Diamond Mining: Environmental Impact And Pollution Concerns

Diamond mining has been the subject of many movies and tales, with the industry known for its controversial and conflict-provoking nature. The process of diamond mining involves heavy machinery, explosives, hydraulic equipment, and other harsh methods to dig deep into the Earth and extract diamonds. This has a significant impact on the environment, causing soil erosion, deforestation, and ecosystem destruction. In extreme cases, diamond mining can cause entire ecosystems to collapse, with abandoned mining pits left behind, leading to the spread of diseases and the loss of wildlife and topsoil. Diamond mining also produces massive amounts of waste rock and tailings, which can introduce toxic heavy metals into the food chain and cause water pollution.

Water usage: mined diamonds use 126 gallons of water per carat, while lab-grown diamonds use 18

Diamond mining has been associated with significant environmental concerns, including water pollution. In Sub-Saharan Africa, for instance, mining activities have contaminated water sources, exacerbating the challenge of accessing clean water in the region. This issue is not limited to Africa, as even countries like Canada, known for their stringent environmental regulations, have witnessed the dumping of waste rocks into lakes and water sources.

The impact of diamond mining on water bodies is multifaceted. Firstly, the process of mining often requires pumping water from below the water table to facilitate operations. This water, along with any wastewater generated, is then released back into the local river system, potentially carrying a range of toxic substances such as sewage, detergents, and heavy metals. Secondly, abandoned mining pits left behind after operations have ceased become breeding grounds for mosquitoes, leading to the spread of water-borne diseases like malaria, as seen in Sierra Leone.

The water-intensive nature of diamond mining is a critical aspect of its environmental impact. According to research, mined diamonds consume approximately 126 gallons of water per carat. This substantial water usage can strain local water resources and ecosystems, particularly in water-stressed regions.

In contrast, lab-grown diamonds offer a more water-efficient alternative. The process of creating synthetic diamonds in a laboratory setting typically requires only 18 gallons of water per carat, significantly less than their mined counterparts. This reduction in water usage can alleviate pressure on water resources and contribute to a more sustainable diamond industry.

While lab-grown diamonds have a lower environmental impact in terms of water usage, it is important to consider other factors as well. For instance, the energy consumption associated with lab-grown diamonds may vary depending on the synthesis technology employed, with some methods being more energy-intensive than others. Additionally, the Diamond Producers Association (DPA) claims that mined diamonds are responsible for "69% less carbon emission per carat than laboratory-created diamonds." Therefore, when assessing the environmental footprint of diamonds, it is essential to consider multiple factors, including energy consumption, carbon emissions, and water usage.

Greenhouse gas emissions: diamonds are responsible for major emissions throughout their lifecycle

Diamond mining has been associated with several negative impacts on the environment and society. While it is generally less harmful to the environment than other types of mining, such as gold mining, due to the absence of toxic chemical use, it still contributes to significant greenhouse gas emissions and can severely scar land, soil, and water.

Diamonds are responsible for major emissions throughout their lifecycle. The mining process itself involves clearing land, producing liquid and solid wastes, and generating greenhouse gases. For example, the Ekati diamond mine in Canada creates 143 pounds of carbon dioxide emissions per carat mined, which is 5.5 times more than the emissions from creating synthetic diamonds. These emissions contribute to climate change and global warming.

The social and humanitarian impacts of diamond mining are also significant. Africa, a major source of diamonds, is known for its poor working conditions and extremely low wages for miners. Child labor is prevalent in the industry, with children facing physical and sexual abuse while being forced to work in dangerous conditions. The diamond industry has also been associated with the funding of civil wars and conflicts in Africa, leading to the term "blood diamonds".

However, it is important to note that the diamond industry has seen increased regulation in recent years, with the introduction of the Kimberly Process in 2003 to certify conflict-free diamonds and ensure fair labor conditions. Additionally, the emergence of lab-created diamonds offers a viable alternative to natural diamonds with a smaller environmental impact and lower cost.

Overall, while diamonds are associated with major emissions and societal issues, efforts are being made to mitigate these impacts and promote more sustainable and ethical practices in the diamond industry.

Soil erosion: diamond mining can cause topsoil to erode, rendering land infertile

Diamond mining can have detrimental effects on the environment, including soil erosion, deforestation, and ecosystem destruction. Soil erosion, in particular, can render land infertile and unsuitable for farming.

