Nemo's Plight: Plastic Pollution's Impact

The popular animated film Finding Nemo depicts the vast Pacific Ocean as a pristine, cobalt blue stretch of marine life. However, in reality, the ocean is filled with plastic pollution, threatening the lives of marine creatures like Nemo and his friends. Point Nemo, the most remote spot in the ocean, is also plagued by plastic pollution, with up to 26 microplastic particles per cubic meter found in seawater samples. Plastic pollution enters the ocean through various sources, such as plastic bags, disposable razors, and industrial waste, endangering aquatic life and finding its way into our food systems. The chemicals in plastic pose risks to both marine and human health, highlighting the urgent need to address plastic pollution and protect our oceans and ourselves.

Plastic pollution in Point Nemo

Point Nemo, the most remote spot in the ocean, is plagued with plastic pollution. It is so far-flung that the nearest humans are often those aboard the International Space Station, hundreds of miles above Earth. Located nearly 1,700 miles from the nearest island, Point Nemo is the oceanic point farthest from land on our planet.

Despite its secluded location, Point Nemo is affected by plastic pollution. Sea vessels participating in the eight-month-long worldwide Volvo Ocean Race took seawater samples from Point Nemo, which contained up to 26 microplastic particles per cubic meter. These plastic-contaminated samples, which were gathered during leg seven of the race from New Zealand to Brazil, represent the first instance in which Point Nemo water has been assessed for plastic content.

The seawater was first analyzed by Dr. Soren Gutekunst of the GEOMAR Institute for Ocean Research Kiel in Germany. “This means that even if I put a plastic bottle in the River Thames, maybe at some point I will find microplastics from this bottle down in South Africa,” Gutekunst told Sky News. While the news of plastic pollution in even the most remote locations is concerning, the level of pollution is still far below that of areas such as the Mediterranean or the South China Sea, which contain the highest levels of microplastic pollution.

Point Nemo was first discovered by survey engineer Hrvoje Lukatela in 1992. Not even marine life drifts into Point Nemo, as it’s situated in the South Pacific Gyre, one of the ocean’s most lifeless locations. The only people that can get anywhere close to the spot are floating more than 200 miles above the water's surface on the International Space Station.

Plastic pollution entering the ocean can be transported through currents and gyres, or sink to the bottom of the ocean, where hotspots of microplastics have been discovered in sediments. Sometimes marine animals eat macro plastic waste — cups, straws, plastic wrap — which has known physical effects, like blocking the digestive tract of loggerhead sea turtles and sperm whales. Less understood and potentially more harmful are the chemicals in macro and microplastics that sea animals ingest.

Plastic bags and their impact on wildlife

Plastic pollution is a pressing environmental issue, with plastic waste overwhelming the planet and harming wildlife. While plastic offers convenience and has been used in various innovations, from medicine to space travel, it has a dark side. Single-use plastics account for 40% of the plastic produced annually, and plastic bags are a significant contributor to this waste.

Plastic bags have a detrimental impact on wildlife, both in marine environments and rural areas. They are often mistaken for food by animals such as turtles, whales, and birds, leading to fatal consequences. The bags cannot be digested or passed, so they remain in the gut, blocking food digestion and causing a slow and painful death. In August 2000, an eight-metre Bryde's whale died after ingesting 6m2 of plastic, including numerous plastic bags. Beaked whale species are highly susceptible to swallowing plastic bags due to their resemblance to their prey, squid. Other large whale species that feed by taking large mouthfuls of water are also at risk of accidentally ingesting plastic bags.

Additionally, plastic bags can entangle and strangle wildlife. A flamingo strangled itself with a plastic bag, unable to free itself. A platypus suffered deep cuts from a bag wrapped around its body, and a pelican died after consuming plastic bags while diving for fish. Turtles have been found with plastic bags lodged in their throats, and calves have ingested bags, leading to their deaths.

The impact of plastic bags on wildlife is not limited to individual animal deaths. Plastic can remain in the environment for hundreds or even thousands of years, and once an animal decays after ingesting plastic, the plastic is released back into the environment, continuing to harm other creatures. It is estimated that at least 100,000 mammals and birds die from plastic bags annually, and the number of affected fish is unknown but likely numbers in the millions.

The far-reaching effects of plastic pollution are evident even in remote locations like Point Nemo, the oceanic pole of inaccessibility. Despite its isolation, Point Nemo is plagued by plastic pollution, with seawater samples containing up to 26 microplastic particles per cubic meter. This highlights that no area of the planet is untouched by plastic waste, and the impact of this pollution on wildlife, including Nemo and his anemone buddy, is an ongoing concern that requires global responses and comprehensive policies to address effectively.

Plastic waste in the Pacific Ocean

The Pacific Ocean is the largest of the world's oceans, covering approximately 30% of the Earth's surface. It is home to some of the most diverse ecosystems on the planet, including coral reefs, mangroves, and coastal wetlands. However, this vast ocean is not immune to the global plastic pollution crisis.

Plastic pollution in the Pacific Ocean is a significant environmental concern, with plastic accounting for at least 85% of total marine waste. The impacts of this pollution are far-reaching, affecting marine life, ecosystems, and the livelihoods of communities dependent on the ocean for food, trade, and tourism. Plastic waste can be found not only floating on the surface but also sinking to the ocean depths, where it accumulates in sediments.

