Cremation's Pollution Problem: How Bad Is It?

Cremation is often marketed as a more environmentally friendly option than traditional embalmment and casket burial. However, with the popularity of cremations increasing worldwide, concerns about its effects on the environment and climate have also been mounting. Cremation results in toxic emissions, including volatile organic compounds (VOCs), particulate matter (PM), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and heavy metals such as mercury. Cremation also requires a significant amount of fuel, contributing to millions of tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions each year. The impact of an individual cremation depends on where and how it is performed. For example, in India, the traditional Hindu practice of cremating relatives on an open-air pyre contributes to air and river pollution. As people around the world seek greener end-of-life options, alternatives to traditional cremation, such as alkaline hydrolysis or bio-cremation, are being explored for their reduced environmental impact.

Cremation methods such as alkaline hydrolysis produce fewer emissions and have a smaller carbon footprint than traditional cremation

Traditional cremation methods, which burn the body at high temperatures to reduce it to ashes, are not environmentally friendly. A single cremation can produce up to 568 pounds of carbon dioxide (CO2), with an average of 534.6 pounds of CO2, according to Matthews Environmental Solutions. This adds up to a significant amount of pollution, with cremations in the US alone accounting for about 360,000 metric tons of CO2 emissions annually.

In response to the environmental impact of traditional cremation, alternative methods such as alkaline hydrolysis, also known as water cremation, bio-cremation, or green cremation, have emerged as more eco-friendly options. Alkaline hydrolysis is a chemical process that uses water, heat, pressure, and alkaline chemicals to break down the body, resulting in a sterile liquid that can be safely released into the local wastewater treatment system or used as fertilizer, and bone residue that can be returned to the family. This method has a significantly smaller carbon footprint, with estimates ranging from one-tenth to one-twentieth of the carbon emissions produced by traditional cremation. It also uses less energy, with the option of being powered by renewable energy sources, and releases no emissions, including mercury vapor from dental fillings, which can be preserved and recycled instead.

The process of alkaline hydrolysis is not new, having been patented in 1888 and used in the medical field for over a decade before its introduction to the funeral industry in 2011. However, its adoption as a funeral practice has been slow due to legal, religious, and cultural barriers, as well as the higher cost of equipment and the "'ick' factor" associated with the method. Nevertheless, with growing environmental concerns and an increasing demand for eco-friendly options, alkaline hydrolysis is gradually gaining acceptance and may become the future norm for funeral services.

While the availability of alkaline hydrolysis may currently be limited, it stands as a noteworthy alternative to traditional cremation, offering a gentler and more natural approach to end-of-life rituals with a reduced environmental impact.

Crematoria emit pollutants such as PCDD/Fs, mercury, and fine particulate matter, which are toxic and can bioaccumulate in humans

Crematoria emit pollutants, including PCDD/Fs, mercury, and fine particulate matter, which are harmful and can remain in the human body.

Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzo-p-furans (PCDD/Fs) are chemical contaminants that persist in the environment and bioaccumulate in the human body. They are released into the atmosphere through industrial processes, such as incineration, and can be present in the diet, mainly through the consumption of contaminated fish and shellfish. These contaminants have toxic effects on humans, including adverse reproductive effects, neurodevelopmental impairment, immune system damage, and endocrine disruption. Due to their potential carcinogenicity and frequent presence at different environmental concentrations, human biomonitoring of PCDD/Fs is crucial to assess the risks they pose to human health.

Mercury, an element that cannot be destroyed, is another pollutant released during cremation. It is particularly toxic to the central nervous system and kidneys, with mild exposure signs including increased protein in the urine and, in more severe cases, kidney failure. Human exposure to mercury occurs primarily through inhalation of elemental mercury vapors during industrial processes and the consumption of contaminated seafood. Once in the environment, mercury can be transformed by bacteria into methylmercury, which then bioaccumulates in fish and shellfish. As a result, larger predatory fish tend to contain higher levels of mercury.

In addition to PCDD/Fs and mercury, crematoria also release fine particulate matter, specifically PM2.5, which is known to have harmful effects on human health. Long-term exposure to fine particulate matter has been linked to illnesses and deaths from heart and lung diseases.

The impact of cremation on the environment and human health is a growing concern, especially as cremation becomes an increasingly popular end-of-life option. While cremation is often marketed as a greener alternative to traditional burial, it is important to consider the release of these pollutants and their potential impact on human health.

