Geothermal Power Plants: Pollution Or Progress?

Geothermal power plants are an important source of renewable energy, but they are not without their environmental impacts. Geothermal energy is a reliable and secure source of energy that is available 24/7, 365 days a year, and has a high-capacity factor, typically operating at maximum capacity most of the time. However, the question arises: do geothermal power plants produce pollution? Geothermal plants can impact water quality and consumption, and some plants produce small amounts of air pollution and solid waste. The environmental impact of geothermal power plants depends on their technology and cooling systems.

Geothermal plants emit greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide and methane

Geothermal power plants are widely considered to be a clean source of energy. However, they do emit small amounts of greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide and methane. These emissions are significantly lower than those of fossil fuel power plants, with geothermal plants emitting 97% less acid rain-causing sulfur compounds and about 99% less carbon dioxide.

The carbon dioxide emitted by geothermal power plants comes from two sources: the natural constituents of geothermal reservoirs and the burning of fuel to generate electricity. The gases released from geothermal fluids may include hydrogen sulfide, which is removed using scrubbers. The use of scrubbers results in the production of a watery sludge that contains captured materials, including sulfur, vanadium, silica compounds, chlorides, arsenic, mercury, nickel, and other heavy metals. This toxic sludge must be disposed of at hazardous waste sites.

The amount of carbon dioxide emitted by geothermal power plants varies depending on the geological conditions, technology, and procedures used. For example, the Dixie Valley geothermal "flash" power plant in Nevada decreased its carbon dioxide emissions by 39% when it started injecting geothermal fluids back into reservoirs to sustain resources. Most geothermal plants re-inject water into the reservoir to prevent contamination and land subsidence, although some water is lost as steam.

Computer modelling has shown that a significant amount of carbon dioxide is discharged into the atmosphere due to the operation of a geothermal plant. For example, a study of the Ohaaki geothermal project in New Zealand found that during the project's lifetime, extra carbon dioxide was emitted. However, after the project is shut down, emissions are expected to decrease below their natural level, and over a long period (300 years) there will be no net increase in carbon dioxide emissions due to the project.

In summary, while geothermal power plants emit small amounts of greenhouse gases, they produce significantly lower emissions than fossil fuel power plants and can meet stringent clean air standards. Additionally, the common practice of injecting geothermal fluids back into reservoirs helps to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.

They can also release small amounts of toxic mercury emissions

Geothermal power plants are considered a clean energy source, but they are not entirely free of pollution. One issue associated with geothermal energy technologies is air and water pollution. Some geothermal plants produce small amounts of toxic mercury emissions, which must be mitigated using mercury filters. Scrubbers can be used to remove air emissions, but they produce a watery sludge composed of captured materials, including toxic substances such as mercury, which must be disposed of at hazardous waste sites.

The water used in geothermal plants for cooling and re-injection can also be contaminated by high levels of sulfur, salt, and other minerals. While there have been no reported cases of water contamination from geothermal sites in the United States, the disposal of hazardous waste and the safe management of water consumption remain important considerations.

To address these issues, most geothermal facilities have adopted closed-loop water systems, where extracted water is pumped back into the geothermal reservoir to prevent contamination and land subsidence. Additionally, some plants use scrubbers to remove hydrogen sulfide from the geothermal steam and water before re-injecting them into the earth, reducing emissions.

Despite the potential for small amounts of mercury emissions and the need for careful waste management, geothermal power plants still offer significant environmental benefits. They emit far lower levels of sulfur compounds and carbon dioxide than fossil fuel power plants, and their high-capacity factor allows them to operate at maximum capacity almost all the time, providing a reliable source of renewable energy.

Scrubbers are used to remove hydrogen sulfide, but produce toxic sludge

While geothermal energy provides substantial benefits for our climate, health, and economy, it is not without its environmental impacts. Geothermal power plants can affect both water quality and consumption. Hot water pumped from underground reservoirs often contains high levels of sulfur, salt, and other minerals. Most geothermal facilities have closed-loop water systems, where the extracted water is pumped directly back into the geothermal reservoir after use. However, the use of water for cooling and re-injection can lead to significant water consumption, with plants requiring between 1,700 and 4,000 gallons of water per megawatt-hour.

