Injection Wells: Air Pollution Culprits Or Safe Practice?

Injection wells are used to dispose of liquid waste by shooting it thousands of feet below the surface. There are more than 680,000 injection wells in the US, and they have become the preferred method of liquid waste disposal since the 1960s. While federal officials insist that the risks posed by injection wells are minimal, some experts argue that the idea that injection wells are safe rests on uncertain science and lax oversight. Injection wells have been linked to groundwater pollution and may contribute to air pollution by releasing contaminants into the atmosphere.

Injection wells and air pollution regulations

Injection wells are used to place fluids underground into porous geologic formations. These underground formations may range from deep sandstone or limestone to a shallow soil layer. Injected fluids may include water, wastewater, brine (salt water), or water mixed with chemicals.

There are more than 680,000 underground waste and injection wells nationwide, with more than 150,000 of these shooting industrial fluids thousands of feet below the surface. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has acknowledged that the risks posed by this dumping are minimal, with accidents being uncommon. However, several experts have acknowledged that the idea that injection is safe is based on science that has not kept pace with reality and oversight that is sometimes lacking.

The EPA's Underground Injection Control (UIC) program regulates injection wells under the authority of the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 (SDWA) and its own federal regulations. The program sets minimum requirements for injection wells to protect public health and prevent contamination of underground sources of drinking water (USDWs). The EPA groups injection wells into six classes, with Class VI wells used for the injection of carbon dioxide (CO2) into underground rock formations for long-term storage or geologic sequestration.

State UIC programs, such as in Nevada, also regulate injection wells to prevent degradation of USDWs. These programs prohibit the use of injection wells for hazardous waste and require permits for all injection activities, regardless of well class.

Overall, while injection wells may not directly cause air pollution, they have the potential to contaminate underground water sources, which could have significant environmental and public health impacts. The EPA and state UIC programs have implemented regulations to mitigate these risks, but the effectiveness of these measures depends on consistent oversight and enforcement.

The impact of injection wells on groundwater

Injection wells are devices that place fluids deep underground into porous rock formations or into or below the shallow soil layer. The use of injection wells began in the 1930s to dispose of brine generated during oil production. In the 1950s, chemical companies started injecting industrial waste into deep wells, and as chemical manufacturing increased, so did the use of deep injection.

Today, there are more than 680,000 underground waste and injection wells in the US, with over 150,000 of these shooting industrial fluids thousands of feet below the surface. Injection wells are commonly used by chemical manufacturers, petroleum refineries, food producers, and municipal wastewater plants. Most produced water generated by oil and gas extraction wells in the US is disposed of in deep injection wells.

According to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), injection wells are constructed based on the type and depth of the fluid injected. Deep wells that inject hazardous wastes or carbon dioxide deep below the Earth's surface have multiple layers of protective casing and cement. These wells are designed to prevent the movement of fluid containing contaminants into underground sources of drinking water (USDWs). The EPA has established the Underground Injection Control (UIC) program, which sets minimum requirements for injection wells to protect USDWs and ensure that injection activities do not endanger public health.

However, there have been cases where injection wells have been linked to groundwater contamination. In 2000, a study in Walkerton, Ontario, found that bacteria-polluted water had migrated horizontally underground, contaminating a drinking water well and sickening thousands of residents. In another case, a well in Ohio was found to have been injected with waste at a faster rate and higher pressure than the geologic formation could bear, resulting in pollution migrating upwards through the rock. Additionally, a 2010 consent decree revealed that more than half of the injectate from a County of Maui injection well was appearing in nearby coastal waters, leading to a lawsuit and potential federal fines.

While injection wells are intended to prevent groundwater contamination, the potential impacts of some injected wastes on groundwater are not yet fully understood. The science and regulatory agencies are constantly evolving to address the challenges and uncertainties associated with injection wells and their impact on groundwater.

The safety of injection wells

One of the main concerns regarding injection wells is the potential contamination of groundwater reserves, which provide drinking water for most Americans. According to hydrogeologists, the movement of fluids underground, including the migration of bacteria-polluted water, can occur much faster than predicted by standard software models. Additionally, studies have found that human viruses have infiltrated deep aquifers, indicating that fluid can move through rock layers over time. The breakdown of cement seals in abandoned wells, which may not even appear in regulators' records, can also allow for the seepage of pollutants.

