Food Transportation's Pollution Problem: How Bad Is It?

The global food trade is a key link in worldwide food supply chains, with food transportation accounting for a significant proportion of total food-system emissions. The distance travelled, mode of transport, and type of food transported all contribute to the environmental impact of food transportation. While some argue that eating local produce is the most effective way to reduce one's carbon footprint, others suggest that the type of food consumed has a greater impact on emissions than the distance it travels.

Food miles and carbon footprint

The transportation of food, particularly fresh produce like fruits and vegetables, contributes significantly to carbon emissions. Moving these items in refrigerated vehicles is emissions-intensive, and the energy required to maintain temperature-controlled conditions adds to the carbon footprint. The mode of transport also plays a role, with air freight generating 50 times more CO2 than sea shipping. However, sea shipping is slower, and in the demand for fresh food, faster and more polluting transport methods are often chosen.

Research suggests that food transport emissions account for nearly one-fifth of all carbon emissions in the food system. Studies by the University of Sydney and Curtin University highlight that high-income countries, constituting 12.5% of the world's population, generate nearly half (46%) of international food transport emissions. This is due to the high demand for diverse and unseasonal food items that need to be transported from other parts of the world.

To reduce the carbon footprint associated with food miles, consumers in affluent countries are encouraged to adopt more sustainable diets. This includes eating local and seasonal produce, reducing consumption of animal-derived foods, and shifting towards plant-based diets. Governments and investors can also play a role by creating sustainable food supply environments and investing in cleaner energy sources for vehicles.

While "food miles" are a useful indicator, they do not provide a complete picture of the carbon footprint of the food system. The type of food, production methods, and distribution processes also contribute to emissions. A comprehensive assessment of the carbon footprint of the global food trade, considering all these factors, is necessary to fully understand the environmental impact of our food choices.

Fossil fuels and energy consumption

Fossil fuels are a major contributor to pollution from food transportation. The burning of fossil fuels releases carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, into the atmosphere, leading to an estimated 38% of global energy use across the food value chain. The transportation sector is the largest contributor to direct greenhouse gas emissions, with indirect emissions from electricity end-use also playing a significant role. In the United States, the transportation sector accounts for about 28% of total greenhouse gas emissions.

The use of fossil fuels in food transportation has significant environmental and health costs. Air pollution from fossil fuels can cause acid rain, eutrophication, damage to crops and forests, and harm to wildlife and human health. It can lead to respiratory and cardiovascular issues, cancer, and even premature death. Globally, one in five deaths has been attributed to fossil fuel pollution, with certain communities of color and low-income communities being disproportionately affected.

Additionally, the extraction, transportation, and refining of fossil fuels can result in oil spills that harm communities, destroy habitats, erode shorelines, and contaminate water sources. Fracking, a process used in fossil fuel extraction, consumes large amounts of water and generates toxic wastewater that can contaminate groundwater and drinking water sources.

To reduce the environmental and health impacts of fossil fuel use in food transportation, a shift towards cleaner energy sources and more sustainable food choices is necessary. This includes investing in renewable fuels, improving vehicle technologies, and reducing the number of vehicle miles traveled. Consumers can also play a role by choosing locally sourced and seasonal food options, reducing the demand for long-distance food transportation.

While there are challenges and externalities associated with the use of fossil fuels in food transportation, there are also opportunities for improvement. By prioritizing sustainable practices, reducing emissions, and transitioning to low-carbon alternatives, it is possible to mitigate the pollution caused by food transportation and contribute to a healthier environment and improved livelihoods.

Air freight and CO2 emissions

Air freight is often considered the freight mode with the worst carbon footprint. Long-haul flights produce an estimated 602 grams of CO2 emissions per ton-kilometer, or 500 grams of CO2 per metric ton of freight per km of transportation. This means that on a long-haul route of 10,000 kilometers, each ton of cargo is responsible for 6 tons of CO2 emissions. In comparison, road freight emits 62 grams, rail 22 grams, and long-haul container shipping only 8 grams per ton-kilometer.

