Nasa Rockets: Polluting Or Not?

As the world looks towards space tourism and an increase in rocket launches, the question of whether NASA rockets pollute is an important one. Rocket launches are an integral part of the 21st century, but their polluting exhausts are accelerating climate change. While the number of rocket launches is still relatively small compared to commercial flights, the space industry is expected to grow, and the impact of rocket emissions on the atmosphere is a cause for concern. The effects of rocket exhaust on Earth's atmosphere are not yet fully understood, but scientists are examining how rockets might harm the atmosphere, and companies are experimenting with new types of fuel to reduce environmental impacts.

Rocket fuel and emissions

The impact of rocket emissions on the atmosphere is difficult to determine. While the global quantities of gas emissions from rockets may not significantly affect the global climate or ozone layer, they are still a contributing factor. Rocket emissions have been growing faster than global emissions from other sources, and this growth is expected to accelerate. The number of rocket launches has increased steadily since the mid-2000s, with an average annual increase of 5.6%. The anticipated growth in space tourism and satellite launches will further increase the demand for rocket launches.

The choice of rocket fuel can also impact the environment. The fuel UDMH (unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine), used in many rockets, is highly carcinogenic and has been blamed for turning the Kazakh Steppe into an ecological disaster zone. RP-1, a highly refined form of kerosene, is one of the most popular rocket fuels due to its low cost, stability, and high energy output. However, it is also a pollutant and contributes to emissions.

Some companies are exploring sustainable alternatives to traditional rocket fuels. Virgin Orbit, for example, is investigating the use of sustainable rocket fuels and alternative launch methods, such as horizontal launches or slingshots. SpaceX's Raptor engine and the European Space Agency's Prometheus engine are designed to use gas as fuel, which has a higher performance and produces less soot. Start-ups are also experimenting with sustainable alternatives made from waste plastic or biomass, although these efforts are still in the early stages.

Climate change

The climate impact of rockets has not been seriously addressed, and there is a great deal of uncertainty about the effects of rocket emissions on the atmosphere. Rocket launches are an integral part of the 21st-century world, and the global space industry is experiencing a surge in the number of rockets launched into Earth's orbit. This increase in rocket launches will inevitably lead to a rise in rocket engine emissions, which contain gases and particles that can affect Earth's climate and ozone layer.

Rocket soot accumulates in the upper stratosphere, where the particles absorb sunlight, changing chemical reaction rates and likely leading to ozone loss. The space industry could impact the climate even if it doesn't grow as big as other polluting industries. Rocket launches affect the atmosphere in the areas where they take place. For example, the Baikonur launch site in Kazakhstan has created a large pollution zone due to toxic rocket fuel seeping into the soil. The fuel used by many rockets that blasted off from Baikonur was UDMH (unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine), which turned a large area of the Kazakh Steppe into an ecological disaster zone.

The impact of rocket emissions on the climate is expected to become more significant as the rate of rocket launches increases. Some companies are experimenting with new types of fuel that may burn cleaner, such as bio-propane, which can cut CO2 emissions by 90% compared to traditional launch fuel. Virgin Galactic's spaceships are also designed to be lightweight and fly hundreds of times to mitigate their environmental impact. However, kerosene-fueled rockets transport large amounts of black carbon or soot into the upper layers of the atmosphere, where it remains for a long time, potentially contributing to global warming.

The anticipated surge in emissions directly into the stratosphere would push the climate impacts of rocket emissions to be comparable in magnitude to other sources of climate change that receive intense study. For example, a 2010 global climate model study considered rocket BC emissions of 600 tons per year, more than double the current emissions of about 225 tons. This led to a significant increase in north polar surface temperatures and a loss of polar sea ice coverage. As the rate of rocket launches continues to increase, it is essential to address the climate impact of rocket emissions and explore ways to reduce their environmental impact.

Space junk and debris

Space junk or space debris refers to any piece of machinery or debris left by humans in space. This includes both large objects such as dead satellites that have failed or been left in orbit at the end of their mission, as well as smaller objects like bits of debris or paint flecks that have fallen off a rocket.

