Nestle's Environmental Impact: Air And Water Pollution

Nestlé, the world's largest food and beverage company, has been at the centre of numerous controversies regarding its environmental impact, particularly concerning water and air pollution. The company has been accused of exploiting natural water sources, contributing to plastic pollution, and failing to address its role in the global plastic pollution crisis adequately. Nestlé's practices have sparked protests and campaigns by environmental groups such as Greenpeace and Break Free From Plastic, who demand accountability and more sustainable practices. With its far-reaching influence and impact on the environment, Nestlé's actions and decisions have significant consequences for communities and ecosystems worldwide.

Nestle's plastic pollution

Nestlé has been identified as one of the worst plastic polluters in the world. The company has a plastic footprint of 1.7 million tonnes annually, with a plastic pollution footprint of 95,000 tonnes a year across just six countries. This is enough to cover 15 football pitches every day.

Nestlé has been called out for its production of single-use plastic, which Greenpeace activists say has created a 'monster' that is polluting streets, rivers, and beaches worldwide. In 2021, activists confronted executives with plastics found polluting the world’s oceans, urging the company to take responsibility for its role in the global plastic pollution crisis.

Nestlé has also been criticised for its plastic pollution in Southeast Asia, where it sells non-recyclable sachets that frequently end up in waterways and oceans. In the Philippines, Filipino activists from Break Free From Plastic sent plastic waste back to Nestlé, demanding that the company stop greenwashing its plastic pollution. Nestlé has been identified as a top plastic polluter in the country, with brand audits in 2017 and 2019 naming it the worst plastic polluter.

Despite these criticisms, Nestlé has taken some steps to address its plastic pollution. The company has committed to making 100% of its packaging recyclable or reusable by 2025 and has pledged to work across the industry to create a circular economy for plastic. Nestlé has also partnered with Project STOP, an initiative to prevent plastic leakage into the ocean in Southeast Asia, and has invested in developing sustainable packaging materials. However, the company has been accused of failing to act with the urgency and ambition needed to address the plastic pollution crisis, with activists calling on Nestlé to reduce its production of throwaway packaging and invest in truly sustainable refill and reuse delivery systems.

Nestle's water privatisation

Nestle has been criticised for its role in the privatisation of water. The company has been accused of pushing to privatise and control public water resources, and then selling it back to consumers in plastic bottles. This has led to accusations of the company bullying communities into giving up control of their water and restricting access to water for poor communities.

Nestle's former CEO and Chairman of the Board, Peter Brabeck, has been quoted as saying that the idea that humans have a right to water is "extreme". While he has since backtracked on this statement, it has been interpreted as indicating that Nestle does not believe water is a human right. This view is controversial, as it stands in direct contradiction to the position taken by the United Nations and human rights organisations.

In response to criticism, Nestle has emphasised its commitment to making 100% of its packaging reusable or recyclable by 2025. However, the company has been accused of greenwashing, with activists claiming that Nestle plans to achieve this goal primarily by burning plastic waste, creating toxins that harm people and wildlife.

Nestle has also been criticised for its water bottling operations, which have been accused of harming water resources and lowering water tables, making safe water less accessible and affordable for local residents. Organisations such as FLOW and the Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation (MCWC) have led legal efforts to challenge Nestle's permits for groundwater extraction and call for greater transparency and accountability in the company's water monitoring plans.

Nestle's greenwashing

Nestlé has been accused of greenwashing, particularly in relation to its plastic pollution and its sustainability programs.

Plastic Pollution

Nestlé has been named one of the worst plastic polluters in recent brand audits and cleanups. The company has been criticised for producing large quantities of single-use plastic, with a plastic footprint of 1.7 million tonnes annually and a plastic pollution footprint of 95,000 tonnes a year across just six countries. Nestlé has also been called out for selling non-recyclable sachets in Southeast Asia that often end up in waterways and oceans. In response to these criticisms, Nestlé has acknowledged the impact of its throwaway plastics and has committed to making all its packaging reusable or recyclable by 2025. However, the company has been accused of greenwashing as it plans to achieve this by burning plastic waste, creating toxins that harm wildlife and people's health.

