Geothermal Energy's Pollution Paradox: What's The Real Cost?

Geothermal energy is a clean energy source with minimal environmental impact, but it does cause some pollution. Geothermal power plants emit small amounts of particulate matter and nitrous oxides, and hydrogen sulfide is the pollutant of greatest concern. Some plants also produce small amounts of mercury emissions, which must be mitigated with filters. Additionally, the use of scrubbers to reduce air emissions creates a toxic sludge that must be disposed of at hazardous waste sites. The environmental effects of geothermal energy depend on how it is used and converted, and land subsidence can occur due to water removal from geothermal reservoirs.

Greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and hydrogen sulfide

Geothermal energy is a form of clean, renewable energy that is gaining popularity as the world seeks alternative energy sources. Unlike fossil fuels, geothermal power plants do not burn fuel to generate electricity and are, therefore, more environmentally friendly. However, they do release small amounts of greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and hydrogen sulfide.

Carbon dioxide is the most common greenhouse gas emitted by geothermal power plants. However, the amount released is minimal compared to other power plants, with geothermal plants emitting 99% less carbon dioxide than similarly-sized fossil fuel plants.

Methane is another greenhouse gas that may be released by geothermal plants, particularly when using cooling systems such as warm water ponds or cooling towers. However, these emissions are also minimal and much lower than those from combustion-based power plants.

Nitrous oxide is an important component of geothermal energy, used to generate heat and electricity for residential and commercial applications. While it is a greenhouse gas, emissions from geothermal sources are much lower than those from other fossil fuels.

Hydrogen sulfide is a powerful greenhouse gas, estimated to be up to 300 times more impactful than carbon dioxide on global warming. It is the pollutant of greatest concern for geothermal power plants. To mitigate this, plants employ mechanical scrubbers or Hydrogen Sulfide Abatement Systems, which can remove up to 99.9% of the gas.

Overall, while geothermal energy does release small amounts of greenhouse gases, the amounts are significantly lower than those released by fossil fuel power plants, making it a more environmentally friendly option.

Water pollution: wastewater re-injection, use of freshwater, and contamination

Water pollution is one of the leading environmental issues associated with geothermal energy technologies. Water contamination can occur in several ways, including wastewater re-injection, the use of freshwater, and the release of harmful substances.

Wastewater re-injection is a common practice in geothermal power plants to prevent contamination and land subsidence. Most plants re-inject water into the reservoir after capturing its heat to maintain water levels. However, not all removed water is re-injected, as some is lost as steam. This requires additional sources of water, which can include freshwater or other sources that may have lower water quality. The use of external water sources can introduce contaminants into the geothermal reservoir, degrading water quality.

Brine, a byproduct of geothermal processes, is a particular concern. It contains dissolved compounds such as silica, sulfates, and carbonates, which can contaminate water if mixing occurs. Additionally, the re-injection of wastewater can cause land subsidence, where the land surface sinks due to the removal and re-injection of water. This can affect both man-made structures and the natural environment.

The use of freshwater in geothermal power plants is another issue. Geothermal plants require significant amounts of water for cooling, and while they can use geothermal fluid or freshwater, the latter reduces the plant's overall water impact. This can create conflicts with other water users, especially in areas with limited water supplies, such as fish spawning and rearing habitats.

Furthermore, geothermal power plants may release small amounts of harmful substances into the water. For example, scrubbers used to remove hydrogen sulfide from geothermal reservoirs produce a toxic sludge containing sulfur, vanadium, silica compounds, chlorides, arsenic, mercury, nickel, and other heavy metals. The disposal of this sludge in hazardous waste sites can potentially impact water sources.

While geothermal energy has its challenges regarding water pollution, it is important to note that it generally has a much lower environmental impact than fossil fuel power generation. Direct-use applications and geothermal heat pumps have almost no negative effects on the environment and can positively impact by reducing the use of more harmful energy sources.

Air pollution: particulates, SO2, and mercury emissions

Geothermal energy has been shown to have a positive impact on reducing air pollution and emissions. The use of geothermal electricity has helped to cut NOx emissions and SO2 emissions without increasing PM10, PM2.5, and VOC. According to the European Environment Agency, the increase in geothermal electricity production in Italy by 2018 helped the country avoid emitting 0.51 Mton of CO2 and 0.05 kt of SO2.

