The World Is Polluted: Can We Recover?

The question of whether we have surpassed the point of no return in terms of pollution is a pressing and complex issue. While some scientists argue that volcanic activity might temporarily cool the planet, providing a window of opportunity to transition from fossil fuels, others believe we have already passed the point of no return, citing the simultaneous melting of the Arctic and Antarctica in March 2022 as evidence. The Paris Climate Agreement of 2016 set a goal to limit global warming to below 2 degrees Celsius relative to pre-industrial temperatures, with an ambitious target of 1.5 degrees Celsius. However, the effectiveness of climate models and predictions has been questioned, and the impact of different policies and risk tolerances on carbon budgets remains uncertain. Industrialization has had massive consequences for the environment, with Asia's unprecedented economic growth contributing significantly to global emissions. Air pollution, a silent public health emergency, claims the lives of at least seven million people annually, and the costs of pollution to the global economy are substantial. While some regions have taken steps to control emissions, modern societies continue to rely heavily on polluting activities and energy sources. The United Nations has emphasized the urgency of addressing these challenges, highlighting the need for transformative measures to advance sustainability and gender equality.

The impact of industrialisation on pollution

The Industrial Revolution, which began in Britain in the late 18th century, brought about rapid economic growth and advancements in production and efficiency. However, these developments had severe environmental repercussions, marking the beginning of our intensive use of fossil fuels, which is the primary driver of climate change. The environmental impact of industrialization has been significant, with natural resources being exploited and polluted, and long-term damage being caused to the environment.

The shift to a manufacturing-based economy during the Industrial Revolution resulted in a sharp increase in carbon emissions and harmful environmental pollution. The use of fossil fuels, such as coal, to power factories and machinery, led to increased air pollution and respiratory issues for those living in industrial cities. The burning of coal and other fossil fuels released smoke and emissions, including toxins such as asbestos, dioxin, lead, and chromium, into the atmosphere, contributing to the thick smog that darkened the skies over industrialised cities.

Waterways were also heavily polluted during this period, with oil spills and industrial waste dumping causing widespread losses of wildlife and disrupting fragile aquatic ecosystems. The Cuyahoga River Fire in the United States alarmed Americans and led to the passage of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) in 1970, marking a significant step toward environmental protection.

In addition to air and water pollution, industrialization has contributed to soil contamination, with lead and other heavy metals leaching into the soil from industrial activities. Deforestation and habitat destruction have also occurred as forests have been cleared for lumber and to make way for infrastructure development. The loss of biodiversity and the continuous rise in greenhouse gas emissions due to deforestation are major global challenges that can be traced back to the Industrial Revolution.

While it is difficult to determine if we have passed a point of no return regarding pollution, it is clear that the industrialization and the subsequent economic growth it brought about have had a significant impact on the environment. The patterns of unchecked resource exploitation and high emissions that began during this period continue to drive global climate change today. However, it is important to note that we have made progress in terms of emissions and carbon released into the atmosphere since the 1980s and 1990s, and efforts to reduce fossil fuel consumption and limit global warming, such as the Paris Climate Agreement of 2016, have been put in place.

The role of climate change agreements

While some scientists believe that we have passed the point of no return for climate change, it is important to note that human efforts to combat pollution can still have a significant impact. The role of climate change agreements is crucial in this regard, providing a framework for global cooperation and action to address pollution and its impacts.

One of the most prominent climate change agreements is the Paris Agreement, which was adopted by all 196 Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change at COP21 in Paris in 2015. This agreement aims to limit global temperature rise to well below 2 degrees Celsius and strives for a 1.5-degree limit due to the severe risks associated with even a 2-degree increase. The Paris Agreement provides a roadmap for climate actions, including emission reductions and building climate resilience. Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) are at the core of the agreement, with each country committing to reducing emissions and adapting to climate change impacts.

The Paris Agreement has gained widespread support, with 55 countries, accounting for 55% of global greenhouse gas emissions, ratifying it by 2017. This agreement has solidified international cooperation on climate change and provided a mechanism to increase ambition in addressing the issue. The subsequent COP24 and COP25 conferences further emphasized the urgency of enhanced ambition and the need for all parties to take action.

In addition to the Paris Agreement, other international agreements address specific aspects of pollution and climate change. For example, the Global Plastics Treaty, adopted by the United Nations Environment Assembly in 2022, aims to negotiate a legally binding agreement by 2024 to tackle plastic pollution. The Kyoto Protocol, the Montreal Protocol, and the Aarhus Convention are also relevant international agreements targeting pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.

Climate change agreements play a vital role in coordinating global efforts to combat pollution and its impacts. They provide a platform for countries to collaborate, share knowledge, and commit to taking action. These agreements also help raise awareness, strengthen political will, and provide a framework for accountability and progress assessment. While the challenges posed by pollution and climate change are significant, the existence of these agreements demonstrates a growing recognition of the urgency to act and a commitment to work towards a sustainable future.

Pollution's impact on human health

While it is challenging to determine if we have passed a point of no return regarding pollution, the impact of pollution on human health is undeniable and far-reaching. Air pollution, in particular, poses significant risks to human health due to the presence of contaminants in the atmosphere, such as dust, fumes, gases, and particulate matter. These pollutants can be inhaled, leading to inflammation, oxidative stress, immunosuppression, and even genetic damage in cells throughout the body.

