Pollution's Main Culprit: Corporations' Responsibility And Their Evasion

Corporations are responsible for a significant portion of global pollution and play an outsized role in driving climate change. A 2015 study by Carbon Tracker found that just 100 companies were responsible for 71% of global greenhouse gas emissions since 1988, with 25 corporate and state-owned entities contributing to over 50% of global industrial emissions. ExxonMobil, Shell, BP, and Chevron are among the highest-emitting investor-owned companies. The fashion industry is another major contributor, accounting for 10% of global emissions. While corporations can easily make their products greener, they often prioritize profits and ignore the environmental impact of their actions. Some even actively block measures to reduce emissions. Coca-Cola, Pepsi, and agrochemical producers like Syngenta and ChemChina are among the top 20 corporations producing the most ocean pollution.

100 companies responsible for 71% of global emissions

Corporations are major contributors to climate change, producing the vast majority of the goods we buy, use, and throw away. A 2017 report by the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) revealed that just 100 companies, primarily fossil fuel producers, have been responsible for 71% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions since 1988. This figure includes scope 3 emissions, meaning these companies are accountable for all emissions from extraction to use and combustion.

The report, titled "CDP Carbon Majors Report 2017", was the first to utilize a worldwide GHG emissions database at the company level. It shed light on the significant role of companies and investors in addressing climate change. According to the study, 25 corporate and state-owned entities were responsible for over 50% of global industrial emissions during the same period. ExxonMobil, Shell, BP, and Chevron are among the highest-emitting investor-owned companies.

The findings underscore the urgent need for these corporations to reduce their emissions and transition to more sustainable practices. However, many companies have been criticized for their lack of commitment to addressing their climate impact. For instance, Exxon, a multinational gas and oil company, was aware of climate change for decades but chose to block emission-cutting measures.

The tissue sector provides another example of corporate greenwashing. Companies like P&G and Kimberly-Clark, despite claiming to be environmental leaders, have been found to underestimate their emissions, with Kimberly-Clark using substantial amounts of virgin pulp in its disposable products.

While some corporations are advocating for cleaner energy, their efforts may be driven more by profit motives and public relations than genuine concern. As such, investors are encouraged to move away from fossil fuels and toward clean energy, as the world is rapidly transitioning to more sustainable practices.

Despite the alarming findings, there is a growing wave of companies committed to positive change. Nearly 100 companies, including Apple, Facebook, Google, and Ikea, have pledged to transition to 100% renewable power under the RE100 initiative. These companies are leading the charge toward a carbon-free economy, recognizing the importance of reducing their climate footprint.

Fossil fuel companies wasting trillions

While it is challenging to attribute an exact percentage of pollution caused by corporations, it is evident that they play a significant role in contributing to environmental degradation and climate change. A notable example is the fossil fuel industry, which has come under scrutiny for its role in global warming and pollution.

A 2015 study by the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) revealed that just 100 fossil fuel companies were responsible for 71% of global greenhouse gas emissions since 1988. This small group of corporations, including ExxonMobil, Shell, BP, and Chevron, have had a substantial impact on the planet, with their emissions contributing significantly to climate change. The report also highlighted that over half of global industrial emissions during this period could be traced back to just 25 corporate and state-owned entities.

Despite the urgent need to address climate change, fossil fuel companies continue to pursue projects that may become worthless due to international action on climate change and the growing popularity of renewable energy sources. In 2021, a report by Carbon Tracker estimated that fossil fuel companies risked wasting up to $2 trillion of investors' money in the following decade. This figure represents the potential waste of resources on projects that may become redundant as the market for fossil fuels shrinks due to global efforts to mitigate climate change.

The issue of wasted investment in the fossil fuel industry is not just a financial concern but also a critical factor in the transition to a sustainable economy. As governments and organizations strive to meet global warming targets, continued investment in fossil fuel projects can hinder progress. According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), fossil fuel subsidies surged to a record $7 trillion in 2023, exceeding the amount spent on education and approaching two-thirds of global healthcare spending. These subsidies contribute to environmental damage and hinder the transition to cleaner energy sources.

To address this challenge, there is a growing call for transparency and accountability in the fossil fuel industry. Investors are increasingly demanding that companies reduce carbon emissions and provide more transparency around future investments. Additionally, there is a push for the removal of fossil fuel subsidies, which could prevent premature deaths, raise government revenues, and help achieve global warming targets. However, phasing out these subsidies requires careful planning and implementation to ensure that vulnerable households are not disproportionately affected by rising energy prices.

