Plastic Pollution: Harmful Impact On Our Planet

Plastic pollution is a pressing issue that affects all ecosystems, including land, freshwater, and marine environments. It is caused primarily by the improper disposal of plastic waste, which breaks down into microplastics and releases toxic chemicals, impacting the health of both wildlife and humans. Plastic pollution is driven by single-use products, such as bottles, bags, and straws, as well as industrial activities and littering. With over 460 million metric tons of plastic produced annually, it has led to the degradation of ecosystems and contributed to climate change. Efforts to combat plastic pollution include reducing consumption, promoting recycling, and advocating for stronger national plans and global treaties to phase out harmful plastic production and usage.

Plastic waste in landfills

Plastic pollution is a pressing issue, and plastic waste in landfills is a significant contributor to this problem. Landfills are rapidly filling up with plastic waste, which has a slow decomposition rate and can release harmful chemicals into the environment.

Plastics in landfills can take years to break down into microplastics, and even then, it is uncertain whether they fully degrade or biodegrade. This process can have negative consequences, such as the destabilization of the structural stability of the landfill. Landfills are meant to prevent any exchange with the surrounding environment, but older, unrestricted contaminant release landfills do not control environmental contamination.

Microplastics, or MPs, are emerging pollutants, and landfills are a critical source of them. These tiny plastic particles, ranging from 0.03 to 5 mm in size, are released into the environment through primary and secondary sources. Primary sources include plastic pellets from industries, washing machines, and personal care products, while secondary sources include the erosion of plastic bags and packing products. MPs have been detected in high concentrations in refuse samples from landfills, indicating the significant role of landfills in their distribution and pollution.

The global mass of produced plastic is staggering, exceeding the biomass of all land and marine animals combined as of 2020. This has resulted in a significant amount of plastic waste, with landfills receiving a substantial portion of it. In 2018, landfills in the European Union alone received 7.2 million tons of plastic. Packaging plastics, such as HDPE, LDPE, PP, PET, PS, and PVC, constitute a large portion of plastics in landfills.

To address plastic waste in landfills, some countries have implemented taxes to discourage the disposal of plastics in landfills, providing an incentive for recycling. However, the recycling process must be carefully managed to ensure it does not become a source of pollution itself, as seen in some informal and formal recycling facilities in Asia.

Plastic's slow decomposition rate

Plastic is one of the most useful inventions of humanity, but it is also one of its most persistent problems. Plastic's slow decomposition rate is a major obstacle for the rapidly filling landfills worldwide. Unlike natural materials like wood or paper, plastic is synthetic, and its tightly bonded carbon structure does not break down easily. This durability is why only about nine per cent of plastic is recycled globally, despite decades of recycling efforts. The rest ends up in landfills, incinerators, or, more often than not, in our oceans and landscapes.

The decomposition rate of plastic varies depending on the item. A plastic straw, for example, can be used for 15 minutes but can remain in the environment for 200 years. Single-use plastic grocery bags take about two decades to break down, while plastic water bottles made with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) can take approximately 450 years. Experts estimate that some plastics can last hundreds of years before they finally break down.

The rate of degradation depends on the intrinsic properties of the plastic, such as polymer type, molecular weight, and fillers, as well as environmental conditions such as temperature, moisture, and air. The extrinsic properties of the plastic, such as size and shape, also play a role. For example, a plastic bag and a spherical HDPE resin bead have the same polymer volume, but the bag has a much larger surface area, so its initial degradation rate will be nearly 400 times faster than that of the bead.

The slow decomposition of plastic has led to a growing amount of plastic waste in the environment, causing problems throughout the ecosystem. Studies suggest that the bodies of 90% of seabirds contain plastic debris, and plastic has been found on beaches and in the ocean worldwide. The incineration of plastic waste releases toxins, including heavy metals, persistent organic pollutants (POPs), and other toxic chemicals, which can have significant health effects and contribute to air pollution.

To address the issue of plastic waste and its slow decomposition, efforts have been made to reduce plastic consumption, promote recycling, and develop alternatives to traditional plastics. Plant-based plastics made from corn or sugarcane and plastic-eating bacteria are among the innovations aimed at tackling this global issue.