One of the most remote spots in the Pacific Ocean, Point Nemo, is a stark example of the extent of plastic pollution. Located nearly 1,700 miles from the nearest island, it is the oceanic point farthest from land. Despite its isolation, seawater samples from Point Nemo contained up to 26 microplastic particles per cubic meter. This discovery underscores the pervasive nature of plastic pollution, reaching even the most distant regions of our oceans.

Plastic pollution in the Pacific Ocean is driven by various factors, including marine currents and human activities such as tourism and waste mismanagement. The impact of plastic waste on marine life is profound, with animals ingesting macro and microplastics, leading to physical blockages and the consumption of toxic chemicals. The Pacific Islands, in particular, are on the front lines of this crisis, with local marine scientists finding microplastics in common food sources.

To address the plastic pollution crisis in the Pacific Ocean, a multi-faceted approach is necessary. Initiatives such as the Pacific Ocean Litter Project (POLP), funded by the Australian Government, aim to reduce marine plastic litter in the coastal environments of Pacific Island countries by targeting single-use plastics. Additionally, organizations like the Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) are working to implement effective waste management practices and increase plastic recycling rates. Internationally, the United Nations is partnering with countries to improve plastic regulations and engage communities in taking action against plastic pollution.

The fight against plastic pollution in the Pacific Ocean is gaining momentum, with Pacific Island nations advocating for a legally binding global treaty. Through collective efforts, there is hope for a future where the Pacific Ocean, including beloved characters like Nemo and his anemone buddy, can thrive free from the threat of plastic pollution.

Microplastics and pharmaceuticals

Microplastics are plastic particles with a diameter of ≤5 mm. They are released into the environment through various pathways, including the improper disposal of plastic products and the excretion of ingested microplastics from the body. Due to their microscopic size, microplastics are easily ingested by marine organisms and can accumulate in their tissues, potentially transferring up the food chain.

Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) are synthetic chemicals used in various personal care and medicinal products. They are designed to have specific biological effects on the human body. However, when released into the environment, they can have unintended consequences. PPCPs have been detected in water bodies, co-existing with microplastics. The extensive use of PPCPs has led to their ubiquitous presence in the environment, resulting in their co-occurrence with microplastics.

Recent studies have shown that PPCPs have the ability to adsorb onto microplastic surfaces. This adsorption is influenced by various environmental factors such as pH, salinity, and dissolved organic matter, as well as the properties of the polymers and PPCP compounds themselves. The sorption capacities of microplastics for different PPCP compounds have been extensively studied, but the findings have not yet been synthesized and critically analyzed.

The co-occurrence of microplastics and PPCPs in the environment has raised concerns about their potential ecological and human health impacts. Microplastics can act as vectors for the transport of hydrophobic organic contaminants, and the presence of PPCPs on their surfaces may enhance their ability to transfer these contaminants to organisms that ingest them. Additionally, the release of pharmaceuticals into the environment can contribute to the development of antimicrobial resistance and endocrine disruption in ecosystems.

To address these concerns, efforts are being made to restrict the use of intentionally added microplastics in various industrial segments, including pharmaceuticals. The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) has proposed a restriction dossier that outlines measures to minimize the use of microplastics in pharmaceuticals and other industries. The dossier recommends labeling and reporting obligations and suggests a ban on certain consumer and professional uses of microplastics.

The role of plastic pollution in Finding Nemo

The popular animated film "Finding Nemo" has inadvertently brought to light the issue of plastic pollution in the ocean and its impact on marine life. The movie features a clownfish named Nemo, who lives among sea anemones, and his journey across the ocean in search of his father. Unfortunately, the ocean that Nemo explores is increasingly threatened by plastic pollution, endangering him, his friends, and the entire marine ecosystem.

Plastic pollution in the ocean is a significant environmental concern. It arises from various human activities, such as the dumping of plastic waste and plastic particles finding their way into water bodies. Plastic items such as bags, straws, bottles, and microplastics like nurdles and microfibers, are common pollutants. These pollutants can have devastating effects on marine life, including fish, turtles, whales, and even coral reefs. For example, turtles may mistake plastic bags for jellyfish and ingest them, leading to blockage of their digestive tracts. Similarly, whales can consume plastic bags, unable to digest them, resulting in severe health issues.

The impact of plastic pollution is not limited to larger marine organisms; it also affects smaller creatures like clownfish and their symbiotic relationship with sea anemones. Sea anemones, like those that host Nemo and his friends, are not immune to plastic pollution. In reality, plastic microfibers and preproduction plastic pellets (nurdles) can reach these anemones, potentially impacting their health and the delicate balance of their relationship with clownfish.

The issue of plastic pollution in the ocean is not confined to a specific location but is widespread, even reaching remote areas like Point Nemo, one of the most isolated places on the ocean. This area, despite its distance from human activity, has been found to contain microplastic particles, highlighting the extent of plastic pollution's reach.

To address the problem of plastic pollution in the ocean, as depicted in "Finding Nemo," individuals and societies must take responsibility and action. This includes reducing plastic consumption, properly disposing of plastic waste, and advocating for comprehensive policies to tackle plastic pollution at various stages of its lifecycle. By doing so, we can protect marine life, preserve our precious ocean ecosystems, and ensure that characters like Nemo and Dory can continue to thrive in their natural habitats, free from the threat of plastic pollution.

Frequently asked questions