Nuclear Waste Disposal: Pollution's Lingering Threat

Nuclear waste is produced by industrial, medical, and scientific processes that use radioactive materials. While nuclear power plants do not emit carbon dioxide during their operation, the processes for mining and refining uranium ore, as well as the creation of reactor fuel, require large amounts of energy and can result in carbon dioxide emissions. Radioactive waste, a major environmental concern, can remain dangerous to human health and the environment for thousands of years. This waste includes uranium mill tailings, spent reactor fuel, and other radioactive materials. The transport and storage of nuclear waste pose risks, and there are concerns about the potential for leaks and the lack of a permanent solution for high-level waste disposal.

Uranium mining and milling

One of the main concerns with uranium mining and milling is the generation of radioactive waste, such as uranium mill tailings. Uranium mill tailings contain the radioactive element radium, which decays and produces the radioactive gas radon. Radon is a significant health risk as it tends to collect in homes and can cause lung cancer. Uranium mining can also contaminate water supplies with elevated levels of radium and other radioactive materials. Modern uranium mines must treat wastewater to comply with regulations, but older mines may have discharged contaminated water into rivers, causing significant environmental damage.

The Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act in the United States amended the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, giving the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the authority to establish health and environmental standards for uranium mill waste management. The EPA also regulates runoff water from mines, mills, and ore piles under the Clean Water Act and sets limits for radionuclides in drinking water through the Safe Drinking Water Act. Some uranium mining and milling sites are cleaned up under the EPA Superfund program.

Uranium can be recovered through conventional mining of rock ore or by using strong chemicals to dissolve uranium from rock and pumping it to the surface. Open-pit mining, also known as strip mining, involves removing topsoil and rock above the uranium ore. This method can cause problems as wind can blow radioactive dust from waste rock piles into populated areas, and the waste can contaminate surface water. Underground mining can result in the collection of radon gas in mineshafts, posing a health risk to miners.

Radioactive waste disposal

Nuclear waste is produced from industrial, medical, and scientific processes that use radioactive material. Nuclear power plants do not burn fossil fuels and so do not directly emit carbon dioxide. However, they still produce radioactive waste that can remain dangerous for thousands of years. Radioactive wastes are classified as low-level waste or high-level waste. Low-level waste may be generated from civilian and defense activities and can be disposed of in near-surface disposal facilities. High-level waste, on the other hand, remains highly radioactive for tens of thousands of years and must be disposed of securely.

Low-level radioactive waste (LLW) is typically sent to land-based disposal immediately following its packaging for long-term management. This accounts for about 90% of the volume of waste produced by nuclear technologies. LLW disposal facilities are located in Texas, South Carolina, Utah, Tennessee, and Washington in the USA. Similar facilities exist in Sweden, Finland, and other countries.

High-level radioactive waste (HLW) consists of irradiated or spent nuclear reactor fuel. This type of waste is highly radioactive and must be stored in specially designed pools of water or dry storage containers to allow for the decay of radioactivity and heat, making handling safer. The United States does not currently have a permanent disposal facility for high-level nuclear waste, but deep geological disposal is widely regarded as the best solution for final disposal.

Transuranic nuclear waste is another type of waste contaminated by nuclear elements heavier than uranium, such as diluted plutonium. The United States disposes of defense-related transuranic waste in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in New Mexico. Finland's Onkalo repository, expected to begin operations in 2024, will be the first deep geological repository licensed for the disposal of used fuel from civil reactors.

The disposal of radioactive waste is subject to strict regulations to protect human health and the environment. The Department of Energy (DOE) in the United States oversees the treatment and disposal of radioactive waste from nuclear weapons programs, while the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulates the operation of nuclear power plants.

Nuclear power plant accidents

Nuclear power plants do not burn fossil fuels and so do not directly emit carbon dioxide. However, the processes for mining and refining uranium ore and making reactor fuel require large amounts of energy. If fossil fuels are used in these processes, then the emissions from burning those fuels could be associated with the electricity that nuclear power plants generate.

There are various environmental impacts of nuclear power, both positive and negative. The construction and operation of the plant, the nuclear fuel cycle, and the effects of nuclear accidents can all have an impact. While nuclear power plants do not produce air pollution or carbon dioxide while operating, the creation of radioactive wastes is a major environmental concern. These include uranium mill tailings, spent (used) reactor fuel, and other radioactive wastes. These materials can remain radioactive and dangerous to human health for thousands of years.

