Insects And Animals: Pollution Indicators In Water

Insects and other macroinvertebrates are often used to indicate the quality of a body of water. They are useful bioindicators because they are abundant, long-lived, and sensitive to environmental changes. The presence or lack of certain insects can indicate whether water is clean or polluted. For example, stoneflies and caddisflies are less tolerant of pollution compared to beetles and dragonflies. By sampling the types and quantities of insects in a body of water, scientists can use biological indices, such as the EPT index, to assess water quality and determine the degree of organic pollution.

Aquatic insects are ideal bioindicators of water quality

Aquatic insects, also known as benthic macroinvertebrates, are ideal bioindicators of water quality. Benthic refers to the "bottom of a body of water", and macroinvertebrates are large enough to be seen with the naked eye and do not have a backbone. Aquatic insects are ideal bioindicators because they are sensitive to environmental changes, and their presence or absence indicates clean or polluted water.

Aquatic insects are not very mobile and live in bodies of water for long periods. This means that monitoring and testing the water does not need to be done as frequently. For example, if you sample the insect population in a stream annually and find a diverse population of stoneflies, caddisflies, beetles, and dragonflies, and then the following year you only find beetles and dragonflies, you can deduce that the water was polluted in the intervening time and that the pollution wiped out the stonefly and caddisfly populations.

The composition of the aquatic insect population can be used to determine water quality and reveal the impact of pollution. This is done using biological indices that use the presence of organisms to infer information about their habitat. One such index is the EPT index, which uses the pollution tolerance levels of different macroinvertebrates to indicate water quality. It is named after the three orders of macroinvertebrates that are assessed: Ephemeroptera (mayflies), Plecoptera (stoneflies), and Trichoptera (caddisflies). These orders are sensitive to decreased water quality and are not found in polluted or disturbed areas. The EPT index looks at taxa richness, or the number of different species, within a sample to determine an EPT index score.

The University of Wisconsin Extension offers citizen science training for monitoring water quality using benthic macroinvertebrates, and Purdue Extension publishes a Bioindicators of Water Quality Guide that provides detailed instructions for using bioindicators to determine water quality.

The EPT index uses the pollution tolerance levels of macroinvertebrates to indicate water quality

Aquatic insects, or benthic macroinvertebrates, are excellent bioindicators of water quality. Benthic refers to the bottom of a body of water, and macroinvertebrates are large enough to be seen by the human eye and lack a backbone. Aquatic insects are ideal bioindicators because they spend most or all of their lives in the water, and their low mobility means they are unable to avoid pollutants. Therefore, they can reveal the cumulative effects of pollutants in a given stretch of water.

The EPT index is a commonly used method for rapid assessments of water quality. It uses the pollution tolerance levels of different macroinvertebrates to indicate water quality. The name EPT comes from the three orders of macroinvertebrates that are assessed: Ephemeroptera (mayflies), Plecoptera (stoneflies), and Trichoptera (caddisflies). These orders are sensitive to decreased water quality and are not found in areas with pollution or disturbance.

The EPT index looks at taxa richness, or the number of different species, within a sample. It uses the number of distinct taxa within the three orders mentioned above to determine an EPT index score. This score is then compared to an EPT rating chart to determine the water quality. The higher the EPT index, the better the water quality. The EPT index can also be calculated as a percentage, where the number of EPT taxa is compared to the total number of taxa found in the sample. A high percentage of EPT taxa indicates good water quality.

The EPT index is a useful tool for understanding the health of streams and lakes. It is often used in conjunction with other measures, such as physical and chemical parameters, to get a comprehensive understanding of water quality. By sampling the water for aquatic insects and determining the EPT index score, scientists can gain valuable insights into the health of aquatic ecosystems and take appropriate actions to protect them.

Scientists use physical, chemical, and biological measures to understand water quality

Scientists use a combination of physical, chemical, and biological measures to assess water quality. This involves collecting and analysing data on various parameters that indicate the presence of pollutants and their impact on aquatic ecosystems.

Physical measures refer to the physical characteristics of a water body and its surrounding environment. This includes assessing factors such as the area, depth, and bathymetry of lakes or the channel characteristics of a stream. Physical measures also encompass parameters like water flow, temperature, turbidity, and conductivity. These factors play a crucial role in understanding the health of the water body and its ability to support aquatic life.

