Starlink: Space Pollution Or Innovation?

SpaceX's Starlink satellites have been the subject of much debate and criticism since their launch in 2019. The project aims to provide high-speed broadband internet access globally, especially in rural and remote areas with unreliable or non-existent connections. However, the rapid deployment of thousands of satellites has led to concerns about space pollution, particularly the accumulation of space junk and its potential impact on the environment. Critics worry about the lack of formal reviews and call for intervention to regulate satellite launches. Additionally, astronomers face challenges due to light pollution and radio frequency disruptions, hindering their observations and research. Despite efforts to reduce satellite brightness, the issue persists, and the increasing number of satellites in orbit raises concerns about potential collisions and their long-term effects on Earth.

Light pollution

SpaceX's Starlink satellites have been criticised for their contribution to light pollution. The project, which aims to provide global internet service, has raised concerns about space junk, light pollution, and astronomical observations.

The night sky has already been altered by the presence of these satellites, with ""trains" of spacecraft marching across skies around the globe. The light pollution caused by these satellites is a particular concern for astronomers, who are urging policymakers to regulate satellite launches. The brightness of the satellites can interfere with astronomical research and observations, and the radio frequencies emitted by the satellites can cause further disruption.

SpaceX has attempted to address these concerns, with the development of light-deflecting shielding and software changes to the way solar panels work, to prevent sunlight from reflecting too brightly off the satellites. They have also tested a satellite with an experimental darkening coating to reduce reflective brightness. However, these changes have not fully eased researchers' concerns, as darker objects can appear brighter in infrared and submillimetre wavelengths.

The vast number of satellites planned for the Starlink project, with nearly 12,000 satellites intended to be launched into low-Earth orbit, means that light pollution and other issues are likely to continue. This has led to calls for greater regulation from government agencies to prevent the contamination of our celestial views.

The light pollution caused by Starlink satellites is not just a concern for astronomers but also for the general public. The night sky has played an important role in scientific research and our evolution, influencing early humans and providing inspiration in art, culture, and other aspects of our development.

Radio frequency disruption

SpaceX's Starlink satellites have been criticised for their impact on astronomy and the environment. The brightness of the satellites has been a cause for concern for astronomers, who claim that their brightness in both optical and radio wavelengths will severely impact scientific observations.

Starlink satellites unintentionally leak electromagnetic radiation at low frequencies, which can be picked up by telescopes. This radiation is intrinsic to the satellites and is caused by their electronics. This creates "noise" for radio telescopes, which rely on specific radio frequencies. The more satellites that are launched, the more difficult it becomes for astronomers to schedule observations to avoid them.

The large number of satellites also poses a risk of collision, with the potential to cause a cascade phenomenon known as Kessler syndrome. In addition, the satellites will contribute to space debris when they reach the end of their lifespan and fall back down to Earth, burning up in the atmosphere and leaving behind metals. The long-term effects of this are unclear.

SpaceX has agreed to work with the international astronomical community to address these issues, and new techniques have been developed to help radio astronomers by steering radio emission beams away from radio telescopes. However, the rate at which commercial satellites are being launched without studying their impact on the environment has led some experts to call for intervention.

Space debris

The accumulation of space debris began with the launch of the first artificial satellite, Sputnik 1, into orbit in October 1957. However, even before this, humans may have produced ejecta that became space debris, such as the August 1957 Pascal B test. Natural ejecta from Earth, such as that resulting from the 1961 testing of anti-satellite weapons, has also contributed to space debris. Today, sources of space debris include in-orbit fragmentation events, explosions of rocket bodies, and solid rocket motor firings.

The issue of space debris is a global problem that requires international cooperation to address. NASA's Orbital Debris Program, which began in 1979, aims to create less orbital debris and develop equipment to track and remove existing debris. However, the removal of space debris is expensive and challenging, and there are currently no international space laws governing the cleanup of debris in low Earth orbit (LEO). As space activities continue to increase, the number of debris objects in space will also rise, leading to a higher probability of catastrophic collisions.

Environmental impact

SpaceX's Starlink satellites have been criticised for their environmental impact, with some researchers calling for the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to pause launches to allow for an environmental review. The potential issues are twofold: the impact on the night sky and light pollution, and the creation of space debris.

Light Pollution

Starlink satellites are visible in the night sky, particularly at twilight, and in darker places on Earth. They are almost as bright as meteors, and can be seen by telescopes. This light pollution is a problem for astronomers, who are urging policymakers to regulate satellite launches. SpaceX has said it is working with the astronomical community to limit its impact, including by reducing the optical brightness of its satellites. However, some researchers are concerned that darker satellites could pose new problems, as they may appear brighter in infrared and submillimetre wavelengths.

Space Debris

Starlink satellites have a lifespan of around five years, after which they de-orbit and are destroyed upon re-entering the Earth's atmosphere. SpaceX claims that this process means no orbital debris is created, but researchers say that without environmental oversight, it is unclear what the long-term effects will be. Some experts are concerned about the potential for on-orbit collisions, which could create a Kessler effect, where one collision sets off a chain reaction of further collisions. SpaceX says its satellites are designed to be capable of fully autonomous collision avoidance, but some are sceptical about the effectiveness of this system.

SpaceX's Starlink satellites now make up 40% of re-entering satellite debris, according to one source. Another source states that the incineration of Starlink satellites upon re-entry amounts to a minimum of 500 kilograms of satellite trash per day.

Astronomy interference

SpaceX's Starlink satellites are causing significant interference with astronomy, with their brightness and debris affecting observations and research.

Starlink satellites are very bright, comparable to a meteor, and are easily visible to telescopes, especially at twilight. This creates light pollution, which is a major concern for astronomers as it interferes with their observations and research. The satellite trails create long lines in images taken by optical telescopes, and the brightness of the satellites can outshine dimmer celestial objects, making them harder to study. The light pollution is not limited to urban areas but can also be seen in darker regions, affecting astronomy worldwide.

The rapid proliferation of Starlink satellites is leading to an increase in space debris, which further exacerbates the issue of light pollution. The debris can create additional obstacles for astronomers, blocking their view of the universe. The accumulation of space junk can also interfere with radio frequencies, creating "noise" that disrupts astronomical research.

SpaceX has acknowledged the issue and agreed to work with the astronomical community to mitigate the impact of their satellites on astronomy. Efforts to reduce the optical brightness of the satellites have been made, but these changes have not fully addressed the concerns of researchers. The increase in space debris raises concerns about potential collisions, which could have a cascading effect, impacting other satellites and affecting our reliance on them for various services.

The interference caused by Starlink satellites is not an isolated problem but part of a larger trend of satellite constellations disrupting astronomy. The growing number of satellites in orbit is leading to concerns about the lack of regulation and the need for better environmental oversight to manage the impact on the night sky and the scientific research that depends on it.

Frequently asked questions