Ethanol Fuel: Pollution Or Solution?

Ethanol is a biofuel that has been touted as a clean alternative to fossil fuels. However, the question of whether ethanol fuel causes pollution is a highly debated topic. While some argue that ethanol reduces harmful tailpipe emissions and fights air pollution, others contend that the process of producing ethanol, particularly from corn, has significant environmental impacts and contributes to global warming. With the number of ethanol plants rapidly increasing and the ongoing debate about its environmental impact, it is essential to examine the evidence and explore the potential benefits and drawbacks of ethanol fuel to determine its true effect on pollution.

Ethanol production and environmental impact

Ethanol is a biofuel, and the production and use of biofuels are considered by the US government to have fewer negative effects on the environment compared to fossil-fuel-derived fuels. Biofuels have environmental benefits, but their production and use do have impacts on the environment.

Pure ethanol is non-toxic and biodegradable, breaking down into harmless substances if spilled. However, fuel ethanol contains denaturants to make it undrinkable. Like petroleum fuels, biofuels are flammable and must be transported carefully. When burned, biofuels produce emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), a greenhouse gas. However, international convention excludes CO2 emissions from biofuel combustion from national greenhouse gas emissions inventories because growing the biomass feedstocks used for biofuel production may offset the CO2 produced when biofuels are burned. The effect that biofuel use has on net CO2 emissions depends on how the biofuels are produced and whether emissions associated with cropland cultivation are included in the calculations.

The process of producing ethanol requires a heat source, and most producers of biofuels currently use fossil fuels. Some US ethanol producers burn corn stalks for heat, and ethanol producers in Brazil use sugarcane stalks (called bagasse) to generate heat and electricity. The US government supports efforts to produce biofuels with methods that use less energy than conventional fermentation and that use cellulosic biomass, which requires less cultivation, fertilizer, and pesticides than corn or sugarcane. Cellulosic ethanol feedstock includes native prairie grasses, fast-growing trees, sawdust, and even waste paper. However, there is currently no commercial cellulosic ethanol production in the US because of technical and economic challenges.

The use of ethanol in vehicles has measurable GHG emissions benefits when considering the life cycle steps required for gasoline. The carbon dioxide (CO2) released when ethanol is used in vehicles is offset by the CO2 captured when crops used to make the ethanol are grown. As a result, vehicles running on high-level blends of ethanol produce less net CO2 than conventional vehicles per mile traveled. An analysis by Argonne National Laboratory found that using corn-based ethanol instead of gasoline reduces life cycle GHG emissions by 40% on average. Using cellulosic ethanol provides an even greater benefit. A 2012 study by Argonne National Laboratory found that when fuel life cycles are considered, average emissions reductions of cellulosic ethanol compared to conventional gasoline range from 88% to 108% depending on feedstocks used.

Ethanol blends can offer emissions benefits depending on vehicle type, engine calibration, and blend level. However, the use and storage of ethanol blends can result in emissions of regulated pollutants, toxic chemicals, and greenhouse gases (GHGs). Today's emissions standards require ethanol/gasoline-capable flexible fuel vehicles (FFVs) to meet the same emissions standards as conventional vehicles, regardless of the fuel used. Low-level ethanol blends can increase evaporative emissions in vehicles because low levels of ethanol can cause gasoline to evaporate more easily. However, vapor pressure for low-level ethanol blends can be adjusted to adhere to the same volatility standards as gasoline. E85 (a high-level, gasoline-ethanol blend) is less volatile than gasoline and low-level ethanol blends and results in lower evaporative emissions.

Ethanol emissions and air pollution

Ethanol is a biofuel that can be produced from crops such as corn, sugarcane, and cellulosic biomass. It is often blended with gasoline to create a fuel mixture that can be used in vehicles. The use of ethanol as a vehicle fuel has been the subject of much debate, with some arguing that it offers environmental benefits, while others claim that it contributes to air pollution and has other negative environmental impacts.

When burned, pure biofuels like ethanol generally produce fewer emissions of particulates, sulfur dioxide, and air toxics compared to fossil-fuel-derived fuels. Ethanol-gasoline mixtures burn cleaner and have higher octane levels than gasoline without ethanol. However, they also have higher evaporative emissions from fuel tanks and dispensing equipment, which contribute to the formation of ground-level ozone and smog. Additionally, the production and use of biofuels like ethanol can still have significant environmental impacts.

