Susquehanna River: A Polluted Paradise?

The Susquehanna River is an important source of drinking water for millions and a popular destination for outdoor activities. However, it faces significant pollution problems, including agricultural runoff, urban stormwater, and sewage discharge. High levels of nitrogen, phosphorus, sediment, and toxic metals have contaminated the river, posing risks to both human health and aquatic ecosystems. While efforts to improve water quality have shown some success, recent reports indicate that contamination is worsening, with fecal bacteria levels exceeding safe limits. This complex issue requires further attention and effective solutions to ensure the river's sustainability and safeguard the health of those who depend on it.

Sources of pollution: agricultural and urban runoff, sewage treatment plants

The Susquehanna River is a vital source of freshwater, providing drinking water for millions and supporting various ecological and recreational activities. However, it faces significant pollution challenges, with agricultural and urban runoff, as well as sewage treatment plants, being major sources of contamination.

Agricultural practices contribute heavily to the pollution of the Susquehanna River. The river basin experiences intensive farming, with conventional tillage practices leading to high erosion rates. This results in increased sediment in the water, impairing aquatic habitats and reducing water quality. Additionally, agricultural runoff introduces excess nutrients, particularly nitrogen and phosphorus, into the river. These nutrients stimulate algal growth, and when the algae decompose, they deplete oxygen levels, creating "dead zones" that threaten aquatic life. The application of manure and pesticides on farmland further exacerbates the problem, with manure being a significant source of nitrogen and phosphorus, and pesticides adding to the toxic mix in the water.

Urban runoff is another significant contributor to the pollution of the Susquehanna River. Stormwater from city streets carries pollutants such as lead and zinc, which mix with agricultural toxics. Construction sites in urban areas also contribute to erosion, adding to the sediment load in the water. Moreover, sewage treatment plants discharge untreated sewage and wastewater into the river during heavy rainfall events, leading to fecal bacteria contamination. Harrisburg's combined sewer system, which handles both sanitary sewage and stormwater, has been particularly blamed for this issue.

The accumulation of these pollutants has severe ecological and potential human health consequences. Toxics in the water, such as cadmium, chromium, copper, nickel, and zinc, can lower the reproductive success of aquatic organisms and stress their overall health. These toxics can also accumulate in fish and shellfish tissues, making them unsafe for human consumption. Additionally, the excess nutrients and sedimentation disrupt the natural balance of the river ecosystem, impacting the health of coldwater fisheries and reducing fish populations.

While efforts to improve sewage treatment practices and agricultural methods have shown some positive results, maintaining these improvements in the face of population growth, urban development, and intensified animal production remains a challenge. Implementing effective pollution control measures and sustainable practices, such as manureshed management, is essential to restoring and preserving the health of the Susquehanna River.

Types of pollution: sediment, toxic metals, nitrogen, phosphorus

The Susquehanna River is a vital source of drinking water for millions and a popular destination for outdoor activities like fishing, canoeing, and swimming. However, it faces significant pollution challenges, particularly from sediment, toxic metals, nitrogen, and phosphorus.

Sediment pollution is a result of erosion in the Susquehanna basin, which is intensified by conventional tillage practices in agriculture and construction in urban areas. This high erosion rate leads to increased sediment in the water, disrupting fish spawning habitats and reducing sunlight penetration.

Toxic metals, including cadmium, chromium, copper, nickel, and zinc, are introduced into the river through industrial and municipal wastewater discharge, stormwater runoff, and agricultural practices. These toxics accumulate in fish and shellfish tissues, posing a threat to human health and impacting aquatic ecosystems.

Nitrogen pollution in the Susquehanna River is primarily attributed to agricultural runoff and sewage. Nitrogen enters the soil through manure and sewage and contaminates the groundwater, affecting the water supply for those reliant on the river basin. Nitrogen pollution has severe ecological consequences, damaging the Chesapeake Bay more than any other pollutant.

Phosphorus pollution, similarly, enters the river through manure and sewage. While efforts to reduce phosphorus pollution have been made, such as banning phosphates in laundry detergents, recent data suggests that progress has slowed or even reversed in some areas.

The cumulative impact of these pollutants has degraded the river's ecosystem and affected the health of aquatic life and humans who depend on it. However, scientists have identified solutions, and with proper funding and implementation, there is hope for restoring the Susquehanna River's health.

Impact on human health: contaminated water supply, risk of illness

The Susquehanna River is a source of drinking water for millions of people. However, the river is contaminated with various pollutants that pose significant risks to human health. One of the primary concerns is the presence of toxic metals, including cadmium, chromium, copper, nickel, and zinc. These metals can originate from industrial and municipal wastewater treatment plants, urban stormwater runoff, and agricultural practices such as the use of pesticides and herbicides.

The accumulation of toxic metals in the river has severe implications for human health. When these metals build up in the tissues of fish and shellfish, they become a danger to humans who consume them. Additionally, toxic metals can seep into the groundwater, further contaminating the water supply for those who rely on it for drinking and other purposes. The impact of these toxins can lead to reduced reproductive success and stress in humans, similar to their effects on aquatic animals.

Another critical issue affecting the Susquehanna River is the discharge of untreated sewage. Harrisburg's sewer system has been blamed for releasing millions of gallons of raw sewage into the river, resulting in high levels of fecal bacteria contamination. This contamination poses a severe health risk to anyone who comes into contact with the water, as warned by the Lower Susquehanna Riverkeeper, Ted Evgeniadis. According to Evgeniadis, "If you go out into the river, you are going to get sick. You are going to end up in hospital. You may even die."

