Sulfur Dioxide Pollution: Reducing Its Harmful Effects

Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is a harmful air pollutant that is released into the atmosphere through the burning of fossil fuels and other sulfur-containing fuels, such as coal, petroleum oil, or diesel. It poses a significant threat to both human health and the environment. To combat this issue, governments and organizations worldwide have implemented various measures to reduce SO2 pollution. For instance, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established national ambient air quality standards specifically designed to minimize exposure to sulfur oxides, with a particular focus on SO2. Additionally, the Clean Air Act, which has been in effect for over a decade, mandates sustained monitoring and mitigation plans. Similarly, Canada has adopted Ambient Air Quality Standards and is actively working towards reducing SO2 emissions in several provinces to comply with regulations like the Canada-wide Acid Rain Strategy. The EPA's Acid Rain Program also plays a crucial role in limiting sulfur dioxide emissions from power plants, which are the largest source of SO2 in the atmosphere.

The US's Clean Air Act requires sustained monitoring and mitigation plans

The US Clean Air Act, first enacted in 1963 and significantly amended in 1970, 1977, and 1990, is the primary means by which the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates air emissions and protects air quality. The Act has required sustained monitoring measures and mitigation plans for over a decade.

The Clean Air Act has been pivotal in addressing major pollutants, including sulfur dioxide (SO2), and setting National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) to safeguard public health and welfare. The 1990 amendments specifically targeted SO2 and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from power plants, mandating a reduction of approximately 10 million tons of SO2 annually. This was to be achieved through a market-based system of "emissions allowances," with power plants required to either reduce emissions or acquire additional allowances.

The Act also establishes regulatory standards for various industries, including the oil and gas industry. For instance, the 2012 amendments required the reduction of volatile organic compound and methane emissions from hydraulic fracturing activities. The Clean Air Act further addresses mobile sources of pollution, such as motor vehicles, with revised tailpipe emission standards and the promotion of low-emission vehicles.

The EPA identifies areas that fail to meet the NAAQS as "non-attainment areas." State, local, and tribal governments in these areas are responsible for developing plans to improve air quality and reduce SO2 levels. These plans may involve implementing control measures, such as flue gas desulfurization (FGD) technology, to reduce SO2 emissions from industrial facilities.

The Clean Air Act's sustained monitoring and mitigation plans demonstrate a commitment to addressing SO2 pollution and improving air quality on a national scale. By setting standards, regulating emissions, and empowering local governments to take action, the Act provides a comprehensive framework for reducing SO2 pollution and protecting public health.

The Acid Rain Program caps power plants' SO2 emissions

The Acid Rain Program (ARP) is a market-based initiative by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to reduce the overall atmospheric levels of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), which are the primary contributors to acid rain. The program targets coal-burning power plants, allowing them to buy and sell emission permits ("allowances") according to their individual needs and costs.

The ARP was established under Title IV of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, which set a goal of reducing annual SO2 emissions by 10 million tons below 1980 levels of about 18.9 million tons. The program was implemented in two phases: Phase I, which began on January 1, 1995, and Phase II, which started on January 1, 2000. The law required a two-phase tightening of operating restrictions on fossil fuel-fired power plants, aiming to reduce overall emissions to 50% of 1980 levels by 2010.

Phase I required half the total reductions by January 1, 1995, with 110 electric power-generating plants (261 units in 21 states) needing to cut sulfur dioxide emission rates to 2.5 pounds per million British thermal units (3.9 kg/MWh). Each of these generating units was allocated a specific quantity of emissions allowances in tons of allowable SO2 emissions per year. As an incentive, for each ton of sulfur dioxide reduced below the limit, owners of a generating unit received an emissions allowance that they could use at another unit, keep for the future, or sell.

Phase II applied to all fossil-fired units over 75 MWe, requiring them to limit emissions of sulfur dioxide to 1.2 pounds per million British thermal units (1.9 kg/MWh) by January 1, 2000. After this date, they were mandated to obtain an emissions allowance for each ton of sulfur dioxide emitted, with a mandatory fine of $2,000 for each ton emitted in excess of their allowances.

The EPA distributes allowances based on calculations of historical Btu usage for each unit, and may also allocate "bonus reserves" of allowances. The Acid Rain Program was the first national cap-and-trade program in the United States, and it has been successful in reducing SO2 emissions. The program's flexibility allows regulated sources to select the most cost-effective approach to reducing emissions, meeting environmental goals and improving human health.

Flue gas desulphurisation (FGD) treats flue gases before release

Flue-gas desulphurisation (FGD) is a critical process in many industrial plants, especially in the power generation industry, that removes sulphur dioxide (SO2) from flue gas or exhaust gas before it is released into the atmosphere. This process has become increasingly important due to the implementation of stringent environmental legislation aiming to reduce acid rain and protect the environment and human health.

FGD processes can be categorised into two main types: wet and dry. Dry FGD systems use a reagent in powder form, while wet FGD systems utilise an alkaline slurry, typically made by mixing a dry reagent with water. Wet FGD systems are the most common, accounting for over 75% of FGD systems in power generation.