However, this negative reputation may be exaggerated, as air cargo's carbon footprint is likely comparable to trucking. For example, cargo traveling on the lower deck of passenger flights, which accounts for about half of all air cargo, has a carbon footprint similar to road freight. When cargo is carried on a passenger flight, its carbon footprint is limited to the extra fuel burned to accommodate the cargo's weight.

The choice of transportation mode can have a severe impact on the environment. Airfreight is generally considered the more significant pollutant, but it can significantly reduce travel time. Ocean freight, on the other hand, is slower but better for the environment in terms of carbon emissions. However, it is challenging to determine the overall environmental impact of each mode due to the different types and volumes of pollutants emitted.

The growth in demand for passenger and freight traffic is a significant challenge in controlling commercial aviation emissions. By 2050, commercial aircraft emissions could triple due to the projected growth in air travel and freight. However, it is important to note that other sectors, such as automobile use, electricity production, and agriculture, currently have a more substantial impact on climate change than commercial aviation.

Health impact of air pollution

Air pollution from food transportation has severe health implications. The burning of fossil fuels during the transport process releases harmful pollutants, including carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and particulate matter (PM2.5). These pollutants have far-reaching consequences for both human health and the environment.

CO2 emissions from food transportation contribute to global warming and climate change. While CO2 is not directly harmful to human health at low concentrations, the resulting climate change impacts human health in various ways. These include increased frequency and intensity of extreme weather events, such as heatwaves, droughts, and floods, which can have direct and indirect health effects.

NOx gases, including nitrogen dioxide (NO2), are released into the atmosphere primarily due to the combustion of fossil fuels. High levels of NO2 can irritate the respiratory system, leading to or exacerbating conditions such as asthma, chronic bronchitis, and lung infections. Vulnerable populations, including children and the elderly, are at a higher risk of experiencing the health impacts of NO2 pollution.

Particulate matter, especially PM2.5, is of significant concern due to its ability to be inhaled deeply into the lung tissue. PM2.5 has been linked to various adverse health outcomes, including respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. Chronic exposure to PM2.5 has been associated with increased incidence of premature mortality from cardiovascular disease, cancer, and stroke.

The health impacts of air pollution from food transportation are not limited to respiratory and cardiovascular issues. Poor air quality resulting from transportation emissions can also affect lung development and is implicated in the development of emphysema and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Additionally, socioeconomic factors play a role, with people from low-income urban areas experiencing higher levels of air pollution and related health consequences.

To mitigate the health impacts of air pollution from food transportation, it is essential to reduce emissions and improve air quality. This can be achieved by transitioning to more sustainable transport methods, promoting locally sourced and seasonal produce, and adopting dietary shifts towards more plant-based options. These measures will not only reduce the environmental impact of the food system but also improve public health and reduce the burden of air pollution-related diseases.

Reducing emissions and eating local

The transportation of food generates large amounts of carbon dioxide, contributing to air pollution and causing damage to human health. Moving fruit and vegetables in refrigerated vehicles is particularly emissions-intensive. The long-distance transportation of food also consumes large quantities of fossil fuels. It is estimated that for every 1 kcal of energy we get as food, 10 kcal of fossil fuel energy is put into the food system.

However, the impact of transport on the total emissions produced by our food is fairly insensitive to the distance travelled. In fact, for most foods, the largest sources of emissions are from land use change and farm-stage emissions, such as the application of fertilisers and enteric fermentation. Combined, these sources account for more than 80% of the footprint for most foods. On the other hand, transport accounts for less than 10% of emissions for most food products, and it is much smaller for the largest emitters.

While eating locally-sourced food may not significantly reduce the carbon emissions from food transportation, it does have other benefits. Local food is often fresher and more nutritious, as it spends less time in transit. Eating local produce also encourages people to eat with the seasons and to support local farmers who use sustainable practices.

To significantly reduce emissions from the food system, the greatest impact would be achieved by reducing our consumption of animal products.

Frequently asked questions