Socialism Vs Capitalism: Who Pollutes More?

Capitalism and socialism are two opposing economic systems that have been at the forefront of the global economy debate for decades. While capitalism is a system where the means of production and distribution are privately owned, socialism advocates for public or collective ownership. The impact of these opposing ideologies on the environment has been a subject of intense debate, with proponents of each system arguing that the other causes more pollution. Supporters of capitalism argue that socialism has a dismal environmental legacy, pointing to examples such as the pollution in former socialist countries like East Germany and the Soviet Union. On the other hand, supporters of socialism argue that capitalism's relentless pursuit of profits leads to environmental degradation and that only a socialist system can truly address the climate crisis. With the world facing an unprecedented climate emergency, the question of which system is more conducive to environmental protection is of utmost importance.

Characteristics of Socialism and Capitalism in relation to pollution

Capitalism's pursuit of profit causes pollution

Capitalism's pursuit of profit is a major cause of pollution and environmental degradation. This economic system, driven by the motive to maximise profits, often comes at the cost of the environment. The focus on profit leads to increased production and consumption, resulting in a higher demand for energy and natural resources, which contributes to pollution and climate change.

The endless pursuit of profit by private owners forces a "perpetual treadmill of production and consumption", as described by Hans A. Baer. This relentless drive for economic growth and market dominance leads to the overexploitation of natural resources and the intensification of environmental issues.

An example of this dynamic can be seen in the plastic industry. The shift from reusable containers to disposable plastic was motivated by the profits that could be generated by encouraging single-use products. This change led to a tsunami of plastic trash, with manufacturers shifting the blame onto consumers, or "litter bugs", rather than addressing their role in creating a culture of disposability.

The capitalist system also contributes to food waste, which is another significant driver of climate change. The competition between companies and the pressure to maximise profits lead to overproduction, resulting in about a third of fruits and vegetables being rejected even before they reach the shops due to aesthetic standards. This wasted food releases greenhouse gases as it rots, contributing to the climate crisis.

Furthermore, the accumulation of wealth and the pursuit of profit under capitalism result in a disparity between the environmental impacts of the rich and the poor. While many individuals strive to be "green consumers", the reality is that their consumption patterns are often driven by their financial capacity. The richest 1% of the world's population produces an average of more than 70 tonnes of carbon dioxide per person per year, far exceeding the sustainable limit of two tonnes required to prevent global heating.

The pursuit of profit under capitalism creates artificial economic barriers to implementing known solutions to environmental issues. Technological advancements may exist, but their adoption may conflict with the profit motive as they could increase costs and reduce competitive advantage. This dynamic perpetuates environmental harm as the necessary steps to mitigate pollution are hindered by financial considerations.

Socialist countries have a poor environmental record

The environmental legacy of socialism is a contentious issue. Some sources argue that socialist countries have a poor environmental record, while others suggest that the perception of socialist states as ecologically disastrous is exaggerated.

One argument against the environmental record of socialist countries is that central planners tend to focus on heavy industry at the expense of the environment. For example, Jeffrey Sachs noted that the "singular dominant fact of the Soviet economic strategy" was the subordination of all other goals to the development of heavy industry. This led to industrial pollution from factories in Eastern Europe, with Time magazine describing the region as "where the sky stays dark." Acid rain in Krakow, Poland, damaged historic buildings and statues, and industrial pollution contributed to respiratory problems, throat cancer, and other illnesses for residents.

In addition to industrial pollution, socialist policies have been linked to other forms of environmental degradation. For instance, in Venezuela, socialist policies have been blamed for contaminating drinking water supplies, rampant deforestation, unrestrained mining activity, and frequent oil spills attributed to the state-owned energy company. Similarly, in Cuba, the quest to maximize production at all costs has resulted in extensive air, soil, and water pollution, according to researchers Díaz-Briquets and Pérez-López. They describe Cuba's environmental record after decades of socialist control as "far different from the utopian view."

The issue of property rights, or the lack thereof, in socialist societies is also cited as a factor contributing to poor environmental outcomes. Without clearly defined property rights, it becomes difficult to hold individuals or governments accountable for environmental damages. Planners can increase industrial output without bearing the costs of pollution, and there are fewer incentives to conserve resources. This can lead to the overexploitation and degradation of natural resources, as seen in the example of overfishing in public waterways compared to private lakes and streams.

However, it is important to acknowledge that the perception of socialist states as ecologically disastrous may be exaggerated. Recent scholarship suggests that the environmental legacies of Soviet states, for example, have been oversimplified and require re-examination. While it is undeniable that air and water pollution were significant issues in socialist Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, with particulate air pollution estimated to be 13 times higher per unit of GDP than in Western Europe, other factors may have contributed to this disparity. For instance, subsidized energy prices in socialist economies made industrial production far more energy-intensive, leading to increased pollution levels.

