Electric Vehicles: Less Pollution, More Questions

Electric vehicles (EVs) are often touted as a more environmentally friendly alternative to traditional gasoline cars. While it is true that EVs have zero tailpipe emissions, the process of generating the electricity used to charge them may create carbon pollution. The environmental impact of EVs is influenced by various factors, including the energy sources used for electricity generation, tyre wear, and the manufacturing process. This article will explore the complexities of EV pollution and compare it to that of traditional gasoline vehicles to determine which has a lower environmental impact.

Electric vehicles have zero tailpipe emissions

Electric vehicles (EVs) have zero tailpipe emissions, meaning they emit no direct emissions. This is a significant advantage over conventional vehicles with internal combustion engines (ICEs), which produce emissions through the tailpipe, evaporation from the fuel system, and during the fueling process. The absence of tailpipe emissions in EVs eliminates local emissions of NOx and other harmful pollutants, improving air quality and reducing health problems associated with vehicle emissions.

However, it is important to note that EVs are typically heavier than their petrol or diesel counterparts, which can lead to increased pollution from brake, tyre, and road wear. This is because the increased weight can result in greater brake dust and tyre particulate matter pollution. Additionally, the energy required to manufacture EV batteries can contribute to higher carbon pollution during the production phase compared to gasoline cars.

Despite these considerations, EVs generally have a lower environmental impact than conventional vehicles. This is especially true in geographic areas that use low-polluting energy sources for electricity generation, such as renewable resources like wind or solar power. In these regions, the life cycle emissions of EVs, including fuel-cycle emissions and vehicle-cycle emissions, are significantly lower than those of conventional vehicles.

To maximize the environmental benefits of EVs, it is important to consider the entire life cycle of the vehicle, from production to end-of-life recycling or scrapping. Additionally, advancements in EV technology, such as regenerative braking and the development of special tyres with greater efficiency and less wear, can help mitigate the impact of increased weight on brake and tyre pollution.

Overall, while EVs may not completely eliminate all forms of pollution associated with vehicles, their zero tailpipe emissions contribute significantly to reducing air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, particularly in regions with cleaner electricity generation methods.

Electricity generation for charging may emit carbon

Electric vehicles (EVs) produce zero tailpipe emissions. However, the electricity used to charge them may emit carbon, depending on the energy sources used for electricity generation. For instance, in 2023, utility-scale electric power plants that burned coal, natural gas, or petroleum made up about 60% of the total annual US utility-scale electricity net generation, but they accounted for 99% of the associated carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions.

The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) considers electricity generation from biomass, hydro, solar, and wind to be carbon neutral. In 2020, renewable energy sources became the second-most prevalent US electricity source. The more renewable energy sources like wind and solar are used to generate electricity, the lower the total greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) associated with EVs.

The EPA and Department of Energy's (DOE) Beyond Tailpipe Emissions Calculator can help estimate the GHG emissions associated with charging and driving an EV or a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) in a particular area. In geographic areas that use relatively low-polluting energy sources for electricity generation, EVs typically have a significant life cycle emissions advantage over similar conventional vehicles running on gasoline or diesel.

On the other hand, in areas with higher-emissions electricity, EVs may not demonstrate as strong a life cycle emissions benefit. All electricity generation technologies emit GHGs at some point in their life cycle. Nuclear power emits just a few grams of CO2 equivalent per kilowatt-hour (kWh) of electricity produced, while estimates for solar range from a median of 12g CO2 equivalent/kWh to about one-third that of wind.

Overall, even accounting for electricity emissions, research shows that an EV is typically responsible for lower levels of GHGs than an average new gasoline car.

Total emissions depend on energy sources

Electric vehicles (EVs) produce zero tailpipe emissions. However, the electricity used to power them may be generated through carbon-emitting sources, such as coal or natural gas. The total emissions associated with EVs depend on the energy sources used to generate the electricity they run on.

