Airlines' Pollution Problem: How Bad Is It?

The aviation industry is a significant contributor to global carbon emissions, with air travel being the most carbon-intensive activity an individual can undertake. In 2015, the Center for Biological Diversity estimated that aircraft could generate 43 gigatons of carbon dioxide emissions by 2050, consuming about 5% of the remaining global carbon budget. The industry is responsible for around 2.4% of global CO2 emissions and, when considering other gases and water vapour trails, its impact on global warming rises to about 5%. Aircraft also emit ozone and ultrafine particles, which are hazardous to health, and airports can generate water pollution through their handling of jet fuel and de-icing chemicals. However, some airlines are taking steps to reduce their environmental impact, with JetBlue becoming carbon-neutral for its US domestic flights in 2020, and Delta Air Lines and United Airlines pledging to follow suit.

Airlines' contribution to global emissions

Aviation is a significant contributor to global emissions and climate change. While the exact percentage of emissions stemming from the aviation industry varies across sources, it is estimated that around 2.4% of global CO2 emissions come from aviation. When considering other gases and water vapour trails, the industry is responsible for approximately 5% of global warming. If the aviation industry were a country, it would be among the top ten carbon-polluting nations, ranking sixth in emissions between Japan and Germany.

The impact of aviation emissions on the environment is significant, with aircraft emitting ozone and ultrafine particles that pose health hazards. Additionally, airports can generate water pollution due to their handling of jet fuel and de-icing chemicals, which, if not properly contained, can contaminate nearby water bodies. De-icing fluids, such as ethylene glycol or propylene glycol, can exert high levels of biochemical oxygen demand, consuming oxygen needed by aquatic life and reducing usable aquatic habitats.

The aviation sector has recognised the need to reduce its carbon footprint, with airlines investing in carbon capture and storage technologies and improving air traffic management systems to optimise routes and cruising altitudes, reducing emissions by up to 18%. Aircraft have also become more fuel-efficient, with a 70% improvement between 1967 and 2007, and new aircraft from Boeing and Airbus meeting or exceeding emission standards. By choosing newer aircraft, flying direct routes, and reducing corporate travel, the industry can further decrease its environmental impact.

Despite these efforts, the volume of air travel continues to grow, leading to an overall increase in emissions. Without regulation and more sustainable practices, global aviation emissions are projected to triple by 2050. To curb this, organisations like the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) advocate for the regulation of emissions, the development of alternative jet fuels, and the inclusion of aviation emissions in countries' climate pledges under the Paris Agreement. The transition to a low-carbon economy requires the collaboration of policymakers, industry leaders, and airlines to set ambitious targets and explore innovative solutions.

Reducing aviation emissions

Aviation is one of the fastest-growing sources of greenhouse gas emissions, with the industry being responsible for around 5% of global warming. The aviation sector needs to get on a sustainable flight path, and there are several ways in which this can be achieved.

Firstly, individuals can reduce the amount they fly, as flying makes up a considerable chunk of an individual's carbon footprint. For example, a passenger flying from New York to London and back emits more emissions than an average person in Paraguay over a year. If a journey is possible by coach or train, this is likely to be far more climate-friendly than flying. Individuals can also choose to fly with an airline that uses the newest aircraft possible, as these tend to be more efficient and produce fewer emissions.

Secondly, airlines can invest in new technologies to set more efficient flight paths and reduce delays. They can also use sustainable, lower-carbon alternative fuels, such as biofuels, e-kerosene, and power-to-liquid. Airlines can also improve airframes and engines, as well as reduce the need for transport through video conferencing.

Thirdly, governments and policymakers can implement regulations and standards to reduce aviation emissions. For example, the EU has included outbound aviation emissions in its 2030 target and launched the European Green Deal, with the goal of becoming climate-neutral by 2050. The US has also implemented a new CO2 standard, and the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) is working with governments to adopt global measures, such as a long-term emissions reduction goal and a global offsetting scheme (CORSIA).

The impact of aviation on climate change

Aviation has a significant impact on climate change, contributing to global warming and carbon emissions. While the industry has made strides in fuel efficiency, overall emissions have risen due to increased air travel. The volume of air travel is expected to continue growing, with forecasts predicting an increase from 2.4 billion passengers in 2010 to 8.2 billion in 2035. This rise in air travel will have a substantial impact on the environment if left unchecked.

