Speed Reduction: A Solution To Pollution?

There is a direct link between speed and pollution. The faster a vehicle travels, the more fuel it burns, and the more emissions it creates. Reducing speed limits can help improve air quality and reduce pollution. For example, the Welsh government introduced new 50 mph zones in five locations in south and north-east Wales, resulting in a 47% reduction in air pollution in some areas. Similarly, the UK is trialling 60 mph speed limits on sections of its network, expecting a reduction in nitrogen dioxide (NO2) emissions. However, the impact of reduced speed limits on pollution may vary depending on driving habits and vehicle types.

Slower speeds reduce nitrogen dioxide (NO2) emissions

Slower speeds do indeed reduce nitrogen dioxide (NO2) emissions, but the relationship between speed and NO2 reduction is complex.

NO2 emissions are lowest at speeds up to 50 mph, according to research on light-duty vehicles. As a result, several locations have implemented 50 mph speed limits to improve air quality. For example, the UK's National Highways has been trialling 60 mph speed limits on sections of its network where action is needed to reduce emissions, and it expects a reduction in NO2 when traffic is reduced from 70 to 60 mph.

However, the impact of slower speeds on NO2 emissions may vary depending on the type of vehicle and the driving context. For instance, in Oslo, a reduction in speed limits from 80 to 60 km/h did not lead to a decrease in nitrogen oxides (NO2 and NOX). This discrepancy may be due to differences in vehicle types and driving conditions between the UK and Norway.

Additionally, the impact of slower speeds on NO2 emissions in urban areas is less clear. While slower speeds on highways generally reduce emissions, the same may not be true for city driving. Most vehicles operate most efficiently at higher speeds, so changing speeds below 40 mph may not make a significant difference in NO2 emissions.

Nevertheless, slower speeds can have indirect climate benefits, such as discouraging car travel and encouraging walking and cycling, which can reduce overall emissions. Additionally, slower speeds can improve traffic flow in urban areas, reducing congestion and the associated increase in emissions.

Overall, while slower speeds can reduce NO2 emissions in some contexts, the impact may vary depending on vehicle type, driving conditions, and the specific speed limit implemented.

Lower speed limits discourage aggressive driving

Lowering speed limits is an effective way to reduce air pollution and improve road safety. It discourages aggressive driving behaviours, such as speeding, frequent lane changes, and road rage. By implementing lower speed limits, drivers are less likely to engage in these risky behaviours, which not only reduce emissions but also make roads safer for everyone.

The impact of lower speed limits on aggressive driving

Aggressive driving is a significant road safety issue, often stemming from traffic congestion, time pressures, or a sense of detachment from other drivers. Lowering speed limits directly addresses these factors by reducing the speed differential between vehicles and improving traffic flow, thereby reducing the frustration and urgency that can fuel aggressive behaviours.

The benefits of lower speed limits on pollution and safety

Lower speed limits have been shown to reduce emissions and improve air quality. For example, reducing motorway speed limits from 120 to 110 km/h can lead to a 12–18% reduction in fuel consumption and lower carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide emissions. Additionally, lower speed limits improve road safety by reducing the probability and severity of crashes. A 10% decrease in average speed can result in a 40% decrease in fatal crashes.

The effectiveness of lower speed limits in different contexts

The effectiveness of lower speed limits varies depending on the context. On highways, reducing speed limits can have a significant impact on emissions and safety. For example, lowering speed limits from 70 mph to 60 mph can reduce emissions and improve air quality. In urban areas, the impact of lower speed limits on emissions is less clear, with some research suggesting that changes below 40 mph may not significantly impact engine efficiency. However, lower speed limits in cities can still improve safety and encourage active modes of transportation, such as walking and cycling.

Best practices for implementing lower speed limits

To ensure the success of lower speed limits, they should be complemented with traffic calming measures and enforcement strategies. For example, speed cameras have been associated with a 57% decrease in vehicles exceeding the speed limit, resulting in a 19% reduction in crashes. Additionally, traditional manual enforcement methods, such as radar speed detection, may not be sufficient to keep up with increasing traffic volumes.

Real-world examples of the success of lower speed limits

Several cities and countries have successfully implemented lower speed limits, resulting in significant improvements in road safety and pollution reduction. For instance, in Bogotá, Colombia, lowering the speed limit from 60 km/h to 50 km/h and using speed cameras led to a 21% drop in road deaths. Similarly, in Fortaleza, Brazil, lowering the speed limit on 16 arterial roads from 60 km/h to 50 km/h resulted in a 68.1% reduction in fatal crashes. These examples demonstrate the positive impact of lower speed limits on aggressive driving, pollution, and road safety.

