Rockets: Polluters Or Not?

Rocket launches are an integral part of the 21st century, but they also contribute to pollution and climate change. The combustion-driven propulsion of rocket engines releases harmful emissions into the atmosphere, including black carbon, nitrogen oxides, alumina, chlorine, and water vapour. While most of this pollution is released at high altitudes, it can still have a significant impact on the climate and ozone layer. With the increasing demand for space tourism and satellite services, the number of rocket launches is expected to rise, exacerbating the environmental impact. While some companies are experimenting with cleaner fuels, the space sector remains unregulated by international treaties, and the full extent of rocket pollution is yet to be determined.

Rocket launches pollute the stratosphere

Rocket launches are an integral part of the modern world, but they also contribute to pollution in the Earth's stratosphere. While the impact of rocket emissions on the atmosphere and climate is still being studied, there are concerns about the pollution they generate at high altitudes, including in the stratosphere, which is about 20 km or more above the Earth's surface.

Rocket launches spew pollutants into the atmosphere, and the specific pollutants depend on the type of fuel used. Common rocket fuels include kerosene, hypergolic, liquid hydrogen, and solid fuels. The combustion of these fuels produces emissions such as nitrogen oxides (NOx), water vapour (H2O), black carbon (BC), alumina (Al2O3), and chlorine (derived from hydrochloric acid, HCl). These emissions contribute to ozone depletion through chemical reactions in the stratosphere. Ozone protects the Earth from harmful UV radiation, so its depletion poses a risk to humanity.

Water vapour released by rocket launches can act as a greenhouse gas in the stratosphere, and it also leads to increased cloud formation. Alumina and black carbon can cause radiative forcing, where they reflect and absorb solar flux, resulting in cooling. However, they can also absorb and trap long-wave radiation from the Earth, leading to warming. This warming of the stratosphere can accelerate ozone depletion by speeding up the chemical reactions that cause ozone loss.

The impact of rocket emissions on the stratosphere is not limited to chemical reactions. The re-entry of satellites and rocket boosters into the Earth's atmosphere also contributes to pollution. Scientists have found particles containing metals in the stratosphere, originating from the re-entry of these objects. Additionally, the burning of rocket fuel can release greenhouse gases like methane, and while methane-fuelled rockets produce less soot than kerosene-fuelled ones, they still release some soot.

While the space industry may bring benefits to the 21st century, it is important to address the pollution caused by rocket launches. Some companies are experimenting with new types of fuel that may burn cleaner, but the environmental impact of these alternatives is yet to be fully understood.

Climate change and ozone depletion

Climate change refers to the long-term alteration in Earth's climate, primarily driven by human activities that increase greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere. These gases, including carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide, trap heat, leading to a phenomenon known as the greenhouse effect. This effect is naturally occurring and essential for supporting life on Earth, but human activities have amplified it, resulting in global warming and climate change. The burning of fossil fuels, such as coal, oil, and gas, for energy production and transportation is the dominant source of these emissions. Deforestation and land-use changes also contribute, as trees absorb and store carbon dioxide, acting as natural carbon sinks. The consequences of climate change are far-reaching and include rising global temperatures, altered weather patterns, increased frequency and intensity of extreme weather events, sea-level rise, and disruptions to ecosystems and biodiversity.

Ozone depletion, on the other hand, specifically refers to the thinning or reduction of Earth's ozone layer in the upper atmosphere, particularly over the Antarctic region. The ozone layer plays a critical role in protecting life on Earth by absorbing and filtering out most of the Sun's harmful ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and other ozone-depleting substances (ODS) are the main contributors to ozone depletion. These chemicals, once widely used in refrigeration, air conditioning, foam-blowing agents, and aerosol propellants, are released into the atmosphere and can persist for many years. When they reach the stratosphere, they are broken down by intense UV radiation, releasing chlorine and bromine atoms that catalyze the destruction of ozone molecules. This leads to the formation of ozone holes, significantly reducing the ozone layer's ability to shield the Earth from UV-B and UV-C radiation, which are harmful to humans, animals, and ecosystems.

The release of ozone-depleting substances and their contribution to ozone depletion has global implications. UV-B radiation can cause skin cancer, cataracts, and weakened immune systems in humans, as well as harm marine ecosystems, including plankton, fish, and marine mammals. It also affects terrestrial ecosystems, reducing crop yields and causing developmental issues in plants and animals. Climate change and ozone depletion have synergistic effects as well. For example, increased UV-B radiation due to ozone depletion can affect the carbon cycle and impact climate change. It can accelerate the decomposition of organic matter in soils, reducing their ability to store carbon and potentially releasing more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

Addressing climate change and ozone depletion requires global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and phase out the use of ozone-depleting substances. International agreements, such as the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, have been pivotal in coordinating these efforts. The transition to renewable and low-carbon energy sources, improvements in energy efficiency, reforestation, and the development of sustainable agricultural practices are crucial steps in mitigating climate change. At the same time, strict regulations and the adoption of alternative chemicals and technologies have successfully phased out many ozone-depleting substances, leading to signs of recovery in the ozone layer.

