Windmills And Pollution: What's The Real Impact?

Wind energy is one of the cleanest and most sustainable ways to generate electricity, as wind turbines do not emit toxic pollution or global warming emissions. However, there are some environmental and health concerns associated with wind turbines, including light and noise pollution, the impact on wildlife, and the visual impact on the landscape. While wind energy has a much lower environmental impact than fossil fuels, it is important to consider these potential issues and take steps to mitigate any negative effects. For example, wind turbines have been linked to bird and bat deaths, but research and technological advances have helped to reduce these fatalities.

Wind turbines and wildlife

Wind energy is one of the cleanest and most sustainable ways to generate electricity, as it produces no toxic pollution or global warming emissions. However, as wind energy production expands, so do the potential impacts on wildlife.

The impact of wind turbines on wildlife, particularly birds and bats, has been widely studied. Birds and bats often do not survive an encounter with a wind turbine blade, and there are also more subtle negative impacts, such as displacement when animals avoid an area they used to inhabit. For example, bird fatalities in a location not only impact resident species but also migrating birds, meaning the overall impact can be broader than expected.

A recent National Wind Coordinating Committee (NWCC) review found evidence of bird and bat deaths from collisions with wind turbines, as well as from changes in air pressure caused by the spinning turbines and habitat disruption. However, the NWCC concluded that these impacts are relatively low and do not pose a threat to species populations. Research into wildlife behaviour and advances in wind turbine technology have helped to reduce bird and bat deaths. For instance, wildlife biologists have found that bats are most active when wind speeds are low, so keeping wind turbines motionless during times of low wind speeds could reduce bat deaths without significantly affecting power production.

To minimise the impact on wildlife, wind energy developers and site operators must work to understand, avoid, and/or minimise these potential effects during all phases of a project's life. For example, developers are required to screen a site to help determine the potential for impacts on local wildlife, and emerging monitoring technologies are making it easier to identify the type and number of animals present at a potential wind energy site.

USGS science is also helping to reduce impacts from wind energy production. Scientists have developed decision-making tools to help plan the location of new wind facilities in places where the risk to wildlife is lower. Another study showed that systems put in place to automatically slow and temporarily shut off wind turbine blades when golden eagles are nearby are effective at reducing eagle fatalities.

Light and noise pollution

Wind turbines are one of the cleanest and most sustainable ways to generate electricity as they produce no toxic pollution or global warming emissions. However, they do have some environmental impacts.

Light Pollution

Wind turbines require aircraft warning lights, which can create light pollution. This has led to complaints from residents near turbines about "shadow flicker", which is caused by rotating turbine blades when the sun passes behind the turbine. Shadow flicker can be avoided by locating the wind farm away from areas that would be affected by shadow flicker or by turning the turbine off when the sun is at an angle that causes flicker.

Noise Pollution

Wind turbines can also generate noise pollution. Most of the sound generated by wind turbines is aerodynamic, caused by the movement of turbine blades through the air, and there is also mechanical sound generated by the turbine itself. Sounds caused by wind turbines include a mechanical hum produced by the generator and a "whooshing" noise produced by the blades moving through the air. While the noise generated by wind turbines is usually extremely low at typical setback distances, it can have a detrimental effect on nearby wildlife. Wind turbine noise can harm vital survival, social, and rearing mechanisms in certain species. However, a 2012 review of global peer-reviewed scientific data found that sound from wind power plants does not pose a risk of hearing loss and has no direct impact on physical human health.

Land use and landscape

While wind energy is often touted as a clean and renewable alternative to fossil fuels, the construction and operation of wind farms can have significant impacts on land use and the surrounding landscape.

One of the most significant impacts of wind farms on land use is the large amount of land area that is required for their installation. Wind turbines are typically spaced a distance of 5-10 times their height, to minimize the impact of turbulence on their performance. This means that a modern utility-scale turbine, with a height of around 200-300 meters

Peatland and carbon emissions

Wind turbines do not emit air or water pollutants and can help reduce electricity generation from fossil fuels, thereby lowering carbon dioxide emissions. However, the use of wind turbines for energy production has been associated with various environmental impacts, including bird and bat deaths, community concerns about sound and vibration, and land use.

Now, on to the topic of peatlands and carbon emissions:

Peatlands play a crucial role in carbon emissions and sequestration. While not all modified peatlands are carbon sources, certain management practices can significantly impact their carbon fluxes. The UK's Department of Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS) has published a report on the inclusion of peatlands in the country's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventory. The report estimates that UK peatlands could release over 20 megatonnes of CO2 annually, with lowland peat drained for intensive agriculture being the most intense GHG source.

The IUCN UK Peatland Programme promotes peatland restoration and advocates for recognizing the multiple benefits of peatlands. They have commissioned various initiatives, including a technical review of remote sensing for UK peatlands, a film series, and an update to the Peatland Code to highlight the importance of peatland rewetting for wildfire resilience.

The JNCC Resource Hub provides a review of current evidence on carbon and GHG fluxes from UK peatlands under different land management states. The study considers various land uses, such as semi-natural, drained, burnt, and converted to agriculture, to generate robust emission factors.

Overall, the inclusion of peatlands in emissions inventories and the promotion of peatland restoration are essential steps toward understanding and mitigating carbon emissions from these unique ecosystems.

Backup power sources and emissions

Using wind to produce energy has fewer effects on the environment than many other energy sources. Wind turbines do not emit air or water pollution and do not require water for cooling. They may also reduce electricity generation from fossil fuels, resulting in lower air pollution and carbon dioxide emissions.

However, wind turbines can have other environmental impacts. For example, they may affect the landscape, and a small number have caught fire or leaked lubricating fluids, although these occurrences are rare. Wind turbines can also impact wildlife, particularly birds and bats, although evidence suggests that these impacts are relatively low and do not threaten species populations. Additionally, wind turbines can generate sound and vibrations, which some people living close to wind facilities have complained about. However, studies in Canada and Australia have found that these issues do not adversely impact public health.

When considering backup power sources, it is essential to evaluate their environmental impact and potential energy savings. Traditional generators, especially diesel and gas generators, produce emissions that contribute to air pollution. Diesel generators, in particular, have been associated with high levels of CO2 and NOX emissions. As a result, diesel generators are falling out of favor due to environmental concerns.

To reduce environmental impact, alternative energy sources with fewer emissions can be considered. Solar power, for example, is a renewable energy option that can provide reliable backup power when paired with a battery storage system. Propane and natural gas generators are other options that provide a consistent and long-lasting power source during extended outages. While these options produce fewer emissions than diesel or gas generators, they still emit some pollutants.

For zero-emission backup power, hydrogen fuel cells are an increasingly popular option. Hydrogen fuel cells provide highly reliable backup power with no or low emissions, making them a cleaner and more cost-effective alternative to traditional combustion generators and battery backups. PEM fuel cells, in particular, have been found to be cost-competitive for short-run-time applications.

Frequently asked questions