In 2022, 60% of electricity in the US was produced by burning fossil fuels, mainly coal and natural gas. Fossil fuel use is the primary source of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. The burning of coal, natural gas, and oil for electricity and heat is the largest single source of global greenhouse gas emissions, accounting for 34% of the 2019 total. In the US, electricity production is the second-largest source of direct greenhouse gas emissions, after the transportation sector.

The environmental impact of EVs depends on the carbon intensity of the local power generation mix. In areas with relatively low-polluting energy sources, EVs typically have a significant life cycle emissions advantage over conventional gasoline or diesel vehicles. Conversely, in regions with higher-emissions electricity, the life cycle emissions benefit of EVs may be less pronounced.

The carbon intensity of electricity production varies across regions. For example, California, which has over one million electric vehicles, sources less than 1% of its electricity from EV charging. As more regions transition to cleaner energy sources, such as renewables, the emissions associated with EVs are expected to decrease further.

It is worth noting that, despite the upfront carbon emissions associated with EV battery manufacturing, over the lifetime of the vehicle, total greenhouse gas emissions associated with EVs are typically lower than those of gasoline cars. This is primarily due to the absence of tailpipe emissions in EVs and their generally lower GHG emissions during operation.

EVs may have higher manufacturing emissions

Electric vehicles (EVs) have zero tailpipe emissions. However, the electricity used to charge them may create carbon pollution, depending on the energy sources used for electricity generation. For example, coal or natural gas emit carbon pollution, whereas renewable resources like wind or solar do not.

While EVs typically produce lower levels of greenhouse gases (GHGs) than gasoline cars, some studies indicate that manufacturing a typical EV may generate more carbon pollution. This is due to the additional energy and intensive processes required to produce an EV's battery. The creation of large lithium-ion batteries involves the use of fossil fuels for mining and heating the necessary minerals, including lithium, cobalt, and nickel.

The higher emissions associated with EV battery manufacturing are estimated to be around 80% more than those of a comparable gas-powered car. However, it is important to consider the entire lifecycle of the vehicle. Over its lifetime, an EV is generally associated with lower total GHG emissions than a gasoline car. This is because, despite higher upfront emissions, EVs have zero tailpipe emissions and produce significantly fewer GHGs during operation.

The Argonne National Laboratory's GREET (Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Technologies) Model provides insights into the emissions associated with EV and gas-powered car manufacturing and end-of-life disposal. According to the model, manufacturing and end-of-life disposal contribute to approximately 9% of a gas car's emissions, while accounting for about 29% of an EV's emissions, with more than half attributed to the battery alone.

Additionally, the transition to EVs will lead to an increased demand for electricity. However, with smart planning and the integration of more clean energy sources, this demand can be met while still reducing overall emissions.

EVs reduce particulate matter from brake wear

Electric vehicles (EVs) have been accused of producing more particulate matter pollution than petrol and diesel cars. These claims suggest that EVs are heavier, and therefore the wear and tear on the roads may reduce the gains made by switching from combustion engine vehicles.

However, EVs produce zero tailpipe emissions, and the electricity used to charge them can come from renewable sources, which do not emit carbon pollution. EVs also have very low battery failure rates, with recent data showing a failure rate of 2.5% outside of recalls.

Secondly, EVs make little use of their brakes, meaning that heat build-up is not an issue, and brake drums can be used instead of discs. Brake drums are enclosed, so any particulates from their use are not released into the environment. This also contributes to a longer lifespan for EV brakes. For example, Ryan Todd, director of Dundee Taxi Rentals, notes that his electric Nissan Leaf taxis have a brake pad lifespan of 80,000 to 100,000 miles, compared to 20,000 to 25,000 miles for diesel taxis. Cleevely EV, a UK-based EV mechanic, regularly sees EVs with brakes that have lasted over 100,000 miles.

A study by Dr. Euan McTurk, sponsored by the Royal Automobile Club Foundation (RAC), found that EVs' brakes wear far more slowly than those of legacy vehicles. Dr. McTurk also found that tyre wear is similar for non-driven wheels and only slightly worse for driven wheels.

In summary, EVs reduce particulate matter from brake wear through the use of regenerative braking and the longer lifespan of their brakes.

Frequently asked questions