In wet FGD systems, the flue gas is passed through a baghouse or electrostatic precipitator before entering the desulphuriser, where it undergoes wet scrubbing to separate SO2. The flue gas travels from the bottom of the scrubber tower to the top, while the alkaline slurry moves in the opposite direction, maximising contact between the two mediums. Spray decks with nozzles ensure the alkaline slurry is uniformly distributed within the tower, creating a large surface area for interaction. The flue gas then passes through a perforated tray, forcing it to bubble through the slurry, further enhancing direct contact. The alkaline slurry, typically made from limestone, absorbs the SO2, neutralising its acidity. This process produces calcium sulphite (CaSO3), which can be further oxidised to form calcium sulphate (CaSO4), also known as gypsum.

The wet scrubbing process can be fine-tuned by adjusting the liquid-to-gas (L/G) flow rates, which impact the efficiency of SO2 removal and the prevention of slurry solidification within the tower. Additionally, maintaining the desired pH of the alkaline slurry is crucial, requiring a continuous supply of limestone to the effluent holding tank.

The by-products of FGD processes, such as calcium sulphite and calcium sulphate, are often saleable and can be used in various commercial products, including plasterboard and fertiliser. If they cannot be sold, these by-products are usually mixed with fly ash and sent to landfills.

Overall, FGD plays a vital role in mitigating the environmental and health impacts of sulphur dioxide emissions, particularly in the power generation industry, by treating flue gases before their release into the atmosphere.

Renewable energy sources produce much less SO2 pollution

The burning of fossil fuels by power plants and industrial facilities is the largest source of SO2 in the atmosphere. As such, transitioning to renewable energy sources is a key strategy for reducing SO2 pollution.

Renewable energy sources, such as solar, wind, and hydroelectric power, produce little to no emissions that cause air pollution. In contrast, the combustion of fossil fuels releases harmful gases, including SO2, into the atmosphere. By increasing the supply of renewable energy, we can replace carbon-intensive energy sources and significantly reduce global warming emissions.

For example, a study by the Union of Concerned Scientists found that a 25% national renewable electricity standard by 2025 would lower power plant CO2 emissions by 277 million metric tons annually by 2025. This is equivalent to the annual output of 70 typical new coal plants. Additionally, a study by the US Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) found that renewable energy could provide up to 80% of US electricity by 2050, reducing the electricity sector's emissions by approximately 81%.

The benefits of renewable energy sources extend beyond reduced SO2 pollution. They also create more jobs, stabilize energy prices, and improve public health. For instance, the clean energy sector employed about 3.4 million workers in the US at the start of 2020, with higher wages compared to the national average. Renewable energy sources also provide stable energy prices, as they have low operating costs and stable energy outputs. Finally, by reducing air pollution, renewable energy sources can help improve public health outcomes, such as reducing breathing problems, neurological damage, and heart attacks associated with air pollution.

Diesel regulations have significantly lowered SO2 emissions

Diesel vehicles and equipment were previously a major source of sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions. However, federal regulations to reduce the sulfur content in diesel fuels have significantly lowered SO2 emissions from diesel sources.

Diesel-powered vehicles account for about 4% of motor vehicles in California, yet they produce about 60% of directly emitted particulate matter (PM). In addition to causing adverse health effects, diesel PM is also a toxic air contaminant (TAC). The potential cancer risk associated with exposure to diesel PM is greater than the combined risks of all other TACs. As a result, the Air Resources Board (ARB) in California has implemented a risk reduction plan that includes the use of low-sulfur diesel fuel. This fuel contains 15 parts per million by weight (ppmw) or less of sulfur, which is a significant reduction from the previous limit of 500 ppmw. This change enables the use of catalyzed particulate filters, nitrogen oxide (NOx) after-treatment, and other advanced emission control technologies, for both new and retrofitted engines.

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also plays a crucial role in reducing SO2 emissions from diesel sources. In 2001, the EPA adopted a low-sulfur requirement for diesel fuel used in on-road motor vehicles, which came into effect in June 2006. This regulation reduced the maximum sulfur content from 500 ppmw to 15 ppmw, aligning with California's standards. The EPA has also proposed extending this low-sulfur requirement to off-road vehicles, further reducing SO2 emissions from diesel sources.

The impact of these regulations is significant. The California Air Resources Board regulations, for example, are expected to reduce SO2 emissions by 80%. Additionally, the proposed amendments to California's diesel fuel regulations aim to further decrease SO2 emissions by 88%. These regulations not only reduce SO2 but also lower NOx emissions by 7% and PM emissions by 25%, along with several toxic substances.

The efforts to reduce sulfur content in diesel fuels are part of a broader strategy to mitigate the harmful effects of SO2. Power plants, industrial facilities, and vehicles that burn fossil fuels are significant sources of SO2 emissions. By implementing regulations and adopting new technologies, governments and industries are working together to reduce SO2 pollution and protect human health and the environment.

Frequently asked questions