Water Pollution In California: Sources And Origins

California faces significant water quality challenges, with 95% of its rivers, lakes, bays, and wetlands plagued by pesticides, metals, pathogens, trash, and sediment. The state's water pollution issues stem from various sources, including agricultural runoff, wastewater treatment facilities, oil fracking, and natural processes. The agricultural sector, responsible for 70% of global freshwater consumption, contributes to water degradation through the use of fertilizers, pesticides, and animal waste, which wash into waterways during rainfall. Additionally, California's wastewater treatment facilities, despite processing vast amounts of wastewater daily, release billions of gallons of untreated wastewater annually due to aging infrastructure. Oil fracking, a controversial practice, poses risks of contaminating water sources with chemically infused fluids and releasing hazardous volatile compounds. Furthermore, natural processes, such as the lack of Phytoplankton blooms, contribute to decreased biodiversity and water quality issues. California's diverse challenges require effective management to ensure safe and adequate water supplies for its residents, businesses, and environment.

Agricultural pollution

Agriculture is the leading cause of water degradation worldwide, and it is no different in the United States, where agricultural pollution is the top source of contamination in rivers and streams, the second-biggest source in wetlands, and the third in lakes. In California, agricultural pollution is a significant contributor to water pollution, and it comes in various forms.

One of the most pressing issues is the use of fertilizers and pesticides, which contain harmful chemicals such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and nitrate. When it rains, these chemicals are washed into waterways, contaminating rivers, streams, and groundwater. This leads to excessive nutrient enrichment of the water, known as eutrophication, which can cause harmful algal blooms and deplete oxygen levels, leading to fish kills and other ecological disruptions. Additionally, the use of pesticides can result in the contamination of drinking water sources, posing risks to human health.

Agricultural runoff also contributes to water pollution in California. Animal waste from farms and livestock operations contain bacteria and viruses that can wash into waterways, leading to waterborne diseases such as cholera, giardia, and typhoid. This runoff can also introduce antibiotics, growth hormones, and other pharmaceuticals used in livestock operations into water bodies, further contaminating them. In addition to water pollution, agricultural practices in California also contribute significantly to air pollution. Nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions from fertilized agricultural soils are a primary component of air pollution and a leading cause of premature death and biodiversity decline worldwide. California's Central Valley region, in particular, has been identified as an area of concern due to high NOx emissions from agricultural activities.

Salt buildup is another water quality concern for California's agricultural industry. Salt occurs naturally in some soils and is also found in fertilizers, animal waste, and urban wastewater. When saltwater intrudes into freshwater ecosystems, it can have detrimental effects on aquatic life and disrupt the natural balance of these environments. Furthermore, the treatment of contaminated water can be costly, especially for small, rural communities that lack the economies of scale to implement effective wastewater management systems.

To address these issues, California has implemented policies such as the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act and joined federal initiatives like the Clean Water and Safe Drinking Water Acts. However, more needs to be done, especially in rural areas, to ensure safe drinking water and protect both public health and the environment from the adverse effects of agricultural pollution.

Industrial waste

California faces significant challenges in ensuring safe and adequate water supplies for its residents, businesses, and environment. The state grapples with various sources of water pollution, including industrial waste, agricultural runoff, and urban stormwater runoff. While the Clean Water Act and other legislation have helped curb pollution from traditional industrial outfalls, industrial waste remains a concern.

Industrial activities have historically been a major contributor to water pollution in California. The state's industrial sector has been responsible for discharging untreated or inadequately treated wastewater containing heavy metals, toxic chemicals, and other hazardous substances into water bodies. This has led to the contamination of rivers, lakes, and groundwater sources, posing risks to both human health and the environment.

One of the primary concerns regarding industrial waste in California is the presence of toxic chemicals and heavy metals. These pollutants can have severe ecological and health impacts. For example, mercury contamination, a legacy of the state's mining history, persists in water bodies and can accumulate in the food chain, leading to health issues such as neurological disorders. Similarly, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) have been detected in water sources, particularly in the San Francisco Bay and the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. PCBs are persistent organic pollutants that can have detrimental effects on aquatic life and human health, including developmental and reproductive issues.

In addition to heavy metals and toxic chemicals, industrial wastewater can also introduce other harmful substances into water bodies. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), for instance, are released during certain industrial processes and can contaminate both water and air. Oil and natural gas extraction activities, including fracking, have been controversial due to their potential to contaminate underground and surface water sources with chemically infused fracking fluids. This can occur through faulty construction, leaks, or other unintended incidents, further exacerbating water pollution issues in the state.

Furthermore, industrial waste often contains high levels of nutrients, particularly nitrogen and phosphorus, which can contribute to eutrophication in water bodies. When excessive amounts of these nutrients are introduced, they act as fertilizers, promoting excessive growth of algae and aquatic plants. This, in turn, leads to oxygen depletion and the creation of dead zones where aquatic life cannot survive. The discharge of industrial wastewater into water bodies can also disrupt the natural balance of ecosystems, threatening the survival of various plant and animal species.

