Farms Vs Low-Income Apartments: Who's Polluting Whom?

Low-income communities are disproportionately affected by air pollution due to a variety of factors, including the placement of polluting facilities near low-income neighborhoods, a lack of emissions regulations, and the political power of large emitters. This has led to adverse health effects, including physical, mental, and cognitive impairments. Additionally, low-income housing sites often face environmental issues such as mold, inadequate ventilation, and exposure to pollutants.

In the United States, factory farms, also known as agricultural areas, have been identified as significant contributors to air and water pollution, particularly in low-income and minority communities. The EPA has been criticized for its inaction and failure to enforce stronger regulations to address these issues.

This introduction will explore the topic of whether farms are polluting low-income apartments by examining the impact of agricultural pollution on nearby low-income communities and the role of regulatory bodies in mitigating these negative externalities.

Factory farms and water pollution

Individuals from low-socioeconomic backgrounds are disproportionately exposed to air pollution compared to wealthier individuals. This is due to a variety of factors, including the lack of emissions regulations and the proximity of polluting facilities to low-income neighborhoods.

One significant source of air pollution that impacts these communities is agricultural emissions, particularly from farms. While farms contribute significantly to air pollution, the focus of this response is on factory farms and their impact on water pollution, as requested by the user.

Factory farms, also known as Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs), house thousands of animals, generating vast amounts of animal waste. This waste contains high levels of toxins, antibiotics, hormones, bacteria, and pathogens that can be harmful to both human and aquatic life. The waste is often collected in open-air lagoons or pits, which are prone to leaks and spills, leading to groundwater and surface water contamination. In addition, the application of waste as fertilizer on fields can result in runoff that pollutes nearby waterways.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been criticized for its inaction and inadequate regulations regarding factory farm water pollution. Despite acknowledging the issue, the EPA's current rules have not effectively addressed the problem. This has led to legal action from environmental justice groups, family farm advocates, and scientists.

The impact of factory farm water pollution extends beyond the environment, affecting the quality of life and incomes of nearby residents. Water pollution can lead to closures of beaches, limitations on fishing activities, and even severe health problems for those exposed to contaminated water.

To conclude, factory farms contribute significantly to water pollution through the mismanagement of animal waste. This pollution has detrimental effects on the environment, public health, and local communities. It is important to address this issue and implement stronger regulations to hold factory farms accountable for their waste management practices and protect water resources.

Air pollution and health risks

Air pollution is the presence of contaminants in the atmosphere, such as dust, fumes, gases, mists, odours, smoke, or vapours, in quantities that can be harmful to human health. It is a major problem in the United States, and individuals of low socioeconomic status are disproportionately exposed to it compared to wealthier individuals. Contributing factors to this disparity include a lack of emissions regulations and enforcement, the placement of pollution sources near low-income neighbourhoods, and the political power of large emitters. This overexposure to air pollution has negative consequences for the physical and mental health of low-income individuals, as well as their cognitive function.

The main pathway of exposure to air pollution is through the respiratory tract. Pollutants cause inflammation, oxidative stress, immunosuppression, and mutagenicity in cells throughout the body, impacting organs such as the lungs, heart, and brain. Almost every organ in the body can be affected by air pollution, as some pollutants are small enough to penetrate the bloodstream through the lungs and circulate throughout the body.

Particulate matter (PM), including PM10 and PM2.5, is a significant source of health risks. These fine inhalable particles can penetrate deep into the lungs and enter the bloodstream, causing systemic damage to tissues and cells. Exposure to high levels of PM can lead to reduced lung function, respiratory infections, and aggravated asthma in the short term. Long-term exposure increases the risk of non-communicable diseases such as stroke, heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cancer. Other pollutants of concern include carbon monoxide (CO), ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and sulphur dioxide (SO2).

Children, the elderly, and pregnant women are more susceptible to the health impacts of air pollution. Exposure during pregnancy has been linked to adverse outcomes such as low birth weight and small gestational age. Air pollution can also affect neurological development in children, increasing the risk of asthma and cognitive and emotional problems later in life. Living near busy roads or in highly polluted areas increases the risk of developing respiratory infections and asthma.

In addition to the direct health impacts, psychosocial stress caused by factors such as poverty and racial/ethnic discrimination can amplify the harmful effects of air pollution. Research has shown that people of colour are more likely to be exposed to air pollution and suffer more significant health consequences from it. This disparity is often a result of discriminatory practices such as redlining, which has led to the placement of pollution sources in economically disadvantaged communities of colour.

Housing conditions and indoor air quality

The Health in Common Study, conducted in Boston from 2005 to 2009, found that environmental problems were prevalent in low-income housing, with more than half of the homes having three or more exposure-related issues. The most common issues included pests, combustion byproducts, mold, and inadequate ventilation. These issues can have significant impacts on the health of residents, particularly in communities with a higher proportion of racial and ethnic minorities, where exposure to environmental hazards is already disproportionately higher.

