Trains Vs Planes: The Green Transport Debate

Trains are widely considered to be less polluting than planes. Various studies suggest that on European routes, train travel can be faster and more environmentally friendly than flying. Trains offer the advantage of direct connections to many cities, and train journeys are among the most eco-friendly ways to travel. On average, a train trip produces up to 96.5% less CO2 emissions than a comparable flight. Additionally, airplanes emit other pollutants like nitrogen oxides and soot and form contrails, which further warm the planet. However, the margin between train and plane emissions varies depending on factors such as the type of train and flight distance. For instance, the EcoPassenger calculator shows that a London to Madrid journey emits 43kg of CO2 per passenger by train but 118kg by plane, yet this increases to 265kg if non-CO2 emissions are included.

Trains produce up to 96.5% less CO2 emissions than planes

When it comes to the environmental impact of travel, trains are a more eco-friendly option than planes. On average, a train trip produces up to 96.5% fewer CO2 emissions than a comparable flight. This significant difference in carbon emissions makes trains a more sustainable choice for travellers concerned about their carbon footprint.

The disparity in CO2 emissions between trains and planes is striking. A return journey by plane for one person typically generates approximately 227 kg of CO2, whereas the same trip by train emits only about 7.4 kg. This translates to a substantially lower carbon footprint for train travel, contributing to a greener mode of transportation.

Additionally, the aviation industry's impact extends beyond CO2 emissions. Aircraft also emit nitrogen oxides, soot, and contrails, which have a warming effect on the planet. These additional pollutants magnify the climate impact of air travel, making it even more detrimental to the environment.

Furthermore, the efficiency of train travel is notable. Studies suggest that on European routes, train travel can often be faster than flying due to direct connections to many cities. This convenience, coupled with the environmental benefits, makes trains an attractive alternative to planes for travellers seeking sustainable and stress-free experiences.

However, it is worth noting that the decision between flying and taking the train depends on various factors, including the specific travel route and personal priorities. Nonetheless, with businesses and individuals increasingly prioritizing sustainability, the advantages of train travel in terms of lower CO2 emissions and a reduced carbon footprint are becoming more influential in transportation choices.

Trains are more time and cost-efficient than planes on some routes

Trains are significantly less polluting than planes. A return journey by plane for a single passenger produces approximately 227 kg of CO2, while the same trip by train emits only 7.4 kg. This represents 96.5% fewer emissions when travelling by train.

However, despite the environmental benefits of train travel, planes carry more passengers. For example, in 2018, United States carriers transported 777.9 million passengers on domestic flights, while Amtrak customers took 31.7 million trips. This discrepancy can be attributed to various factors, including cost and time efficiency, which can make planes more appealing for shorter distances or when direct connections are unavailable.

Indeed, on certain routes, trains can be more time and cost-efficient than planes. For instance, the Berlin-to-Prague route is not only faster and cheaper by train but also 30 times more environmentally friendly. Similarly, the travel search website Hipmunk found that, for the top 100 Amtrak routes booked over a year, train travel was cheaper 80% of the time, with an average savings of $132 per trip.

Furthermore, unforeseen flight cancellations, often accompanied by additional costs and inconveniences, are less common in train travel. Direct flights are more readily available than direct train connections, but the latter offers advantages such as the ability to work, read, or move around during the journey.

While train travel is generally more expensive than flying, this is due in part to an unfair taxing system. Many countries charge railways value-added taxes (VAT), energy taxes, and high tolls, while exempting plane tickets from VAT and not taxing kerosene fuel. Additionally, airlines have reduced ticket prices by cutting staff costs, including suppressing workers' salaries.

Trains are more environmentally friendly than planes on short-haul flights

Trains are a more environmentally friendly way to travel than planes, especially on short-haul flights. On average, a train journey produces up to 96.5% less CO2 than a comparable flight, with a return train journey emitting 7.4 kg of CO2 compared to 227 kg for the same trip by plane. This is because taking off uses a lot more fuel than cruising, so on shorter flights, taking off makes up a larger proportion of the journey.

The aviation industry contributes to around 2.4% of global CO2 emissions, with short-haul flights accounting for a quarter of the EU's aviation emissions. Airplanes also emit other pollutants like nitrogen oxides and soot and form contrails, all of which further warm the planet.

Trains are particularly low-carbon ways to travel, with rail emissions being around 20% of those of cars. For example, the carbon emission factor for high-speed rail is 0.0045 kgCO2e per passenger kilometre, substantially lower than that of airplanes. Electric trains are even more environmentally friendly, and the Eurostar, in particular, emits as little as 6g of CO2 per passenger kilometre.

Furthermore, trains offer other advantages such as being faster, more comfortable, and cheaper than planes on some European routes. They also provide direct connections between city centres, reducing the need for additional transport. However, the lack of reliable and comfortable direct connections means many still choose to fly shorter distances, which negatively impacts the environmental balance.

Trains are more sustainable for business travel

Trains are a more sustainable option for business travel than planes. They produce up to 96.5% less CO2 and are often cheaper and faster than planes.

A return journey by plane for one person typically produces around 227 kg of CO2, while the same trip by train emits only 7.4 kg. This is because taking off uses more fuel than cruising, so shorter flights are more polluting per kilometre than longer ones. Trains also have the advantage of offering direct connections between city centres, reducing the need for additional transport.

Furthermore, planes emit other pollutants like nitrogen oxides and soot and form contrails, all of which warm the planet.

However, the margin between train and plane emissions varies depending on factors such as the type of train and how full it is. For instance, the UK rail emits 41g of CO2 per passenger per kilometre, but the Eurostar emits only 6g.

Overall, trains are a much more sustainable option for business travel than planes, offering a greener, often cheaper and faster way to travel.

Trains are more environmentally friendly than planes, but less so than coaches or ferries

Trains are a more environmentally friendly way to travel than planes. Trains produce up to 96.5% less CO2 than planes, and they emit fewer nitrogen oxides, soot, and contrails, all of which contribute to global warming.

However, trains are not the most environmentally friendly mode of transport. Ferries, for example, emit less CO2 per passenger kilometre for foot passengers. Coaches are also more environmentally friendly, emitting 27g of CO2 per person per kilometre, compared to 41g on UK rail.

The environmental impact of different modes of transport is a complex issue. For instance, the number of passengers on a plane or train will affect its carbon emissions per person. Additionally, the type of train must be considered: electric trains, for instance, produce carbon emissions depending on how the electricity they use is generated.

Furthermore, the distance travelled is an important factor. Short-haul flights have higher CO2 emissions per passenger-kilometre than long-haul flights because taking off uses more fuel than cruising. Therefore, for shorter distances, trains are a much more environmentally friendly option than planes.

Finally, it is worth noting that the availability of direct connections is a significant factor in the decision between trains and planes. Direct flights are almost three times more common than direct trains, making planes a more convenient choice for many travellers. However, the lack of reliable and comfortable direct train connections could be improved to promote train travel and reduce the environmental impact of travel.

Frequently asked questions