Airplane Pollution: How Bad Is It For The Environment?

Aviation is a significant contributor to global carbon emissions, with air travel being the most carbon-intensive activity an individual can undertake. The burning of jet fuel releases carbon dioxide, ozone, ultrafine particles, and other pollutants into the atmosphere, causing a net warming effect that contributes to climate change. Aircraft noise pollution also has adverse health impacts, and airports can generate water pollution through the handling of jet fuel and de-icing chemicals. With the aviation sector's emissions projected to grow, there is an increasing need to explore sustainable alternatives and implement measures to reduce its environmental footprint.

Aviation's contribution to global warming

The primary way that aviation contributes to global warming is through the emission of greenhouse gases, particularly carbon dioxide (CO2). Aircraft engines produce gases, noise, and particulates from fossil fuel combustion, with jet airliners being the main culprit. In addition to CO2, these engines emit nitrogen oxides, water vapour, carbon monoxide, and atmospheric particulates such as incompletely burned hydrocarbons, sulfur oxides, and black carbon. The radiative forcing of these emissions is estimated to be 1.3-1.4 times that of CO2 alone, and when including the effects of induced cirrus clouds, the impact is likely even greater.

Another way that aviation contributes to global warming is through the formation of contrails and cirrus clouds. Contrails, or condensation trails, are formed when water vapour from fuel burning condenses at high altitudes under cold and humid conditions. While they have a less significant warming effect than CO2 emissions, they are still thought to contribute to global warming. Cirrus clouds can develop after the formation of persistent contrails, and their warming contribution is uncertain but potentially significant.

Furthermore, aviation is the main human source of ozone, a respiratory health hazard that causes an estimated 6,800 premature deaths per year. Aircraft engines emit ultrafine particles (UFPs) and hydrocarbons, which contribute to the formation of ozone. In addition, piston engines used in general aviation burn Avgas, releasing toxic lead into the atmosphere. This has been linked to adverse effects on the nervous system, red blood cells, and cardiovascular and immune systems, with particularly harmful consequences for infants and young children.

Airports also contribute to aviation's impact on global warming through water pollution and aircraft noise pollution. The extensive handling of jet fuel, lubricants, deicing fluids, and other chemicals can contaminate nearby water bodies if not properly contained. Aircraft noise pollution disrupts sleep, negatively affects children's education, and could increase cardiovascular risk.

While the aviation industry has made some improvements, such as increasing fuel efficiency and reducing soot particle emissions, overall emissions have risen due to the growing volume of air travel. To combat this, individuals can reduce their personal air travel and choose airlines with efficient fleets and a commitment to carbon offsetting. Additionally, the industry can further improve fuel economy, optimize air traffic control and flight routes, and transition to hybrid or electric aircraft.

Aircraft noise pollution

Aircraft noise can significantly impact human health and well-being. Research has linked aircraft noise to sleep disturbance, with studies showing that aircraft noise is associated with more self-reported sleep disturbance than road traffic noise. Sleep disturbance can lead to next-day fatigue and increased stress levels, which can have negative consequences on overall health and well-being.

Additionally, aircraft noise has been found to impact cognitive performance, particularly in children. Studies have suggested that aircraft noise can affect reading comprehension, memory, attention, perception, mood, and learning. The association between aviation noise and cognitive performance in children appears to be stronger in younger children than in older ones.

Aircraft noise has also been associated with cardiovascular health risks. Research has suggested a link between high levels of aircraft noise and an increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). This association is particularly strong with nighttime noise exposure, indicating that the impact of aircraft noise on cardiovascular health may be more significant when it disrupts sleep.

To mitigate aircraft noise pollution, several measures have been proposed and implemented. These include the development of quieter engines, such as the PW1000G, which is 75% quieter than previous engines. Additionally, serrated edges or 'chevrons' on the back of the nacelle can help reduce noise. Implementing a Continuous Descent Approach (CDA) during landing can also reduce noise on the ground by 1-5 dB per flight as the engines operate at near-idle power.

Water pollution at airports

Airports are among the largest sources of air pollution in the United States. For instance, Los Angeles International Airport is the largest source of carbon monoxide (CO) in the state of California. Wolfram Schlenker and Reed Walker's research shows how runway traffic congestion from East Coast airports influences West Coast airports, increasing pollution levels. Small amounts of ambient air pollution can have substantial effects on the incidence of local respiratory illness. Infants, the elderly, and adults aged 20-64 are affected by pollution fluctuations. Schlenker and Walker estimate that a single standard deviation increase in daily pollution levels costs at least $1 million per day in hospitalization costs for the 6 million people living within 10 km of one of the 12 California airports in their study.

