Mitigating Air Pollution: Strategies For Power Plants

how to reduce air pollution from power plants

Air pollution from power plants is a pressing issue that poses significant risks to human health and the environment. Power plants emit a range of harmful pollutants, including sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxide (NOx), particulate matter (PM), carbon dioxide (CO2), and heavy metals such as mercury. These pollutants contribute to respiratory illnesses, lung disease, cardiovascular disease, and even cancer.

To address this issue, various strategies have been proposed and implemented to reduce air pollution from power plants. One approach is to transition from coal-fired power plants, which are major contributors to air pollution, to alternative sources such as renewable energy. Additionally, improvements in emission control technologies play a crucial role in reducing air pollution from coal-fired power plants. This includes the use of advanced physical technologies to control multiple air pollutants simultaneously, such as carbon control technologies and the removal of specific pollutants like mercury.

Furthermore, the implementation of air pollution control standards and regulations, such as the Clean Air Act in the United States, has been effective in reducing emissions from power plants. These standards set limits on the amount of pollutants that power plants can release into the atmosphere.

Overall, reducing air pollution from power plants requires a combination of transitioning to cleaner energy sources, adopting improved emission control technologies, and enforcing strict regulations to protect human health and the environment.

Characteristics Values
Air Pollutants Sulfur dioxide (SO2), Nitrogen oxide (NOx), Particulate matter (PM), Carbon dioxide (CO2), Mercury (Hg), Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), Lead, Cadmium, Arsenic
Health Risks Asthma attacks, Respiratory disease, Heart attacks, Premature deaths, Lung cancer, Cardiac problems
Emission Control Techniques Flue gas desulfurization (FGD), Wet scrubbers, Bag-houses, Electrostatic precipitators, Wet and dry scrubbers, Low NOx burners, Selective catalytic and non-catalytic converters, Activated carbon injection (ACI), Electrocatalytic oxidation (ECO)
Energy Sources Fossil fuels (coal, natural gas, petroleum, and other gases), Biomass, Municipal and industrial wastes, Hydro/water, Solar, Wind, Nuclear

shunwaste

Using electrostatic precipitators to remove particulate matter

Electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) are highly effective at removing particulate matter from power plant emissions. They are large industrial emission control units that use electrostatic forces to remove fine particles, such as dust and smoke, from flowing gases. The process involves charging the particles, moving them to collecting surfaces, and then removing them through the application of high-voltage direct current.

The basic design of an ESP consists of a row of thin vertical wires or rods and a stack of large flat vertical metal plates. The contaminated gas flows horizontally through the spaces between the wires or rods and then passes through the stack of plates. The wires or rods are charged with a high negative voltage of several thousand volts, which ionizes the gas as it passes through. This ionization causes the particles in the gas to become charged. The charged particles are then attracted to the grounded metal plates, where they adhere, removing them from the gas stream.

The treated air then passes out of the ESP and through a stack to the atmosphere. When enough particles have accumulated on the collection plates, they are removed through various methods, such as mechanical shaking or rapping, and fall into a hopper or bin at the bottom of the unit for disposal or recycling.

ESPs are highly efficient at reducing particle pollution, capturing fine particles smaller than 2.5 microns in diameter, which are particularly harmful if released into the atmosphere as they can be drawn deep into the lungs and trigger inflammatory reactions. ESPs can handle large volumes of gas at various temperatures and flow rates and are available in different sizes and types to suit specific requirements. They are also energy-efficient, as they apply energy only to the particulate matter being collected, rather than the flowing fluid medium.

Overall, ESPs are an important technology for reducing air pollution from power plants by removing harmful particulate matter from waste gases, improving air quality, and reducing the health risks associated with particle pollution.

shunwaste

Using wet scrubbers to remove particulate matter

Wet scrubbers are devices that remove pollutants from a gas stream. They are used to control acid gases and remove particulate matter from power plant emissions. The process involves bringing the polluted gas stream into contact with a scrubbing liquid, such as water or an alkaline solution, to capture and dissolve or absorb the pollutants. The versatility of wet scrubbers allows them to be built in various configurations, all designed to provide good contact between the liquid and the gas stream.

