Masks: Pollution Protection Or Just A Myth?

Face masks have become a common sight in recent years, with many people wearing them to protect themselves and others from infectious diseases like COVID-19. But do masks also protect against air pollution? The answer is complicated and depends on various factors, including the type of mask, the type of pollutant, and how well the mask fits. While some masks, like simple paper or surgical masks, offer limited protection against air pollution, others, like N95 respirators, are much more effective at filtering out airborne particles. Additionally, masks with features like activated charcoal can help reduce exposure to harmful gases. Studies have shown that wearing particle-filtering masks can positively impact cardiovascular health, but more research is needed to understand the effects on lung health and long-term exposure. Overall, while masks can help reduce exposure to air pollution, they are not a perfect solution, and other measures, such as indoor air purifiers, may also be necessary to improve air quality.

N95 masks can protect against COVID-19 and air pollution

Face masks have become a common sight since the outbreak of COVID-19. They are an effective barrier to the spread of the virus, especially for unvaccinated individuals. But do they also protect against air pollution?

N95 masks are a type of respirator that can filter out both large and small particles when the wearer inhales. They are highly effective at filtering out airborne particles, with a protection factor of 5, meaning they can filter out all but 5% of particles. They are also effective at reducing exposure to PM2.5 and other airborne particulates, decreasing the chance of illness and death related to air pollution. N95 masks are particularly good at protecting against viral infections like COVID-19 and are recommended for use during air pollution caused by wildfires.

A study from Colorado State University found that wearing N95 respirators could reduce the public's risk of respiratory hospitalizations caused by wildfire smoke by 22-39%. Another study from Beijing, China, found that N95 masks were most effective for filtering PM2.5 and diesel soot. N95 masks with respirator valves can also improve protection against PM2.5 and various small-sized pathogens, while also offering less breathing resistance.

However, N95 masks do have some drawbacks. They can be hard to come by and usually need to be fitted to the wearer's face. They are also more expensive than other types of masks and may not be practical for everyone, especially those with beards or who are unshaven, as they cannot achieve a tight fit.

While N95 masks are effective at protecting against both COVID-19 and air pollution, it is important to consider the limitations and ensure proper use and fitting to maximize protection.

Masks with a good seal are most effective

Masks are assigned a protection factor, which is the percentage of a pollutant that the mask does not filter out. A protection factor of 10 means that all but 10% of the pollutant is filtered out by the mask, assuming it fits tightly on the face. Masks with a good seal are most effective at preventing air pollution exposure. A good seal ensures that particles do not leak in or out of the mask, protecting you from harmful particles and preventing infected aerosols from escaping.

Simple paper dust masks are largely ineffective when it comes to reducing air pollution exposure. They often lack a sturdy clip to create a tight seal around the nose, and air can flow freely in and out of them. Cotton masks also tend to have large gaps that the pollution filter cannot reach.

However, some inexpensive HEPA filter masks can be effective in limiting exposure to fine particles. The N95 masks, for example, have a protection factor of 5 and can filter out 95% of particles larger than 0.3 microns. They are among the top-performing masks for particulate matter and are affordable and easily available. N95 masks can also be combined with features such as activated charcoal to reduce exposure to gases, though these masks are more expensive.

The IQAir Mask is another example of a highly effective air pollution mask. It is designed to provide superior reduction for a wide range of airborne pollutants while also being comfortable to wear. It is a valveless, medical-grade, all-day protection KN95-certified air pollution mask that filters 95% of particles down to 0.3 microns.

Masks with filters can be effective against fine particles

Masks with filters can be effective in reducing exposure to fine particles. Their effectiveness depends on the type of pollutant, the mask, and how it is used. Masks are assigned a protection factor, which is the percentage of a pollutant that the mask does not filter out. A protection factor of 10 means that all but 10% of the pollutant is filtered out, assuming a tight fit.