Soil erosion occurs when the top layers of soil are removed or disturbed, exposing the land to wind and water erosion. In the case of diamond mining, this can happen through strip mining, where the top layers of soil and vegetation are stripped away to access the diamonds underneath. If the area is not properly reclaimed after mining—through soil replacement, grading, and revegetation—it becomes highly susceptible to erosion.

The consequences of soil erosion can be severe. The loss of topsoil, which is typically the most fertile layer, can render the land infertile and unsuitable for agriculture. This can have significant economic and social impacts, particularly in regions where farming is a primary source of livelihood. Erosion can also lead to increased sedimentation in nearby water bodies, altering aquatic ecosystems and disrupting the natural flow of water.

Additionally, soil erosion can have indirect effects on the environment. For example, it can increase the risk of landslides and mudflows, further damaging the landscape and infrastructure. It can also expose underlying soils and rocks, releasing contaminants and heavy metals that can pollute water sources and harm local wildlife.

The impact of diamond mining on soil erosion is well-documented. In the Kono district of eastern Sierra Leone, for instance, diamond mining has left behind thousands of abandoned mining pits. The topsoil in these areas has eroded, and the once-fertile land is now barren and unsuitable for farming. Similar impacts have been observed in other diamond-mining regions, highlighting the need for proper regulation, planning, and reclamation efforts to minimize the environmental footprint of diamond mining.

Child labour: children are often forced into labour in African mines, facing physical and sexual abuse

Diamond mining can cause severe environmental damage, including soil erosion, deforestation, and ecosystem destruction. In some cases, it can even lead to the collapse of entire ecosystems. However, the human cost of diamond mining is even more devastating, especially when it comes to child labour.

Children are often forced into labour in African mines, facing dangerous working conditions and inadequate wages as low as $1 per day. In countries like Ghana, many child miners do not attend school regularly, compromising their right to education. The situation is similar in Tanzania, where despite laws prohibiting child labour in mines and quarries, approximately 12,000 children remain engaged in mining due to poor enforcement.

The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has also struggled to curb child labour in its mining industry, despite adopting a National Action Plan and a Committee to Combat the Worst Forms of Child Labour. The country faces additional challenges due to rampant corruption, violence, and the presence of armed groups vying for control over lucrative resources.

Children working in African mines are vulnerable to physical and sexual abuse, with little protection from hazardous working conditions. They are exposed to the health risks associated with mercury poisoning and the spread of diseases due to poor sanitation and living conditions. The physical, cognitive, and behavioural development of these children is at stake, and their fundamental rights to health, security, and protection from violence and abuse are being infringed upon.

To address this issue, international companies sourcing minerals from Africa must actively discourage child labour and remove children from their supply chains. This can be achieved by engaging with suppliers, demanding compliance with due diligence procedures, and ceasing to source from those who fail to meet these standards. Additionally, international donors, civil society groups, NGOs, and advocacy groups should collaborate with African governments to implement and strengthen initiatives and laws against child labour in mining.

Marine life: marine mining operations dredge up the ocean floor, threatening marine habitats and introducing toxins into the food chain

Marine biologists and other researchers have warned that deep-sea mining operations will have devastating consequences for marine life. Mining companies are eager to exploit the ocean floor for valuable mineral deposits, but in doing so, they risk destroying delicate marine ecosystems and introducing toxins into the food chain.

Deep-sea mining involves using robot rovers, attached by pipelines to surface ships, to trundle over the ocean floor, sucking up nodules and pumping them to the mother craft. These operations would disturb the ocean floor, threatening marine habitats and species. The heavy mining equipment deployed on the seabed is likely to directly harm and kill less mobile deep-sea organisms, while others may be smothered and suffocated.

Polymetallic nodules, which can take millions of years to develop, are an important habitat for many deep-sea species. Mining would remove these habitats, and scientists are fairly certain that some species would face extinction, with ecosystems requiring extremely long periods to recover, if they ever do. Mining waste discharge could spread over large distances, threatening open-ocean fish and invertebrates crucial to international fisheries and food security.

The introduction of toxins into the marine food chain is another grave concern. Marine debris, such as the estimated 8 million pieces of plastic that enter the oceans every day, can infiltrate the food chain as smaller organisms carrying plastic particles are consumed by larger predators, resulting in biomagnification of toxins. This not only threatens marine biodiversity but also poses risks to human health through seafood consumption.

The potential impact of deep-sea mining on marine life is immense, and the full extent of the damage may not be known until it is too late. While diamond mining is generally considered less harmful to the environment than other types of mining due to the absence of toxic chemicals, it can still cause severe environmental damage, including soil erosion, deforestation, and ecosystem destruction.

Frequently asked questions