Airports also generate water pollution due to their extensive handling of jet fuel, lubricants, and other chemicals. Deicing fluids used in cold weather can pollute water, as they fall to the ground and surface runoff carries them to nearby streams, rivers, or coastal waters. Deicing fluids are typically ethylene glycol or propylene glycol, which consume the oxygen needed by aquatic life during degradation in surface waters. Low oxygen concentrations reduce usable aquatic habitats, causing the death of organisms that cannot move to areas with sufficient oxygen levels.

To mitigate chemical spills, airports can implement spill containment structures and clean-up equipment such as vacuum trucks, portable berms, and absorbents.

Ozone and ultrafine particle emissions

Aviation activities emit ozone and ultrafine particles, both of which are health hazards. Aircraft engines emit ultrafine particles (UFPs) in and near airports, as does ground support equipment. During takeoff, 3 to 50 × 10^15 particles were measured per kg of fuel burned, while significant differences were observed depending on the engine. Other estimates include 4 to 200 × 10^15 particles for 0.1–0.7 grams, or 14 to 710 × 10^15 particles, or 0.1–10 × 10^15 black carbon particles for 0.046–0.941 grams.

Mobile monitoring has confirmed the area-wide impact of emissions from airport activities on neighbourhoods within a few kilometres. A mobile monitoring campaign conducted in the approach path of LAX found a much larger area of impact covering 60 square kilometres and extending 20 kilometres downwind from the airport. The authors reported increased ultrafine particle number concentrations (UFPN) of 4–5 times the normal rate at distances of 8–10 kilometres from the airport on multiple days.

Fixed-site downwind measurements conducted at Schiphol airport in the Netherlands have shown substantial impacts of airport emissions on UFPN concentration extending more than 8 kilometres from the airport. Mobile monitoring may be the most effective means to refine the understanding of the impact that aircraft and airport emissions have on air quality in a variety of urban settings.

Aircraft-emitted NOx participates in ozone chemistry. Subsonic aircraft fly in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (at altitudes of about 9 to 13 kilometres), whereas supersonic aircraft cruise several kilometres higher (at about 17 to 20 kilometres) in the stratosphere. Ozone in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere is expected to increase in response to NOx increases, and methane is expected to decrease. At higher altitudes, increases in NOx lead to decreases in the stratospheric ozone layer. Ozone precursor (NOx) residence times in these regions increase with altitude, and hence perturbations to ozone by aircraft depend on the altitude of NOx injection and vary from regional in scale in the troposphere to global in scale in the stratosphere.

The need for Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAF)

Aviation is a major contributor to global carbon emissions, with global international aviation emissions increasing by around 70% between 2005 and 2020. The aviation industry's environmental footprint includes not only carbon emissions but also water pollution, noise pollution, and the emission of ozone and ultrafine particles, all of which have adverse health and environmental effects.

The need to address aviation's contribution to global warming and climate change has led to the development and increasing adoption of Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAF). SAF is a biofuel used to power aircraft that has similar properties to conventional jet fuel but with a smaller carbon footprint. SAF can be produced from a variety of renewable and waste feedstocks, including food and yard waste, woody biomass, fats, greases, oils, and carbon-rich waste gases. SAF offers several benefits over conventional jet fuel, including reduced greenhouse gas emissions, engine and infrastructure compatibility, and more flexibility in feedstocks and production technologies.

The expansion of domestic SAF production can help to sustain and grow the biofuel industry, creating new economic benefits and employment opportunities. The U.S. Department of Energy is actively working to promote the development and use of SAF through initiatives such as the Sustainable Aviation Fuel Grand Challenge, which aims to increase domestic consumption of SAF to 3 billion gallons by 2030 and 35 billion gallons by 2050 while achieving at least a 50% reduction in lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions.

To meet the growing demand for SAF and achieve aviation climate goals, more production pathways and feedstocks are needed. Researchers are working to develop novel pathways for producing SAF from renewable and waste feedstocks that meet strict fuel specifications. ASTM and the Federal Aviation Administration have also established fuel quality standards and blending limitations for non-petroleum-based jet fuel to ensure the safety and reliability of aircraft operations.

In conclusion, the adoption of Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAF) is necessary to reduce the environmental and health impacts of the aviation industry. SAF offers a more sustainable alternative to conventional jet fuel, with the potential to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions and contribute to the fight against climate change.

Frequently asked questions