Wet scrubbers typically use one of three basic configurations: gas-humidification, gas-liquid contact, and gas-liquid separation. In the gas-humidification process, fine particles are agglomerated, increasing their bulk and making collection easier. The gas-liquid contact phase is one of the most critical factors affecting collection efficiency, where the particles and droplets come into contact through mechanisms such as inertial impaction, interception, diffusion, and condensation nucleation. The gas-liquid separation phase ensures the removal of as much liquid and dust as possible, with the combined dust particulates and water droplets settling into a collector.

Wet scrubbers can be categorised by their energy usage levels: low, medium, and high energy. Low-energy scrubbers, like spray tower scrubbers, are simple and commonly used for particulate control. They consist of an open vessel with spray nozzles to distribute the scrubbing liquid, with the gas stream passing upward through the sprays. Medium-energy scrubbers have a pressure drop ranging from 5 to 25 inches of water column and are effective at removing micrometer-sized particles. High-energy scrubbers, such as venturi scrubbers, expend the most energy and are necessary for capturing sub-micrometre particles. Venturi scrubbers have a converging section, a throat section, and a diverging section. The gas stream enters the converging section, accelerating toward the throat where it strikes liquid streams, shattering into small droplets that capture the pollutants.

Wet scrubbers offer several advantages, including the ability to handle high temperatures and moisture, neutralise corrosive gases, and remove both gases and particulate matter. However, they also present challenges such as corrosion, the need for entrainment separation or mist removal, and the treatment or reuse of spent liquid. Overall, wet scrubbers are a versatile and effective technology for reducing air pollution from power plants, particularly in capturing particulate matter.

shunwaste

Using low NOx burners to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions

Nitrogen oxides (NOx) are hazardous air pollutants emitted from power plants, contributing to ground-level ozone which irritates and damages the lungs. To reduce NOx emissions, low NOx burners can be used during the combustion phase. These burners have been designed to minimise nitrogen dioxide emissions, a harmful byproduct of combustion.

Low NOx burners use premixed, surface-stabilized combustion, a two-step process where fuel and air are first premixed, then the mixture burns on the outer surface of the burner element. This process ensures that combustion temperatures remain well below the peak NOx formation temperature range. The surface acts as a barrier, preventing direct contact between the fuel and air mixture and the burner element, reducing NOx emissions.

The materials used in low NOx burners also play a role in minimising NOx emissions. Factors such as the surface firing rate, heat transfer from the surface, and flame stability are considered in the design to optimise combustion and reduce NOx formation. Some burners, such as Duratherm™ and Pyromat™, further reduce emissions by operating at lower surface firing rates and radiating energy away during combustion, keeping temperatures low.

The use of low NOx burners offers several advantages. Firstly, they simplify the process of meeting low NOx emission requirements as the combustion process is decoupled from the furnace or boiler design. This means that the configuration of the combustion chamber has minimal influence on NOx formation, making emissions more predictable and easier to control. Additionally, low NOx burners can be customised to meet specific low NOx emission requirements, ensuring compliance with environmental regulations.

Overall, the adoption of low NOx burners is an effective strategy for power plants to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions, improve air quality, and mitigate the harmful health impacts of NOx pollutants.

shunwaste

Using flue gas desulfurization to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions

Flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) is a set of technologies used to remove sulfur dioxide (SO2) from exhaust flue gases of fossil-fuel power plants, as well as from the emissions of other sulfur oxide-emitting processes such as waste incineration, petroleum refineries, cement and lime kilns.

The removal of sulfur dioxide is critical to establishing a safe and clean environment where toxic emissions are kept to a minimum. Sulfur dioxide is an acidic gas that reacts easily with other substances to form harmful compounds such as sulfuric acid, sulfate particles, and sulfurous acid. When inhaled, it can irritate the nose, throat, and airways, with the potential to cause more severe problems over prolonged exposure. It is also a major air pollutant that impacts all life and is a precursor to acid rain, which has significant adverse effects on forests, freshwaters, and soils, killing insects and aquatic life, and causing paint to peel, corrosion of steel structures, and weathering of stone buildings and statues.

Since stringent environmental regulations limiting SO2 emissions have been enacted in many countries, SO2 is being removed from flue gases by a variety of methods. The most common methods used include:

  • Wet scrubbing using a slurry of alkaline sorbent, usually limestone or lime, or seawater to scrub gases.
  • Spray-dry scrubbing using similar sorbent slurries.
  • Wet sulfuric acid process recovering sulfur in the form of commercial-quality sulfuric acid.
  • SNOX FGD removes sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulates from flue gases.
  • Dry sorbent injection systems introduce powdered hydrated lime or other sorbent materials into exhaust ducts to eliminate SO3 from process emissions.