Nuclear accidents have been a key factor in public concern about nuclear facilities since the first nuclear reactors were constructed in 1954. Worldwide, there have been almost 100 accidents at nuclear power plants from 1952 to 2009, defined as incidents that resulted in the loss of human life or more than $50,000 of property damage. Serious nuclear power plant accidents include:

• The Fukushima nuclear disaster (2011)
• The Chernobyl disaster (1986)
• The Three Mile Island accident (1979)
• The SL-1 accident (1961)

The Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident was caused by an earthquake and tsunami that struck eastern Japan in March 2011. The earthquake cut off external power to the reactors, and the tsunami disabled the backup diesel generators, crippling the reactor cooling systems. Overheating fuel in the plant's operating reactor cores led to hydrogen explosions that severely damaged three of the reactor buildings. Fuel in three of the reactor cores melted, and radiation releases from the damaged reactors contaminated a wide area surrounding the plant. Nearly half a million residents were forced to evacuate.

The Chernobyl disaster in 1986 was the world's worst nuclear accident. It occurred when an unsafe systems test led to a series of steam explosions that destroyed reactor number four. A 30-kilometre "Zone of alienation" has been formed around the reactor. At least 57 accidents and severe incidents have occurred since Chernobyl, and over 56 severe incidents have occurred in the USA.

Impact on marine habitats

Nuclear waste is produced from industrial, medical, and scientific processes that use radioactive material. Nuclear waste has detrimental effects on marine habitats. Since 1946, the ocean has been used to dispose of radioactive waste. On February 20, 1994, the dumping of all radioactive waste was internationally banned, but the ongoing effects of previous dumping and the continuation of unregulated nuclear waste dumping continue to impact marine life.

Radioactive isotopes have a very long half-life and can persist in radioactive form for much longer than other radioactive elements. These isotopes are absorbed by phytoplankton, zooplankton, kelp, and other marine life and then transmitted up the food chain, to fish, marine mammals, and humans. This results in the bioaccumulation of radioactivity in higher-trophic organisms, impacting the entire marine food web. Coastal marine ecosystems are more directly affected by this low-level radiation as they tend to be shallower, allowing radionuclides to accumulate in greater concentrations.

The Fukushima nuclear reactor meltdown in 2011 released nuclear waste directly into coastal waters. Elevated levels of Cesium radionuclides were found in zooplankton and mesopelagic fish 30-600km away from the incident site. This sudden influx of radioactivity undeniably impacted marine ecosystems. Other incidents of radioactive waste being discharged into oceans include a British nuclear fuels plant releasing waste into the Irish Sea, a French nuclear reprocessing plant discharging waste into the English Channel, and the Soviets dumping large quantities of radioactive material into the Arctic Ocean, the Kara Sea, and the Barents Sea.

The impact of radioactive contamination on marine life is still unclear, and the effects are difficult to predict as they depend on the exact isotopes leaked and the degree of exposure. However, there have been instances of die-offs of seals and other marine life in the Barents Sea and White Sea attributed to pollution or nuclear contamination. Radioactive waste in the ocean can have far-reaching consequences, and it is essential to study and understand its impact on marine habitats and the potential risks to human health.

Carbon dioxide emissions

Nuclear waste does not directly cause carbon dioxide emissions. However, nuclear energy does have carbon dioxide emissions associated with it, which are produced during the construction of nuclear power plants, the demolition of decommissioned sites, the transportation of nuclear waste, and the storage of nuclear waste.

Nuclear energy is often considered a clean energy source as it does not produce any carbon dioxide emissions during the energy generation process. Nuclear power plants generate power through nuclear fission, which is the process of splitting uranium atoms to produce energy. The heat released by fission is used to create steam that spins a turbine to generate electricity without the harmful byproducts emitted by fossil fuels.

However, the life cycle of a nuclear power plant includes other stages that do produce carbon dioxide emissions. Uranium extraction, transport, and processing, for example, produce emissions. The construction of nuclear power plants can also be long and complex, releasing carbon dioxide. Similarly, the demolition of decommissioned sites and the transportation and storage of nuclear waste under strict conditions produce emissions.

Estimates of the carbon dioxide emissions associated with nuclear power plants vary. Some studies have estimated emissions of 3.7 to 110 grams of CO2 equivalent per kilowatt-hour (kWh). Newer power plants are expected to generate more CO2 during construction due to stricter safety regulations. When compared to renewable energy sources, nuclear power releases 3.5 times more carbon dioxide emissions. However, when compared to fossil fuels, nuclear energy still comes out ahead in terms of lower emissions.

To summarize, while nuclear waste itself does not directly cause carbon dioxide emissions, the broader nuclear energy industry does have carbon dioxide emissions associated with various stages of the nuclear power plant life cycle.

Frequently asked questions