Green consumerism

While consumer choices are important, the onus of creating systemic change to address climate change lies with corporations and governments. A 2015 study found that just 100 companies were responsible for 71% of global greenhouse gas emissions since 1988, with 25 corporate and state-owned entities contributing to over 50% of global industrial emissions. Despite this, the pressure to tackle climate change has largely fallen on individual consumers, who are encouraged to make changes in their everyday lives, such as buying green products, using public transport, or changing their diets.

To address this, consumers are becoming more discerning, demanding transparency and accountability from brands. They are also leveraging social media and online tools to call out companies that fail to live up to their eco-friendly promises. This shift in consumer behavior has prompted companies to transition to sustainable practices and renewable energy sources.

However, green consumerism alone cannot solve the climate crisis. Corporations must be held accountable for their emissions and the environmental impact of their products and services. They should prioritize sustainability and eco-friendly practices, not just as a marketing strategy, but as a core part of their brand positioning.

To foster green consumerism, companies can employ several strategies:

• Use social influence: Encourage sustainable choices by leveraging social norms and peer influence.
• Shape good habits: Help consumers develop sustainable habits by providing education and simple, achievable goals.
• Leverage the domino effect: Highlight how individual actions can create a collective impact.
• Talk to the heart or the brain: Appeal to consumers' emotions and rational thinking by communicating the personal and global benefits of sustainability.
• Favor experiences over ownership: Focus on providing experiences and services that promote sustainability, rather than solely selling products.

Coca-Cola, Pepsi, and ocean pollution

A recent report revealed that just 100 companies are responsible for 71% of global greenhouse gas emissions since 1988. Fossil fuel companies, in particular, have contributed significantly to climate change, with ExxonMobil, Shell, BP, and Chevron being among the highest emitters.

In addition to their contribution to global emissions, some corporations have also been implicated in environmental pollution, specifically, Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, the world's largest beverage companies, have come under fire for their role in plastic pollution. Los Angeles County filed a lawsuit against these companies, alleging that they misled consumers about the recyclability of their plastic products and downplayed the health and environmental impacts of single-use plastic bottles. The lawsuit claims that Coca-Cola and PepsiCo engaged in a disinformation campaign, making consumers believe that purchasing their products in single-use plastic bottles is environmentally responsible.

Coca-Cola and PepsiCo collectively own dozens of beverage brands, including Coke, Pepsi, Dasani, Smartwater, Fanta, Aquafina, Gatorade, 7-Up, Sprite, Vitamin Water, and Mountain Dew. Due to their significant market share, these two companies have consistently ranked as the world's top plastic polluters for five consecutive years. The lawsuit highlights that the companies' actions have contributed to plastic pollution, threatening both human and ecosystem health.

Environmentalists and plastic pollution opponents have praised the lawsuit, holding these corporate polluters accountable for their deceptive business practices. It remains to be seen what the outcome of the lawsuit will be and whether it will lead to meaningful change in addressing plastic pollution caused by these beverage giants.

While Coca-Cola and PepsiCo have faced legal repercussions for their role in plastic pollution, it is important to note that they are not solely responsible for ocean pollution. Other industries, such as the fashion industry, are also major contributors to environmental pollution, emphasizing the need for collective efforts to address these global issues.

Corporations and climate change

Corporations play a significant role in climate change, with their actions and decisions having a substantial impact on the environment. According to several reports, just 100 companies are responsible for 71% of global greenhouse gas emissions since 1988. This small group of corporations and state-owned entities have contributed significantly to climate change through their industrial emissions. ExxonMobil, Shell, BP, Chevron, and Exxon are among the highest emitting investor-owned companies.

The issue is not just limited to greenhouse gas emissions but also extends to ocean pollution. Coca-Cola, Pepsi, and 18 other corporations are the largest polluters, heavily impacting the world's oceans. These companies operate in industries known for heavy pollution, and their activities have led to species extinction and the disruption of marine ecosystems.

The tissue sector, including companies like P&G, is another major contributor to climate change. P&G's disposable paper, hygiene, and baby care products generate an estimated 17.8 million metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions annually. However, their climate commitments fall short of addressing the full scope of their emissions, particularly those associated with the production of raw materials and the use and disposal of their products.

While some corporations prioritize profits over environmental concerns, there is a growing trend of large companies supporting the transition to a carbon-free economy. Apple, Facebook, Google, and Ikea are leading the way, committing to obtaining 100% of their energy from renewable sources.

The fashion industry, the second-biggest industrial polluter, responsible for 10% of global emissions, also comes under scrutiny. Often, the blame for unsustainable practices is placed on consumers, particularly those from working-class backgrounds, rather than the companies themselves.

Overall, corporations have an outsized influence on climate change, and their actions, or lack thereof, can significantly impact the planet. While some companies are taking steps towards sustainability, many more need to prioritize environmental concerns and take responsibility for reducing their emissions and pollution.

Frequently asked questions