Wet scrubbing can be conducted with a Ca(OH)2 (hydrated lime) and M(OH)2 + SO2 → MSO3 + H2O (M = Ca, Mg) reaction. The alkaline slurry is sprayed across the entire tray area where the gas meets the slurry. As the sulfur dioxide comes into contact with the slurry, it is absorbed by the water and neutralised by the limestone within the slurry. The gas that continues to rise is now at a pH level closer to neutral, and the slurry then drops back down into the EHT (effluent holding tank). Any remaining slurry that continues to rise is prevented from passing by a mist eliminator. The sulfur dioxide gases are now neutralised, and the reaction that has taken place in the slurry has produced calcium sulfite (CaSO3) which, in turn, can be turned into calcium sulfate (CaSO4) using a process known as forced oxidation.

FGD scrubbers can achieve sulfur removal efficiencies of between 50% and 98%. Wet scrubbers typically achieve the highest removal rates and dry scrubbers the lowest, although newer designs for dry scrubbers are capable of achieving efficiencies of around 90%.

shunwaste

Using ultra-low emission technologies to reduce sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, and particulate matter emissions

Ultra-low emission (ULE) technologies are an effective way to reduce air pollution from power plants, specifically targeting sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxide (NOx), and particulate matter emissions. Power plants are a major source of fine particulate matter (PM2.5), which contributes to regional atmospheric haze, climate change, reduced atmospheric visibility, and adverse health effects.

ULE Technologies for SO2 Reduction

Flue gas desulfurization (FGD) is a critical process in reducing SO2 emissions from power plants. FGD involves removing SO2 from flue gas produced by industrial processes, such as power generation. There are three main types of FGD technologies:

  • Dry desulfurization: This method uses metal oxides and solid compounds like copper oxide, activated carbon, and activated manganese oxide as adsorbents to remove SO2. However, it has a low desulfurization rate and doesn't efficiently utilise adsorbents.
  • Semi-dry desulfurization: This method doesn't require reheating energy or wastewater treatment, making it more cost-effective. However, its desulfurization efficiency is lower than wet desulfurization. Semi-dry methods, such as the spray drying process, are suitable for retrofitting old power plants.
  • Wet desulfurization: This is a mature and widely used technology due to its high desulfurization rate. It uses an alkaline liquid desulfurizer to absorb SO2. However, it often requires a large area and has high investment costs.

ULE Technologies for NOx Reduction

Low-NOx combustion (LNB) technology, combined with selective catalytic reduction (SCR) or selective non-catalytic reduction, can effectively reduce NOx emissions. LNB technology minimises the formation of NOx during combustion, while SCR and selective non-catalytic reduction use catalysts to convert NOx into less harmful byproducts.

ULE Technologies for Particulate Matter Reduction

To control particulate matter emissions, traditional decontamination devices have been improved. For example, the electrostatic precipitator (ESP) has been enhanced with a low-low temperature system (LLT-ESP), reducing the flue gas temperature to 90–95 °C. This improvement increases the efficiency of capturing particulate matter, including PM2.5.

By implementing these ULE technologies, power plants can significantly reduce their emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, and particulate matter, contributing to improved air quality and reduced health risks for the population.

Frequently asked questions

Power plants emit over 80 hazardous air pollutants, including arsenic, chromium, lead, formaldehyde, acid gases, dioxins, and furans.

These pollutants can cause cancer; damage to the eyes, skin, and breathing passages; harm to the kidneys, lungs, and nervous system; cause cardiovascular disease; and even death.

Babies, children, pregnant women, older adults, and people with lung disease, heart disease, or diabetes are at an even higher risk of health issues from these pollutants.

To reduce air pollution from power plants, regulations such as the Clean Air Act and the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards have been implemented. Additionally, power plants can use emission control technologies like baghouses, electrostatic precipitators, and wet scrubbers to reduce the release of harmful pollutants.

By reducing air pollution from power plants, the number of premature deaths, asthma attacks, heart attacks, and other health issues can be significantly decreased, improving the health and well-being of people living near these plants.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment