Subway Systems: Pollution Or Progress?

Subways are often considered a more environmentally friendly mode of transport than cars, but do they cause pollution? A study by NYU Langone's Department of Environmental Medicine found that New York's subways are the most polluted in the Northeast, with one station having higher levels of particulate pollution than any other station in the world. However, other studies have shown that subway openings can reduce particulate concentrations in highly polluted cities, providing an external mortality benefit of about $1 billion per year. So, while subways may contribute to pollution in some areas, they can also help to improve air quality and reduce pollution-related deaths in highly polluted cities.

Subway systems in highly polluted cities can reduce particulate concentrations by 4% in the area surrounding a city centre

The impact of subways on pollution levels is a complex issue that depends on various factors, including the initial pollution levels in a city. While subways can provide significant environmental benefits in highly polluted cities, they may also contribute to pollution in certain contexts.

A study by the American Economic Association investigated the effect of subway system openings on urban air pollution. The research found that, on average, particulate concentrations remain unchanged by subway openings. However, in cities with higher initial pollution levels, the introduction of a subway system can lead to a 4% reduction in particulate concentrations in the area surrounding the city centre. This effect gradually diminishes with distance from the city centre and persists for approximately four years, the longest time horizon measured in the study.

The impact of subways on pollution is particularly evident in highly polluted cities. For instance, New York's subway system has been identified as the most polluted in the Northeast region of the United States, with one subterranean station recording exceptionally high levels of particulate pollution. Despite this, the overall environmental impact of subways in highly polluted areas can still be positive. The American Economic Association study estimated that a new subway system in such cities could provide an external mortality benefit of about $1 billion per year, primarily attributed to reduced mortality rates associated with lower air pollution.

Additionally, the health benefits of reduced pollution levels due to subway openings cannot be overlooked. According to estimates, a subway opening in a city with high air pollution levels can prevent approximately 22.5 infant deaths and 500 total deaths annually. These averted mortality figures translate to a substantial economic value, ranging from $43 million to $1 billion per year, depending on the income-adjusted life values used.

In summary, while subways may not always directly reduce particulate concentrations, their introduction in highly polluted cities can lead to a modest decrease in pollution levels near city centres. More importantly, the broader environmental and health benefits of subways in these contexts can be significant, potentially saving lives and providing substantial economic value.

The effect of subway openings in less polluted cities is small and not distinguishable from zero

The impact of subway openings on air pollution in cities with low levels of pollution is negligible. On average, particulate concentrations are unchanged by subway openings. However, in cities with higher initial pollution levels, subway openings can reduce particulates by 4% in the area surrounding a city centre. The effect decays with distance from the city centre and persists for about four years, which is the longest time horizon that can be measured with current data.

The American Economic Association estimates that a new subway system provides an external mortality benefit of about $1 billion per year for highly polluted cities. However, for less polluted cities, the effect is so small that it is not distinguishable from zero. This means that the reduction in pollution following a subway opening in a city with low pollution levels is minimal and has little to no impact on the overall air quality.

The construction of subways can be costly, and while reduced mortality due to lower air pollution can offset a significant share of these costs in highly polluted cities, the same cannot be said for less polluted cities. The impact of subway openings on air pollution in these cities is so minimal that it may not provide enough health benefits to justify the construction costs.

Overall, while subways can have a positive impact on air quality and public health in highly polluted cities, their effect in less polluted cities is negligible and may not be worth the investment.

A study found that New York's subways are the most polluted in the Northeast

A study published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives found that New York's subways are the most polluted in the Northeast. The study, conducted by researchers from NYU Langone's Department of Environmental Medicine, measured particulate matter and carbon pollution during morning and evening rush hour in 71 stations across four metropolitan centres in the Northeast: Boston, Philadelphia, Washington, DC, and New York. The results showed that one subterranean station in New York had higher levels of particulate pollution than any other station in the world.

The study also found that subway air pollution disproportionately impacts New York City's minority and low-income commuters. This is due to a combination of longer commutes and the reliance on the subway system among lower-income populations, who have limited access to alternative transportation options. Residents in upper Manhattan neighbourhoods, including Washington Heights and Inwood, have the highest per capita levels of subway pollutant commuting exposure.

While the opening of a subway system may not significantly impact particulate concentrations in less polluted cities, it can have a notable effect on highly polluted cities. For example, in cities with higher initial pollution levels, subway openings can reduce particulates by about 4% in the area surrounding a city centre. This reduction in pollution can provide an external mortality benefit of about $1 billion per year.

Overall, the study highlights the complex relationship between subway systems and urban air pollution, indicating that while subways can contribute to pollution in certain contexts, they may also offer environmental and health benefits in highly polluted areas.

The study measured particulate matter and carbon pollution during morning and evening rush hour in 71 stations across four metropolitan centres in the Northeast

A study published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives found that New York's subways are the most polluted in the Northeast. The study, conducted by researchers from NYU Langone's Department of Environmental Medicine, measured particulate matter and carbon pollution during morning and evening rush hour in 71 stations across four metropolitan centres in the Northeast: Boston, Philadelphia, Washington, DC, and New York. The study found that one subterranean station in New York had higher levels of particulate pollution than any other station in the world.

The researchers measured pollution on station platforms, in the ambient environment outside the stations, and on trains while riding between stations. The study found that, on average, particulate concentrations are unchanged by subway openings. However, for cities with higher initial pollution levels, subway openings can reduce particulates by 4% in the area surrounding a city centre. The effect decays with distance from the city centre and persists for about four years, the longest time horizon that the researchers could measure with their data.

For highly polluted cities, the study estimated that a new subway system provides an external mortality benefit of about $1 billion per year. This is due to the reduced mortality associated with lower air pollution, which offsets a substantial share of the construction costs of subways. In contrast, for less polluted cities, the effect of subway openings on urban air pollution is indistinguishable from zero.

The dirtiest subway system in the region was found to be in New York

Subways can cause pollution, but the impact on pollution levels depends on the city in question. In cities with high levels of pollution, subway openings can reduce particulates by 4% in the area surrounding a city centre. However, in cities with lower levels of pollution, the effect is indistinguishable from zero.

New York's subway system is the most polluted in the Northeast, with one subterranean station having higher levels of particulate pollution than any other station in the world. The study, conducted by researchers from NYU Langone’s Department of Environmental Medicine, measured particulate matter and carbon pollution during morning and evening rush hour in 71 stations across four metropolitan centres in the Northeast: Boston, Philadelphia, Washington, DC, and New York. The researchers measured pollution on station platforms, in the ambient environment outside the stations, and on trains while riding between stations.

The study found that the median amount of particulate pollution found in PATH stations surveyed in the study is more than double the median amount found at underground stations in Boston, Philadelphia or Washington. The particulate levels measured were two to seven times what the Environmental Protection Agencies’ ambient air quality standards recommend over a 24-hour period of exposure.

The Metropolitan Transit Authority, the state agency that runs New York’s subway system, did not respond to requests for comment.

Frequently asked questions