Pollution Poisoning: Nature's Culling Hand?

Poisoning by pollution is a major driver of population decline in several animal species. However, some animals have been observed to adapt to polluted environments, sparking the question: could poisoning by pollution be natural selection? While the impact of pollution on animal populations is complex and difficult to predict, there is evidence that it can act as a selective pressure, influencing the evolution of certain species.

Animals are adapting to polluted environments

Animals are rapidly adapting to the increasingly polluted world. Killifish, for instance, have been found to have remarkable tolerance for a wide range of environmental challenges, including pollution. They have been found to be far more tolerant of toxic compounds like polyaromatic hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyl, and dioxins. The basic adaptation observed in these fish is the desensitization of the aryl-hydrocarbon receptor pathway, an important detoxifying pathway that allows proteins to break down toxic compounds. This adaptation helps the fish survive in highly contaminated environments.

Another example is that of pigeons and rats, which seem to thrive in new urban environments. On the other hand, some animals like coral reefs and giant pandas seem to be dangerously close to extinction.

The ability to cope with human-induced climate shifts determines which animals pass on their genes to the next generation. This selective pressure influences the building blocks (genes) of evolution in a species. For instance, snakes with high resistance to toxins in newts have been found to have a reproductive advantage over those with low or no resistance.

While animals are adapting to polluted environments, these changes also cause evolutionary trade-offs. Even if animals can initially survive in polluted environments, they may face long-term consequences that are difficult to predict and could lead to their decline.

The evolutionary influence of anthropogenic stressors

The presence of persistent pollutants, such as dioxins, phenyls, hydrocarbons, and pesticides, poses a significant challenge to many species. These substances can persist in the environment for generations, exerting selective pressures that influence the genetic building blocks of evolution. While some species, like urban rats and pigeons, seem to thrive in these altered environments, others, such as coral reefs and giant pandas, are pushed towards extinction. The ability to cope with human-induced climate shifts becomes a crucial factor in determining the survival and reproductive success of species.

The evolutionary response to anthropogenic stressors is complex and varies across species. In the case of killifish, the evolutionary influence of pollution has resulted in the alteration of allele frequencies at loci associated with fitness. This adaptation allows them to tolerate toxic compounds, increasing their chances of survival in polluted habitats. However, as noted by Reid et al., these adaptations come with trade-offs, and the long-term consequences for affected species are difficult to predict.

While some species may develop resistance or tolerance mechanisms, others may experience negative impacts on their reproductive success and overall fitness. For example, in the great African lakes, increasing eutrophication has been linked to a decrease in sexual selection among cichlid fishes, potentially leading to a breakdown of reproductive barriers and a negative impact on biodiversity. Additionally, the complexity of industrial pollutants, which can cause toxicity through diverse mechanisms, may hinder the rapid evolution of adaptive phenotypes, especially in species with small population sizes.

Pollution-adapted killifish populations

Killifish populations have been found to adapt and survive in polluted waters, with some exhibiting tolerance to concentrations of toxic industrial pollutants up to 8,000 times higher than sensitive fish. These pollution-adapted killifish populations provide valuable insights into the genetic basis of adaptation and the impact of human-induced environmental changes.

Killifish, with their extremely high levels of genetic variation, serve as a model for studying the effects of pollution on animal populations. Researchers have compared killifish populations from polluted and non-polluted sites along the East Coast estuaries, specifically in New Bedford Harbor, Massachusetts; Newark Bay, New Jersey; Connecticut's Bridgeport area; and Virginia's Elizabeth River. These sites are heavily contaminated with industrial chemicals, including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dioxins, and hydrocarbons (PAHs).

Genetic analysis of the killifish populations revealed hundreds of "hotspots" in the genome, indicating regions that have undergone natural selection in response to pollution. The adaptations observed in the pollution-resistant killifish involve the desensitization of the aryl-hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) pathway, which is crucial for detoxifying toxic compounds.

The discovery of pollution-adapted killifish populations highlights the evolutionary influence of anthropogenic stressors as selective agents. However, it is important to note that adaptation to chemical pollution may come with trade-offs, such as increased sensitivity to other stressors or potential long-term consequences that are difficult to predict.

While the genetic diversity of killifish allows them to adapt and survive in polluted environments, it also makes them a valuable subject for research. By studying the genetic basis of their resistance, scientists can gain insights into the toxicity, mechanisms, and health effects of hazardous contaminants, as well as their potential impact on humans and other species.

Poison-driven population decline

Poisoning by pollution can be a natural selection process. While some animals are dangerously close to extinction due to human-caused climate shifts, others are adapting to polluted environments. Animals that are best able to cope with human-induced changes tend to be the ones to pass on their genes to the next generation.

For example, in the great African lakes, there is evidence that pollution works negatively, with increasing eutrophication curbing sexual selection. As sexual selection has been a primary driver of speciation in these systems, the impact on biodiversity (evolution) is likely to be negative.

Similarly, in a study, it was found that the number of red kite breeding pairs in Spain decreased by at least 31% in 20 years, with poisoning being a major cause. Poisoning in all its forms, such as poaching, pest and predator control, and anthropogenic pollutants, threatens the global populations of at least 2,602 animal species, representing about 3.5% of the 73,488 animal species and 3.5% of the 50,816 vertebrate species on the IUCN Red List.

In another instance, the teleost fish Fundulus heteroclitus has independently evolved adaptive resistance to chemical pollutants. In these polluted populations, natural selection has likely altered allele frequencies of loci that affect fitness or are linked to these loci.

Killifish from polluted areas are far more tolerant of a large class of persistent toxic compounds like polychlorinated biphenyls and dioxins. They have the same basic adaptation: desensitization of the aryl-hydrocarbon receptor pathway, an important detoxifying pathway that allows proteins to break down toxic compounds.

The impact of pollution on sexual selection

Human activities have led to various forms of pollution, including chemical, light, noise, and heat, which have negatively impacted the environment and wildlife. These pollutants can interfere with biological processes, such as reproduction, and have consequences for sexual selection and the evolutionary trajectory of affected populations. While some animals thrive in polluted environments, the long-term consequences are challenging to predict and could lead to their decline.

Light pollution, for instance, can negatively affect mate attraction success, as observed in the European common glow-worm. However, it is suggested that sexual selection for brighter signals could mitigate the impact of light pollution in this species. On the other hand, water conditions can influence female preferences for ultraviolet-based traits in the three-spined stickleback.

In aquatic ecosystems, invasive species can interfere with the mating signals of native species through "pheromone pollution." For example, the introduction of sea lampreys in the Laurentian Great Lakes poses a threat to native lamprey species' successful reproduction.

Pollution can also have complex evolutionary consequences. While some animals adapt to polluted environments, these changes can lead to evolutionary trade-offs, impacting reproductive success. For instance, killifish populations in polluted environments have become tolerant of toxic compounds, but these adaptations may come with unknown long-term consequences.

Overall, pollution has significant impacts on sexual selection and reproduction in wildlife, affecting the viability and evolutionary trajectory of populations. While some species may adapt to pollutants, the complex interactions between pollution, sexual selection, and evolution are still not fully understood and require further research.

Frequently asked questions