Measuring Water Pollution: Effective Ways To Assess Aquatic Health

Water pollution is a pressing issue that can have detrimental effects on both the environment and human health. To combat this, it is essential to measure and monitor water quality regularly. This involves assessing various indicators, such as pH levels, which indicate the acidity or alkalinity of the water, and turbidity, which refers to the clarity or cloudiness of the water. Other factors include temperature, dissolved oxygen levels, specific conductance (a measure of water's ability to conduct electricity), and the presence of contaminants like E. coli and nitrates. By routinely testing these parameters, we can gain insights into the health of a water body and implement necessary measures to ensure safe and clean water for all.

Testing water samples for pH, temperature, conductivity, and dissolved oxygen

Testing water samples is crucial for understanding water quality and maintaining healthy ecosystems. Here is a guide on how to test water samples for pH, temperature, conductivity, and dissolved oxygen:

PH

The pH level of water is a crucial indicator of water quality. The pH scale measures the acidity or alkalinity of water, ranging from 0 to 14. A pH of 7 is considered neutral, below 7 is acidic, and above 7 is alkaline or basic. Proper pH levels are essential for maintaining water quality and protecting aquatic life. For drinking water, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommends a pH between 6.5 and 8.5.

To test water pH, you can use pH test strips or a pH meter. Test strips are simple to use: dip the coloured part of the strip into the water sample and swirl for about 2 minutes. Then, compare the colours on the strip to a colour chart to determine the pH. pH meters provide more accurate readings and should be calibrated before use to ensure precision.

Temperature

Accurate temperature measurement is important as it can affect the water's properties, such as solubility and biological activity. To measure water temperature, use a thermometer and immerse it a few centimetres into the water source or the water sample. Record the temperature to the nearest 0.5°C and wait for about a minute until the recording stabilises. Repeat the measurement for accuracy and calculate the average if multiple measurements deviate.

Conductivity

Conductivity measures the ability of water to transmit an electrical current and is influenced by the presence of ions from dissolved substances. To test water conductivity, you will need a conductivity probe and a calibration solution. First, calibrate the probe by submerging it into the calibration solution, ensuring it is in the same form as it will be used in testing. Tilt the probe to remove any air bubbles, and then define the measurement with the conductivity value on the solution bottle. After calibration, the probe can be used for testing by inserting it into the water sample or installing it directly into the piping for continuous measurement.

Dissolved Oxygen (DO)

Dissolved oxygen is a critical parameter in monitoring water quality as it is essential for most forms of aquatic life. DO is typically measured using a dissolved oxygen meter, and the best time to measure is the same time every day as concentrations can vary throughout the day. There are several methods to test DO, including titrimetric, electroanalytical (using galvanic or polarographic probes), optical dissolved oxygen, and colorimetric. The colorimetric method involves adding chemical reagents that react with DO to produce a specific colour, and the intensity of the colour indicates the amount of DO present.

Monitoring nitrate levels and the impact on aquatic life

Monitoring nitrate levels is essential for maintaining water quality and protecting aquatic ecosystems. Nitrates are a form of nitrogen found in various states in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. While nitrates are essential plant nutrients, excessive amounts can cause water quality issues. High nitrate concentrations, particularly in conjunction with phosphorus, can accelerate eutrophication, leading to rapid increases in aquatic plant growth and changes in the types of plants and animals in the water body. This, in turn, affects dissolved oxygen levels, temperature, and other indicators, potentially causing hypoxia and posing a threat to aquatic life.

There are several methods available for monitoring nitrate levels. The cadmium reduction method is a commonly used technique that involves reacting nitrate in a sample with cadmium particles, converting nitrates to nitrites. The resulting nitrites then react with another reagent to form a red colour whose intensity is proportional to the initial nitrate concentration. This colour can be measured using a colour wheel or an electronic spectrophotometer. The spectrophotometer measures the amount of light absorbed by the treated sample at a specific wavelength, and the absorbance value is converted to the nitrate concentration using a standard curve.

Another approach is to use a nitrate electrode and meter. This method employs a probe with a sensor that measures nitrate activity, which affects the electric potential of a solution in the probe. This change is transmitted to the meter, which converts the electric signal into a nitrate concentration reading. However, this equipment is more expensive than the field kits used for the cadmium reduction method.

Regular monitoring of nitrate levels is crucial for detecting potential sources of pollution and their impact on aquatic life. High nitrate levels in water can result from runoff or leakage from fertilised soil, wastewater, landfills, animal feedlots, septic systems, or urban drainage. Monitoring programs and directives, such as the Nitrates Directive in the EU, aim to identify polluted waters and areas at risk of pollution, especially those impacted by agricultural activities. By regularly testing water quality parameters like nitrate levels, temperature, pH, and dissolved oxygen, we can better understand the health of aquatic ecosystems and implement measures to mitigate the negative effects of pollution on aquatic life.

