Water Pollution: Nature Vs Nurture — A Complex Debate

Water pollution is a pressing issue that raises questions about the nature of polluted water. Is it considered abiotic or biotic? To answer this question, it is crucial to understand the difference between abiotic and biotic factors. Abiotic factors refer to non-living variables, while biotic factors encompass the interactions between organisms. Water pollution results from the discharge of harmful substances, such as untreated sewage, into water bodies. This pollution affects the diversity and distribution of organisms within those ecosystems. The presence, abundance, or absence of certain indicator species can provide valuable information about the level of water pollution.

Water pollution is caused by the discharge of harmful substances

Water is essential for all living beings and is crucial for social and economic development, as well as energy production and adaptation to climate change. However, water pollution, caused by the discharge of harmful substances, is endangering the health of millions worldwide. Water pollution occurs when harmful substances contaminate a body of water, degrading water quality and making it toxic. These harmful substances can be abiotic, such as chemicals, fertilisers, pesticides, pharmaceuticals, heavy metals, petroleum, and radioactive substances, or biotic, such as pathogenic microorganisms, parasites, and putrescible organic waste.

One of the main sources of water pollution is human activity, including domestic sewage and industrial waste. Sewage can contain pathogens, or disease-causing microorganisms, as well as organic matter that is decomposed by bacteria, depleting the oxygen content of the water. This can create eutrophic "dead zones" where aquatic life cannot survive. Pharmaceutical products in sewage can also harm aquatic organisms. Industrial waste often contains toxic chemicals, heavy metals, and oil, which can have devastating impacts on ecosystems. Accidental oil spills from tankers or rigs are another source of oil pollution, harming marine life and damaging recreation areas.

Water pollution also comes from dispersed or nonpoint sources, which are harder to regulate and control. These include agricultural runoff, which can contain fertilisers, pesticides, and waste, and stormwater runoff, which can carry oil and other pollutants from roads and parking lots into water bodies. Felling forests can also contribute to water pollution by generating organic residue that becomes a breeding ground for harmful bacteria. Climate change, caused by human activity, further exacerbates the problem by heating water and reducing its oxygen content.

The discharge of harmful substances into water bodies has severe consequences for both human health and the environment. Fishing in polluted waters and using wastewater for agriculture can introduce toxins into the food chain, endangering those who consume contaminated food or water. Water pollution also reduces access to clean drinking water, with the UN reporting that billions worldwide lack safe drinking water sources, particularly in rural areas. According to the WHO, approximately 2 billion people are forced to drink water contaminated by excrement, exposing them to diseases such as cholera, hepatitis A, and dysentery. Water pollution is a pressing issue that requires urgent attention and action to protect human health and the environment.

Biotic factors are the interactions between organisms

Biotic factors refer to all the living organisms in an ecosystem, including animals, humans, plants, fungi, and bacteria. These biotic factors encompass the interactions between various organisms, such as disease, predation, parasitism, and competition among or within species. The interplay of biotic factors is essential for the reproduction of each species and fulfilling their basic needs, such as food.

For example, ecologists studying the reintroduction of wolves in Yellowstone National Park examined the relationships between biotic and abiotic factors. By understanding how changes in wolf populations impact the ecosystem, they can predict future ecological events and manage invasive species. This knowledge is valuable in controlling invasive species, such as wild pigs, by identifying the factors influencing their population density.

Biotic factors are crucial in maintaining ecological balance. If one of these factors is altered or removed, it can have repercussions throughout the entire ecosystem. For instance, a shortage of autotrophic organisms due to insufficient sunlight can create a food shortage for primary consumers, leading to an imbalance in the ecosystem.

In summary, biotic factors represent the living components of an ecosystem and their interactions. These interactions are necessary for the survival and reproduction of species, and any changes in biotic factors can have cascading effects on the ecosystem. Ecologists study these relationships to predict population changes, manage invasive species, and maintain ecological stability.

The presence of certain species indicates the level of water pollution

The presence, abundance, or absence of certain species can provide valuable information about the level of pollution in a body of water. These species, known as indicator species, are highly sensitive to changes in their environment, making them reliable indicators of water quality.

Benthic macroinvertebrates, for instance, are commonly used to assess the biological condition of water bodies. Benthic, meaning "bottom-dwelling," refers to small aquatic animals and the aquatic larval stages of insects, such as dragonfly and stonefly larvae, snails, worms, and beetles. They are found attached to rocks, vegetation, or burrowed into the bottom sediments of water bodies. Benthic macroinvertebrates are useful indicators because they have varied responses to pollution, are relatively long-lived, and are easy to collect and identify. A healthy water body typically supports a diverse and abundant population of these organisms, including pollution-intolerant species.

