Wind Turbines: Friend Or Foe In The Pollution War?

Wind power is one of the cleanest and most sustainable ways to generate electricity, producing no toxic pollution or global warming emissions. However, wind turbines do cause some pollution. For example, wind farms constructed near wetlands have been linked to several bog landslides in Ireland that have polluted rivers. Additionally, the production of wind turbines may involve the use of fossil fuels, and the extraction of rare-earth elements such as neodymium may cause pollution. Furthermore, wind turbines can cause light pollution, noise pollution, and habitat loss, and they may interfere with the migration and mating patterns of bats.

Characteristics of pollution caused by wind turbines:

Light pollution

While wind energy is widely considered a clean and renewable alternative to fossil fuels, the towering structures of wind turbines, particularly in open landscapes, can be considered a form of visual pollution. The movement of the turbine blades can create a "shadow flicker" effect, which can be disruptive and disorienting to nearby residents. This can be addressed through careful evaluation of visual impacts and community engagement.

One of the main concerns regarding light pollution caused by wind turbines is the presence of obstruction lights, which are required for aviation safety. These lights are necessary to ensure that aircraft can safely navigate around tall structures. However, the continuous flashing or blinking of red lights during the night can be a source of annoyance and disruption to nearby communities, affecting their views and night skies.

In response to these concerns, some regions, such as Washington state, have proposed or implemented bills to restrict the use of blinking lights on wind turbines. These bills aim to mitigate light pollution by requiring aircraft detection lighting systems, which would turn the lights on only when aircraft are nearby. This approach balances aviation safety with the need to reduce light pollution and its potential impact on the well-being of residents and local tourism.

It is important to note that the impact of light pollution from wind turbines can be subjective and influenced by various factors. Some people may view the structures as graceful sculptures, while others may consider them eyesores. Therefore, addressing light pollution involves careful consideration of community preferences and engagement, as well as the implementation of technological solutions.

Overall, while wind turbines can contribute to light pollution, particularly through obstruction lights, there are ongoing efforts to minimize this impact through legislation, community dialogue, and the development of aircraft detection lighting systems. By balancing safety requirements with community needs, it is possible to reduce the negative effects of light pollution while still harnessing the benefits of wind energy as a clean and sustainable power source.

Bird and bat deaths

Wind power is one of the cleanest and most sustainable ways to generate electricity, as it produces no toxic pollution or global warming emissions. However, wind turbines do have some environmental impacts, including the risk of bird and bat deaths.

Birds and bats can be injured or killed by colliding with wind turbine blades. There is also evidence that changes in air pressure caused by the spinning turbines can cause bird and bat deaths. Additionally, wind turbines can disrupt the natural habitats of these animals.

The impact of wind turbines on bird and bat populations has been widely studied. While there are varying estimates of bird deaths caused by wind turbines, most studies suggest that the number is relatively low compared to other hazards. For example, a 2012 study found that wind projects kill 0.269 birds per gigawatt-hour of electricity produced, compared to 5.18 birds killed per gigawatt-hour of electricity from fossil fuel projects. Another study estimated that the number of bird deaths caused by wind turbines ranges from 4 to 18 birds killed per turbine per year. However, it is important to note that these estimates may not include small birds, such as songbirds, that are often missed during carcass counts.

Bats are particularly attracted to wind turbines for reasons that are not fully understood. They may see the turbines as potential roosting sites or places to find insect prey. This attraction puts them at a higher risk of mortality, and studies have found that bats have higher mortality rates than birds at wind farms. Estimates suggest that between 6 and 20 bats are killed per turbine per year, with some estimates being even higher.

Despite the relatively low impact of wind turbines on bird and bat populations, efforts are being made to reduce these deaths further. Researchers are investigating methods to prevent collisions, such as limiting the activity of turbines during low wind speeds when bats are most active, refining turbine design, and using ultrasonic deterrents. These solutions may allow wind turbines to coexist peacefully with airborne wildlife.

Noise pollution

Studies have found that wind turbines generate low-frequency noise (LFN), which can affect the health of nearby residents. A study conducted on individuals living within a 500-meter radius of wind turbines found that exposure to LFN was associated with a significant reduction in heart rate variability (HRV). Another study assessed the indoor/outdoor differences in LFN exposure in households at varying distances from wind turbines, finding that indoor LFN levels decreased with distance from the turbines.

