Coal Power Plants: Pollutants And Their Sources

Coal-fired power plants are a major source of harmful air pollutants, including fine particulate matter (PM2.5), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxide (NOx), carbon monoxide, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and toxic heavy metals such as mercury, lead, and arsenic. These emissions have been linked to increased mortality and various health issues such as asthma, cancer, heart and lung ailments, and neurological problems. While regulations and the retirement of coal power plants have helped reduce emissions and associated deaths, understanding the impact of individual power plants is crucial for designing targeted policies to further improve air quality and public health. The release of pollutants from coal power plants into the atmosphere has severe environmental and health consequences, making it a pressing issue that requires continued efforts to mitigate its harmful effects.

Sulfur dioxide emissions

Burning coal is a major source of harmful sulphur dioxide (SO2) emissions, which contribute to air pollution and have serious health impacts. Sulphur is an impurity found in coal, and when coal is burned, it releases sulphur dioxide gas. Power plants are responsible for a significant proportion of these emissions, which have been linked to increased mortality and respiratory illnesses.

Sulphur dioxide is one of the "major" air pollutants, along with nitrogen oxide (NOx) and particulate matter (PM). Coal-fired power plants are one of the largest sources of these health-harming pollutants, and as large, stationary point sources, they are relatively easy to monitor and regulate. The release of these pollutants has been addressed through various methods, including the implementation of environmental regulations and the use of pollution control technologies.

In the United States, annual electric power industry emissions of sulphur dioxide declined by 88% between 1997 and 2017, with coal-fired generation responsible for 90% of these emissions. This decrease is attributed to several factors, including the declining use of coal for electricity generation, the implementation of environmental regulations, and the increased utilisation of natural gas and renewable energy sources. From 2006 to 2015, SO2 emissions from power plants in the U.S. decreased by 73%, a much larger reduction than the 32% decrease in coal-fired electricity generation.

To control and reduce sulphur dioxide emissions, power plants employ flue gas desulfurization equipment, also known as scrubbers. These devices clean the sulphur from the smoke before it exits the smokestacks. Additionally, some power plants have retired or reduced the operation of their most-polluting units, contributing to lower SO2 emission rates.

The health impacts of sulphur dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants have been studied extensively. Research has linked these emissions to increased mortality, with one study estimating that between 1999 and 2020, 460,000 deaths could have been prevented in the absence of emissions from coal power plants. The installation of pollution control technology or the shutdown of polluting plants has been shown to reduce the number of associated deaths.

Nitrogen oxide emissions

Nitrogen oxides (NOx) are one of the three "major" air pollutants emitted by coal-fired power plants, along with sulfur dioxide (SO2) and particulate matter (PM). NOx refers to both nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Coal contains a higher amount of nitrogen than other fossil fuels, making coal-fired power plants the largest source of NOx emissions.

During gasification, most of the nitrogen in the coal is converted into harmless nitrogen gas (N2). However, small amounts of ammonia (NH3) and hydrogen cyanide (H3N) are produced, which must be removed during the syngas cooling process. In gasification-based power production systems, NOx can be formed downstream by the combustion of syngas with air in gas turbines. The use of a diluent to lower flame temperature, such as nitrogen or steam, is the preferred method for minimizing NOx generation from a syngas-fired turbine. Other methods for controlling NOx formation include the installation of SCR in an IGCC's HRSG, which requires considering the environmental impacts of ammonia slip. While ammonia slip is typically limited to less than 5 ppm in SCR applications, it may be higher when the NOx level entering the catalyst bed is very low.

The release of NOx into the atmosphere has several environmental effects, and precise control of NOx emissions is required in the operation of coal-fired power plants. The United States' Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) of 1990 have contributed to the decrease in NOx emissions from the electric power industry. Annual U.S. electric power industry emissions of NOx declined by 76% between 1997 and 2017, with coal-fired generation responsible for 76% of NOx emissions from the industry during this period.

Particulate matter emissions

Coal-fired power plants are a significant source of particulate matter (PM) emissions, which are among the three "major" air pollutants, along with sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxide (NOx). These emissions contribute to smog, haze, respiratory illnesses, and lung disease.

