Space Junk: Threatening Our Space Devices?

Space debris, also known as space junk, is a growing concern for scientists and astronauts. Since the beginning of the space age in the 1950s, thousands of rockets and satellites have been launched into space, with many still in orbit. This has led to an increased risk of collision with other devices in space, including active satellites and the International Space Station (ISS). The ISS, for example, has had to carry out collision avoidance manoeuvres several times to prevent damage from space junk. Space debris also contributes to air pollution and ozone layer depletion, with black carbon ranked as the worst pollutant out of all the pollutants emitted from spacecraft rockets. The management of space debris is becoming a critical issue, with new technologies being developed to reduce and remove existing space junk.

Space junk/debris poses a collision risk to satellites and the ISS

Space junk, also known as space debris, refers to any piece of machinery or debris left by humans in space. This includes dead satellites, rocket debris, and even smaller objects like paint flecks. Since the 1950s, thousands of rockets have been launched, and an even greater number of satellites have been sent into orbit. Many of these satellites remain in orbit, along with rocket debris from launches over the years. This has led to an ever-increasing risk of collisions with active satellites and spacecraft, including the International Space Station (ISS).

The ISS routinely performs collision avoidance maneuvers to prevent damage from space junk. While collisions are rare, a Chinese satellite broke up after a collision with space junk in March 2021, and a satellite was last destroyed by space junk in 2009. The risk is particularly high in certain orbit altitudes, such as between 800 and 1100 km in altitude, which contain 40% of tracked space debris. Orbits near the Earth's poles are also more dangerous due to frequent orbit crossings.

The presence of space junk can also hinder future launches and space exploration efforts. It can release chemicals into the atmosphere, contributing to ozone layer depletion, and increase the risk of collision for incoming spacecraft. Additionally, space junk can make space missions more costly and difficult by requiring extra fuel for collision avoidance maneuvers and shielding to protect against small debris.

There have been various proposals and efforts to address the issue of space junk. Some methods involve capturing and removing space junk from orbit using nets, harpoons, robotic arms, or laser blasts. Other techniques include using grappling satellites to capture and eject debris, as well as de-orbiting defunct satellites to reduce the overall amount of space junk. These efforts are crucial to mitigate the growing risk of collisions and ensure the safety of active satellites and spacecraft like the ISS.

The ozone layer is depleted by space pollution

The ozone layer is a shield in the Earth's atmosphere that sits about 9 to 18 miles (15 to 30 kilometres) above the surface. It protects life on Earth from harmful UV radiation by absorbing it. Ozone depletion is a serious issue that has been caused by human activities, such as the release of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) from spray aerosols, refrigerators, and air conditioners.

Space pollution is also a contributing factor to ozone depletion. As rockets are launched into space, they release soot particles and alumina, a byproduct of solid-fuel rockets, into the stratosphere. These particles react with ozone molecules, triggering destructive reactions between ozone and chlorine that deplete the ozone layer. The increase in space travel and rocket launches is projected to expose humans to increased UV radiation, as the ozone layer is our primary protection against it.

Satellite remnants are another form of space pollution that contributes to ozone depletion. When satellites burn in the atmosphere, they release chemicals and aluminium oxides that can deplete the ozone layer. The atmospheric reentry process generates extreme heat, causing the satellites to disintegrate at an altitude of about 45 miles. The chemicals released during this process can alter the chemistry of the Earth's upper atmosphere and cause damage to the protective ozone layer.

Furthermore, the demand for global internet coverage has led to the planned launch of thousands of communication satellites by companies such as SpaceX, Amazon, and others. The short lifespan of these satellites, approximately five years, creates a cycle of planned obsolescence and pollution. As these satellites burn up in the atmosphere, they contribute to the depletion of the ozone layer through chemical reactions.

To address the issue of space pollution contributing to ozone depletion, some have called for an environmental review of the potential impacts of satellite launches. Additionally, the Montreal Protocol, proposed in 1987, aims to minimise the concentration of ozone-depleting substances in the atmosphere by regulating their use, production, and import. While ozone depletion has slowed, continued efforts are needed to ensure the recovery of the ozone layer to its pre-1980 condition.

The environmental impact of space debris is negative

The impact of space debris on the environment is twofold. Firstly, it contributes to the depletion of the ozone layer. Objects left behind in space release various chemicals into the atmosphere, including black carbon, which can contribute to global warming up to 500 times more than other pollutants emitted from spacecraft rockets. Secondly, space debris can hinder our ability to use weather satellites and monitor weather changes caused by ground-based pollution. The density of space junk may become so great that it interferes with our weather monitoring capabilities.