Since the dawn of the space age in the 1950s, thousands of rockets have been launched, and even more satellites have been sent into orbit. Many of these objects are still in orbit, and the risk of collision increases as more objects are launched. This could pose a significant issue in the future.

Space junk can be dangerous due to the high speeds at which objects orbit the Earth, with debris travelling at roughly 10 kilometres per second. A collision with a large object at this speed could be catastrophic, but even tiny pieces of space junk like paint flecks can be problematic. For example, a one-centimetre object could puncture the protective shields of the International Space Station (ISS).

Space junk has been generated in several ways. Firstly, through rocket launches, where debris such as paint flecks are released when rockets reach space. Secondly, through collisions or anti-satellite tests in orbit, which can create thousands of new pieces of dangerous debris. Additionally, some space junk has resulted from accidents, such as satellite explosions or collisions. Furthermore, some countries have used missiles to blow up their own satellites, contributing to the problem.

The accumulation of space junk has led to an increased focus on developing methods to slow down or remove this debris. One proposed method is the use of lasers to move small debris into new orbits, out of the way of working satellites. Another approach involves grappling satellites that can capture and eject debris or remove defunct satellites from orbit. While these methods show promise, the challenge of removing or mitigating space junk remains a pressing issue that requires continued attention and innovation.

Alternative fuels

The rocket and space businesses have been increasingly affected by the global focus on green technologies as the world grapples with pollution and climate change. The chemicals used in space propulsion have often been toxic, carcinogenic, and corrosive, such as hydrazine, mixed oxides of nitrogen, and UDMH (unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine).

The impact of rocket emissions on the atmosphere is not yet fully understood, but scientists are actively studying this issue. For instance, the interactions between Earth's atmosphere and methane-fuelled rocket engines have not been modelled, so the effects of these rockets are unknown. Similarly, the chemical kinetics of particles produced when spacecraft re-enter the atmosphere are not well understood, and some particles are very reactive, so small amounts could significantly affect atmospheric chemistry.

The good news is that researchers are exploring alternative sustainable solid fuels for hybrid rockets that are not derived from fossil fuels and are ideally carbon neutral. Hybrid rockets that use specific oxidizer-fuel combinations are considered a green alternative to current propulsion systems as they do not release very toxic or polluting exhausts, only less harmful substances such as carbon monoxide/dioxide and soot. Virgin Orbit is one company investigating the use of sustainable rocket fuels.

Another option to reduce the space industry's environmental impact is to explore new ways of launching satellites, such as horizontally or via a slingshot, as NASA is doing. However, the industry has little incentive to change due to the absence of regulations, the cost of new engines and testing, and the proven safety of current methods.

NASA's stance

Firstly, it's important to recognise that rocket launches do contribute to air pollution. Rocket engines emit pollutants such as black carbon, water vapour, carbon dioxide, hydrochloric acid, and other gases and particles. These emissions are released into the middle and upper atmosphere, including the stratosphere and mesosphere, which can have an impact on the ozone layer and temperatures.

NASA has been actively studying and addressing the issue of rocket pollution. The organisation has collaborated with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to study atmospheric layer altitudes and has contributed to research on rocket emissions estimates and projections. Additionally, NASA has been working on innovative ways to launch rockets, such as the slingshot method, which could potentially reduce atmospheric impact.

While NASA has not publicly stated a specific stance on rocket pollution, their actions indicate a recognition of the issue and a willingness to explore more sustainable practices. The organisation's involvement in research and the development of alternative launch methods suggest a commitment to mitigating the environmental impact of rocket launches.

It is worth noting that the space industry as a whole, including private companies and government agencies, is facing increasing pressure to address the environmental impact of their activities. With the expected surge in rocket launches due to space tourism, satellite constellations, and other emerging technologies, the industry will need to implement more sustainable practices to reduce their overall environmental footprint.

Frequently asked questions