Water Pollution In Minnesota: What's The Main Concern?

Minnesota's water quality is managed by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), which collects water quality data from various sources and works to protect and improve the state's water bodies. The MPCA categorises pollution sources into two types: point source and non-point source. Point source pollution comes from localised sources such as industrial discharge and sewage effluent, while non-point source pollution comes from unidentifiable, general sources like fertiliser or pesticides in urban and agricultural runoff. The state's water quality is also impacted by human activities such as channelising, ditching, and damming, which have altered the natural course of streams. Additionally, Minnesota's waters face threats from pollutants like nitrogen, phosphorus, bacteria, and chemicals such as perchloroethylene and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. With a range of organisations working to monitor and manage water quality, the state aims to ensure its waters support healthy aquatic life and recreation.

Nitrogen, phosphorus, and other chemicals

Ammonia, another form of nitrogen, is directly toxic to aquatic life. It originates from wastewater treatment plants, animal waste, air pollution, and agricultural runoff. High concentrations of ammonia in water can kill fish by building up in their tissues and blood. On average, 158 million pounds of nitrate leave Minnesota annually through the Mississippi River, with 75% of it coming from Minnesota watersheds. This contributes to the oxygen-depleted dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico, which cannot support aquatic life and negatively impacts fishing and the overall health of the region.

Phosphorus, another nutrient pollutant, is also harming Minnesota's waters. It originates from both regulated and non-regulated sources, including agricultural fertilizers, manure, organic wastes in sewage, and industrial discharges. Increased precipitation and more intense storms in Minnesota lead to higher levels of phosphorus in lakes and rivers. Additionally, longer periods of hotter temperatures contribute to the potential for algal blooms, including toxic varieties that are harmful to people and pets. A quarter of Minnesota's lakes have high phosphorus levels, which negatively impacts water quality for recreation and the health of aquatic life.

Other chemicals, such as perchloroethylene (PCE or Perc), an organic chemical used in dry cleaning and as a solvent, have damaged natural resources in Minnesota due to spills and releases from pipelines, trains, trucks, and storage tanks. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are another concern, as they are human-made chemicals that do not break down over time. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are a class of chemicals found in coal, crude oil, gasoline, and fossil fuel products, posing a risk to the environment. Additionally, other pollutants like bacteria, heavy metals, and chloride also contribute to water quality issues in Minnesota.

Bacteria from septic systems, livestock, and stormwater

Minnesota's waters are susceptible to various pollutants, and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) is tasked with monitoring and addressing these issues. One significant class of water pollutants in the state is bacteria from septic systems, livestock, and stormwater.

Bacteria in Minnesota's lakes and streams primarily originate from failing septic systems, wastewater treatment plant releases, livestock operations, and urban stormwater runoff. Septic systems, when malfunctioning or non-compliant, can introduce bacteria such as fecal coliforms and Escherichia coli (E. coli) into water bodies. These bacteria are indicative of potential disease-causing pathogens in the water, which can be harmful to humans and other animals.

Livestock waste is another significant source of bacteria in Minnesota's water bodies. E. coli, for example, can be introduced into surface water through manure spills or runoff from areas where manure is used as fertilizer. According to the MPCA, bacteria from livestock waste are more commonly found in heavily farmed areas.

Urban stormwater, particularly in populated areas, also contributes to the presence of bacteria in Minnesota's waters. Stormwater systems can carry bacteria from various sources, including human, pet, and wildlife waste, into lakes and streams. This is especially concerning because, once in the water, chloride from sources like de-icing salt and water softeners cannot be removed, permanently polluting the water.

The behaviour of bacteria in the environment is complex and influenced by factors such as weather, currents, and water temperature. As a result, bacteria levels in a body of water can fluctuate over time. While some bacteria can survive and grow, many pathogens tend to die off. However, testing for specific disease-causing bacteria or pathogens is challenging, expensive, and time-consuming, so indicator organisms like E. coli are used to assess the likelihood of their presence.

Overall, bacteria from septic systems, livestock, and stormwater are significant classes of water pollutants in Minnesota, and their management is crucial to ensuring the state's water quality and safety for human and animal health.

Groundwater contamination from landfills and gas stations

Groundwater contamination is a pressing issue in Minnesota, where groundwater serves as the primary drinking water source for approximately 75% of the state's population. Landfills and gas stations are significant contributors to groundwater pollution, posing risks to human health and the environment.

Landfills, if not properly managed, can be a major source of groundwater contamination. As waste decomposes in landfills, it can generate harmful leachate, which can seep into the groundwater and lead to the discharge of pollutants. A study examining the effect of landfill age, closure, and season on groundwater chemistry found that closing the landfill resulted in improved water quality, with a significant decrease in contaminant concentrations. However, it is important to note that the aquifer treating the pollutants was no longer suitable for human use due to potential health risks.

