.59 iPads.

The exact amount of e-waste generated by bitcoin mining is difficult to determine due to the distributed nature of the network. However, estimates range from 10,948 metric tons in 2018 to up to 64.4 metric kilotons at peak bitcoin price levels in 2021. This amount of e-waste is comparable to the electronic waste produced by small IT and telecommunication equipment in countries like the Netherlands or Luxembourg.

The impact of bitcoin's e-waste is exacerbated by the low recycling rate of electronic waste globally. Only about 20% of all electronic waste is recycled, with the rest ending up in landfills or being incinerated, leading to toxic chemicals and heavy metals leaching into soils and causing air and water pollution.

To address the e-waste problem, some have proposed transitioning to a "proof-of-stake" protocol, which is more energy-efficient and does not require extensive computing power. However, bitcoin advocates oppose such changes, arguing that the current proof-of-work mechanism is necessary to secure the network.

Bitcoin's energy consumption

The energy used in bitcoin mining often comes from fossil fuels, leading to correspondingly high carbon emissions. In 2021, about half of the electricity used in bitcoin mining was generated through fossil fuels. The carbon dioxide produced by bitcoin mining each year may be comparable to the amount emitted by Greece in 2019. The total energy consumption of the Bitcoin network has grown over the years, and it now consumes more energy than several countries. If Bitcoin was a country, it would rank between Belgium and the Netherlands in terms of electricity consumption, with an estimated 95.5 TWh (344 PJ) of energy consumed annually.

The decentralised nature of Bitcoin mining also contributes to its high energy consumption. Multiple miners compete to solve the mathematical problems, and as more miners join the network, the energy consumption increases. The continuous block mining cycle incentivises people worldwide to mine Bitcoin, as it can provide a solid stream of revenue. However, this has led to a growing number of power-hungry machines being used for Bitcoin mining.

Some estimates put the global electricity usage associated with Bitcoin mining at 67 TWh to 240 TWh in 2023, with a point estimate of 120 TWh. This represents about 0.2% to 0.9% of global electricity demand, equivalent to the total electricity consumption in Greece or Australia. Other estimates, such as the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance, suggest Bitcoin consumes around 87 TWh per year.

Frequently asked questions