Outboard Motors: Eco-Friendly Or Polluting Our Oceans?

Outboard motors have evolved to become more environmentally friendly, but older models, particularly those purchased before 2006, are likely to be carbureted 2-stroke engines that emit 25-30% of their unburned fuel and oil mixture into the water. This pollution can affect the pH and dissolved oxygen levels in lakes and rivers, which in turn impacts the type and abundance of fish and wildlife. Electric outboard motors are a more sustainable alternative as they are exhaust- and emission-free, but they are more expensive than traditional outboard engines.

Two-stroke engines release unburned fuel into the water and air

Two-stroke engines are a common type of outboard motor. They are traditionally designed with both the intake and exhaust ports open during the piston's downstroke. This means that a significant amount of fuel, up to a third, passes through the combustion chamber unburned or partially burned. As a result, this unburned fuel is released directly into the water and air as pollution. This issue has been recognised by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the US, which has implemented emission standards for outboard manufacturers to reduce pollution.

The release of unburned fuel from two-stroke engines has detrimental effects on the environment. In the water, the fuel can form a film on the surface, impacting aquatic ecosystems. It can also affect the pH and dissolved oxygen levels, influencing the type and abundance of fish and wildlife. Additionally, the compounds in the unburned fuel can have toxic effects on fish, tainting their flesh and potentially affecting their reproduction.

The pollution from two-stroke engines is not limited to water but also extends to the air. The unburned fuel released into the air contributes to air pollution and can have respiratory health impacts on those nearby. This issue is particularly relevant as outboard engine exhaust pipes are often submerged, allowing the toxic gases to first contaminate the water before rising into the air.

To address the environmental concerns associated with two-stroke engines, some regions have taken regulatory action. For example, the US, Canada, Europe, Japan, Brazil, and Chile have banned the sale of the most polluting two-stroke engines. Additionally, manufacturers have transitioned to cleaner and more efficient technologies, such as four-stroke engines and direct injection two-stroke engines. These alternatives offer significant reductions in air and water pollution compared to older two-stroke models.

While the industry has made strides towards cleaner outboard motors, there is still a need for education and awareness among consumers. Boaters can play a crucial role in reducing pollution by upgrading their old two-stroke engines and adopting more environmentally friendly alternatives. Additionally, implementing best practices, such as proper engine tuning and respectful wildlife distancing, can further minimise the impact on the environment.

Four-stroke engines emit 97% less pollution than two-stroke engines

Outboard engines have been found to cause significant environmental damage. Two-stroke engines, in particular, have been criticised for their high levels of pollution. In fact, retired Queensland academic and marine industry researcher Gary Fooks claims that outboard engines are causing more environmental damage than oil spills.

Two-stroke engines burn a combination of lubricating oil and petrol, and a large amount of the oil is emitted as unburnt vapour. This results in the emission of smoke, carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, and particulate matter. These pollutants have severe environmental and health consequences. For example, in Asian cities, two-stroke engines on two- and three-wheeled vehicles have been found to cause respiratory issues, with two-thirds of residents experiencing respiratory symptoms.

To address this issue, some countries have taken steps to phase out two-stroke engines. For instance, in 2002, Dhaka, Bangladesh, phased out two-stroke baby taxis, leading to a 40% drop in particulate concentrations and a significant reduction in carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons. Similarly, San Fernando City in the Philippines offered interest-free loans for down payments on four-stroke tricycle models, resulting in the replacement of 400 two-stroke vehicles by March 2004.

Four-stroke engines have been recognised as a cleaner alternative to two-stroke engines. They operate by burning pure petrol, which results in significantly lower emissions. In fact, four-stroke engines emit just one-sixth to one-tenth of the hydrocarbons emitted by two-stroke engines, which equates to 97% less pollution. This makes four-stroke engines a more environmentally friendly option for outboard motors.

Electric outboard engines are emission-free but limited by battery weight and size

Outboard engines have long been associated with environmental damage and pollution. Two-stroke engines, in particular, have been criticised for their impact on the environment, with retired academic and marine industry researcher Gary Fooks claiming that they are "worse than an oil spill". Fooks also asserted that weekend boaters using outdated two-stroke engines dump thousands of tonnes of volatile organic compounds into Queensland waterways each year.

However, there are now several options for zero-emissions outboard engines, which are electric. Electric outboard engines are emission-free and quiet, and users don't need to worry about fuel and oil spills. They are also low maintenance and have low operating costs.

Despite these advantages, electric outboard engines are limited by the weight and size of the batteries they require. For example, the outboard engine of the Evoy Storm weighs 180kg, while the weight of the 70kWh battery pack is 400kg. The weight of the battery pack remains the same whether it is full or almost empty. However, some newer batteries are lighter, such as the 5kg detachable battery from the Spirit 1.0 Evo, which is the lightest in its class.

The weight of the battery can also be offset by the lack of a fuel tank and starter batteries, and batteries can be charged by renewable energy sources such as solar panels, wind or water generators.

Outboard motors can add metals and chemicals to the water

Outboard motors can have a detrimental impact on the environment, with their emissions contributing to air and water pollution. In particular, outboard motors can add metals and chemicals to the water. A study by the Wisconsin DNR examined the effects of motorized watercraft on aquatic ecosystems, finding that outboard motors can introduce metals and chemicals into the water column.

The type of fuel used in outboard motors is a significant factor in water pollution. Two-stroke engines, for instance, are known to emit a substantial amount of unburned fuel and oil into the water. This can result in the release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) into the environment. The Wisconsin DNR study found that two-stroke motors can discharge up to 30% of their unburned fuel and oil mixture into the water, while four-stroke motors emit 97% less pollution.

The impact of these emissions on water quality can be significant. High concentrations of outboard motor exhaust water can be toxic to fish, tainting their flesh and potentially affecting their reproduction. Additionally, the presence of unburned fuel and oil in the water can lead to the formation of undesirable tastes and odors, as well as the appearance of oily substances.

To address the issue of water pollution from outboard motors, some countries have taken regulatory action. The United States, Canada, Europe, Japan, Brazil, and Chile have implemented bans or regulations on the sale and use of certain two-stroke engines. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has also enacted emission standards for outboard manufacturers to reduce pollution.

To further mitigate the impact of outboard motors on water quality, individuals can consider switching to cleaner and more efficient engine types, such as four-stroke engines or electric motors. Electric outboard engines are emission-free, quiet, and have lower operating costs, making them a more environmentally friendly alternative to traditional outboard motors.

Outboard motors can negatively impact fish and wildlife

Secondly, outboard motors can emit toxic gases that can have detrimental effects on fish and other aquatic organisms. Research has shown that outboard motor exhaust water can be toxic to fathead minnows and bluegills, taint the flesh of various fish, and potentially impact their reproduction. These toxic compounds can also lead to the formation of undesirable tastes and odours in the water and the presence of oily substances.

Additionally, outboard motors contribute to air pollution. The exhaust pipes of outboard motors are underwater, so they first add to water pollution before the toxic gases bubble up into the air. The use of 2-stroke engines, which emit a high level of unburned fuel, further exacerbates this issue. The emissions from outboard motors include hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides, and carbon monoxide, which can have indirect effects on wildlife and the environment.

The impact of outboard motors on fish and wildlife is significant enough that some regions, including the United States, Canada, Europe, Japan, Brazil, and Chile, have implemented regulations to control outboard motor emissions and reduce their environmental impact. Electric outboard motors are also being introduced as a cleaner and more cost-effective alternative, offering quiet, exhaust-free, and emission-free propulsion.

Frequently asked questions