The La River: A Polluted Waterway?

The Los Angeles River has a long history of pollution, with industrial dumping and untreated sewage causing significant issues as far back as the 1900s. Today, the river remains polluted, with over 21 identified pollutants exceeding federal guidelines, including ammonia, metals, coliform, trash, scum, algae, oil, pesticides, and volatile organics. The majority of these pollutants can be attributed to stormwater runoff, which is considerably more polluted than sewage and flows directly into the river during rainfall. Insufficient government cooperation has hindered progress in meeting stormwater pollution standards, and recent reports have revealed toxic forever chemicals from a former NASA lab are leaking into the river. With the river flowing through 11 cities in LA County, it is crucial to address these pollution issues to protect both the environment and public health.

The LA River is polluted by toxic chemicals from a former NASA lab

The LA River has long been a subject of concern due to its water quality and the potential health risks it poses to the public. Various pollutants, including bacteria, nutrients, oil, grease, trash, and trace metals, have been found in the river, leading to a degraded aquatic ecosystem. In recent years, there has been growing concern over the pollution of the LA River by toxic chemicals from a former NASA laboratory.

The Santa Susana Field Laboratory, located about 30 miles north of downtown Los Angeles, was a NASA research site that is notorious for its radioactive waste. The site was used for rocket testing and has a history of nuclear accidents. Watchdog groups and whistleblowers have alleged that toxic substances from the site are contaminating the nearby LA River and the aquifer from which agricultural growers source their water.

Two highly toxic chemicals, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), or "forever chemicals," are of particular concern. PCBs are a highly toxic chemical class that has been banned for over 40 years but were used at Santa Susana in industrial applications. PFAS, the main ingredient in firefighting foam, was also likely used in large quantities during rocket testing. Evidence suggests that these chemicals are migrating into the Los Angeles River headwaters, with testing at the river's mouth revealing PCB levels 100 times higher than clean water limits.

Despite these alarming findings, there has been a lack of decisive action from state regulators. In January 2021, NASA alerted the California Department of Toxic Substances Control about the presence of PFAS-containing materials in NASA-administered areas, recommending further investigation. However, this investigation never materialized. While the Los Angeles Regional Water Board added PFAS monitoring to a five-year pollution discharge permit for the site, critics argue that merely monitoring PFAS levels is insufficient, and a comprehensive cleanup is necessary.

The contamination of the LA River by toxic chemicals from the former NASA lab has significant implications for public health and the environment. Water from the affected aquifer is used by farmers in Ventura County, potentially contaminating crops. Additionally, the river flows through designated recreation zones, raising concerns about the safety of activities such as fishing, kayaking, and swimming. The situation underscores the urgent need for effective pollution control measures and accountability from responsible parties to mitigate the impact on the community and ecosystem.

Bacteria, nutrients, oil, grease, trash, and trace metals are among the pollutants

The Los Angeles River has been plagued by pollution for over a century. Beginning in 1900, the river became so polluted by industrial dumping and untreated sewage that the city began sourcing its water elsewhere. Today, the LA River continues to face significant pollution from various sources, with over 21 identified pollutants that exceed federal guidelines.

Bacteria, nutrients, oil, grease, trash, and trace metals are among the key pollutants affecting the LA River. These contaminants typically originate from land use activities and are mobilized by dry and wet weather runoff, eventually making their way into the river. The impact of these pollutants on the river's ecosystem is significant, degrading water quality and harming aquatic life.

Bacteria, particularly fecal indicator bacteria (FIB), are a major concern in the LA River. Elevated levels of FIB can signal potential health risks for humans, especially at beaches near the river's mouth in Long Beach. Monitoring FIB levels is crucial for environmental assessment and public health measures, as it helps identify potential waterborne illnesses, including COVID-19, which can be present in sewage systems.

Nutrients, such as ammonia, contribute to the degradation of water quality in the LA River. Excessive nutrient pollution can lead to harmful algal blooms, depleting oxygen levels in the water and creating dead zones where aquatic life cannot survive.

Oil and grease are also significant pollutants in the LA River. These contaminants often come from stormwater runoff, carrying toxic chemicals from sources like herbicides, lawn fertilizers, and engine oil into the river. The high percentage of paved areas in LA (approximately 60%) exacerbates the problem, as most rainfall runs off into the river without being absorbed and filtered by the ground.

Trash and solid waste are additional concerns for the LA River. Plastic debris from packaging accumulates in the river during rainfall and ends up in the Santa Monica Bay. This not only affects the aesthetics of the river but also poses risks to aquatic life and birds that may ingest or become entangled in the trash.

Trace metals, including cadmium, copper, lead, zinc, and various other metals, are among the pollutants found in the LA River. These metals can originate from various sources, such as industrial activities, stormwater runoff, and even residential sources like lawn fertilizers. The presence of trace metals in the water can have detrimental effects on aquatic ecosystems and potentially impact human health through the consumption of contaminated water or crops.

Stormwater pollution is a significant issue due to the large paved areas in LA

Stormwater pollution is a critical issue in Los Angeles due to the vast paved areas across the city. When it rains, the rainwater does not permeate the ground and instead runs off into the LA River, carrying with it harmful pollutants. This is known as stormwater runoff, and it is a significant contributor to the degradation of water quality in the river.

The problem is exacerbated by the fact that Los Angeles has a high population density and a large amount of urban development. With approximately 60% of the city paved, most rainfall becomes runoff, bypassing the natural process of groundwater filtration. As a result, toxic chemicals from sources such as herbicides, lawn fertilizers, grease, and engine oil, become concentrated in the river. This has detrimental effects on the aquatic ecosystem, killing off wildlife and endangering species like the steelhead trout, which is now on the brink of extinction.