Similarly, mussels and other molluscs are highly effective indicators of water quality. They have a low tolerance for pollutants and will clamp their shells shut if the water becomes too contaminated. This behaviour is so reliable that it is used in the Dębiec Water Treatment Plant in Poland, where a network of mussels with sensors attached to their shells is used to monitor water safety. If a certain number of mussels close their shells simultaneously, indicating high pollution levels, the water supply is shut off.

In addition to benthic macroinvertebrates and molluscs, other indicator species include fish and amoebas. Researchers have found that studying amoeba populations can reveal a great deal about the environmental health of a body of water, as they are highly responsive to even minor changes in their surroundings. Fish populations are also good indicators of water quality, particularly in areas undergoing environmental restoration. By assessing the diversity of fish species and their overall health, researchers can gain insights into the broader environmental health of the region.

The absence of species indicates high levels of water pollution

The presence or absence of certain species is a reliable indicator of the level of pollution in a body of water. This is known as an indicator species. Biomonitoring involves the use of indicators, indicator species, or indicator communities. Aquatic macroinvertebrates, such as mayflies, stoneflies, and caddisflies, are commonly used as indicator species due to their low mobility, which makes them unable to escape the pollutants in their stretch of the stream. The presence of pollution-tolerant species such as leeches, bloodworms, and sludge worms indicates high levels of water pollution. On the other hand, the absence of multiple species with similar tolerance levels that were previously present at the same site can also indicate high levels of water pollution.

The EPT index is a commonly used method for rapid assessments of water quality. It considers the taxa richness, or the number of different species, within a sample of three orders of macroinvertebrates: Ephemeroptera (mayflies), Plecoptera (stoneflies), and Trichoptera (caddisflies). These organisms are sensitive to decreased water quality and will not be found in polluted areas. The higher the EPT index score, the better the water quality.

It is important to note that the absence of a single species may not always be indicative of high levels of water pollution, as there may be other factors at play, such as predation, competition, or geographic barriers. However, the absence of multiple species with similar tolerance levels that were previously present at the same site is more indicative of pollution.

In addition to macroinvertebrates, fish and algae are also used as indicator species for water pollution. Certain aquatic plants have also been used as indicators, particularly for nutrient enrichment. Biochemical, genetic, morphological, and physiological changes in certain organisms have been linked to specific environmental stressors, providing valuable information about the health of aquatic ecosystems.

Parasites, which are biotic, can be a source of water pollution

Water pollution can be biotic or abiotic. Biotic factors, such as parasites, can be a source of water pollution. Parasites are organisms that depend on a host for survival, and they can cause harm to the host in the process. While parasites can enter water bodies through various means, such as wastewater overflow, non-functioning sewage systems, or agricultural effluent, their presence in water supplies can have significant health impacts.

Parasites, as a source of water pollution, pose a considerable risk to human health. Certain parasites, such as gastrointestinal worms, are transmitted via the fecal-oral route. When infected individuals defecate, they release parasitic ova into the environment, which then develop and infect new hosts through contaminated water or food sources. This transmission route is particularly prevalent in areas with poor sanitation and hygiene practices, emphasizing the importance of safe wastewater treatment and disposal.

In developing countries, the reuse of treated wastewater is crucial for domestic, industrial, and agricultural purposes. However, if this wastewater is not properly treated before being discharged into nearby water bodies, it can become a significant source of pollution, including the spread of parasites. Protozoan parasites, for example, can be transmitted through liquid sewage from improperly maintained toilets, cesspools, and livestock farms, contaminating soil and groundwater used for drinking water.

Climate change and land use patterns also play a role in parasite transmission. In arid regions or periods of low rainfall, water sources become focal points for animal activity, increasing the concentration of fecal-oral parasites in the environment. This dynamic creates heterogeneous disease landscapes, with varying levels of parasite exposure across different areas. As climate change expands dryland regions, the importance of surface water for wildlife, domestic animals, and humans increases, intensifying the potential for parasite transmission.

To address the issue of parasite-contaminated water, it is essential to prioritize safe sanitation and hygiene practices, particularly in areas with limited access to resources. This includes improving wastewater treatment processes, ensuring proper disposal of human and animal waste, and promoting access to basic sanitation facilities that are not shared between households. By implementing these measures, we can reduce the presence of parasites in water sources and mitigate the associated health risks, especially in vulnerable communities.

Frequently asked questions