Agriculture's Role In Air Pollution: A Complex Relationship

Agriculture is a significant contributor to air pollution worldwide. Food production is responsible for a quarter of the world's greenhouse gas emissions. The agricultural industry is crucial in producing enough food for the global population, but it's also one of the most damaging sectors on the planet. There are several ways in which agriculture contributes to air pollution, including the application of fertilizers and insecticides, the rearing of livestock, the use of heavy-duty machinery, and the burning of crop stubble.

Animal agriculture

The process of raising animals for food often involves concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs), where a large number of animals are confined and raised in a small space. The waste generated in these operations is often stored in massive, open-air lagoons, which can lead to the breakdown of waste and the formation of ammonia gas. Ammonia gas then combines with other pollutants in the air, such as nitrogen oxides and sulfates, to create tiny solid particles that can be inhaled by humans and cause respiratory and cardiovascular issues.

Additionally, the feed required for livestock is typically grown using pesticides and fertilizers, which contribute to air pollution. The production and application of fertilizers, especially nitrogen-rich ones, release fumes and fine particles that combine with industrial emissions and animal waste in the air, exacerbating air quality issues. The heavy use of fertilizers in agriculture has been identified as a major contributor to fine-particulate air pollution in regions like the United States, Europe, Russia, and China.

The impact of animal agriculture on air pollution is not limited to emissions but also extends to land use. Clearing land for livestock grazing or feed crop production releases stored carbon into the environment and destroys diverse ecosystems. The shift to animal agriculture from plant-based agriculture also contributes to increased pollution. For example, planting legumes helps sequester nitrogen in the soil, while raising cows for meat releases more methane and nitrous oxide into the atmosphere.

To mitigate the air pollution caused by animal agriculture, reducing meat and dairy consumption is essential. By choosing more plant-based foods, individuals can lower their carbon footprint and lessen the demand for resource-intensive animal agriculture. This shift can help improve air quality and mitigate the negative environmental and health impacts associated with animal farming.

Ammonia emissions

Agriculture is a significant contributor to air pollution. Farms release pollutants into the atmosphere through various activities and equipment, such as diesel emissions from tractors and farm vehicles, chemical discharges, and particulate matter. One of the major concerns related to agricultural air pollution is ammonia emissions, which have severe implications for human health and the environment.

Ammonia (NH3) is a colourless gas with a pungent odour. It is produced naturally in small amounts by animals and plants, but human activities, especially agricultural practices, have significantly increased its presence in the atmosphere. Ammonia emissions from agriculture primarily arise from two sources: fertilised fields and livestock waste. The heavy use of nitrogen-rich fertilisers in modern agriculture has led to increased ammonia emissions. When excess fertilisers are applied to fields, ammonia gas is released into the air. Livestock waste, particularly from animal feeding operations (AFOs), is another significant source of ammonia emissions.

Ammonia contributes significantly to air pollution in the form of fine particulate matter, known as PM2.5. These tiny particles, no more than 2.5 micrometres across, are formed when ammonia combines with other pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides and sulphates from industrial emissions. PM2.5 can scatter and absorb light, creating a haze that reduces visibility. More importantly, these particles can penetrate deep into the lungs, causing serious health issues.

The health impacts of atmospheric ammonia on the general public are not fully understood yet and are underrepresented in scientific literature. However, studies have indicated that exposure to ammonia can have direct effects on respiratory health. People who work closely with livestock, such as farmers and animal handlers, are particularly at risk. The potential health consequences of ammonia exposure include reduced lung function, irritation to the throat and eyes, increased coughing, and phlegm expulsion. In the long term, exposure to PM2.5 can lead to chronic respiratory illnesses, such as Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and lung cancer, and even premature mortality.

Regulating and reducing ammonia emissions from agriculture is crucial to mitigate these health risks and protect the environment. As agriculture contributes to over 81% of global ammonia emissions, addressing this issue is essential to ensure food production does not compromise air quality. Fortunately, reducing ammonia emissions can be easier to achieve compared to other associated pollutants. By implementing conservation measures, such as those outlined in the Agricultural Air Quality Conservation Measures Reference Guide, farmers can successfully reduce emissions of various air pollutants on their farms. Additionally, more careful fertiliser application and management can significantly reduce ammonia emissions from fields.

Machinery emissions

Agriculture is a major source of air pollution. Some activities and equipment on farms release pollutants into the atmosphere. While agricultural air pollution includes emissions from tractors and other farm vehicles, the greatest agricultural contributors to air pollution are animal-raising operations.

The use of machinery in agricultural operations is a significant contributor to air pollution. Tractors and other self-propelled machines release exhaust gases during fuel combustion, which can contain harmful pollutants such as nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate matter (PM). These emissions have been linked to adverse effects on human health, including lung irritation, asthma, wheezing, bronchitis, and heart or pulmonary disease.