The impact of stormwater pollution is not limited to the ecological consequences but also extends to potential risks to human health. Elevated levels of fecal indicator bacteria and other pollutants in the Lower LA River can indicate possible pollution risks at nearby beaches. Monitoring these indicators is crucial for environmental assessment and public health measures, as it helps identify potential health hazards for individuals engaging in recreational activities such as fishing, kayaking, or swimming in the river or nearby areas.

To address the issue of stormwater pollution, there have been efforts to implement initiatives and regulations. The Total Daily Maximum Loads (TMDLs) were established to set limits on the maximum amount of pollutants allowed to be discharged into the impaired water body, including the LA River. Additionally, organizations like Heal the Bay are actively working to improve water quality and protect public health by sampling, analyzing, and reporting on water quality in popular freshwater recreation areas. However, challenges remain due to the large number of localities with jurisdiction over the river and the lack of coordination among stakeholders, hindering progress toward meeting stormwater pollution reduction goals.

In conclusion, stormwater pollution is a significant issue in the LA River due to the extensive paved areas in Los Angeles. The high percentage of paved surfaces prevent rainwater absorption, leading to increased runoff that concentrates pollutants in the river. This has resulted in ecological damage and potential risks to human health. Addressing this issue requires coordinated efforts and the implementation of effective pollution reduction strategies to improve water quality and mitigate the environmental and public health impacts.

The river was once polluted by industrial dumping and untreated sewage

The Los Angeles River has a long history of pollution, with the waterway's health being a significant concern for various local organisations. By 1900, the river had become so polluted by industrial waste and untreated sewage that the city began sourcing water elsewhere. In addition, a flood in 1938 led to the paving over of large portions of the lower river, which resulted in the loss of wildlife and cut off the LA community from the river for over 50 years.

Today, the river continues to face pollution challenges, with over 21 identified pollutants that exceed federal guidelines. These pollutants include ammonia, metals, coliform, trash, scum, algae, oil, pesticides, volatile organics, and plastic debris. The primary source of these pollutants is stormwater runoff, which is considerably more polluted than sewage due to the lack of precipitation absorption in the highly paved city. As a result, rainfall carries toxic chemicals, herbicides, lawn fertilizers, grease, and engine oil directly into the river.

Furthermore, a recent report by Heal the Bay highlighted the lack of cooperation among relevant stakeholders in addressing stormwater pollution. The report indicated that most localities were falling short of the 2021 Clean Water Act deadline for improved stormwater pollution standards. Insufficient government cooperation has slowed progress in meeting federal goals for stormwater reduction.

The river also faces pollution from a former NASA lab, with evidence pointing to the presence of toxic "forever chemicals" such as PFAS and PCBs leaking into the river. These pollutants are highly potent carcinogens that can have severe health impacts. Despite these concerns, there has been a lack of transparency and urgency in addressing the issue, with the responsible agencies falling under scrutiny for their handling of the situation.

The LA River is subject to regulatory measures such as Total Daily Maximum Loads (TMDLs), which set limits on the amount of specific pollutants allowed in the water. However, the complex jurisdiction over the river, with 17 localities involved, presents challenges in implementing effective pollution reduction initiatives. Overall, the river's health remains a critical issue, and ongoing efforts are necessary to mitigate the impact of various pollutants and restore the ecosystem.

The Clean Water Act aims to regulate pollutant discharge into the river

The Clean Water Act (CWA) is the primary federal statute regulating the protection and restoration of the nation's water bodies, including the LA River. The CWA establishes the basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants into US waters and sets quality standards for surface waters. The Act makes it unlawful to discharge any pollutant from a point source into navigable waters without a permit.

Under the CWA, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has implemented several pollution control programs and developed national water quality criteria recommendations. The EPA issues technology-based effluent guidelines that establish discharge standards based on available and economically achievable treatment technologies. The guidelines identify three broad categories of pollutants: conventional, toxic, and non-conventional. Conventional pollutants include sanitary wastes from households, businesses, and industries, such as fecal coliform and oils. Toxic pollutants include substances like PFAS and PCBs, which have been found in the LA River due to contamination from a former NASA lab site.

To prevent, reduce, and eliminate pollution, the CWA has set up several regulatory programs, standards, and plans. One key program is the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), which establishes an effluent permit system for point source discharges. The NPDES permit system requires permit holders to maintain records and report on the amount and nature of discharged waste. New source discharges, such as new industrial facilities, are subject to more rigorous effluent limits and must comply with stringent new source performance standards (NSPS).

The CWA also includes the Oil Pollution Prevention regulation, which aims to prevent oil discharges at specific facilities and contains procedures and equipment requirements for spill prevention, control, and countermeasures. Additionally, the Act addresses nonpoint source pollution, such as stormwater runoff, which is a significant contributor to the pollution of the LA River. The EPA has funded the construction of sewage treatment plants and supported projects that capture and treat stormwater runoff, reducing the impact of pollutants on the river.

The State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board have also established Total Daily Maximum Loads (TMDLs) for the LA River, setting the maximum allowable amounts of 13 pollutants, including bacteria, trash, and heavy metals. These regulatory efforts aim to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the LA River, ensuring that it can be safely enjoyed by the public for recreation and supporting a healthy aquatic ecosystem.

Frequently asked questions