How Covid-19 Impacted Pollution Levels

The COVID-19 pandemic caused a global decrease in carbon emissions and air pollution, with a 23% drop in carbon emissions and a 25% drop in carbon dioxide emissions. NASA scientists monitoring pollution satellites observed a decrease in air pollution after a two-week lockdown in China. However, despite the positive environmental impacts of the pandemic, air pollution remains a significant issue in the US, with nearly half of Americans exposed to potentially dangerous levels of air pollution, according to a 2025 report. This problem is especially prevalent in communities of color, with people of color being more than twice as likely to live in areas with unhealthy air quality. Wildfires, extreme heat, and drought have contributed to the degradation of air quality, and efforts to cut climate protections and deregulate energy production may further exacerbate the issue.

Global carbon emissions dropped by 23%

The COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting lockdowns caused a significant drop in global carbon emissions. In 2020, global carbon emissions per day were 17% lower than the average daily emissions in 2019. This decrease is attributed to reduced air and vehicle travel due to stay-at-home orders and lockdowns. The drop in emissions from surface transport, particularly cars, buses, and trucks, accounted for a significant portion of the total decrease, with a 43% reduction in emissions from this sector.

The impact of the pandemic on carbon emissions varied across different countries. China saw a 23% drop in emissions, the United States 20%, and India 9%. Countries at the peaks of their lockdowns experienced an average emissions decrease of 26%. Overall, emissions between January and mid-April 2020 dropped by 1,048 million metric tons compared to the previous year's 12-month average.

While the environmental impact of the pandemic was significant, experts warned that these gains could be short-lived. To ensure lasting change, governments needed to consider carbon emissions goals when rebuilding their economies. The pandemic demonstrated that drastic reductions in emissions are possible, but locking people at home is not a sustainable solution. Instead, structural changes and a transition to renewable energy sources are necessary to address the climate crisis.

The decrease in carbon emissions during the pandemic provided valuable insights into the human impact on pollution production. It highlighted that humans have control over their pollution output and that individual actions can collectively make a significant difference. This realization offers a glimmer of hope for the future, as it indicates that with the right policies and global efforts, it may be possible to mitigate the worst effects of climate change and protect vulnerable ecosystems like coral reefs.

While the COVID-19 pandemic unintentionally led to a drop in carbon emissions, it also served as a wake-up call for the world to actively address the climate crisis. It underscored the urgency of transitioning to renewable energy sources and implementing carbon emissions reduction strategies. The temporary clean air experienced during lockdowns also emphasized the importance of tackling air pollution to improve public health and reduce the risk of respiratory issues and other health complications.

China's air pollution decreased after a two-week lockdown

The COVID-19 pandemic, which emerged in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, resulted in a stringent lockdown to reduce infection rates. The lockdown had a significant impact on air quality, with a dramatic drop in pollution levels observed.

A study on air pollution in Nanjing, China, analysed six pollutants (PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NO2, CO, and O3) before, during, and after the lockdown. The results indicated a notable decrease in PM10 and PM2.5 average concentrations, with a more significant reduction when compared to the previous three years. Concentrations of SO2, NO2, and CO also decreased during the lockdown, while O3 levels increased.

Another study focusing on six megacities in China, including Beijing and Chengdu, found that the lockdown led to substantial reductions in NO2 concentrations, with levels dropping by 36-53% during the most restrictive periods. Traffic emission changes were identified as a major factor contributing to the decrease in NO2 and the increase in O3 concentrations.

The monthly air quality index (AQI) in Wuhan, one of the worst-affected cities, showed a significant improvement after the lockdown, with a 33.9% lower AQI compared to pre-lockdown levels and a 47.5% reduction compared to the corresponding period from 2015 to 2019. Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) decreased by 36.9%, and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) showed the largest decrease of approximately 53.3%.

The lockdown measures in China, which included restrictions on vehicular movement, industrial activities, and construction, played a crucial role in reducing air pollution levels. The decrease in pollution had a positive impact on public health, particularly for those living in areas with previously high levels of air pollution.

