The Home's Pollution Footprint: A Surprising Impact

Households contribute significantly to global pollution levels, with the average US household emitting 4 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year. The primary sources of household emissions are transportation, housing, and food, with supply chain emissions from services such as healthcare, banking, and lodging also contributing. Household air pollution, caused by the use of inefficient and polluting fuels and technologies, is particularly harmful, leading to 3.2 million premature deaths annually. Exposure to indoor air pollution is especially dangerous for women and children, who spend the most time near the domestic hearth and are vulnerable to respiratory infections, heart disease, and stroke. Greenhouse gas emissions from households are driven by energy use, with refrigeration and washing clothes contributing significantly. Additionally, the carbon footprint of a household increases with income, with the wealthiest households having a carbon footprint five times that of the poorest.

Cooking with open fires or inefficient stoves

The use of solid fuels and inefficient stoves generates harmful household air pollution, which has severe health consequences. The incomplete combustion of these fuels releases particulate matter, such as fine particles of dirt, dust, smoke, soot, and black carbon, which can penetrate deep into the lungs and enter the bloodstream. As a result, exposure to household air pollution can cause and exacerbate various health issues, including respiratory infections, ischaemic heart disease, stroke, lung cancer, low birth weight, and tuberculosis. The impact is more pronounced in children, who breathe faster and have developing immune systems, making them more susceptible to the harmful effects of indoor air pollution.

In 2020, an estimated 3.2 million people died prematurely each year due to household air pollution caused by the use of inefficient stoves and open fires. This figure includes over 237,000 children under the age of five. Additionally, open fires pose a risk of burn injuries, with approximately 11 million burns and 200,000 deaths occurring annually. The use of inefficient stoves and open fires also has climate implications, as the combustion of solid fuels produces significant amounts of planet-warming carbon dioxide, contributing to climate change.

To address these issues, transitioning to cleaner cooking methods is essential. This includes adopting electric stoves, ethanol, biogas, liquid petroleum gas, or high-efficiency charcoal and biomass pellets. These alternatives produce less smoke and emit fewer pollutants, improving indoor air quality and reducing health risks. Additionally, technological advancements and cost reductions have made electric cooking more accessible to low-income households, providing a more sustainable and healthier option for those relying on inefficient cooking methods.

It is worth noting that lower-income households, particularly those belonging to racial minorities, are at a higher risk of exposure to indoor air pollution due to factors such as limited ventilation and the use of gas stoves for heating. Therefore, addressing this issue requires not only the adoption of cleaner cooking technologies but also the implementation of significant policy changes to improve access to clean fuels and technologies, reduce health inequities, and mitigate climate change.

Energy use and production

A typical US household has an annual carbon footprint of 4 metric tons of CO2 equivalent (CO2e), with a significant portion of this attributed to energy use. Residential electricity use in 2022 contributed to 582.2 metric tons of CO2e, or 9.2% of the US total. Space heating and cooling account for a substantial proportion of energy use in residential buildings, estimated at 44% in 2023. Additionally, household appliances like refrigerators and washing machines contribute to GHG emissions, with an average of 686 lbs of CO2e attributed to refrigeration per household in 2020, and 26 metric tons of CO2e released annually from washing clothes.

To reduce the environmental impact of energy use and production, individuals can take several measures. Switching to renewable energy sources, such as hydropower, solar, wind turbines, and geothermal, can significantly reduce GHG emissions. Some energy providers offer "green pricing," allowing consumers to opt for cleaner energy sources for a slightly higher rate. Additionally, reducing overall energy consumption can be achieved through home energy audits, replacing outdated appliances with energy-efficient alternatives, and adopting simple habits like turning off appliances when not in use.

It is worth noting that developing countries face distinct challenges, with women in these regions often relying on coal and biomass fuels for cooking and heating, which contributes to indoor air pollution and poses health risks. Initiatives promoting clean technologies and fuels for household cooking, heating, and lighting are crucial to improving air quality in homes and reducing health risks, especially for children.

Household appliances

The manufacturing of electronic appliances often involves the use of oils and heavy metals, and the environmental impact of mining these materials should not be underestimated. Rare earth metals such as gold, palladium, and cobalt are used in electronic equipment, and as these metals become less readily available, the environmental impact of drilling for them increases. Additionally, the production of a single electronic product can involve shipping parts from all over the world, adding to pollution levels.

The use of household appliances also contributes to pollution, particularly the emission of greenhouse gases. For example, refrigerators require a tremendous amount of energy to operate, and an older refrigerator may use up to 50% of the energy generated in a home. Electric ovens and stoves are also harmful to the environment, as the energy they use comes from burning coal. Other appliances that burn gas, such as cooktops and ovens, can affect indoor air quality and lead to kitchen concentrations of nitrogen oxides, which are respiratory irritants.

The disposal of household appliances can also have environmental consequences. If appliances end up in landfills, they may leech toxic substances that can contaminate soil, water, and air. Incineration of appliances is another disposal method, but this process can release gases that contribute to air pollution and acid rain, and the ash produced can contain heavy metals and other toxins.

To reduce the environmental impact of household appliances, individuals can invest in energy-efficient appliances, use appliances only when necessary, and properly dispose of old appliances. Additionally, a global transition to e-cooking and the use of electric heat pumps and induction cooktops can help reduce pollution and improve health outcomes.

Transportation

Road transport is the largest contributor to climate change within the transport sector, with cars, trucks, and buses producing air pollution throughout their life cycle, including during vehicle operation, fuel production, refining, and distribution, as well as during the manufacturing and disposal or recycling of the vehicle. Heavy-duty vehicles, such as trucks and buses, are of particular concern, as they make up only about 10% of all vehicles on the road but generate more than 25% of global warming emissions and a significant amount of air pollution, especially in communities adjacent to ports and interstates.

The growth in online shopping and e-commerce has also contributed to transport emissions, with the number of delivery vans on the road increasing significantly. Additionally, ride-hailing services like Uber and Lyft can emit more climate pollution than the journeys they displace due to "deadheading," or driving without passengers while waiting for a fare.

To reduce transport-related pollution, some cities are prioritizing public transport, bicycles, and pedestrian movement, creating "20-minute neighborhoods" that promote exercise and reduce vehicle dependency. Electric vehicles, improved fuel efficiency, and low-carbon fuels are also important strategies for reducing emissions from the transportation sector.

Income

Diets from the top 20% of income earners in the US produce 7.9 times more GHG emissions than the bottom 20% of diets. This disparity is also evident in developing countries, where wealthier households have greater access to cleaner cooking alternatives. In 2021, only 14% of people in urban areas of low- and middle-income countries relied on polluting fuels and technologies, compared to 49% in rural areas.

The larger carbon footprint of higher-income households can be attributed to various factors. Firstly, wealthier neighbourhoods tend to have larger homes, which require more energy to heat, cool, and power. Additionally, higher-income households may have more electronic devices, which contribute to higher energy consumption, even when in standby mode. The types of food consumed also play a role, as meat products have larger carbon footprints per calorie than grain or vegetable products.

However, it is important to note that while lower-income households may have smaller carbon footprints in certain aspects, they are often more vulnerable to the dangers of climate change. They are more likely to suffer from health issues and lack the resources to protect themselves from the impacts of heatwaves and other climate-related events.

Frequently asked questions