One of the main concerns with ethanol production is the impact on land use and food prices. Growing crops for fuel requires large areas of land, and in some cases, natural vegetation and forests have been cleared or burned to make way for biofuel crops. This can lead to habitat destruction and a loss of biodiversity. Additionally, using crops like corn for fuel can drive up food prices and impact food security, as seen in the case of corn in the US.

Ethanol emissions have also been linked to air pollution and potential health risks. While ethanol blends can reduce certain tailpipe emissions, such as carbon dioxide (CO2) and benzene, they can also increase emissions of other harmful substances, such as acetaldehyde, which is considered a likely human carcinogen. Furthermore, a study in Wilmington, North Carolina, found that increased ethanol production and use have led to higher ethanol concentrations in rainwater and the atmosphere, impacting air quality.

Despite these concerns, some argue that ethanol can still play a role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Life cycle analyses consider the entire life cycle of a fuel, from raw material extraction to disposal or recycling. Some studies have found that using corn-based ethanol instead of gasoline can reduce life cycle greenhouse gas emissions by up to 40%. Cellulosic ethanol, which does not rely on food crops, may offer even greater benefits, with potential emissions reductions of up to 108% compared to conventional gasoline.

Ethanol vs gasoline

Ethanol is a renewable fuel made from various plant materials collectively known as biomass. More than 98% of U.S. gasoline contains ethanol to oxygenate the fuel. Typically, gasoline contains E10 (10% ethanol, 90% gasoline), which reduces air pollution. Ethanol is also available as E85 (or flex fuel), which can be used in flexible fuel vehicles designed to operate on any blend of gasoline and ethanol up to 83%. Another blend, E15, is approved for use in model year 2001 and newer light-duty vehicles.

Ethanol has a higher octane number than gasoline, providing premium blending properties. Minimum octane number requirements for gasoline prevent engine knocking and ensure drivability. Lower-octane gasoline is blended with 10% ethanol to attain the standard 87 octane. However, ethanol contains less energy per gallon than gasoline, with the degree of variance depending on the volume percentage of ethanol in the blend. Denatured ethanol (98% ethanol) contains about 30% less energy than gasoline per gallon.

Ethanol sales are projected to decline, according to a 2014 Congressional Budget Office report, from 135 billion gallons to 125 billion gallons in 2022. This is one reason behind the urgency of the ethanol industry to adopt higher blend levels. The American Automobile Association (AAA) has objected to ethanol blend increases, even to 15%.

When blended with gasoline for use as a vehicle fuel, ethanol can offer some emissions benefits depending on vehicle type, engine calibration, and blend level. As with conventional fuels, the use and storage of ethanol blends can result in emissions of regulated pollutants, toxic chemicals, and greenhouse gases (GHGs). Today's emissions standards require ethanol/gasoline-capable flexible fuel vehicles (FFVs) to meet the same emissions standards as conventional vehicles, regardless of the fuel used.

Ethanol and ethanol-gasoline mixtures burn cleaner and have higher octane levels than gasoline that does not contain ethanol. However, they also have higher evaporative emissions from fuel tanks and dispensing equipment. These evaporative emissions contribute to the formation of harmful, ground-level ozone and smog. Gasoline requires extra processing to reduce evaporative emissions before blending with ethanol.

Burning biofuels results in emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), a greenhouse gas. However, according to international convention, CO2 emissions from biofuel combustion are excluded from national greenhouse gas emissions inventories because growing the biomass feedstocks used for biofuel production may offset the CO2 produced when biofuels are burned. The effect that biofuel use has on net CO2 emissions depends on how the biofuels are produced and whether or not emissions associated with cropland cultivation are included in the calculations.

Today’s corn-based ethanol reduces greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by roughly 40%–50% compared to regular gasoline, according to studies by Harvard, USDA, and the Department of Energy’s Argonne National Laboratory. Using cellulosic ethanol provides an even greater benefit. A 2012 study by Argonne National Laboratory found that when fuel life cycles are considered, average emissions reductions of cellulosic ethanol compared to conventional gasoline range from 88% to 108% depending on feedstocks used.

The production and use of biofuels are considered by the U.S. government to have fewer or lower negative effects on the environment compared to fossil-fuel-derived fuels. There are also potential national economic and security benefits when biofuel use reduces the need to import petroleum fuels. However, critics argue that growing corn for fuel has a major environmental impact and will lead to higher prices for this staple food crop.