Carbon dioxide emissions dropped by 25%

The COVID-19 pandemic caused a significant drop in carbon dioxide emissions globally. According to a study by UC Berkeley's Daniel Kammen and colleagues in China, there was an abrupt 8.8% decrease in global carbon dioxide emissions in the first half of 2020. This equates to a 25% drop in emissions over the same period. The study utilized a network of carbon dioxide sensors set up around the Bay Area by UC Berkeley scientists to gather accurate data on emissions changes during the pandemic.

The decrease in emissions was primarily due to declining emissions from electricity generation in advanced economies, such as the United States, the European Union, and Japan. In the US, a 15% reduction in the use of coal for power generation contributed to a 2.9% decline in energy-related carbon dioxide emissions in 2019. Similarly, Japan experienced a 4.3% drop in energy-related emissions in 2019, the fastest pace of decline since 2009, due to a 40% increase in nuclear power output. In the European Union, emissions dropped by 5% in 2019.

The expanding role of renewable energy sources, fuel switching from coal to natural gas, and higher nuclear power generation were also key factors in the reduction of emissions. For example, in the US, gas prices were 45% lower than in 2018, leading to a record high of 37% in electricity generation from natural gas. Additionally, milder weather in several countries and slower economic growth in some emerging markets contributed to the decline in emissions.

The COVID-19 pandemic provided a unique opportunity to observe the impact of reduced human activity on carbon dioxide emissions. The data and insights gained during this period can inform policy decisions and strategies to combat climate change and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the future.

Nitrogen oxide emissions dropped by 40%

Nitrogen oxides (NOx) are a group of harmful gases that contribute to particle pollution and the chemical reactions that create ozone. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is one of the gases in this group. It is formed when fossil fuels such as coal, oil, methane gas, or diesel are burned at high temperatures. The burning of fuels by trucks, buses, and cars is the largest source of NO2 emissions, followed by industrial processes such as oil and gas production, and coal-fired power plants.

During the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, human activity was significantly reduced due to lockdown measures and travel restrictions. This resulted in a notable decrease in NO2 emissions, particularly in the northeast region of the United States.

One study reported that emissions in major cities in the northeastern U.S., such as New York City and Philadelphia, dropped by 28% and 24% respectively during the onset of the pandemic. However, the same study found that emissions in rural areas in the same region dropped by around 40%. This highlights the impact of urban areas on NO2 emissions, as the reduction in human activity had a more pronounced effect in less populated areas.

The decrease in NO2 emissions during the pandemic underscores the influence of human activities on air pollution levels. It also demonstrates the potential for improved air quality through the implementation of cleaner technologies and practices, particularly in the transportation and industrial sectors.

While the COVID-19 pandemic had a temporary impact on reducing NO2 emissions, long-term solutions are necessary to address the ongoing issue of air pollution and its associated health risks.

Ocean acidification decreased

During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a dramatic drop in pollution levels. This decrease in air pollution caused a reduction in ocean acidification.

Ocean acidification is the process by which seawater becomes more acidic due to increased levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere. The ocean absorbs about 30% of the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. As the levels of atmospheric CO2 increase due to human activities such as burning fossil fuels and deforestation, the amount of carbon dioxide absorbed by the ocean also increases. This leads to a decrease in the pH of the seawater, making it more acidic.

The impact of ocean acidification is already being felt by many ocean species, particularly organisms that rely on calcium and carbonate from seawater to create shells and skeletons, such as oysters and corals. As the ocean becomes more acidic, there are fewer carbonate ions available for these organisms to build their shells and skeletons. This reduction in carbonate ions also affects the survival of larval clownfish, as they struggle to locate suitable habitats.

The Arctic and subarctic shelf seas, which support large fisheries, are particularly vulnerable to ocean acidification. By the end of the century, ocean acidification is expected to significantly impact the shellfish industry, with projected declines in clam, oyster, and scallop supplies. Additionally, ocean acidification, coupled with warming waters, poses a severe threat to the survival of many marine species, including coral reefs.

While the decrease in human activity during the COVID-19 pandemic may have temporarily reduced ocean acidification, the long-term solution to combat this issue lies in addressing climate change and significantly reducing the use of fossil fuels.

Frequently asked questions