In addition to indoor environmental exposures, the placement of polluting facilities and sources nearby low-income neighborhoods contributes to poor indoor air quality. This is influenced by a lack of emissions regulations and enforcement, as well as the political power of large emitters. As a result, individuals living in low-income apartments may be exposed to higher levels of pollutants and hazardous particles, leading to negative physical and mental health outcomes.

Furthermore, individuals from low-income communities are more likely to live in areas with higher levels of outdoor air pollution, such as industrial sites, transportation corridors, and agricultural areas. These areas often have higher concentrations of particulate matter, such as dust, dirt, soot, and smoke, which can infiltrate homes and negatively impact indoor air quality.

To improve housing conditions and indoor air quality in low-income apartments, a combination of regulatory changes, community organizing, and targeted interventions are necessary. Regulatory changes should address the lack of emissions regulations and enforcement, while community organizing can help increase participation in the political process and advocate for change. Targeted interventions may include improving ventilation systems, addressing pest infestations, and mitigating the impact of nearby polluting facilities. By addressing these issues, it is possible to reduce the health disparities experienced by individuals living in low-income apartments.

Government inaction and environmental justice

Environmental justice is a pressing issue in the United States, with low-income communities and individuals of low socioeconomic status disproportionately affected by air pollution. This injustice is exacerbated by government inaction, particularly in the enforcement of emissions regulations and the placement of polluting facilities near low-income neighborhoods. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been criticized for its failure to address factory farm water pollution, which has contaminated waterways and harmed both farmers and frontline communities. In addition, more than 9,000 federally subsidized housing properties are located within a mile of a Superfund site, and the government has been accused of failing to inform residents of potential health threats.

The EPA has acknowledged the inadequacy of its current rules in tackling factory farm water pollution, yet has failed to implement stronger regulations. This inaction has been highlighted by environmental justice groups, family farm advocates, and scientists who have submitted amicus briefs to the Court. The briefs detail how the EPA's inaction has negatively impacted communities and the environment. For example, in Hardin County, Iowa, the hog industry produces 120 times more manure than the human population, and this waste is often spread untreated on fields as fertilizer, contaminating groundwater and surface waters.

Government inaction on environmental justice has also been evident in the placement of public housing near polluted areas. An investigation revealed that thousands of public housing residents live near or on some of the most toxic places in the nation. For example, in north Birmingham, Alabama, public housing complexes are located less than half a mile from heavy industrial areas, including a metals scrap yard, a foundry, and a coke plant. The environmental burden of Superfund sites falls disproportionately on people of color, who are overrepresented in public housing.

The health consequences of government inaction on environmental justice can be severe, with low-income individuals suffering physical and mental health issues, as well as impaired cognitive function due to overexposure to air pollution. In addition, environmental exposures in low-income housing, such as mold, combustion byproducts, secondhand smoke, inadequate ventilation, and pest infestations, can further exacerbate health disparities. These issues are often not adequately addressed due to a lack of risk assessment and intervention.

To address these injustices, NGOs and other organizations are working to increase community organizing and participation in the political process, both locally and nationally, to advocate for stronger emissions regulations and the relocation of polluting facilities away from low-income neighborhoods. It is crucial that governments listen to these voices and take decisive action to protect the health and well-being of their most vulnerable citizens.

Racial and economic disparities in pollution exposure

People of colour are exposed to greater than average concentrations from source types that cause 75% of overall exposure to air pollution. In contrast, white people are exposed to lower-than-average concentrations from emission source types that cause 60% of overall exposure. This disparity holds across states, urban and rural areas, and income levels.

Racial-ethnic exposure disparities are the result of systemic racism. Over time, people of colour and pollution have been pushed together for nearly all types of emissions. Due to decades of residential segregation, African Americans tend to live where there is greater exposure to air pollution.

A 2012 study found that unemployed people, those with low incomes or low education, and non-Hispanic blacks were more likely to live in areas with higher exposures to particle pollution. A 2008 study of Washington, DC, found that while poor air quality and worsened asthma went hand in hand in areas where Medicaid enrollment was high, the areas with the highest Medicaid enrollment did not always have the strongest association of high air pollution and asthma attacks. A 2016 study of New Jersey residents found that the risk of dying early from long-term exposure to particle pollution was higher in communities with larger African American populations, lower home values, and lower median incomes.

Communities and neighbourhoods with predominantly lower socioeconomic status (SES) are consistently exposed to higher levels of pollutants than wealthier neighbourhoods, leading to greater health and environmental risks. Low-income individuals suffer from both physical and mental health consequences as a result of this overexposure to air pollution, as well as impaired cognitive function.

Housing conditions in low-income urban areas are influenced by building and household characteristics. In multifamily housing, building characteristics can be shaped by construction and renovation practices, as well as by the actions of professional staff and residents. In the home, the proximate determinants of environmental exposures include pollutant sources, product usage, resident activity patterns, the presence and performance of ventilation systems, and pest infestation levels.

Frequently asked questions