Aviation emissions consist of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other pollutants, including soot and ultrafine particles, which have detrimental effects on human health and the environment. Aircraft engines emit ozone and ultrafine particles, which are hazardous to human health, and piston engines used in general aviation release toxic lead. Additionally, airports contribute to water pollution through their handling of jet fuel and the use of de-icing fluids, which can contaminate nearby water bodies if not properly contained.

To address the environmental impact of aviation, several measures have been proposed and implemented. Some airlines have taken steps towards carbon neutrality by investing in carbon capture and storage technologies and improving air traffic management systems. The use of clean fuels and e-fuels, such as power-to-liquid and e-kerosene, has been suggested as a way to reduce emissions. However, e-fuels require significant amounts of renewable energy, and their effectiveness depends on the source of CO2 used in their production.

Individuals can also play a role in reducing the climate impact of aviation. Choosing direct flights, flying with airlines that use newer aircraft, and opting for economy class tickets can help lower emissions. Reducing corporate travel and opting for alternative modes of transportation, such as trains or coaches, can also significantly reduce carbon emissions.

Addressing aviation's impact on climate change requires a collective effort from policymakers, industry leaders, and individuals. By setting carbon targets, adopting new technologies, and making conscious travel choices, we can work towards a more sustainable future for the aviation industry.

The impact of aviation on human health

Aviation is a major contributor to air pollution, which has a significant impact on human health. Aircraft engines emit gases, noise, and particulates from fossil fuel combustion, which have detrimental effects on both local and global air quality. The main human health impact of aviation is through the release of pollutants, particularly ozone, particulate matter, and lead.

Ozone, a powerful lung irritant, is a major factor in causing and exacerbating asthma. It causes inflammation and damage to the lining of the respiratory tract, impacting multiple body systems. Ozone exposure has been linked to increased emergency room visits, respiratory symptoms, and decreased lung function, even in healthy young adults. Ground-level ozone, also known as smog, is one of the most widespread and dangerous pollutants, with hundreds of studies confirming its harmful effects on human health. Aviation is the primary human source of ozone, causing an estimated 6,800 premature deaths per year.

Particulate matter, or particle pollution, refers to a mixture of tiny solids and liquids in the air. These particles can penetrate deep into the lungs, enter the bloodstream, and travel to various organs, causing systemic damage. Aircraft engines emit ultrafine particles, particularly during takeoff, and ground support equipment near airports also contributes to this pollution. Fine particulate matter has been linked to an increased risk of lung cancer, heart attacks, strokes, and other adverse health outcomes.

Additionally, aviation releases lead into the atmosphere, primarily through the burning of Avgas fuel by piston aircraft engines. The Federal Aviation Administration acknowledges the adverse effects of lead exposure on the nervous system, red blood cells, and cardiovascular and immune systems. While leaded fuel has been largely phased out, the historical release of lead has had lasting impacts, and aviation continues to contribute to lead pollution in some regions.

Aviation's impact on air pollution has serious public health implications. The pollutants emitted by aircraft engines can affect almost every organ in the body, leading to a range of diseases and health complications. While aviation is not the only source of air pollution, it is a significant contributor, particularly in regions with high air traffic. The health effects of aviation-related pollution are particularly concerning for vulnerable groups, including those with pre-existing health conditions, children, and individuals in low- and middle-income countries where aviation emissions may exacerbate existing environmental and health challenges.

The future of aviation and emissions

Aviation currently contributes between 2% and 3% of total annual carbon dioxide emissions, but this could grow by 300% by 2050. The industry is responsible for around 5% of global warming when other gases and the water vapour trails produced by aircraft are included.

To reduce emissions, airlines can use clean fuels to decrease the amount of pollutants released into the air. Jet fuels with high aromatics and naphthalene concentrations increase soot formation, which leads to persistent contrail cirrus. Reducing aromatics content in jet fuel can lower non-CO2 effects significantly.

Another way to reduce emissions is to improve air traffic management systems. More direct routes and optimised cruising altitudes could allow airlines to reduce emissions by up to 18%.

Sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) produced from renewable and waste feedstock can also help to reduce emissions. These fuels have the potential to cut emissions by up to 100% and will be critical to the industry's ability to meet net-zero emissions goals. However, increasing SAF use in aviation will require a significant ramp-up of investment and supportive policies.

Frequently asked questions