Plastic incineration

Incineration facilities, often referred to as waste-to-energy (WTE) facilities, claim to generate electricity from burning waste. However, the electricity produced from plastic incineration is even dirtier than coal, and the process is not an effective solution to the plastic crisis. Incinerators rely on energy-dense materials like plastic to maintain high burn temperatures, incentivizing the continued production and use of plastic. Additionally, the presence of incinerators can compete with local recycling systems and discourage efforts to reduce, reuse, or recycle plastic waste.

The negative impacts of plastic incineration are not limited to the environment; they also have social and economic implications. Incinerators are disproportionately located in deprived and diverse neighbourhoods, exacerbating environmental injustice and potentially exposing vulnerable communities to toxic emissions. The health risks associated with incinerator emissions are well-documented, and studies have found contaminated chicken eggs and adverse health effects on nearby residents.

Overall, plastic incineration is a significant contributor to air pollution and has far-reaching consequences for the environment, public health, and society. While it may be a common method of waste disposal, particularly in areas lacking solid waste collection services, the negative impacts of incineration underscore the urgent need for alternative waste management strategies and a reduction in plastic consumption.

Plastic in the ocean

One of the significant issues with plastic in the ocean is its persistence. Unlike organic waste, plastic does not decompose, which means it can remain in the marine environment indefinitely. Over time, larger plastic items break down into smaller pieces called microplastics, which can be as small as 5 millimeters or less in width. These microplastics, including microfibers from synthetic clothing and fishing nets, can absorb harmful pollutants such as pesticides, dyes, and flame retardants, and later release them into the ocean.

The presence of microplastics in the ocean has severe ecological implications. These tiny particles can be mistaken for food by marine organisms, leading to ingestion. Studies suggest that the bodies of 90% of seabirds contain plastic debris, and it is estimated that 60% of all seabird species have consumed plastic, with predictions that this number will increase to 99% by 2050. Additionally, plastic ingestion has been linked to intestinal injuries and deaths in fish, with potential impacts on larger marine mammals and even human seafood eaters.

The impact of plastic in the ocean extends beyond the ingestion of microplastics. Marine animals can also become entangled in plastic debris, leading to injuries and deaths. This issue affects a wide range of species, from small finches to large whales and endangered wildlife such as Hawaiian monk seals and Pacific loggerhead sea turtles. The accumulation of plastic in critical habitats, such as breeding grounds, further exacerbates the problem.

Addressing the issue of plastic in the ocean requires a multifaceted approach. On a global scale, governments and industries need to implement systemic changes to reduce plastic production and improve waste management. This includes promoting recycling, reducing plastic consumption, and supporting initiatives like the "Global Alliance to End Plastic Waste," which aims to clean the environment and increase recycling efforts. Additionally, raising awareness about the extent of the problem and encouraging individuals to reduce, reuse, and recycle plastic products can help mitigate plastic pollution.

Plastic microbeads in soil

Plastic does create pollution. The burning of plastic releases a number of toxins, including dioxins, furans, mercury, and polychlorinated biphenyls. This can have detrimental effects on human health and the environment, contributing to air pollution. Plastic waste also enters the environment, causing problems throughout the ecosystem. For example, studies suggest that the bodies of 90% of seabirds contain plastic debris.

Plastic microbeads are small, manufactured plastic beads, typically measuring less than 5mm in diameter. They are commonly used in health, cosmetic, and beauty products, such as exfoliating cleansers and toothpastes. These microbeads are designed to be small and solid, and they do not degrade or dissolve in water. This property allows them to pass through water filtration systems and eventually end up in oceans, lakes, and rivers. The presence of plastic microbeads in aquatic environments poses a threat to marine life, the environment, and even human health.

The use of plastic microbeads in rinse-off cosmetic, personal care, and cleaning products contributes to their entry into the soil and water ecosystems. When these products are washed down the drain, the microbeads can enter our waterways and persist in the environment.

To address the environmental concerns associated with plastic microbeads, several countries have taken steps to ban or phase out their use. In 2015, the United States banned the use of microbeads in cosmetics and personal care products through the Microbead-Free Waters Act. Similarly, Australia has implemented a voluntary industry phase-out of plastic microbeads in rinse-off personal care, cosmetic, and cleaning products.

Natural alternatives to plastic microbeads are available, such as pumice, salt, and crushed seed kernels, which can be used as abrasives or exfoliants. These alternatives can help reduce the impact of plastic microbeads on the environment and human health.

Frequently asked questions