Plastic Recycling: Air Pollution Paradox?

Plastic is a valuable industry for many nations, but it is also one of the most polluting industries per product. Plastic contributes to air pollution across its life cycle, from production to disposal. Oil refineries convert crude oil into plastic, emitting dozens of pollutants that make the air more toxic to breathe. The burning of plastic waste is also common, with almost 40% of plastic waste burned globally, releasing toxins into the air. Furthermore, plastic recycling facilities have been identified as potential hotspots for toxic and hazardous waste.

Plastic recycling facilities emit volatile organic compounds

VOCs are also emitted during the extrusion process, which is often performed in crude facilities without proper ventilation or treatment in many developing countries. This can result in the direct discharge of VOCs into the atmosphere. The specific compounds emitted during this process can include alkanes, alkenes, monoaromatics, oxygenated VOCs (OVOCs), chlorinated VOCs (ClVOCs), and acrylonitrile.

The emission of VOCs from plastic recycling facilities can have significant health impacts on nearby residents. Studies have shown that individuals living within 500 to 900 meters of a recycling facility reported higher rates of mucocutaneous and respiratory symptoms such as nasal congestion, eczema, and sore throat. The non-cancer hazard indices (HIs) of individual VOCs were found to be less than 1.0, while the total HI in a PS recycling workshop was 1.9, indicating a potential chronic health threat.

Additionally, the global production of plastic and plastic solid waste (PSW) has grown exponentially in recent decades due to the low cost and ease of use of plastic materials. As a result, the amount of PSW in the environment has increased, contributing to "white pollution" and serving as a carrier of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) that can be transferred to aquatic organisms.

Overall, while plastic recycling is important for reducing the environmental impact of virgin plastic production, it is crucial to ensure that recycling facilities have the necessary pollution control measures in place to minimize the emission of VOCs and protect the health of workers and nearby residents.

Plastic waste is often incinerated, releasing toxins into the air

The burning of plastic waste also releases black carbon (soot), which further contributes to climate change and air pollution. Phthalates, the chemicals that make plastic flexible and soft, are endocrine disruptors, causing a range of health issues, from fertility problems and neonatal impacts to allergies and asthma. In addition, the microplastics generated from burning plastic can be inhaled, entering the bloodstream and leading to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases.

The impact of incinerating plastic waste is evident in various parts of the world. In Guatemala, 71% of households burn waste as their primary disposal method. Similarly, tribal lands often lack solid waste disposal options, leading to frequent waste burning. The toxins released from these burn sites have been detected by passive silicone bands placed at varying distances, highlighting the extent of the pollution.

Furthermore, plastic recycling facilities themselves can contribute to air pollution. Studies have shown that residents living near recycling facilities exhibit higher rates of mucocutaneous and respiratory symptoms, such as nasal congestion, eczema, and sore throat. This is attributed to exposure to volatile organic compounds emitted from the plastic recycling processes.

Overall, the incineration of plastic waste and the associated release of toxins into the air have far-reaching consequences for the environment and public health.

Microplastics can be inhaled and are present in both indoor and outdoor air

Plastic production has increased rapidly from 1.7 to 288 million tons annually within the last 60 years. Decomposed plastics are categorized based on their size, with microplastics (MPs) measuring less than 5 millimeters in diameter and nanoplastics measuring from 1 to 1000 nanometers in diameter.

MPs have been found in indoor and outdoor air samples, with indoor air samples being significantly more contaminated. Fibers were found to be the most common shape in indoor and outdoor airborne microplastics, followed by fragments. Transparent and black-colored microplastic particles were predominant in both indoor and outdoor air samples. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), and polystyrene (PS) were the most prevalent polymer types in both indoor and outdoor environments.

MPs are now ubiquitous environmental contaminants that lead to unavoidable human exposure. They have been found in human blood, placenta, spleen, liver, lung, and other body tissues. The smallest particles can pass into the bloodstream and cause cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. MPs have been shown to have significant negative effects on human health, as well as on terrestrial and marine animals.

Research to better understand how exposure to MPs correlates to health is growing. To fully understand the possible impacts of MPs on human health, it is necessary to quantify MP exposure and identify critical data gaps.

Recycling plastic reduces the need for virgin plastic production, a polluting process

Plastic is one of the most polluting industries per product, and it is a major contributor to air pollution. The production of plastic is a polluting process, releasing greenhouse gases and other pollutants during the manufacturing stage, which are damaging to the environment and human health. Oil and gas drilling, which are required to produce the fossil fuels that make up 90-93% of plastics, release a huge number of contaminants into the air, including benzene, toluene, carbon monoxide, hydrogen sulfide, and particulate matter.

Recycling plastic reduces the need for virgin plastic production, and therefore limits the environmental impact of creating new plastic. Recycling plastic prevents more fossil fuels from being extracted and lowers the demand for oil and gas drilling. Recycling also reduces the amount of plastic waste that is incinerated, landfilled, or dumped in the ocean, which are all incredibly polluting methods of disposal.

However, it is important to note that the recycling process itself can also be a source of air pollution. Recycling facilities have been identified as potential hotspots for toxic and hazardous waste, emitting volatile organic compounds into the atmosphere. A study of residents living near a plastic recycling facility found that those within 500 meters of the facility reported significantly higher levels of nasal congestion, eczema, and sore throat, which were attributed to airborne pollutants.

Despite the potential for pollution, recycling remains an important tool in reducing the environmental impact of plastic. By encouraging recycling and reducing plastic consumption, we can limit the need for virgin plastic production and create pathways to cleaner air and better health.

Plastic recycling facilities in some countries lack safe working conditions and pollution control measures

Plastic recycling is a significant contributor to air pollution, and the process of recycling plastics can emit noxious gases into the atmosphere. While recycling plastic is a step towards lowering our environmental impact, it can also become a problem when strict environmental and workplace standards are not followed.

In many countries, plastic recycling facilities lack safe working conditions and pollution control measures. For instance, in Turkey, workers in plastic recycling facilities often lack basic protective equipment to prevent toxic exposure or limit the inhalation of air pollutants. This situation is not unique to Turkey; many recycling facilities in South and Southeast Asia face similar issues, with workers melting down plastics without wearing professional protective gear. As a result, the air in these areas becomes thick with toxic, plastic-derived emissions.

The health risks associated with exposure to these toxins are significant. Residents living near plastic recycling facilities in Adana, Turkey, have reported various health problems, including asthma, trouble breathing, rashes, eye irritation, and cancer. Similarly, in Ova, a woman named Gönül, who has lived there for 26 years, has developed asthma, bronchitis, and hypertension, which she attributes to the plastic recycling facilities in the area.

The lack of safe working conditions and pollution control measures in plastic recycling facilities is a pressing issue that needs to be addressed. It not only endangers the health of workers but also negatively impacts the surrounding communities, demonstrating the urgent need for stricter regulations and enforcement of environmental and health standards in the plastic recycling industry worldwide.

Frequently asked questions