To address these concerns, the Underground Injection Control (UIC) regulations were enforced by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1980, following the passage of the Safe Drinking Water Act in 1974. These regulations have since undergone significant amendments to ensure that injection well practices protect groundwater, the environment, and public health and safety. The UIC program sets minimum requirements for injection wells, including measures to prevent the movement of contaminated fluids into underground sources of drinking water (USDWs). Wells used for carbon dioxide (CO2) injection, known as Class VI wells, are also subject to specific regulations to ensure long-term storage and prevent endangerment to USDWs.

In addition to federal regulations, states like Michigan and North Carolina have their own programs for regulating injection wells. Michigan's programs include the Mineral Well Program and the Oil and Gas Program, which require public noticing and comment periods for injection well permit applications. North Carolina's Underground Injection Control (UIC) program requires risk assessment evaluations for new substances to be injected into wells, and ambient air injection is also regulated to ensure proper notification and contamination control.

While regulatory measures aim to ensure the safety of injection wells, the potential for human error, mechanical failure, and unforeseen geologic complications underscores the ongoing need for rigorous scientific evaluation, oversight, and adaptation of injection well practices to protect public health and the environment.

The construction and operation of injection wells

The construction of an injection well depends on the type of fluid to be injected and the depth of the injection zone. Wells that inject hazardous wastes or carbon dioxide deep below the Earth's surface have multiple layers of protective casing and cement, while shallow wells that inject non-hazardous fluids into or above drinking water sources are more simply constructed. Injection wells are usually constructed of solid-walled pipes to a deep elevation to prevent injectate from mixing with the surrounding environment.

The construction process of an injection well will vary significantly based on the type of fluid being injected and the proposed depth of the well in question. For instance, constructing a well that handles carbon dioxide and delivers it into deep, isolated geologic formations will require a time- and labour-intensive construction process, as it must be insulated with multiple layers of cement and protective materials to guard against seepage, leaks, or spills. On the other hand, a shallow injection well that will only handle uncontaminated water involves a far simpler construction process and can be constructed at a relatively minimal cost.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established six classes of injection wells based on their functions, construction, and operating features. These classes are:

• Class I wells are used to dispose of municipal and industrial waste that may or may not be hazardous.
• Class III wells are used to inject fluids to dissolve and extract minerals.
• Class IV wells are shallow wells used to inject hazardous or radioactive wastes into or above a geologic formation that contains a USDW.
• Class V wells are used to inject non-hazardous fluids underground. Most Class V wells are used to dispose of wastes into or above underground sources of drinking water.
• Class VI wells are used for the injection of carbon dioxide for long-term storage or geologic sequestration.

The EPA and state regulatory entities have established comprehensive guidelines governing the siting, construction, use, testing, monitoring, and decommissioning of all classes of injection wells. These guidelines are designed to protect underground sources of drinking water (USDW) and prevent contamination. The EPA's Underground Injection Control (UIC) program sets minimum requirements for injection wells to protect USDWs and ensure that fluid injection does not cause a violation of drinking water standards or adversely affect public health.

The history of injection wells

In the 1950s, chemical companies started injecting industrial waste into deep wells, and injection wells became a common method for disposing of liquids associated with industrial facilities. The first report of shallow industrial waste injection was in the mid-1930s. The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) was enacted in 1974, giving the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the authority to regulate underground injection practices to protect public health and prevent the contamination of underground sources of drinking water.

The SDWA's Underground Injection Control (UIC) program, implemented in the early 1980s, established six classes of injection wells based on factors such as the type and depth of injection activity and the potential risk to underground sources of drinking water (USDW). Class I wells handle hazardous and non-hazardous fluids, while Class II wells are for brine fluids associated with oil and gas production. Class III wells are used for in-situ mining, and Class IV wells, which have been banned except for remediation, handled hazardous liquid disposal. Class V wells are for non-hazardous fluids, and Class VI wells, established in 2010, are for long-term carbon dioxide storage.

In 1984, the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) prohibited land disposal of hazardous waste, including underground injection, unless the EPA could ensure no adverse effects on human health and the environment. The EPA's regulations and studies have helped ensure the safety of injection wells, with stringent requirements for siting, construction, operation, and testing. Injection wells are now commonly used for various purposes, including wastewater disposal, environmental remediation, and natural gas and petroleum production.

Frequently asked questions