Particulate matter (PM), carbon monoxide (CO), ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and sulphur dioxide (SO2) are among the pollutants of greatest concern for public health. Fine particulate matter, with its small particle size, can penetrate deep into the lungs, enter the bloodstream, and travel to various organs, causing systemic damage to tissues and cells. Vulnerable populations, including children, the elderly, and pregnant women, are at an increased risk of adverse health effects from air pollution.

Short-term exposure to high levels of particulate matter can lead to reduced lung function, respiratory infections, and aggravated asthma. However, long-term or chronic exposure increases the risk of developing non-communicable diseases with longer onsets, such as stroke, heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cancer. Elderly individuals aged 65 and above are particularly susceptible to the harmful effects of air pollution, with higher concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and black carbon (BC) correlated to an increased rate of heart attacks, heart surgery, and mortality due to coronary heart disease.

Maternal exposure to air pollution during pregnancy has also been linked to adverse birth outcomes, including low birth weight, pre-term birth, and small gestational age births. Additionally, traffic-related air pollution has been associated with significant health impacts, emphasizing the necessity of reducing transport emissions. While emission reduction targets have been set, such as the Paris Climate Agreement's goal to limit global warming, the accuracy of climate models and the potential for unforeseen variables make it challenging to determine if we can avert the most catastrophic consequences of pollution.

The transition to renewable energy

While some scientists believe that we have passed the point of no return for climate change, there are still several opportunities and actions that can be taken to make the transition to renewable energy more just and sustainable. The renewable energy transition is already underway, with a global effort to phase out fossil fuels and embrace clean, renewable energy. This transition is not a simple task and faces many multifaceted challenges, including technological, environmental, societal, economic, and geopolitical issues. However, there is a robust supply of renewable energy components and raw materials, and renewable energy technologies like wind and solar are, in most cases, cheaper than coal and other fossil fuels.

To accelerate the renewable energy transition, organizations must determine how they will procure and integrate renewable energy systems into their portfolios. They have several options, including renewable energy certificates (RECs) and power purchase agreements (PPAs). One of the most pressing challenges related to renewable energy adoption is the upfront cost. However, there are significant long-term benefits for businesses and economies that invest in clean energy projects and renewable energy technologies, such as greater climate action leading to more job opportunities in the clean energy sector.

To further jump-start the renewable energy transition, greater investments are needed to ensure a just transition, including investments in people's skills training, research and innovation, and incentives to build supply chains through sustainable practices that protect ecosystems and cultures. Domestic policy frameworks must be urgently reformed to streamline and fast-track renewable energy projects and catalyze private sector investments. Additionally, fossil fuel subsidies are one of the biggest financial barriers to the world's shift to renewable energy, with about $5.9 trillion spent on subsidizing the fossil fuel industry in 2020 alone.

To meet the energy transition challenges, a multifaceted approach is required. From a technological perspective, the transition seems to be equated with transitioning entirely from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources through novel technologies. While this is ideal, the reality may involve drastically reducing fossil fuels and significantly increasing renewable fuels. Most renewable energy technologies are not fully mature and do not yet match fossil fuels in terms of societal integration. For example, solar technology, the most established, has an efficiency of 26% and a lifespan of 20-25 years, while other solar technologies are still under investigation and not yet market-ready.

In conclusion, while the transition to renewable energy is complex and faces many challenges, there are also many opportunities to drive this transition through global cooperation, collective action, and the implementation of policies and processes that reduce market risk and enable and incentivize investments.

The accuracy of climate models

The early models were based on rudimentary computing power available in the 1970s and 1980s. Despite the limitations of the technology, these models laid the foundation for our understanding of climate change. Modern models, on the other hand, are far more sophisticated, accounting for a multitude of interactions, including ice and snow dynamics, changes in forest coverage, and cloud formation.

While it is acknowledged that "accurate" is a relative term when it comes to climate models, it is important to recognise that some models fit post-industrial warming well, while others better predict pre-industrial warming patterns. The ability to make testable predictions is a key aspect of good science, and climate models have been making such predictions for decades. The recent evaluation of global climate models used to project Earth's average surface temperatures over the past 50 years has bolstered scientists' confidence in the accuracy of both past and present models.

In a study published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, a research team led by Zeke Hausfather of the University of California, Berkeley, evaluated the performance of 17 climate models developed between 1970 and 2007. They found that 10 of the model projections closely matched observations, and after accounting for differences in atmospheric carbon dioxide levels and other climate drivers, the number increased to 14. This study provides strong evidence that climate models are indeed accurate and reliable tools for understanding and predicting climate change.

Despite the advancements and increasing accuracy of climate models, it is important to acknowledge that uncertainties remain. Predicting the magnitude of climate effects is one of the weakest aspects of current models, and making assumptions about future changes can introduce inaccuracies. However, as Piers Forster, an expert in climate modelling at the University of Leeds, notes, "We know enough to trust our climate models" and their urgent call for action. The ongoing refinement of climate models will continue to improve our understanding of the Earth's complex climate system and inform policy decisions to address climate change.

Frequently asked questions