To mitigate noise pollution, wind turbine developers can follow "good neighbor" practices, such as siting turbines away from residential areas and communicating with affected community members. Technological advancements, such as minimizing blade surface imperfections and using sound-absorbent materials, can also help reduce wind turbine noise. Additionally, operators of working wind farms can change turbine operating modes depending on wind conditions to minimize noise.

Land use

The land use impact of wind power facilities varies depending on the site. Wind turbines placed in flat areas typically use more land than those located in hilly areas. However, the turbines themselves and the surrounding infrastructure (roads, transmission lines, etc.) occupy a small portion of the total area of a wind facility. A survey by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory of large wind facilities in the United States found that they use between 30 and 141 acres per megawatt of power output capacity, with less than 1 acre per megawatt disturbed permanently and less than 3.5 acres per megawatt disturbed temporarily during construction. The remainder of the land can still be used for livestock grazing, agriculture, highways, and hiking trails. Wind facilities can also be sited on brownfields or other commercial and industrial locations, which significantly reduces concerns about land use.

Wind farms are often built on land that has already been impacted by land clearing, and the vegetation clearing and ground disturbance required for wind farms are minimal compared with coal mines and coal-fired power stations. However, onshore wind farms can have a significant visual impact on the landscape, and their network of turbines, access roads, transmission lines, and substations can result in "energy sprawl". To access the best wind resource, turbines need to be higher than the nearest surrounding structures, so some visual impact is unavoidable. This can be minimised by avoiding locating turbines in sensitive landscapes, siting them carefully to take account of views from sensitive locations, and making use of screening from landscape features such as trees and hills.

Wind turbines are not generally installed in urban areas due to interference from buildings, the need for a safe distance from residences, and the high value of land. However, there are some exceptions, such as the WindShare ExPlace wind turbine in Toronto, and the Steel Winds project south of Buffalo, New York. Both of these projects benefit from being on uninhabited lakeshore property. In Greece, wind turbine sites have been installed in various locations, including "on mountain peaks, in forests, near archaeological sites, on islands, in protected habitats" and in highly populated tourist areas, causing disruption to the hospitality business and protests from residents.

Wind farms constructed near wetlands have been linked to several bog landslides in Ireland that have polluted rivers, such as at Derrybrien in 2003 and Meenbog in 2020.

Peatland damage

Peatlands are an important natural resource in terms of biodiversity and carbon storage. They store and sequester carbon dioxide, helping to prevent catastrophic climate change. However, the construction of wind turbines on peatlands can damage the peat, leading to increased drainage, decomposition, and carbon emissions.

When wind turbines are installed on peatland, carbon stored in the peat is released into the atmosphere. The deeper the peat soil, the more carbon is emitted during construction. This construction process also rapidly decomposes the peat and creates large holes in the land. As the surrounding peat drains into these holes, the peatland dries out, and even more carbon dioxide is released. Just one hectare of peatland can contain 5,000 tonnes of carbon, which starts to be emitted into the atmosphere during wind turbine installation.

The Scottish government has recognized the importance of peatlands for climate change targets, as peat covers more than a fifth of Scotland's land, storing 1.6 billion tonnes of carbon. However, during the boom in onshore wind energy over the past two decades, most turbines were built on peat, with more than 200 on deep peat. This has led to concerns about the impact of wind farms on peatlands and the potential for "repowering" end-of-life wind farms.

To address these concerns, the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) now uses a Windfarm Calculator tool to ensure environmental benefits from new peatland developments. This tool was developed by researchers at the University of Aberdeen, including Professor Jo Smith, to calculate the environmental impact of peatland wind farms on carbon emissions. The calculator has helped retain carbon stocks in Scottish soils by avoiding construction on deep peats and shifting wind farms to lower-carbon soils. However, some experts argue that the calculator's figures can be flawed and that the science of peatland restoration is not yet settled.

Overall, while wind energy is generally considered a clean and sustainable source of electricity, the construction of wind turbines on peatlands can have significant environmental impacts, particularly related to carbon emissions and biodiversity loss. It is important to carefully consider the potential risks and long-term impacts before constructing wind farms on peatlands.

Frequently asked questions