Strategies To Combat Air Pollution: Legal Approaches

Air pollution is a pressing global issue that has detrimental effects on human health and the environment. A United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) report found that air pollution causes millions of deaths annually, with indoor and outdoor air pollution being the leading avoidable cause of diseases and deaths worldwide. While legislation to curb air pollution exists in many countries, the air quality continues to deteriorate, indicating a need for more effective laws and enforcement mechanisms. The Clean Air Act in the United States, for example, has been instrumental in reducing air pollution and improving air quality. Since its enactment, there has been a significant decline in emissions of key air pollutants, and it has prevented hundreds of thousands of premature deaths and respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. Other global treaties and agreements, such as the Vienna Convention, the Montreal Protocol, and the Paris Agreement, also aim to address air pollution on an international scale.

The Clean Air Act

Section 112 of the Clean Air Act specifically addresses emissions of hazardous air pollutants. The 1990 amendments revised this section to require the issuance of technology-based standards for "major sources" and certain "area sources". Major sources are stationary sources that emit or have the potential to emit 10 tons or more of a hazardous air pollutant per year. The EPA is required to establish emission standards, known as "maximum achievable control technology" (MACT) standards, for these major sources to ensure the maximum degree of emissions reduction.

Global treaties

The Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (CLRTAP/LRTAP) is a groundbreaking framework that has been in place since 1979 and comprises 51 countries from Europe, North America, and Japan. It was the first international legally binding agreement aimed at curbing transboundary air pollution and was established to tackle acid rain. The agreement has been successful, preventing 600,000 premature deaths annually in Europe and reducing harmful emissions by 30-80% in Europe and 30-40% in North America since 1990.

The UNEP report shows that cooperation between countries is necessary to effectively control air pollution across borders. Some other global treaties on air pollution include the Vienna Convention, the Montreal Protocol, the Climate Change Convention, the Kyoto Protocol, the Paris Agreement, the Stockholm Convention, and the Minamata Convention on Mercury. Regional agreements are also important, such as the UN ESCAP Regional Action Programme on Air Pollution, which encompasses the Asia-Pacific region, and the African Ministerial Conference on Environment (AMCEN), which endorsed the implementation of a continent-wide Clean Air Plan.

The success of these agreements and conventions demonstrates the importance of international cooperation in tackling air pollution. These treaties provide scientific tools, models, data, monitoring methods, guidance documents, and best practices for countries and cities to address air pollution at the local level. They also ensure that scientific evidence and technical expertise directly inform political negotiations, policy commitments, and national decision-making.

State implementation plans

The Clean Air Act (CAA) is a comprehensive federal law that regulates air emissions from stationary and mobile sources. It defines the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) responsibilities for protecting and improving the nation's air quality and the stratospheric ozone layer. The CAA also authorizes the EPA to establish National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) to protect public health and welfare and to regulate emissions of hazardous air pollutants.

The Clean Air Act requires that each state submit a State Implementation Plan (SIP) to show how air pollution will be reduced to levels at or below the NAAQS. A SIP is a collection of the regulations a state will use to clean up polluted areas. The states are obligated to notify the public of these plans through hearings that offer opportunities for the public to comment on the development of each SIP. The SIP is a living document that is subject to revisions. For instance, Virginia's original SIP was submitted to the EPA in 1972 and has had hundreds of revisions since.

The EPA may permit individual states to enforce compliance with CAA requirements within their borders. The EPA can also develop and implement a plan and impose sanctions if a state does not submit an acceptable plan or does not develop a plan at all. The EPA has taken final action to approve revisions to SIPs in several states, including California, Louisiana, Colorado, Ohio, Connecticut, Indiana, and West Virginia.

The Clean Air Act has achieved dramatic reductions in air pollution since 1970, preventing hundreds of thousands of cases of serious health effects each year. There has been approximately a 50% decline in emissions of key air pollutants since 1990. The EPA has also worked with states to cut interstate air pollution, achieving additional public health benefits and helping downwind states meet health-based air quality standards.

Despite the progress made by the Clean Air Act, air pollution continues to harm people's health and the environment. Air pollution is a complex issue that requires cooperation between countries to effectively control, as pollution in one country can affect people in another. While there is a global trend towards legislating for air quality standards, many national regimes fall short of meeting the World Health Organization's (WHO) guidelines, which are designed to protect human health from the harmful effects of air pollution.

Technology-based standards

The Clean Air Act (CAA) is a comprehensive federal law that regulates air emissions from stationary and mobile sources in the United States. The Act has been amended several times to address emerging pollution threats and protect public health and the environment.

The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments introduced a significant shift in regulatory focus for toxic air pollutants, recognising the immediate public health benefits of utilising currently available and affordable control technologies. This shift in emphasis resulted in the inclusion of technology-based standards, which are outlined below.

The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments revised Section 112 to require the issuance of technology-based standards for major sources and certain area sources of hazardous air pollutants. "Major sources" are stationary sources or groups of stationary sources that emit or have the potential to emit 10 tons or more of a hazardous air pollutant per year, or 25 tons or more of a combination of such pollutants annually. These emission standards are referred to as ""maximum achievable control technology" (MACT) standards.

The EPA sets MACT standards for major sources, requiring the maximum degree of reduction in emissions of hazardous air pollutants. This involves considering the emissions performance and cost of available technologies to determine achievable pollution reduction targets. The EPA collects and scrutinises data on the performance levels of existing technologies when establishing these standards.

States are also required to implement "reasonably available" controls for existing stationary sources, such as factories, to meet and maintain air quality standards. For new major pollution sources, permits must include the "best available control technology" requirements. State permitting authorities consider alternative control levels for proposed facilities, taking into account the emissions performance of technologies used in other facilities and the associated costs.

Congress has authorised standards that promote the development of new technologies. For instance, the EPA can set future performance levels for new motor vehicle standards, provided they are based on current information and achievable in the future.

The Clean Air Act's technology-based standards aim to balance technical feasibility, cost considerations, and the urgent need to reduce hazardous air pollutants, prioritising public health and environmental protection.

Health-based standards

WHO's Air Quality Guidelines (AQG) are a set of evidence-based recommendations that offer threshold values and limits for key air pollutants that pose health risks. These guidelines are developed through rigorous scientific evaluation and consultation with experts worldwide. They serve as a global target for governments to strive towards improving the health of their citizens by reducing air pollution. While not legally binding, countries can use these guidelines as a benchmark to shape their legislation and policies.

The WHO regularly integrates scientific evidence on the health impacts of air pollution and monitors countries' progress in improving air quality. The guidelines provide interim targets to facilitate a gradual shift towards lower pollutant concentrations, highlighting the associated health benefits. For instance, achieving the first interim target could save approximately 300,000 lives worldwide each year.

In the United States, the Clean Air Act (CAA) is the comprehensive federal law regulating air emissions from stationary and mobile sources. The Act authorizes the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) to safeguard public health and welfare. The EPA works to reduce emissions from various sources, including vehicles, engines, aircraft, and power plants, often in collaboration with other agencies and states.

The CAA has achieved significant reductions in air pollution since its implementation, with a 50% decline in emissions of key air pollutants since 1990. The 1990 amendments addressed four major environmental and health threats: acid rain, urban air pollution, toxic air emissions, and stratospheric ozone depletion. This led to the creation of state implementation plans (SIPs) to tackle these issues, with the overall goal of improving air quality and protecting public health.

Frequently asked questions