Who Is To Blame For Plastic Pollution?

Plastic pollution is one of the most pressing environmental issues of our time. While individual consumers can make a difference by reducing their use of single-use plastics, the responsibility for tackling this crisis ultimately lies with companies, investors, and governments. Research has revealed that just 20 companies are responsible for over half of the world's single-use plastic waste, with 100 companies contributing to more than 90% of global plastic waste. These companies, primarily petrochemical corporations, have directed attention towards individual consumers rather than addressing the problem at its source. However, it is important to note that the private sector is not monolithic, and some companies have demonstrated a commitment to sustainability. To effectively combat plastic pollution, a combination of consumer pressure, corporate intervention, and government action is required.

Companies produce the most plastic waste

The petrochemical industry has often placed the blame on consumers, directing attention towards behaviour change from end-users rather than addressing the root cause. However, the onus should be on companies, investors, and governments to drive change and reduce plastic waste. This involves transitioning to a circular economy based on recycled materials rather than virgin polymers from fossil fuels. Consumer pressure is key, but it is these larger entities that have the power to make systemic change.

The Plastic Waste Makers Index, developed by the Minderoo Foundation with partners including Wood Mackenzie and experts from the London School of Economics and the Stockholm Environment Institute, is a crucial tool for identifying the sources of plastic waste. This index has revealed the stark disconnect between the promises of companies and their actual practices. Many companies have marketed their dedication to sustainability, yet they plan to increase virgin plastic production rather than reduce it. This expansion of single-use plastic companies poses a massive threat to the environment, and their financial backers and governments must also be held accountable.

While individual efforts to reduce single-use plastic consumption are important, they are not enough to combat the plastic pollution crisis. The private sector must take greater action, and voluntary actions by companies are not sufficient. Regional and sectoral gaps exist in green club membership, and companies with a history of reporting on plastics issues tend to be the ones joining these initiatives. To effectively tackle plastic pollution, there needs to be a focus on reducing plastic production, not just improving waste management solutions.

Fossil fuels are the primary material

The link between the fossil fuel and plastic industries is well-established, with many oil and gas companies, such as Mobil, Shell, Chevron, and Total, also manufacturing plastic resins. This connection has led to a mutual dependence, where the expansion of oil and gas production has lowered the cost of petrochemicals, making new plastics cheaper to produce. In turn, the increasing demand for plastic has driven greater extraction and use of fossil fuels.

This relationship has significant environmental implications. As plastic production rises, so does the demand for fossil fuels, leading to expanded fossil fuel infrastructure and increased pollution risks for communities along the plastic supply chain. Additionally, the plastic life cycle, from production to disposal, generates greenhouse gas emissions at each stage, exacerbating climate change.

To address this issue, there have been calls for a transition to a circular economy based on recycled materials rather than virgin polymers derived from fossil fuels. While consumer pressure is essential, more significant action is needed from companies, investors, and governments to reduce plastic pollution and its contribution to climate change.

In conclusion, fossil fuels are the primary material in plastic production, and the intrinsic link between the two industries has severe environmental consequences. To mitigate these impacts, a shift away from fossil fuel-derived plastic and towards recycled alternatives is necessary, requiring collective efforts from various stakeholders.

Poor waste management contributes

Poor waste management is a significant contributor to plastic pollution. Mismanagement of plastic waste occurs due to a lack of proper collection, open burning, unwise dumping, and poorly managed dumping sites. The plastic waste that ends up in landfills is often not properly treated, leading to environmental and ecosystem degradation.

The improper disposal of plastic waste, including burning and dumping, releases harmful emissions into the environment. In 2015, the plastic production, processing, and disposal processes emitted about 1781 Mt of CO2 into the environment. This issue is projected to worsen, with emissions predicted to reach 6500 Mt by 2050.

Inadequate waste management practices also result in plastic pollution entering aquatic ecosystems. Population density, income level, and solid waste generation rates contribute to the amount of plastic waste entering oceans and seas. For example, in 2010, approximately 4.8–12.7 Mt of the total 275 Mt of plastic waste generated by 192 coastal countries ended up in the ocean.

The lack of technical skills for managing hazardous waste, insufficient infrastructure for recycling, and a lack of awareness of rules and regulations further exacerbate the problem of plastic pollution. As a result, the massive pile-up of plastic waste negatively impacts the environment and ecosystems, affecting human livelihoods, food production capabilities, and social well-being.

To address this challenge, improvements in waste management practices are necessary. This includes enhancing collection processes, ensuring proper disposal, and promoting sustainable alternatives to plastic, such as recycled materials. By addressing the issue of poor waste management, we can mitigate the contribution to plastic pollution and minimize its adverse effects on the environment and ecosystems.

People can pressure companies

While companies are the primary contributors to plastic pollution, people can pressure these companies to reduce their plastic waste. People can demand that companies rethink their product cycles and focus on reusing materials instead of single-use plastics that end up in landfills.

People can also advocate for a shift in attention towards the front end of the process, encouraging companies to develop fundamentally different flows of new types of materials to meet people's needs. This could involve pressuring companies to reduce their plastic use and transition to recycled materials instead of virgin polymers from fossil fuels.

In addition, consumers can push companies to move towards circular-economy-based alternatives. This involves building a circular economy in which plastic is reused, reducing the amount of plastic that ends up as waste. People can support companies that have made commitments to reduce plastic pollution and hold other companies accountable for their environmental pledges.

Furthermore, individuals can demand that companies address the root cause of plastic pollution, which is the excessive use of plastic, rather than solely focusing on recycling. Recycling is important to reduce the waste stream, but it does not address the core problem of plastics entering the environment. People can also support policies and regulations that curb plastic production and limit the use of plastic, in addition to pushing for alternatives to fossil fuels as the primary material in plastic production.

Governments must intervene

While individual consumers can make a small difference by pledging to stop using single-use plastics, the reality is that a handful of companies and banks are behind the production of most single-use plastics. According to the Plastic Waste Makers Index, 20 companies are responsible for over half of the world's single-use plastic waste, with 100 companies behind 90% of global single-use plastic production. ExxonMobil tops the list, contributing 5.9 million metric tons to global plastic waste, followed by the US company Dow and China's Sinopec.

The private sector must take greater action to reduce plastic pollution, and companies must do more than pay lip service to sustainability. However, the onus cannot be placed solely on consumers and companies. Governments must intervene to break the cycle of inaction and address the problem at its source.

Firstly, governments must implement policies to improve waste management. While richer countries can contribute through foreign investments in waste management infrastructure, domestic policies are crucial. This includes ensuring that waste is adequately managed through recycling, incineration, or sealed landfills to prevent plastic pollution from reaching our oceans.

Secondly, governments should provide incentives and regulations to promote the transition to a circular economy. This includes encouraging the use of recycled materials instead of virgin polymers derived from fossil fuels. Governments can also support and invest in companies that adhere to sustainable practices, such as those committed to making 100% of their packaging recyclable and increasing the recyclability of their products.

Additionally, governments must address the role of the petrochemical industry in plastic pollution. As the primary material used in single-use plastic production, oil and gas are not only fueling climate change but also devastating our oceans. Governments should encourage and regulate the industry to move towards circular-economy-based alternatives, reducing plastic production and promoting renewable sources.

Furthermore, governments can play a role in monitoring and verifying the claims and practices of companies regarding their environmental impact and sustainability goals. This ongoing monitoring can help assess the effectiveness of policies and interventions, ensuring that corporations are held accountable for their actions and commitments.

Frequently asked questions