To address the issue of industrial waste in California, strict regulations and enforcement are crucial. The state has implemented measures such as the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act and the federal Clean Water and Safe Drinking Water Acts to prevent the discharge of pollution into water bodies and ensure safe drinking water standards. However, there is a continuous need for investment in wastewater treatment infrastructure and pollution control technologies to keep up with the evolving challenges posed by industrial waste and other sources of water pollution in the state.

Sewage treatment systems

California's water quality is protected by a combination of state and federal laws and regulations. The state's wastewater treatment systems are vital to its success, with around \$10 billion spent annually on water pollution control. California's wastewater treatment process involves the collection, conveyance, treatment, reuse, and disposal of wastewater. This process is carried out by public agencies and some private systems, utilising over 100,000 miles of sanitary sewer lines and more than 900 wastewater treatment plants. These facilities treat approximately 4 billion gallons of wastewater produced in the state daily.

The initial step in the treatment process is called preliminary treatment, where raw sewage enters the plant and goes through bar screens to remove large objects. After screening, the wastewater enters a grit removal chamber to capture smaller objects like sand and coffee grounds. California's wastewater agencies employ various processes to eliminate contaminants, making the water suitable for drinking or other purposes like landscape irrigation.

However, California's wastewater treatment plants face several challenges. Firstly, there is ageing infrastructure that requires upgrades, replacement, or expansion. The system also has to deal with disposed pharmaceuticals, pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, and other emerging chemicals. Additionally, a growing population, reduced flows due to drought, and the impacts of climate change and extreme weather put pressure on the system. Nonpoint source pollutants from stormwater runoff further complicate matters.

To address these issues, California has implemented policies like the Water Quality Control Policy for Siting, Design, Operation, and Maintenance of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS Policy). The state also has effluent discharge standards enforced by regional water quality control boards in consultation with the State Water Resources Control Board. Hyperion and Orange County Sanitation are two of California's top wastewater treatment plants.

Oil fracking

In California, fracking has been linked to water pollution and adverse health effects. A 2018 poll by NPR found that 55% of California residents believe that the potential environmental risks of fracking outweigh its economic benefits, a significant increase from 37% in 2014. Research has shown that fracking-related chemicals, including volatile organic compounds, are contaminating groundwater that feeds municipal water systems in the state. This contamination is particularly prevalent during the pre-production period when a new well is established. The lack of adequate oversight and enforcement of regulations has further exacerbated the issue, with companies often skirting chemical disclosure laws and failing to notify the public of spills and violations.

The consequences of fracking-related water pollution in California are wide-ranging. A study by the University of Rochester linked fracking to compromised drinking water quality and negative impacts on infant health, including an increase in preterm births and low birth weight in infants exposed to contaminated water during gestation. The study also found that drilling near public water sources resulted in poorer birth outcomes and higher levels of fracking-related contaminants in drinking water.

In addition to the direct impacts on drinking water quality, fracking can also contribute to water pollution through the release of toxic chemicals and wastewater. The treatment and disposal of wastewater generated during the fracking process can be inadequate, leading to the contamination of nearby water sources. Furthermore, the extraction of oil and natural gas through fracking can result in spills and leaks, further polluting water bodies.

To address the issue of water pollution caused by oil fracking in California, there have been calls for stricter environmental regulations and more effective oversight of the industry. Some states, including New York, Maryland, and Vermont, have banned fracking altogether, while others like California have taken steps towards providing more meaningful oversight. The detection of fracking-related chemicals in drinking water has highlighted the need for improved scientific understanding and detection technologies, as well as increased investment in pollution control and wastewater management.

Water quality regulations

The State Water Board's Division of Drinking Water (DDW) has a compilation of statutes related to drinking water and recycled water, which are included in the DDW's Drinking Water Lawbook. The State Water Board also maintains compilations of regulations in different areas of the water boards' responsibilities. The California Code of Regulations, Title 27 (Environmental Protection), contains provisions for the treatment, storage, processing, and disposal of solid waste.

There are nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards (Regional Boards) with the mission to develop and enforce water quality objectives and implementation plans that will best protect the beneficial uses of the State’s waters, recognizing local differences in climate, topography, geology, and hydrology. California’s water quality standards are embodied in Basin Plans administered by these Regional Water Quality Control Boards and in several statewide Plans and Policies administered by the State Water Resources Control Board. Amendments to a Basin Plan, prepared by the Regional Boards, are reviewed by the State Board and the State’s Office of Administrative Law (OAL). Once approved, the amendments are submitted to the EPA for final approval.

The EPA has approved water quality standards encompassing specific beneficial uses, including tribal cultural use and subsistence fish consumption, mercury water quality objectives to safeguard human health and aquatic wildlife, and flexibility to achieve permit compliance. The Water Quality Control Plan for the Ocean Waters of California (California Ocean Plan) is applicable to point-source discharges into the ocean.

Frequently asked questions