Furthermore, proponents of socialism argue that it is precisely the establishment of a socialist society that will address the ecological challenges posed by capitalism. According to this view, socialism will prioritize the satisfaction of human needs and the rational application of knowledge and energies on a global cooperative scale, thereby mitigating environmental harm.

Capitalism's expansion causes societal breakdown

Capitalism is an economic system in which private actors own and control property in accordance with their interests, and demand and supply freely set prices in markets. The essential feature of capitalism is the motive to make a profit. This motive has been criticised for causing pollution, as production is for profit, creating an economic barrier to the implementation of known solutions.

Capitalism's expansion has been linked to societal breakdown in several ways. Firstly, it has been argued that the pursuit of profit leads to the overexploitation of natural resources, which can result in environmental degradation and societal collapse. This is supported by the example of the Sea Peoples, who were likely victims of environmental changes that led to widespread famine and the Late Bronze Age Collapse.

Secondly, the prioritisation of short-term profits for individuals over the long-term well-being of society can create discontent and political unrest. This was evident during the Covid-19 pandemic and the climate crisis, where the shortcomings of capitalism became apparent.

Thirdly, the success of capitalism relies on free markets, which can be hindered by powerful private interests that seek to protect their economic position at the expense of the public interest. This can lead to "crony capitalism", where nepotism and political interest take precedence over efficiency.

Lastly, the expansion of capitalism can lead to increased economic inequality. In contemporary market economies, the rate of return on investment frequently outpaces overall growth, leading to a widening wealth gap between those who own capital and those who rely on other forms of earnings, such as wages.

In conclusion, while capitalism has brought about numerous innovations and lifted many people out of poverty, its expansion has also contributed to societal breakdown through environmental degradation, inequality, political unrest, and the influence of powerful private interests.

Under socialism, no one is held accountable for pollution

The argument that socialism is worse for the environment than capitalism stems from the idea that in a socialist society, it is impossible to hold individuals or governments accountable for environmental damage. Without property rights, planners can increase industrial output without compensating those who bear the costs in the form of pollution.

In a capitalist society, property rights offer protection against environmental harm and give resource owners the incentive to conserve. In contrast, in a socialist society, communal property ownership means that no one owns or is responsible for a natural resource, leading to the inclination for individuals to abuse or deplete the resource before someone else does. This phenomenon is known as the "tragedy of the commons".

For example, people tend to litter public streets and parks more than their own yards, and national forests may be carelessly over-logged, while private forests are carefully managed and reforested by lumber companies. Similarly, game fish are overfished in public waterways but thrive in private lakes and streams.

The socialist economies of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union serve as examples of this phenomenon. These countries experienced extensive air and water pollution, with particulate air pollution in Central and Eastern Europe estimated to be 13 times higher per unit of GDP than in Western Europe in the late 1980s. As a result, respiratory illnesses from pollution were rampant, with 60% of the population in East Germany suffering from respiratory ailments and nearly half of all children in Leningrad experiencing intestinal disorders due to contaminated water.

Additionally, the destruction of the Aral Sea between Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan has been attributed to Soviet economic policies. Central planners, focused on making the USSR self-sufficient in cotton production, mandated industrial agriculture in the arid region, leading to massive water diversions for irrigation and causing the biggest man-made loss of water in history. As a result, the sea's salty floor was exposed, along with pesticides from agricultural operations, which were carried by strong winds to nearby communities. The human and environmental consequences are still being felt today, with infant mortality rates and childhood illnesses remaining high in the region.

Capitalism's technology causes overproduction

The capitalist system has been criticized for its negative impact on the environment, with some arguing that it is a major contributor to climate change and environmental degradation. This is due, in part, to the inherent focus of capitalism on profit-driven growth and consumption, which can lead to overproduction and excessive consumption.

Capitalism's emphasis on individualism and free markets can hinder collective action and regulation, making it difficult to implement effective climate policies. The drive for endless economic expansion and profit maximization promotes resource extraction, overproduction, and excessive consumption, all of which contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and environmental degradation.

For example, the oil and gas industry often operates in developing countries with lax environmental regulations, where they have been accused of polluting water sources, releasing toxic fumes, and causing soil contamination. The pursuit of profit and economic growth has also led to the exploitation of natural resources and cheap labor in developing countries, with developed nations using them as dumping sites for hazardous waste and electronic garbage.

The capitalist system's focus on short-term gains over long-term sustainability can also lead to underpricing natural resources, resulting in overconsumption. This dynamic of constant consumption and production, driven by the profit motive, is inherent to capitalism as an economic system.

While some argue that socialism is a better alternative for the environment, others point out that socialist countries have also faced significant environmental issues, such as extensive air, soil, and water pollution. However, it is important to note that the success of capitalist growth rates cannot be ignored, and the blame for environmental issues cannot be solely attributed to capitalism.

Frequently asked questions