To address this issue, researchers have been analysing scientific literature and conducting studies to identify solutions for reducing exhaust gas emissions from agricultural machinery. This includes improving engine efficiency, introducing technical solutions to meet emission limits, and exploring the use of biofuel blends. For example, the National Clean Diesel Campaign in the US aims to help farmers operating diesel-powered farm equipment to finance clean diesel initiatives.

In addition to tractors, the use of diesel-powered engines in non-road applications, such as irrigation pumps and generators, also contributes to air pollution in agricultural areas. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has developed technical reports to estimate air pollution emissions related to non-road engine growth and provide guidance on reducing diesel emissions.

While most studies focus on tractor engine designs and emission control technologies, there is a lack of research on the environmental impact of field operations and the variability of machinery in terms of engine power, age, and site-specific information. However, sustainable farming practices, such as agroecology and carbon farming, offer alternatives to industrial agriculture by working with natural ecosystems to reduce the need for chemicals and improve air quality.

Stubble burning

Agriculture is indeed a source of air pollution. Some farming activities and equipment release pollutants into the atmosphere. The greatest agricultural contributors to air pollution are animal-raising operations, which release methane, nitrous oxide, and ammonia into the air.

One specific agricultural practice that contributes to air pollution is stubble burning. Stubble burning is a significant source of air pollution, especially in South Asia. It is the act of burning crop residue, such as rice and wheat stubble, after harvest. This practice is common in India, where it is estimated that about 22% and 34% of the total stubble burned are contributed by wheat and rice stubble, respectively. The burning of stubble releases various gaseous pollutants, including carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), and methane (CH4), as well as particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5). These pollutants have severe effects on both human health and the environment, ranging from skin and eye irritation to respiratory diseases, asthma, and even cancer.

The smoke from stubble burning creates a disastrous haze observed over India during the winter season, often reaching severe levels on the air quality index (AQI). In November 2019, several Indian cities in the National Capital Region (NCR) recorded extremely high AQI levels due to stubble burning. The pollution caused by stubble burning is not limited to local areas but can also affect larger regions, as strong winds can carry the emitted pollutants to downwind locations.

The negative impacts of stubble burning extend beyond air quality. It also affects soil fertility by destroying its nutrients, economic development, and climate change. However, there are alternative management practices for crop stubble that can be beneficial. These include incorporating stubble into the soil, using it as fuel in power plants, as raw material for the pulp and paper industries, or as biomass for biofuel production. It can also be used to generate compost, biochar, or as a blend for cement and brick production. By adopting these alternative practices, farmers can not only improve their economic conditions but also play a crucial role in reducing air pollution and protecting the environment.

To address the issue of stubble burning and its impact on air quality, various measures have been implemented. Researchers have employed remote sensing and GIS techniques to estimate stubble burn areas and forest fires accurately. Additionally, awareness programs are necessary to educate farmers about the environmentally and economically feasible options for managing stubble, reducing the reliance on burning as the primary method of stubble removal.

Pesticides and insecticides

The physical and chemical properties of pesticides, as well as environmental conditions, are key factors influencing their impact. Pesticides can be found in the air in solid, liquid, and gaseous forms, with complex shifts in agricultural practices potentially intensifying their use. Climate change-induced alterations in weather patterns and pest behaviour may also lead to changes in the types and quantities of pesticides required. For instance, elevated carbon dioxide levels can disrupt crop-pest interactions, influencing the need for pesticides.

Pesticide groups such as organochlorine insecticides, organophosphate insecticides, herbicides, and fungicides have been detected in the outdoor air in several countries, including France, Spain, Austria, Italy, Germany, the Republic of Korea, China, Pakistan, South Africa, and the United States. The presence of these pesticides in the air has been linked to adverse health effects, including asthma and rhinitis in children.

The potential toxicity of airborne pesticide residues for humans and other organisms is a significant concern. In a study, 67 different pesticides were detected, including 24 herbicides, 30 fungicides, and 13 insecticides. The human toxicity potential of these pesticides was high, with 54% being acutely toxic, 39% reproductive toxic, 24% carcinogenic, and 10% endocrine-disrupting.

The impact of land use and meteorological factors on the numbers and concentrations of airborne pesticide residues is not yet fully understood. However, it has been observed that pesticide numbers and concentrations increase with the proportion of arable land in the surrounding area. Pesticides have even been found in national parks and city centers, indicating their widespread presence in the environment.

To address the risks associated with pesticide use, interdisciplinary research and robust policies are crucial. This includes the development of innovative application technologies, improved predictive modeling, and the adoption of sustainable pest management strategies.

Frequently asked questions