Ethanol blends and their effects

Ethanol is a biofuel commonly made from biomass such as corn, sugarcane, potato, cassava, and other crops. It is often blended with gasoline to create a fuel mixture that can be used in vehicles. The most common ethanol blends are E10 (10% ethanol and 90% gasoline) and E15 (up to 15% ethanol), which can be used in most vehicles in the United States. Flex-fuel vehicles can use blends of up to 85% ethanol (E85), and in Brazil, some vehicles can use neat ethanol fuel (E100).

Effects of Ethanol Blends

When blended with gasoline, ethanol can have both positive and negative effects on the environment and vehicle performance. Here are some key points:

• Emissions: Ethanol blends burn cleaner than gasoline alone, resulting in lower emissions of particulates, sulfur dioxide, and air toxics. However, they have higher evaporative emissions, which contribute to the formation of ground-level ozone and smog. Additionally, ethanol blends produce regulated pollutants, toxic chemicals, and greenhouse gases (GHGs) during use and storage.
• Fuel Economy: Ethanol blends result in lower vehicle fuel economy (miles travelled per gallon) compared to gasoline alone. E85, for example, has been found to produce significantly lower mileage and requires more frequent refueling.
• Engine Performance: Ethanol blends can improve power, brake-specific fuel consumption, and thermal efficiency. However, they can also negatively affect volumetric efficiency.
• Cold Weather Performance: In cold weather, ethanol blends may have difficulty achieving sufficient vapour pressure for the fuel to evaporate and spark the ignition. This has led to the adoption of E85 as the maximum blend in flexible fuel vehicles in the US and Europe.
• Food Prices: The use of crops such as corn for ethanol production has been criticised for potentially increasing food prices and diverting resources (land, fertilizers, and energy) from food crop production.
• Environmental Impact: The production and use of biofuels like ethanol are generally considered to have fewer negative effects on the environment than fossil-fuel-derived fuels. However, the specific environmental impact depends on how the ethanol is produced and whether emissions associated with cropland cultivation are included in calculations.

Ethanol and the auto industry

Ethanol, a biofuel, has been the subject of much debate in the auto industry, with some touting its environmental benefits and others expressing concerns about its impact on engines and fuel efficiency. The use of ethanol as a vehicle fuel, particularly in the form of ethanol-gasoline blends, has been a growing trend in recent years. The most common use of fuel ethanol is in mixtures of finished motor gasoline, with the exact amount varying by region and season. In the United States, the primary source of ethanol consumption is E10, a blend of 10% ethanol and 90% gasoline, while E85, a high-level blend containing up to 85% ethanol, is also available for flex-fuel vehicles.

The argument for increasing the ethanol content in gasoline blends centres on its potential to reduce harmful particulate pollution, improve gas mileage, and lower gas prices. Proponents of ethanol, including some government programs, point to the environmental benefits of biofuels over fossil fuels. They argue that ethanol-gasoline mixtures burn cleaner, have higher octane levels, and can help meet air quality requirements. Additionally, the production and use of biofuels are considered to have lower negative effects on the environment, and their increased use can reduce the need to import petroleum fuels.

However, critics of ethanol, including some car manufacturers, raise concerns about the potential damage to engines and reduced fuel efficiency caused by higher ethanol blends. They argue that growing corn for fuel, as is often the case in the United States, has a significant environmental impact and can lead to higher food prices. Additionally, while pure ethanol is non-toxic and biodegradable, fuel ethanol contains denaturants to make it undrinkable, and it shares the flammability concerns of petroleum fuels.

The auto industry has been working to address these concerns and find innovative solutions. For example, experimental work at Oak Ridge National Laboratory has shown that higher ethanol blends can deliver more power to smaller, specialized engines, potentially improving fuel efficiency. However, consumer resistance to ethanol remains a challenge, and the American Automobile Association (AAA) has objected to increasing ethanol blend levels, citing potential engine issues.

Despite these challenges, the ethanol vehicle market is expected to grow significantly in the coming years. By 2040, ethanol vehicles are projected to account for 11% of all light-duty vehicle sales, making ethanol the largest alternative fuel technology. This growth will be driven by factors such as depleting natural sources of petroleum, rising emission standards, and the need to minimize reliance on non-renewable energy sources.

Frequently asked questions