Cremation requires a significant amount of fuel, with each cremation using as much energy as a 500-mile car trip

Cremation is often marketed as a more environmentally friendly option than traditional embalmment and casket burial. However, the process requires a significant amount of fuel, and a single cremation can use as much energy as a 500-mile car trip.

The cremation process involves heating the water in the body using a fuel source, typically natural gas in the US due to its abundance and low cost. Once the water is evaporated, the body burns naturally, consuming oxygen and producing carbon dioxide. The amount of carbon dioxide released depends on the weight of the individual, with a 150-pound person resulting in approximately 100 pounds of carbon dioxide.

The environmental impact of cremation is significant, particularly with the increasing popularity of cremations worldwide. Crematoria emit harmful pollutants such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs), particulate matter (PM), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and heavy metals like mercury. These toxins can have adverse health effects on humans, including increased risks of heart disease, lung cancer, and asthma.

To reduce the environmental and health impacts, alternative methods such as alkaline hydrolysis or "bio-cremation" have been proposed. Alkaline hydrolysis uses water, heat, pressure, and chemicals to dissolve tissue, resulting in bone residue and a syrupy liquid. This process has a smaller carbon footprint, using less heat and fuel, and it releases no emissions from the body. However, its commercial use has been limited by higher equipment costs and legal obstacles.

The impact of cremation depends on where and how it's performed. For example, traditional Hindu cremations require cutting down trees and contribute to air and river pollution

The environmental impact of cremation varies depending on the location and the method used. While cremation is often marketed as a more environmentally friendly option than traditional embalmment and casket burial, it still contributes to air pollution and can have other environmental repercussions.

Traditional Hindu cremations, for example, require the cutting down of trees and contribute to air and river pollution. In India, Hindus have traditionally cremated their relatives on an open-air pyre, with the body placed atop a pile of wood and then covered with more wood to be burned. This method requires a large amount of wood, contributing to deforestation and releasing carbon emissions. Additionally, as most pyre cremations occur near water, the ashes and remains can end up in rivers, further polluting them.

To address this issue, organizations like the nonprofit Mokshda Green Cremation System have been working to provide communities with more fuel-efficient structures for funerary rites. These structures use a metal tray heated with firewood, reducing the amount of wood needed and making the transition between cremations easier. However, the adoption of these alternative methods has been slow due to the sentimental value and long-standing traditions associated with the traditional wood-fired pyre.

The type of cremation method chosen can also have an impact on the environment. Standard cremations that use natural gas and electricity emit carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas blamed for global warming, as well as other pollutants like dioxins and mercury vapor if the deceased had silver tooth fillings. Alkaline hydrolysis, or "bio-cremation," has been proposed as a more environmentally friendly alternative, using significantly less energy and reducing carbon emissions by almost 90%. However, the commercial use of this method has been limited due to higher equipment costs and resistance to change.

Overall, while cremation may offer certain benefits over traditional burial methods, it is important to consider its environmental implications, especially when different cremation practices are employed in various cultural and regional contexts.

Cremation releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, with one source estimating that a single cremation produces 534.6 pounds of CO2

Cremation is often marketed as a more environmentally friendly option than traditional embalmment and casket burial. However, it does release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. The amount of carbon dioxide produced depends on the weight of the person being cremated. For a 150-pound person, approximately 100 pounds of CO2 will be produced. Matthews Environmental Solutions, which manufactures cremation technology, estimates that a single cremation produces an average of 534.6 pounds of carbon dioxide. This includes the gas generated as a byproduct of heating the body to 1,200 degrees Fahrenheit or more.

The impact of an individual cremation also depends on where and how it is performed. In India, for example, Hindus have a long tradition of cremating their relatives on an open-air pyre, which requires cutting down millions of trees and contributes to air and river pollution. To curb this pollution, the nonprofit Mokshda Green Cremation System has been providing communities with access to more fuel-efficient structures for funerary rites.

Due to the environmental concerns associated with cremation, some people are exploring alternative options such as alkaline hydrolysis, also known as "bio-cremation" or "water cremation." This process uses less energy and has a smaller carbon footprint than traditional cremation, releasing no emissions from the body itself. The organic liquid produced during this type of cremation can even be used as fertilizer. However, the equipment for alkaline hydrolysis is more expensive, and there are cultural and religious barriers to its adoption.

Frequently asked questions