PM emissions from coal-fired power plants include fine particulate matter with a size of less than 3 μm, known as PM2.5, and larger particles up to 10 μm in diameter, referred to as PM10. These particles are released into the atmosphere during the combustion of coal and have been associated with an increased risk of death and various respiratory problems.

The concentration of PM emissions from coal-fired power plants can be reduced through the use of air pollution control devices such as wet flue gas desulfurization (WFGD) and wet electrostatic precipitators (WESP). These technologies work to remove particulates and heavy metals from the flue gas before it exits the smokestacks. In the United States, the Clean Air Act requires the use of pollution-control devices to capture fly ash emissions, a type of particulate matter produced by coal-fired power plants.

The effectiveness of these control measures varies across different countries and regions. For example, in Canada, coal-fired power plants in Alberta are identified as the most significant sources of PM emissions. In Mexico, coal-fired power plants contribute to PM10 and PM2.5 emissions, along with plants burning residual fuel oil and natural gas. The distribution of PM emissions sources in the United States shows a concentration of coal-fired plants emitting particulate matter in the eastern half of the country.

Overall, the reduction of PM emissions from coal-fired power plants is crucial for improving air quality and protecting public health. The implementation of emission standards and the development of new technologies to remove impurities from coal play important roles in mitigating the environmental and health impacts associated with particulate matter emissions from these sources.

Mercury and heavy metal emissions

Heavy metals, such as arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), and nickel (Ni), have been detected in the flue gas of coal-fired power plants. These emissions can contaminate the surrounding soil, water, and even agricultural produce like rice and cabbage. The concentration of these heavy metals in the environment surrounding the power plants is proportional to the emissions in the flue gas.

Power plants employ various technologies to mitigate these emissions, including electrostatic precipitators and baghouses to remove particulates and heavy metals from the smoke. Additionally, scrubbers, or flue gas desulfurization equipment, are used to reduce the amount of sulfur exiting the smokestacks. While these measures help, coal-fired power plants remain a significant source of mercury and heavy metal emissions.

The impact of these emissions on human health has been the subject of several studies. Research has linked air pollution from coal power plants to increased mortality, with a notable decline in deaths as air pollution regulations and coal power plant retirements reduce emissions. The presence of heavy metals in the environment can pose risks to human health, particularly through the consumption of contaminated agricultural produce and water.

To address the issue of mercury and heavy metal emissions, regulations and emission standards have been implemented. However, the enforcement of these standards varies across countries, and the sector continues to contribute significantly to air pollution and its associated health risks.

Scrubbers and pollution control

Coal-fired power plants emit several health-harming air pollutants, including sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxide (NOx), particulate matter (PM), mercury, and other toxic heavy metals. These emissions contribute to respiratory illnesses, heart disease, and increased mortality rates. To mitigate these harmful effects, scrubbers, also known as flue gas desulfurization (FGD) equipment, are used to reduce sulfur emissions and the formation of acid rain.

Scrubbers are large towers that use aqueous mixtures of lime or limestone to absorb sulfur from the flue gases exiting a coal boiler. This process removes over 90% of the flue gases, including sulfur dioxide, and can also effectively remove acid gases such as hydrochloric acid. The Clean Air Act and subsequent regulations have played a significant role in driving the adoption of scrubbers in coal-fired power plants.

The installation of scrubbers has proven effective in reducing air pollution and improving human health. Studies have shown that areas with scrubbers installed in coal-burning power plants have lower instances of heart disease and decreased mortality rates associated with air pollution. Additionally, scrubbers can contribute to a cleaner and more sustainable production process, reducing the negative impact of coal on the environment and human health.

While scrubbers offer significant benefits in pollution control, they also present some challenges. Scrubbers require a substantial financial investment, with costs running into the billions for installation and maintenance. Additionally, scrubbers make the power plants more complex and require more maintenance than standard coal plants.

Overall, scrubbers play a crucial role in pollution control by reducing sulfur emissions and mitigating the harmful effects of coal-fired power plants on the environment and human health. However, the effectiveness of scrubbers is dependent on their widespread adoption and the enforcement of emission standards to ensure a cleaner and healthier future.

Frequently asked questions