Green Energy Sources: Least Pollution, Maximum Benefits

Pollution is the leading environmental cause of disease and premature death, with air pollution being the most significant contributor. It is caused by solid and liquid particles and certain gases that are suspended in the air, and these particles and gases can come from car and truck exhaust, factories, dust, pollen, mold spores, volcanoes, and wildfires. Industrialization, the use of pesticides and nitrogen-based fertilizers, crop residues in agriculture, urbanization, forest fires, desert dust, and inadequate waste management have intensified environmental health risks and pollution. In this context, it is important to understand which sources of energy or fuel cause the least pollution when burnt. While all types of fuel combustion leads to some amount of pollution, natural gas is considered the cleanest-burning fossil fuel and causes the least pollution when burnt due to its simple hydrocarbon structure.

Characteristics of the cause of least pollution

Natural gas is the cleanest-burning fossil fuel

Natural gas is a fossil fuel that is derived from organic material buried in the Earth millions of years ago. It is primarily composed of methane, a greenhouse gas that is a more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide (CO2). However, when burned, methane produces mostly CO2 and water vapour, similar to human breath.

Natural gas is often referred to as a "clean" or "clean-burning" fossil fuel because it emits less pollution and carbon dioxide than other fossil fuels like coal and petroleum products. For instance, when compared to coal and fuel oil, natural gas produces lower amounts of CO2 for every 1 million British Thermal Units (BTU) consumed. This makes it the cleanest-burning fossil fuel available.

The popularity of natural gas has increased significantly over the past 50 years due to its perceived cleanliness and the expansion of pipeline infrastructure, making it convenient and economical for residential, commercial, and industrial use. In the United States, it is the leading energy choice for homes and industries, with over 65 million households relying on it.

However, it is important to note that the term "clean" is relative and does not mean that natural gas is entirely pollution-free. While it may be cleaner than other fossil fuels, natural gas still contributes to global warming and air pollution. Additionally, some natural gas leaks into the atmosphere from oil and gas wells, storage tanks, pipelines, and processing plants, which can have environmental consequences.

Furthermore, the burning of natural gas, or flaring, at well sites to prevent its release into the atmosphere, produces CO2, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and other compounds, depending on its chemical composition and combustion efficiency. Nevertheless, flaring is considered safer and results in lower overall greenhouse gas emissions than releasing methane into the air.

Water treatment plants reduce pollution

Water treatment plants are essential for reducing water pollution and protecting public health, the environment, and ecosystems. They play a crucial role in removing biological pollutants, such as bacteria, viruses, fungi, and protozoans, which can contaminate water sources and potentially cause waterborne diseases. Additionally, wastewater treatment plants help to reduce erosion by minimising runoff into streams or rivers, which can lead to flooding in downstream areas.

Wastewater treatment plants process water from homes and businesses, removing pollutants such as nitrogen and phosphorus from human waste, food, and certain soaps and detergents. These plants employ specialised processes like biological nutrient removal (BNR) to reduce nutrient levels in treated wastewater. BNR uses microorganisms to convert nitrogen and phosphorus into harmless gases, reducing the potential for nutrient pollution when the treated water is discharged.

The construction of centralised sewage treatment plants began in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, primarily in the United Kingdom and the United States. These plants were designed to prevent the direct discharge of sewage into nearby bodies of water, instead utilising physical, biological, and chemical processes to remove pollutants. Today, wastewater treatment facilities in the United States process approximately 34 billion gallons of wastewater daily.

In addition to pollution control, wastewater treatment plants offer various environmental and economic benefits. By integrating sustainable energy practices, these plants contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and combating climate change. The sludge produced during the treatment process can be transformed into a valuable resource for improving soil fertility and agricultural practices, reducing the need for synthetic fertilisers and promoting sustainable food production.

Furthermore, treated wastewater can be reused in industrial operations, reducing costs associated with sourcing freshwater from distant sources. Wastewater treatment plants can also generate renewable energy and reduce their carbon footprint. For example, methane, a potent greenhouse gas produced during the anaerobic digestion of sludge, can be used as an on-site energy source or fuel for vehicles and agricultural applications.

Reducing intensive material consumption lowers environmental impact

Reducing intensive material consumption is key to lowering environmental impact and promoting sustainability. Firstly, it is important to understand the negative consequences of intensive material consumption. This consumption depletes natural resources, causing adverse effects at every stage of a product's lifecycle, from production to its end-of-life. The process of converting raw materials into usable materials results in substantial energy consumption and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, contributing to global climate change.