Gas stations, particularly those with leaking underground storage tanks, also contribute to groundwater contamination. A study by Markus Hilpert, a senior scientist at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, highlighted that even small spills and drips of gasoline at gas stations can accumulate over time and eventually contaminate groundwater. Older studies have detected gas additives in the groundwater of urban areas, and Hilpert's research provides insights into how these chemicals may be entering the water supply.

The presence of petroleum in groundwater is a significant concern, as it can render the water undrinkable and harm the environment. Abandoned gas stations with petroleum contamination are often classified as "brownfields," indicating the potential presence of hazardous substances. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has initiatives in place to address these sites, including cleanup efforts and funding through the Brownfields Program.

To address groundwater contamination from landfills and gas stations, comprehensive measures are necessary. Proper landfill management, regular inspections of underground storage tanks at gas stations, and strict enforcement of environmental regulations can help mitigate the risks of groundwater pollution. Additionally, remediation techniques, such as those employed by the EPA, aim to restore contaminated sites to ensure safe and sustainable groundwater resources.

In conclusion, groundwater contamination from landfills and gas stations is a critical issue that requires immediate attention. By understanding the sources and impacts of pollution, effective strategies can be implemented to protect the health and well-being of Minnesota's residents and ecosystems.

Sediment and nutrient concentrations

Minnesota's water quality is affected by a variety of factors, including nutrient concentrations and sediment levels. Excessive nutrients, particularly phosphorus and nitrogen, are a significant issue for the state's lakes, rivers, and downstream waters. These nutrients enter the water bodies from agricultural and urban lands, as well as wastewater treatment facilities. High nutrient levels can lead to excessive algae growth, low oxygen levels, toxicity to aquatic life, and unsafe drinking water. According to a 2020 report, while phosphorus concentrations have decreased, nitrogen levels continue to rise due to increased rainfall and runoff from croplands.

The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has been monitoring nutrient trends and concentrations in rivers since 2001, working towards reducing nutrient pollution. The state also implemented a Nutrient Reduction Strategy in 2014, with a revised version expected by 2025. This strategy aims to safeguard water from excess nutrients and protect the health of Minnesotans and downstream communities.

Sediment transport in rivers is another concern for Minnesota's water quality. Elevated levels of suspended sediment can cause issues with flood control, soil conservation, irrigation, aquatic health, and navigation. The MPCA has identified more than 5,800 miles of streams impaired by high levels of suspended sediment. Systematic sampling of suspended-sediment concentration (SSC), total suspended solids (TSS), and turbidity has been conducted since 2007 to better understand fluvial sediment transport relations.

The Zumbro River in southeast Minnesota was found to have the highest mean SSC, followed by the Minnesota River. The Pembina River, part of the Red River of the North Basin, also showed high suspended sediment concentrations, with about 10% of samples exceeding 2,000 mg/L. These high sediment levels can carry harmful contaminants and eutrophication-causing nutrients, further degrading water quality.

Overall, Minnesota is actively working to address the issues of sediment and nutrient concentrations in its water bodies through monitoring, strategies, and collaboration between various organizations. The goal is to improve and maintain the health and safety of its waters for the benefit of the state's residents and the environment.

Mercury and other heavy metals

Mercury is a naturally occurring element that is toxic to humans and animals. At room temperature, mercury is a silvery, liquid metal, but it can also evaporate and become airborne. Mercury contamination has been found in dangerously high levels in 1,400 of Minnesota's water bodies, including Lake Pepin, which is filling in at 10 times its natural rate.

Mercury is a type of heavy metal, a group of inorganic chemical hazards that also includes lead, chromium, arsenic, and cadmium. These metals are toxic and can contaminate water, making it unsafe for human and animal consumption. Heavy metals can enter water through a variety of sources, such as industrial activities, mining, and agriculture. For example, the metals mining industry is the top polluting industry in Minnesota, and activities such as sulfide mining can further contribute to water pollution.

In addition to mercury, other heavy metals can also pose significant risks to water quality in Minnesota. Lead, for instance, is a well-known contaminant that can have detrimental effects on human health, particularly in children. Chromium, arsenic, and cadmium are also hazardous and can be found in water systems. These metals can originate from various sources, including industrial processes, mining activities, and the use of certain chemicals.

The presence of heavy metals in Minnesota's water systems is a concern due to their persistence and potential health risks. Unlike organic compounds, which can degrade over time, heavy metals do not break down easily and can accumulate in the environment. This accumulation can lead to long-term contamination and pose risks to both ecosystems and human populations who rely on these water sources for drinking, agriculture, and other purposes.

To address the issue of mercury and other heavy metal pollution in Minnesota's water, several measures can be implemented. These include stricter regulations on industrial and mining activities, improved waste management practices, and the implementation of water treatment technologies specifically designed to remove heavy metals from water supplies. By combining regulatory measures, improved practices, and advanced treatment solutions, Minnesota can work towards reducing the presence of these toxic contaminants and improving the overall quality and safety of its water resources.

Frequently asked questions