Air and water pollution are two of the leading environmental concerns associated with geothermal energy technologies. Geothermal plants may produce small amounts of mercury emissions, which must be mitigated using mercury filter technology. Additionally, the removal of hydrogen sulfide from natural gas streams is necessary to facilitate the measurement of oxygen and other gases. This is where scrubbers come into play.

Scrubbers are emission control technologies that use natural processes to remove toxins from gas and clean smokestack emissions. They come in two forms: wet scrubbers and dry scrubbers. Wet scrubbers, such as venturi scrubbers, are highly effective in removing pollutants by sending gases through liquid at a high speed. On the other hand, dry scrubbers are commonly used to remove acid from combustion gas.

While scrubbers are effective in reducing air emissions, they produce a watery sludge composed of captured materials, including sulfur, vanadium, silica compounds, chlorides, arsenic, mercury, and other heavy metals. This toxic sludge must be disposed of properly, often at hazardous waste sites. However, improper storage or disposal of this sludge can lead to groundwater pollution and negative ecological impacts.

In conclusion, while scrubbers play a crucial role in mitigating air pollution by removing hydrogen sulfide, they simultaneously generate toxic sludge that requires careful management and disposal to prevent further environmental contamination.

Water quality and consumption are impacted by geothermal plants

Geothermal power plants can impact both water quality and consumption. The hot water pumped from underground reservoirs often contains high levels of sulfur, salt, and other minerals. The water is often pumped back into the geothermal reservoir after it has been used, but some is lost as steam. To maintain a constant volume of water in the reservoir, outside water must be used. This water is often non-potable treated wastewater, as is the case with the Geysers geothermal site in California.

The use of geothermal fluid rather than freshwater for cooling reduces the plant's overall water impact. However, geothermal fluids can be a source of valuable minerals and metals, and uncontrolled discharge of these fluids can negatively affect soil and plants in terms of heavy metal contamination, as well as groundwater. This has been observed in the Harran Plain in Turkey, where geothermal fluid is discharged into drainage channels without controls, leading to heavy metal pollution in the soil and plants.

The amount of water used by geothermal plants depends on the size of the plant and the technology employed. Geothermal plants can require between 1,700 and 4,000 gallons of water per megawatt-hour for cooling and re-injection. This high water usage could lead to conflicts with other users or uses, such as fish spawning and rearing, in areas where water is scarce.

In addition, the removal of water from geothermal reservoirs can cause land subsidence, where the land surface sinks. This can be mitigated by re-injecting wastewater back into the geothermal reservoirs, as most geothermal facilities do.

Geothermal plants require large amounts of water for cooling and re-injection

Geothermal power plants are located near geological "hot spots" where hot molten rock is close to the earth's crust and produces hot water. These plants differ in the technology they use to convert resources to electricity and the type of cooling technology they use. Water is used by geothermal plants for cooling and re-injection. All US geothermal power facilities use wet-recirculating technology with cooling towers. Depending on the cooling technology used, geothermal plants can require between 1,700 and 4,000 gallons of water per megawatt-hour.

Most geothermal plants can use either geothermal fluid or freshwater for cooling. The use of geothermal fluids rather than freshwater reduces the plant's overall water impact. Most geothermal facilities have closed-loop water systems, in which extracted water is pumped directly back into the geothermal reservoir after it has been used for heat or electricity production. In such systems, the water is contained within steel well casings cemented to the surrounding rock. In most cases, however, not all water removed from the reservoir is re-injected because some is lost as steam. To maintain a constant volume of water in the reservoir, outside water must be used. The Geysers geothermal site in California, for example, injects non-potable treated wastewater into its geothermal reservoir.

Water consumption in geothermal plants can be reduced by using alternative, less water-intensive methods of cooling, such as air cooling or hybrid cooling systems. Plants based on organic Rankine cycle technology have very minimal water loss (<1%). On the other hand, plants based on flash steam turbines can have much higher water losses due to evaporation to condense the water enough for reinjection (~20%).

Geothermal power plants do not burn fuel to generate electricity, but they may release small amounts of sulfur and carbon dioxide. They emit 97% less acid rain-causing sulfur compounds and about 99% less carbon dioxide than fossil fuel power plants of similar size. Most geothermal power plants inject the geothermal steam and water they use back into the earth, which helps renew the geothermal resource and reduce emissions.

Frequently asked questions