Chemical measures involve analysing the presence and concentration of chemical pollutants in the water. This includes monitoring parameters such as dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity, specific conductance, and temperature. Additionally, scientists may measure the levels of chemical pollutants like heavy metals and organic chemicals (pesticides, herbicides, solvents), and nutrients such as phosphorus and nitrogen compounds. These chemical measures help identify potential sources of pollution and their impact on water quality.

Biological measures utilise the presence and abundance of organisms, particularly aquatic insects and macroinvertebrates, as indicators of water quality. This is because these organisms are sensitive to environmental changes and can reflect the health of the ecosystem. For example, the presence of certain insect populations, such as stoneflies and caddisflies, which are intolerant to pollution, indicates a healthier water body. On the other hand, a lack of sensitive species can signify poor water quality. Scientists use biological indices, such as the EPT index, which considers the pollution tolerance levels of different macroinvertebrates (mayflies, stoneflies, and caddisflies) to assign a water quality score.

By combining these physical, chemical, and biological measures, scientists can gain a comprehensive understanding of water quality. While each measure provides valuable insights, their integration offers a more complete picture of the complex interactions within aquatic ecosystems and helps identify potential issues that may impact the health of these fragile environments.

Insects are cheaper to sample and analyse than water

Insects are a great way to assess water quality, and they are also cheaper to sample and analyse than water. This is because they are abundant, easy to collect and identify, and can be collected with lightweight, portable equipment.

Firstly, insects are abundant in waterbodies, even in highly polluted waters. This means that a decent sample size can be obtained without impacting their populations, which is not always the case with larger animals. Insect collection is also straightforward. They can be collected with basic equipment, such as an aquatic insect net and a bottle of alcohol, and placed in appropriately labelled plastic bags. The sampling equipment is lightweight and portable, which is especially important when working in remote locations.

Secondly, macroinvertebrates are relatively easy to identify. They are large enough to be seen with the naked eye and have distinct characteristics that can be used to differentiate between species. This means that identification can be done using reference keys and a microscope, without the need for more expensive and complex equipment.

Thirdly, insects are cheaper to analyse than water samples. Water quality analysis is very expensive due to the extensive number of tests required to detect all possible pollutants. In contrast, insect samples cost less to process and analyse, with a price difference of around $200 to $700 per sample. This price difference means that, for any given budget, more insect samples can be collected and analysed than water samples, making insect sampling a preferred method.

Overall, insects are a cost-effective way to assess water quality. They are abundant, easy to collect and identify, and do not require heavy or expensive equipment. Insect sampling and analysis provide a more affordable way to monitor water quality, especially in remote locations or when working with a limited budget.

The presence or lack of sensitive species indicates water quality

The presence or lack of certain sensitive species can be a powerful indicator of water quality. Aquatic insects, also known as benthic macroinvertebrates, are often used as bioindicators of water quality. Benthic refers to the bottom of a body of water, and macroinvertebrates are large enough to be seen by the human eye and lack a backbone. These organisms are ideal bioindicators because they are sensitive to environmental changes and are long-lived. The presence of certain species indicates clean water, while their absence may suggest pollution.

One commonly used index for assessing water quality is the EPT index, which looks at the pollution tolerance levels of different macroinvertebrates. The name EPT comes from three orders of macroinvertebrates: Ephemeroptera (mayflies), Plecoptera (stoneflies), and Trichoptera (caddisflies). These species are sensitive to decreased water quality and are not typically found in polluted areas. By assessing the taxa richness, or the number of distinct taxa within these three orders, an EPT Index score can be determined.

For example, let's consider a scenario where you are monitoring the water quality of a stream. You collect samples in June over several years and find diverse insect populations, including stoneflies, caddisflies, beetles, and dragonflies. However, in June 2018, you only find beetles and dragonflies. Since stoneflies and caddisflies are generally less tolerant of pollution than beetles and dragonflies, the change in insect populations suggests that the water quality has deteriorated over the past year.

In addition to aquatic insects, other biological indicators such as fish, algae, and other macroinvertebrates can also provide valuable information about water quality. By examining the abundance and diversity of these organisms, scientists can gain insights into the health of streams, lakes, and other water bodies. While biological measures alone may not tell the whole story, they provide a rapid assessment tool that can identify areas requiring further investigation and management.

Frequently asked questions