Sustainability Programs

Nestlé has also been accused of greenwashing through its sustainability programs, particularly in the cocoa industry. Nestlé's Cocoa Plan, along with similar programs by other chocolate companies, has been criticised for a lack of transparency and accountability. There are few or no publicly available standards, and monitoring is done by the companies themselves, leading to little impact beyond misleading consumers. Instead of investing in these programs, critics argue that Nestlé should pay cocoa farmers a living income and address issues such as hazardous child labour and poverty wages in the cocoa supply chain.

Water Use

Nestlé has also been criticised for its water use practices, particularly in Michigan, where it pays a low price to pump a significant amount of water while nearby communities lack access to clean drinking water.

Overall, while Nestlé has made commitments to improve its environmental practices, these have been met with scepticism and accusations of greenwashing due to a lack of transparency, specificity, and meaningful action.

Nestle's impact on local communities

Nestlé's impact on local communities has been a subject of concern for many years. The company has been accused of polluting the air and water in several countries, with single-use plastic packaging that is often unrecyclable and contributes to ocean, waterway, and park pollution. Nestlé has a plastic footprint of 1.7 million tonnes annually and is reported to have a plastic pollution footprint of 95,000 tonnes per year across just six countries. This is enough to cover 15 football pitches daily.

Nestlé is also a major producer of highly polluting single-use multi-layered sachets, predominantly in low- and middle-income countries, which frequently end up polluting waterways and oceans. In the Philippines, for instance, Nestlé was named the worst plastic polluter in waste and brand audits in 2017 and 2019. In 2021, an investigative report by Reuters revealed that Nestlé did not respond to questions about the health and environmental impacts of burning plastics in cement kilns.

In addition to plastic pollution, Nestlé has been criticized for its water extraction practices. The company has been accused of exploiting groundwater in areas where the public needs it the most, such as in Pakistan, and selling it for profit. Nestlé has also faced opposition in the United States, particularly in Oregon and California, where it has been criticized for drying up creeks and springs to sell water in plastic bottles. Nestlé Waters, which owns 51 brands, presents itself as a responsible steward of America's water and an eco-friendly company. However, critics characterize it as a "predatory" water company that targets struggling communities with exaggerated job promises and employs cheap strategies to win over local officials.

Nestlé's impact on local communities also extends to its marketing practices. The company has been criticized for its aggressive marketing of baby formula in developing countries, claiming that it is better for infants than breast milk. This has led to millions of infant deaths and nutritional deficiencies, impacting the health and lifespan of people in the developing world.

While Nestlé has acknowledged the impact of its throwaway plastics and made commitments to increase recycling and reusable packaging, activists and environmental groups argue that the company is not acting with sufficient urgency or ambition to address its role in the global plastic pollution crisis.

Nestle's false solutions

Nestle has been accused of pushing false solutions to its plastic pollution problem. Greenpeace and other environmental organizations have criticized Nestle's reliance on single-use plastics and its failure to take responsibility for the environmental impact of its products.

One of the main false solutions that Nestle has been accused of promoting is "plastic neutrality." Nestle has claimed to have achieved plastic neutrality, but Greenpeace Philippines has expressed dismay over the lack of concrete plans to cut the production of single-use packaging and the absence of data on historical plastic production in the country. "Plastic neutrality" is a system that allows companies like Nestle to offset their plastic production by purchasing credits from other companies, without actually reducing their own plastic output. This misleading program has been criticized for offloading the responsibility for plastic waste onto developing countries.

Another false solution attributed to Nestle is its commitment to making 100% of its packaging reusable or recyclable by 2025. Instead of significantly reducing plastic waste, Nestle has been accused of planning to achieve this goal primarily by burning plastic waste, creating toxins that harm wildlife and people's health. This practice of burning plastic has been linked to increased carbon dioxide emissions and the release of potentially harmful toxins, including dioxins and furans, which are known carcinogens.

Nestle has also been criticized for its focus on substituting plastic with other single-use materials, such as paper or biodegradable alternatives. This approach risks creating new environmental problems, rather than addressing the underlying issue of single-use packaging. Additionally, Nestle has a history of failing to meet its voluntary commitments, such as a target by Nestle Waters NA to double the recycling rate of plastic bottles by 2018.

In summary, Nestle's false solutions to plastic pollution include misleading claims of "plastic neutrality," burning plastic waste, promoting single-use alternatives, and failing to meet voluntary commitments. Greenpeace and other activists have demanded that Nestle take genuine responsibility for its environmental impact, reduce its plastic production, and invest in truly sustainable and reusable packaging solutions.

Frequently asked questions