Traffic circles improve traffic flow and reduce emissions

Traffic circles, or roundabouts, are circular intersections that improve traffic flow and reduce emissions. They were developed in the United Kingdom in the 1960s and are now widely used in countries like the United States, Australia, the United Kingdom, and France. Roundabouts have several key features that contribute to their effectiveness:

• The tight circle forces drivers to slow down, reducing the likelihood of severe crashes.
• Traffic flows in the same direction, eliminating head-on and right-angle collisions.
• Pedestrians cross only one direction of traffic at a time, and crossing distances are shorter, improving pedestrian safety.
• Entering vehicles must negotiate a sharp curve, resulting in slower travel speeds compared to older traffic circles.

Research shows that converting traditional intersections to roundabouts improves traffic flow and is better for the environment. The reduction in idling vehicles leads to lower vehicle emissions and fuel consumption. Studies have found significant reductions in injury crashes and all crashes after intersections were converted to roundabouts.

For example, Carmel, Indiana, a city with over 140 roundabouts, has experienced reduced injuries and deaths from crashes, as well as lower carbon emissions. The former city engineer estimates that each roundabout saves about 20,000 gallons of fuel annually, leading to significantly fewer tons of planet-heating carbon emissions. Additionally, roundabouts don't require electricity and continue functioning after storms, making them more resilient.

Furthermore, smart traffic lights at roundabouts can further enhance their benefits. A study in a small Portuguese city found that smart traffic lights can reduce CO2 emissions by 32%-40% in the vicinity of the intersection, depending on traffic density. They also increase average speed by 60%-101% and reduce waiting time by 53%-95%.

In summary, traffic circles, or roundabouts, are an effective solution to improve traffic flow and reduce emissions. They enhance safety, decrease severe crashes, and lower vehicle emissions and fuel consumption. Additionally, smart traffic lights can further amplify these benefits, making them a valuable tool in the quest for more sustainable and efficient transportation systems.

Reducing speed limits encourages active travel

Reducing speed limits is one of the quickest and most effective ways to improve air quality and reduce pollution. This is particularly true for highways, where lower speed limits can reduce emissions and improve air quality. For example, in the UK, reducing speed limits from 70 mph to 60 mph on certain sections of roads is expected to reduce nitrogen dioxide (NO2) emissions.

However, the impact of reduced speed limits in urban areas is less clear. While lower highway speeds generally reduce emissions, the same is not true for city driving. Most vehicles operate most efficiently at higher speeds, so reducing speeds in urban areas may not lead to significant improvements in air quality.

Despite this, reducing speed limits in urban areas can still have important benefits for active travel and public health. Slower speeds make roads feel safer and encourage more people to walk or cycle in their neighbourhoods. This increase in active travel can have positive effects on physical and mental health, as well as reducing carbon emissions and improving air quality.

For instance, in Glasgow, despite positive investments in active travel initiatives, roads remain unsafe for cyclists and pedestrians due to high volumes of traffic and disjointed infrastructure. The Safer Streets Bill, which proposes a national 20 mph limit on restricted roads in Scotland, is expected to reduce casualties and make roads safer for vulnerable road users.

In Minneapolis and St. Paul, speed limits were reduced to 20 mph on residential streets and 25 mph on arterial roads, with the goal of creating a safer and more pedestrian-friendly environment. City leaders hope that these changes will encourage more people to replace driving with walking and bicycling, ultimately reducing emissions.

Therefore, while the impact of reduced speed limits on pollution is mixed, particularly in urban areas, such measures can play a crucial role in encouraging active travel and creating safer, healthier, and more sustainable cities.

Lower speeds make roads safer

Lowering speed limits on roads is a common strategy to improve road safety. The traditional road safety benefits of lower vehicle speeds include saving lives and reducing the impact and likelihood of crashes. When drivers are travelling at higher speeds, they require more time to react to changes in the road environment ahead. This increased reaction time, combined with a higher speed, results in a greater distance required to stop the vehicle. As a result, higher speeds increase the probability of crashes and the severity of injuries and fatalities.

The importance of speed management in road safety is recognised by the Safe System Approach, which is a strategy that aims to reduce roadway fatalities and increase the safety of all road users. This approach is particularly concerned with vulnerable road users such as motorcyclists, bicyclists, and pedestrians, who are at a higher risk of severe injuries or death when involved in crashes with vehicles travelling at higher speeds.

In addition to reducing the likelihood and severity of crashes, lower speeds can also facilitate local community spirit, cycling, and walking, which have wider health benefits for society. Furthermore, lower speeds can lead to a reduction in traffic noise, pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and average fuel consumption.

To implement lower speed limits effectively, transportation officials should customise speed limits to specific road types and travel patterns. For example, local streets and roads need to take into account pedestrians, school zones, and cyclists, while busy, car-focused urban arterials should be set at speeds that best serve public safety and mobility.

While slower speeds do not always equate to safer roads, as the difference in speeds between vehicles can also be a factor in accidents, implementing lower speed limits as part of a comprehensive speed management program can contribute to reducing speeding-related injuries and fatalities and improving overall traffic safety.

Frequently asked questions