The increasing global demand for materials has significantly impacted the environment. Since 1971, the demand for steel has tripled, cement has increased by nearly seven times, primary aluminium by almost six times, and plastics by over ten times. This demand has coincided with population growth and economic development, with the global population doubling and global GDP increasing by nearly five times in the same period. As a result, energy and emission effects from materials production have also grown, with the industry accounting for nearly 40% of total final energy consumption and about a quarter of direct CO2 emissions in 2017.

To address these issues, it is crucial to reduce material demand and promote sustainable practices. This can be achieved through various measures. Firstly, increasing the circular material use rate by reusing, repurposing, and recycling materials can significantly reduce the extraction of natural resources and related environmental impacts. Governments, industries, and the research community have a role in enabling greater uptake of material efficiency, including improving data collection, considering life-cycle impacts in regulations, and promoting sustainable practices.

Additionally, individuals can contribute by reducing their consumption of raw materials, shopping smartly, composting food scraps, donating unused food, and reusing or repurposing items. These actions will not only reduce waste but also lower the emissions created by producing new materials and disposing of waste in landfills. By implementing these strategies, we can lower environmental impact, preserve natural resources, and create a more sustainable future for generations to come.

Land use and public health reforms can help vulnerable areas

Land use and public health reforms are essential to protect vulnerable areas from the detrimental effects of pollution. Pollution is the leading environmental cause of disease and premature death, with air pollution causing more than 9 million premature deaths annually, the majority of which occur in low- and middle-income countries.

Zoning practices play a crucial role in land use and can either mitigate or exacerbate pollution and its health impacts. Restrictive zoning, particularly single-family zoning, has been linked to negative environmental and public health outcomes. Single-family suburbs, for instance, produce higher greenhouse gas emissions per person than cities, contributing to climate change and air pollution. They also tend to lack green spaces and have higher temperatures, creating "heat islands" that negatively impact resident health, especially younger individuals, and hinder their ability to learn.

To address these issues, zoning reforms that promote higher-density, mixed-use development can be implemented. By eliminating single-family zoning, amending height restrictions, and reducing minimum lot sizes, more affordable housing options can be created, fostering social and economic diversity. These reforms can also lead to improved land use efficiency, reduced urban sprawl, and increased active transportation and physical activity among residents. Additionally, zoning for both residential and commercial uses in the same areas can reduce crime and improve the sense of community.

Furthermore, land use policies should consider the potential impacts on water quality. Land development, especially in agricultural areas, can affect watersheds and water availability for other uses. For example, certain irrigation practices and livestock grazing in riparian zones can increase water temperatures and sedimentation. Therefore, land use reforms that regulate these practices and promote sustainable water use can help protect vulnerable areas from water scarcity and pollution.

Public health reforms are also crucial to protect vulnerable communities from the health risks associated with pollution. Environmental justice screening methods, such as cumulative impact mapping, can identify areas overburdened by poverty, unemployment, and pollution. By recognizing these vulnerable areas, resources can be allocated to provide them with the necessary support and infrastructure to mitigate the impacts of pollution on public health.

NASA uses satellites to monitor air pollution

Air pollution is the leading environmental cause of premature deaths, with over 9 million people dying each year due to air pollution. It is caused by solid and liquid particles and certain gases suspended in the air, which can be detrimental to human health and the planet. These particles and gases can come from car and truck exhaust, factories, dust, pollen, mould spores, volcanoes, and wildfires.

NASA uses satellites orbiting Earth to monitor air pollution. Satellites measure the concentration of particles (aerosols) in the atmosphere by observing how much light reaches the Earth's surface and how much is reflected off the aerosols. This measurement is called aerosol optical depth or aerosol optical thickness and can be measured from the ground using a sun photometer. NASA's Aqua, Terra, and Suomi-NPP satellites provide information about aerosols, which is used by air quality forecasters.

NASA is also developing a new instrument called the Multi-Angle Imager for Aerosols (MAIA), which will fly aboard a future spacecraft mission. MAIA will help scientists understand the size, makeup, and quantity of aerosols in the air. This data will be useful for health researchers and will improve our ability to infer surface concentrations of air pollutants from satellite data.

Additionally, NASA-supported collaborations, such as the Health and Air Quality Applied Science Team (HAQAST), have developed methods to track wildfires, dust storms, pollen counts, urban green space, nitrogen dioxide concentrations, and asthma burdens, among other indicators of air pollution and climate change. These efforts support international initiatives to mitigate air pollution and climate change, which require intergovernmental action.

Upcoming launches of pollution-observing satellites, such as those in geosynchronous orbits over East Asia, North America, and Europe, will further enhance our ability to track progress on air pollution and climate change, particularly in individual countries and megacities.

Frequently asked questions