Pollution from space debris

Space debris, also known as space junk, space waste, or cosmic debris, refers to defunct human-made objects in space that no longer serve a useful function. These include derelict spacecraft, abandoned launch vehicle stages, mission-related debris, and fragmentation debris from the breakup of rocket bodies and spacecraft. As of 2020, there were approximately 8,000 metric tons of space debris in orbit, with Low Earth Orbit (LEO) experiencing the highest level of pollution at 85%. This figure is only expected to increase, with the number of satellite launches rising and the end-of-life period for satellites in orbit being reduced from 25 to 5 years.

The accumulation of space debris has significant environmental implications. Firstly, it contributes to air pollution. When debris burns up in the atmosphere, it releases pollutants that can affect air quality. Secondly, the re-entry of spacecraft and the combustion of space debris can lead to global warming and ozone layer depletion. The emissions from these events contain pollutants such as NOx, H2O, BC, Al2O3, and gaseous chlorine, which can accelerate ozone depletion through chemical reactions in the Earth's stratosphere.

The increasing amount of space debris has also heightened the risk of collisions, endangering current and future space-based services, explorations, and operations, as well as posing a safety risk to people and property in space and on Earth. The high speeds at which space debris travels, up to 18,000 miles per hour, further exacerbates the potential impact of collisions.

To address the issue of space debris and its environmental consequences, various mitigation strategies have been proposed. These include active debris removal (ADR), utilizing green fuels with minimal emissions, enhancing spacecraft shields, and implementing regulatory measures to reduce the creation of additional space debris. However, the cleanup of space debris faces challenges due to the lack of international space laws and commercial incentives. The responsibility for managing space debris lies with all spacefaring countries, highlighting the need for global collaboration to tackle this issue effectively.

The impact of rocket fuel types

Rocket fuel types have a significant impact on the environment, with emissions contributing to ozone depletion and climate change. The four main fuel types are kerosene, hypergolic, liquid hydrogen, and solid, each with varying effects on the atmosphere.

Kerosene, a petroleum-based fuel, is the dominant propellant for launches in New Zealand, Russia, and the US. It contributes to the emission of pollutants such as nitrogen oxides (NOx), hydroxyl (OH), and black carbon (BC). These emissions have been shown to deplete the ozone layer, posing risks to humanity by reducing protection from harmful UV radiation.

Hypergolic fuels, commonly used in China, Kazakhstan, and Iran, also contribute to NOx emissions. Additionally, they produce gaseous chlorine, which can lead to further chemical reactions in the Earth's stratosphere.

Liquid hydrogen, while offering high specific impulse values and being suitable for space travel, has very low density. This requires larger storage volumes, increasing the mass of the launch vehicle. It is often used in combination with liquid oxygen, forming a highly efficient propellant system.

Solid rocket propellants, the oldest form dating back to the 7th century, are simple in design and consist of a casing filled with solid fuel and an oxidizer. They have higher density, resulting in greater thrust. Solid propellants are widely used in military applications and commercial rockets, but once ignited, they burn continuously, limiting their versatility.

The choice of rocket fuel type depends on various factors, including specific impulse, thrust, density, storability, and safety. The impact of these fuel types on the environment is an area of ongoing research, with the space sector currently unregulated by international treaties addressing pollution and climate change.

The future of the rocket industry

The "New Space" era has seen the emergence of commercial space companies, or "NewSpace", which operate as standalone industries dedicated to space exploration. These companies, such as SpaceX, have sparked a new space race, with billionaires like Richard Branson, Jeff Bezos, and Elon Musk seeking to commercialize space travel. This has led to an increase in rocket launches and, consequently, a rise in emissions and waste in the Earth's stratosphere. While most of the pollution from rocket launches is released at high altitudes, it still contributes to ozone depletion and climate change.

To mitigate the environmental impact, the rocket industry must focus on reducing emissions and regulating the space sector. Currently, the space sector is unregulated by international treaties such as the Montreal Protocol, which means that the global impact of rocket emissions on atmospheric composition and climate is yet to be fully assessed. As the industry continues to develop, it is crucial to prioritize sustainability and environmental protection.

In addition to addressing pollution concerns, the future of the rocket industry holds promising advancements. There is a rapid pace of development in orbital launchers, with companies like SpaceX pushing the boundaries of rocket technology. Model rocketry is also evolving, with enthusiasts replicating the successes of SpaceX and developing innovative projects. For example, Joe Barnard of Barnard Propulsion Systems is working on thrust vectoring for model rockets and propulsive landing systems, showcasing the advancements in the hobby rocketry scene.

The rocket industry is also witnessing a shift in fuel types used for launches. While kerosene, hypergolic, liquid hydrogen, and solid fuels are the main fuel types, there is variation among different countries. Solid fuels dominate launches from Japan, India, and French Guiana, while hypergolic fuels are typical in China, Kazakhstan, and Iran. As the industry progresses, we may see a greater focus on sustainable fuel sources and more efficient propulsion systems to reduce the environmental footprint of rocket launches.

Frequently asked questions