However, geothermal power plants do release small amounts of sulfur dioxide (SO2) into the atmosphere. Once in the atmosphere, hydrogen sulfide changes into sulfur dioxide (SO2). This contributes to the formation of small acidic particulates that can be absorbed by the bloodstream and cause heart and lung disease. Sulfur dioxide also causes acid rain, which is harmful to crops, forests, and soils, and acidifies lakes and streams. Nevertheless, it is important to note that SO2 emissions from geothermal plants are significantly lower than those from coal plants, which are the nation's largest SO2 source.

Geothermal power plants also emit negligible amounts of particulate matter and nitrous oxides compared to other sources of energy. According to studies, flash and dry-steam plants emit around 1% of the sulfur dioxide that is emitted by a coal-fired plant of equal energy capacity. Some geothermal plants also produce small amounts of mercury emissions, which can be mitigated using mercury filter technology.

Overall, while geothermal energy does release some pollutants into the air, it has been shown to have a net positive impact on reducing air pollution and emissions, especially when compared to fossil fuel power plants.

Land subsidence: sinking land surfaces due to water removal

Geothermal energy is a renewable energy source that has the potential to provide substantial benefits to our climate, health, and economy. However, like any energy source, it has its own set of environmental impacts and concerns. One of the main concerns associated with geothermal energy is land subsidence, which is the slow sinking of the land surface due to water removal from geothermal reservoirs.

The removal of geothermal fluid from underground reservoirs can cause the rock formations above to compact and lead to land subsidence. This is a well-known phenomenon that has occurred in various urban areas, including Seoul, where large cavities and land subsidence have been observed. The risk of land subsidence in geothermal projects needs to be effectively managed through careful review and monitoring of site conditions. Geothermal operators must navigate a complex landscape to mitigate regulatory and legal risks related to subsidence, including environmental and tort laws, regulations, and community relations.

To address the risk of land subsidence, most geothermal facilities re-inject wastewater back into the geothermal reservoirs after capturing its heat. This helps to maintain a constant volume of water in the reservoir and prevent land subsidence. However, it is important to note that not all water removed from the reservoir can be re-injected, as some is lost as steam. Therefore, outside water must be used to maintain the water level in the reservoir.

The environmental impact of geothermal energy projects can be mitigated through careful planning and management. Geothermal power plants, for example, have a minimal land use impact compared to coal and nuclear power plants. Additionally, direct-use applications and geothermal heat pumps have almost no negative effects on the environment and can even have positive effects by reducing the use of more harmful energy sources.

In conclusion, while land subsidence due to water removal is a legitimate concern for geothermal energy projects, it can be effectively managed through proper planning, monitoring, and mitigation strategies. By re-injecting wastewater, maintaining reservoir water levels, and adhering to regulatory requirements, the risk of land subsidence can be significantly reduced.

Earthquakes: increased frequency and risk due to hydrothermal plants

The most common type of geothermal power plant is the hydrothermal plant, which is located near geological "hot spots" where molten rock close to the Earth's crust produces hot water. These "hot spots" are areas of higher levels of earthquake risk.

There is evidence that hydrothermal plants can lead to an even greater frequency of earthquakes. This is due to the process of pumping water at high pressure to fracture underground hot rock reservoirs, similar to the technology used in natural gas hydraulic fracturing. The San Andreas Fault, for example, is capable of unleashing extremely destructive earthquakes of at least magnitude 8. The Salton Sea Geothermal Field, located on the southeastern edge of the Salton Sea, has been found to have a strong correlation between seismic activity and operations for the production of geothermal power.

The risk of earthquakes associated with enhanced geothermal systems can be reduced by locating plants at a safe distance from major fault lines. Most geothermal facilities also address the risk of land subsidence by re-injecting wastewater back into geothermal reservoirs after the water's heat has been captured.

While geothermal energy has the potential to cause earthquakes, it is important to consider the overall risk and benefits of this energy source. Geothermal power plants do not burn fuel to generate electricity and have a much lower environmental impact than fossil fuel plants.

Frequently asked questions