Simple paper dust masks are largely ineffective in reducing exposure to air pollution. However, inexpensive HEPA filter masks, such as N95 respirators, can be highly effective, with a protection factor of 5, filtering out 95% of particles larger than 0.3 microns. N95 masks are also effective against COVID-19 and diesel soot. N99 masks, which filter out 99% of airborne particles, are recommended for sensitive individuals.

The seal of the mask is critical to its effectiveness. A good seal ensures a tight fit, preventing particles from leaking in or out of the mask. Masks with respirator valves may protect the wearer but do not protect others if the wearer is infected, as the air is not filtered upon exhalation.

Some masks, such as the Respro® Masks, are designed for specific environments, like urban sports, and feature replaceable filters with a lifespan of up to 69 hours. Masks with nanofiber technology, like Vogmask™, provide N99-rated filtration and are washable without losing filtration efficiency.

Masks may not filter out gases and the smallest particles

Masks are assigned a protection factor, which is the percentage of a pollutant that the mask does not filter out. A protection factor of 10 means that all but 10% of the pollutant is filtered out by the mask, assuming that the mask fits tightly on the face. Simple paper dust masks are largely useless when it comes to lessening air pollution exposure. Cotton masks also tend to have large gaps that the pollution filter cannot reach. Even common N95 paper masks often lack a method to tighten straps, while others lack a sturdy clip to create a tight seal around the nose.

The effectiveness of masks is reduced for particles smaller than 0.3 microns. Bacteria are larger, but viruses and many fine particles in motor-vehicle emissions are smaller. Masks like normal surgical masks don’t do much good against PM2.5 particulates, but they may do something. N95 masks, on the other hand, do a great deal to keep dirty air out of your lungs. However, they do not remove harmful gases from the air. To filter out gases, N95 masks can be combined with features such as activated charcoal, but these masks are more expensive and care should be taken to identify which gases they filter and how effectively.

Ozone is not able to be blocked by masks. Masks are only effective if they provide a good seal around the face. Men with beards or who are unshaven cannot achieve an adequately tight fit around the nose and mouth. Additionally, while our exposure to air pollution is typically greater outdoors, we spend the majority of our time indoors, where we are exposed to air pollutants, including gases and fine particles. Since masks are seldom worn indoors, the use of indoor air cleaners that have particle- and gas-filtering capabilities would be needed to mitigate this issue.

Masks can reduce exposure to air pollution, lowering health risks

Masks can indeed reduce exposure to air pollution, thereby lowering health risks. The effectiveness of masks depends on the type of pollutant, the mask itself, and how it is used. Masks are assigned a protection factor, which is the percentage of a pollutant that the mask does not filter out. For example, a protection factor of 10 means that 10% of the pollutant is not filtered out, assuming the mask fits tightly on the face.

Simple paper dust masks and surgical masks are largely ineffective in reducing exposure to air pollution, especially against coarse and fine pollution particles ranging from 0.3 to 10 microns in size. However, inexpensive HEPA filter masks, such as N95 respirators, can be highly effective in filtering out fine particles. N95 masks can filter out at least 95% of airborne particles larger than 0.3 microns, which includes most PM2.5 particles. It is important to note that N95 masks do not filter out harmful gases, but they can be combined with features like activated charcoal to reduce exposure to gases.

Studies have shown that wearing particle-filtering masks, such as N95 masks, can lead to positive health outcomes. For example, a study in Beijing found that participants had lower blood pressure when wearing N95 masks, suggesting that these masks can reduce the short-term effects of urban air pollution on the heart and blood vessels. Additionally, during periods of poor air quality, the risk of infectious diseases increases, and masks can help reduce transmission, as seen in a study that found that mask mandates prevented 200,000 cases of COVID-19.

While masks can provide protection, they may be uncomfortable or challenging to use for some people. Additionally, a good seal around the face is crucial for the mask's effectiveness, which may be difficult to achieve for individuals with facial hair. Overall, while masks can help reduce exposure to air pollution and lower health risks, they should be used in conjunction with other measures, such as indoor air purifiers, to ensure comprehensive protection.

Frequently asked questions