Agricultural runoff is another significant contributor to the pollution of the Susquehanna River. Excess manure and fertilizers from livestock-intensive counties wash into the river, leading to increased nitrogen and phosphorus levels. These nutrients stimulate the growth of harmful algae blooms, which, upon decomposition, create "dead zones" with dangerously low oxygen levels, threatening aquatic life and the ecological balance. The impact of agricultural practices extends beyond the river, as the Susquehanna delivers about 40% of the nitrogen pollution and 20% of the phosphorus pollution to the Chesapeake Bay.

The pollution in the Susquehanna River has far-reaching consequences, not only affecting the river itself but also the Chesapeake Bay, where it delivers half of the freshwater inflow. The river's sediment pollution, resulting from erosion and agricultural practices, further exacerbates the environmental and human health impacts. Efforts to address these issues, such as manureshed management, are being explored to improve water quality and mitigate the risks to human health. However, the complexity of the problem requires sustained commitment and collaboration to implement effective solutions.

Impact on wildlife: reduced fish populations, harm to aquatic animals

The Susquehanna River is a vital source of drinking water for millions and a popular destination for fishing, canoeing, and other recreational activities. However, it faces significant pollution challenges that have impacted the river's wildlife and aquatic animals.

One of the primary concerns is the presence of excess nutrients, particularly nitrogen and phosphorus, in the river. These nutrients come from agricultural runoff, urban and suburban stormwater, and sewage treatment plants. While nitrogen and phosphorus are essential for plant growth, too much of them can cause excessive algal growth. As the algae die and decay, they deplete the oxygen levels in the water, creating “dead zones" where fish and other aquatic organisms cannot survive. This process has contributed to the reduction of fish populations in the Susquehanna River.

The river is also contaminated with toxic metals, including cadmium, chromium, copper, nickel, and zinc. These metals are discharged from industrial and municipal wastewater treatment plants and can also come from urban stormwater runoff and agricultural practices in the form of pesticides and herbicides. These toxics accumulate in the tissues of fish and shellfish, posing a threat not only to aquatic life but also to human health when consumed.

Sediment pollution is another issue affecting the Susquehanna River. The intensive farming practices in the lower Susquehanna basin, such as conventional tillage, contribute to high rates of erosion. Construction sites in urban areas also accelerate erosion, leading to increased sediment in the water. This sediment clouds the water, blocking sunlight from reaching aquatic plants and smothering fish spawning habitats. Additionally, the presence of over 3,000 dams in Pennsylvania, many within the Susquehanna River Basin, further alters the river's flow, sediment transport, and critical habitats, impacting fish populations and their ability to migrate and spawn.

The accumulation of pollutants in the Susquehanna River has had a detrimental effect on fish populations and aquatic animals. The health of coldwater fisheries, which were once abundant in Pennsylvania, has significantly declined due to pollution. The reduction in fish populations not only disrupts the ecological balance of the river but also affects recreational fishing and the livelihoods of those who depend on the river for income.

While there have been efforts to reduce pollution, such as improvements in sewage treatment plants and agricultural practices, the increasing human population, land development, and intensified animal production continue to pose challenges. Implementing effective pollution control measures and sustainable practices, such as “manureshed” management, is crucial to restoring the health of the Susquehanna River and mitigating its impact on wildlife and aquatic life.

Efforts to improve water quality: manureshed management, sewage treatment plant improvements

The Susquehanna River is a vital source of drinking water for millions and supports various activities, from sports fishing to cooling nuclear power plants. However, it faces significant pollution challenges, with excess nutrients, sediment, and toxic metals impairing water quality. Efforts to improve the Susquehanna River's water quality have focused on manureshed management and sewage treatment plant improvements.

Manureshed Management

"Manureshed management" is a proposed solution to the Susquehanna River's pollution problem. The concept involves managing the river as a manureshed by matching areas of crop demand (nutrient sinks) with areas generating livestock manure (nutrient sources). This approach aims to reduce manure runoff, a significant contributor to the river's pollution.

A Penn State-led research team developed five manureshed-management scenarios, comparing them to a baseline "business-as-usual" scenario. The findings, published in the Journal of Environmental Quality, suggest that the "watershed nutrient balance avoiding runoff-prone areas" scenario showed the most significant potential for water quality improvement. This scenario involves ensuring manure is transportable but never applied in vulnerable landscapes within the basin, such as steep slopes.

By implementing manureshed management, the sustainable use of manure resources can be guided, reducing the agricultural nutrient contribution to the river and, consequently, improving water quality. This strategy integrates environmentally sustainable livestock development and crop nutrient demands, providing a new dimension to land management.

Sewage Treatment Plant Improvements

Sewage treatment plants have been identified as another source of excess nutrients, particularly nitrogen and phosphorus, in the Susquehanna River. Under the Chesapeake 2000 Agreement, Pennsylvania's Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) committed to reducing nitrogen and phosphorus pollution from these plants. To meet the agreed-upon caps, PADEP introduced a "nutrient trading" program and began issuing draft discharge permits with specified limits on nitrogen and phosphorus pollution.

The long-term efforts to improve sewage treatment plants have shown positive results. Water quality monitoring on the Susquehanna River indicates that flow-adjusted concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus have declined since the 1980s. However, recent samples reveal a slowing or, in some cases, a reversal of this positive trend, highlighting the need for continued focus on sewage treatment plant improvements.

Frequently asked questions