Assessing water clarity and light attenuation

Water clarity is a descriptive term for how deeply visible light penetrates water. It is an important measurement for monitoring programs and research applications. Water clarity is also used to assess the quality of habitats for aquatic plants and animals, as it determines the depth ranges where aquatic plants can live and impacts how well visual animals like fish can see their prey.

Water clarity is measured using multiple techniques. These include Secchi depth, light attenuation, turbidity, beam attenuation, absorption by coloured dissolved organic matter (CDOM), the concentration of chlorophyll-a pigment, and the concentration of total suspended solids.

Secchi depth is the depth at which a disk is no longer visible to the human eye. This measurement was created in 1865 and is one of the oldest oceanographic methods. Light attenuation, on the other hand, measures the loss or attenuation of sunlight as it penetrates deeper into the water, with a focus on the wavelengths plants use for photosynthesis. Light sensors are used to measure light attenuation.

The choice of metric depends on the specific research question or management goal. For example, Secchi depth is most appropriate for studies of fish and other visual predators, while light attenuation is recommended for studies related to underwater grasses and other light-loving organisms.

It is important to clearly communicate the method used to measure water clarity, as the "clarity" of a water parcel depends on the method employed. Different metrics such as light attenuation and Secchi depth vary in effectiveness depending on the research or management application.

Using fish and bioindicators to measure pollution

Water pollution is a critical issue that poses a threat to the health of humans and animals alike. It is important to be able to measure the level of water pollution to address this issue effectively. One method of doing so is by using fish and bioindicators.

Fish are considered bioindicators for environmental contamination, providing an integrated insight into the status of their environment over longer periods. They are useful indicators of environmental water quality because of their differential sensitivity to pollution. For example, a study on two freshwater lakes in Kenya's Rift Valley, Lake Turkana and Lake Naivasha, which differ in water chemistry and anthropogenic influence, used the red belly tilapia Tilapia zillii as a bioindicator to gain insight into trace element contamination. The metal concentrations measured in the fish's liver and muscle helped confirm the pristine status of Lake Turkana and revealed the difference in accumulation patterns between essential and nonessential trace elements.

Another example is a study conducted on the Gomati River in India, where samples of water and the fish Puntius sophore were collected from different sites. The concentration of heavy metals in the water and the bioaccumulation of these metals in the fish tissues were determined using ICP-MS. The formation of micronuclei and DNA fragmentation in the fish were significantly increased compared to the control, confirming the presence of heavy metal contamination in the river water.

The use of fish as bioindicators offers several benefits. Firstly, it provides an integrated insight into the environment over longer periods. Secondly, it helps assess the ecological impacts of anthropogenic activities on aquatic environments. By observing changes in fish communities and their biodiversity, we can better understand the mechanisms and effects of environmental disturbances such as pollution. Additionally, fish are widely distributed in aquatic ecosystems, making them accessible for sampling and analysis.

When using fish and bioindicators to measure water pollution, it is important to consider the specific species and their way-of-life habits. Stationary fish species, for instance, can provide a more integrated depiction of the trace element situation in their habitat as they do not migrate. Furthermore, the relationship between water quality and fish assemblages should be well-documented to improve our understanding of the impacts of pollution on fish communities.

Studying the impact of microplastics and nutrient pollution

Microplastics, microscopic fragments of plastic less than 5 mm in length, have become a pervasive contaminant in aquatic environments. Their floatability and widespread distribution make them a persistent threat to marine life, as they are often ingested, leading to harmful consequences for the health and reproduction of aquatic organisms. Research has detected microplastics in tap water, sea salt, and bottled water, highlighting the potential for human exposure and the need to study their impact on human health.

Nutrient pollution, primarily from human activities in coastal areas, also poses a significant challenge to water quality. Excessive nutrients from fertilizers, wastewater treatment facilities, and agricultural runoff can lead to eutrophication, resulting in severe algal growth. This process depletes oxygen levels in the water, creating an unsuitable environment for aquatic plants and other organisms. Nutrient pollution has economic implications as well, impacting recreational and commercial fishing, business, and tourism.

To study the impact of microplastics and nutrient pollution, various methods and technologies are employed. Sampling and measuring techniques are crucial for assessing the concentration and distribution of these pollutants in water systems. Parameters such as temperature, pH, dissolved solids (specific conductance), dissolved oxygen, hardness, and suspended sediment are measured to understand the overall health of a water body.

Additionally, best management practices (BMPs) are implemented to reduce nutrient pollution from urban and agricultural sources. Detention basins, constructed wetlands, and bioretention facilities are used to slow down stormwater and degrade nutrients before they reach waterways. In agriculture, practices such as planting cover crops, improving fertilizer application, and establishing vegetated buffers along streams help mitigate nutrient runoff. While these practices are effective, the complex interactions between nutrients and their long-term impacts on water systems require further research.

Frequently asked questions