The risk of collision with space debris is a pressing issue. With an average impact speed of 10km/s, any piece of debris larger than 1cm in diameter can cause a catastrophic impact. A single collision can generate thousands of particles of space trash, as evidenced by the 2009 collision between the inactive Russian satellite Cosmos 2251 and the active American communication satellite Iridium 33, which resulted in approximately 2,000 pieces of debris at least 10cm in diameter and thousands of smaller pieces entering Earth's atmosphere. Furthermore, space debris can also prevent future launches from being successful, as the debris could collide with the spacecraft, causing further pollution and potential damage or destruction.

The negative environmental impact of space debris is not limited to the atmosphere and weather monitoring but also extends to the Earth itself. Larger debris can occasionally impact the Earth, causing detrimental effects. For example, debris from Russian Proton rockets in the Altai region of eastern Siberia includes old fuel tanks containing highly toxic fuel residue, unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine (UDMH), which is harmful to plants and animals. While efforts are made to contain the fallout from launches, it is challenging to achieve completely.

The problem of space debris is projected to worsen, with an expected increase in low Earth orbit satellites and the potential for space tourism, space hotel construction, and mineral extraction on the Moon. The current volume of OSD is already alarming, and without proper management and mitigation strategies, the issue will only become more severe.

Space debris can prevent future launches

Space debris, also known as space junk, is a pressing issue that poses a threat to future space exploration and our planet. The accumulation of defunct objects in space is a direct consequence of human activities beyond Earth's atmosphere. Since the launch of the first satellite in 1957, the amount of space debris has grown exponentially. This includes remnants of rockets, dysfunctional satellites, and even stray astronaut tools. The European Space Agency (ESA) estimates that there are over 130 million pieces of space junk, with sizes ranging from one millimeter to ten centimeters, traveling at speeds of 36,000 kilometers per hour.

The presence of space debris increases the risk of collisions with operational satellites, spacecraft, and astronauts. Even small pieces of debris can cause significant damage due to their high velocities. As a result, satellites are forced to perform collision avoidance maneuvers, and while collisions are rare, they can result in the destruction of satellites. The collision between two satellites can generate thousands of new pieces of debris, creating a cascade effect known as the Kessler Syndrome, further exacerbating the problem.

The impact of space debris extends beyond the immediate consequences of collisions. The objects left behind in space release chemicals into the atmosphere, contributing to the depletion of the ozone layer. Additionally, the mere presence of space debris can hinder scientific research and exploration efforts. The risk of collision and the need for avoidance maneuvers limit the effectiveness of scientific missions and the implementation of new technologies.

The escalating quantity of space debris has led to concerns about future launches. With an increasing number of dead satellites and debris in orbit, the chances of successful future launches diminish. The potential for collision with space debris may deter future space missions and exploration. Moreover, the debris generated from unsuccessful launches or on-orbit explosions contributes to the overall problem.

Addressing the issue of space debris is crucial to ensuring the long-term sustainability of space activities. Efforts are currently underway to develop advanced technologies for cleaning up space debris and preventing further accumulation. These include concepts like active debris removal, space-based lasers, and other innovative solutions. By managing and reducing space debris, we can mitigate the risks associated with future launches and continue to explore and utilize space while minimizing potential negative consequences.

There is a lack of incentive to clean up space junk

Space junk, or orbital debris, refers to any piece of machinery or human-made objects that have been left in space by humans. This includes dead satellites, spacecraft, launch vehicle stages, and debris fragments from collisions or anti-satellite tests. While space junk currently does not pose a significant risk to our exploration efforts, it can endanger astronauts and space missions. The biggest danger it poses is to other satellites in orbit, which have to perform hundreds of collision avoidance maneuvers each year to avoid being hit and potentially damaged or destroyed.

There is a growing recognition of the need to address the space junk problem, as the density of objects in orbit is increasing rapidly due to a booming space industry and the increased availability of small satellites at a lower cost. However, there has been a lack of incentive to clean up space junk, with industries hesitant to implement new technologies due to uncertain costs and a lack of comprehensive cost-benefit analyses of debris clean-up methods. This has resulted in a delay in policy development and the implementation of effective solutions.

The recent NASA report on the financial analysis of space debris is a positive step towards addressing this issue. The report illuminates the financial costs and benefits of various paths forward, providing industries with a better understanding of how to implement new technologies effectively. It also highlights that taking action immediately will have minimal financial drawbacks and a high debris-cleaning impact within a few years.

Despite the lack of incentives, some efforts are being made to clean up space junk. For example, the UK government launched a Plan for Space Sustainability in June 2022, which included a $6 million fund for Active Debris Removal (ADR). Additionally, companies are financially incentivized to develop technologies such as refuelling to extend satellite lifespans and enable them to manoeuvre to lower orbits once they are no longer in use.

In conclusion, while there has been a lack of incentive to clean up space junk due to uncertain costs and policy delays, the recent NASA report and increasing recognition of the problem are positive steps towards addressing this issue. With the right incentives and innovative technologies, we can work towards mitigating the impact of space junk on our exploration efforts and the environment.

Frequently asked questions